Motorized Mobility Scooter Use and Knowledge of the Rules And Etiquette: A Survey

References

• Pierce SL. Restoring functional and community mobility. In: Radomski MV, Latham CAT, eds. Occupational Therapy for Physical Dysfunction. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins: Philadelphia; 2014: 804–843.
   Google Scholar
• Lutz W, Sanderson W, Scherbov S. The coming acceleration of global population ageing. Nature. 2008;451(7179):716–719. doi:10.1038/nature06516.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fomiatti R, Moir L, Richmond JJ. The experience of being a motorised mobility scooter user. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2013;9(3):183–187. doi:10.3109/17483107.2013.814171.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jancey J, Cooper L, Howat P, et al. Sleet DBaldwin G, Pedestrian and motorized mobility scooter safety of older people. Traffic Inj Prev. 2013;14(6):647–653. doi:10.1080/15389588.2012.749465.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Australian Competition and Consumer Commission. Help cut mobility scooter accidents. 2015. Canberra, Australian Capital Territory. p. 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Brownsdon A, Marcar C. Council on the Ageing (ACT)Able access scooter safe implications & recommendations related to use of electric scooters and wheelchairs in the Act, in 42291821, COTA, Editor. Australian Capital Territory: Hughes, A.C.T;2002:31–32.
   Google Scholar
• Townsend K, Watson A. Competent use of a motorised mobility scooter – assessment, training and ongoing monitoring: A vital role for occupational therapy practice. Aust Occup Ther J. 2013;60(6):454–457. doi:10.1111/1440-1630.12095.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Auger C, Demers L, Gélinas I, et al. Life-space mobility of middle-aged and older adults at various stages of usage of power mobility devices. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010;91(5):765–773. doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2010.01.018.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miro JV, Black R, Andonovski B Dissanayake, et al. Development of a novel evidence-based automated powered mobility device competency assessment. IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics: [proceedings], 2013. 2013. p. 6650452.
   Google Scholar
• Miro JV, Black R, De Bruijn F, Dissanayake G. Semi-autonomous competency assessment of powered mobility device users. Paper presented at IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot. 2011; US: IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Toosizadeh N, Bunting M, Howe C, et al. Motorized mobility scooters: The use of training/intervention and technology for improving driving skills in aging adults - a mini-review. Gerontology. 2014;60(4):357–365. doi:10.1159/000356766.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker KA, Morgan KA, Morris CL, et al. Development of a community mobility skills course for people who use mobility devices. Am J Occup Ther. 2010;64(4):547–554. doi:10.5014/ajot.2010.08117.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandt A, Kreiner S, Iwarsson S. Mobility-related participation and user satisfaction: Construct validity in the context of powered wheelchair use. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2010;5:305–313. doi:10.3109/17483100903394636.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jutai JW. End-user participation in developing the assistive technology outcomes profile for mobility (atop/m): Thematic session: End-user participation in the development of assistive device assessments and outcome measures. Assist Technol Res Series. 2011;29:1026–1032.
   Google Scholar
• Nitz JC. Evidence from a cohort of able bodied adults to support the need for driver training for motorized scooters before community participation. Patient Educ Couns. 2008;70(2):276–275. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2007.10.014.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Letts L, Dawson D, Bretholz I, et al. Reliability and validity of the power-mobility community driving assessment. Assist Technol. 2007;19(3):154–163. doi:10.1080/10400435.2007.10131872.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandt Å, Iwarsson S. Development of an instrument for assessment of mobility-related participation outcomes: the nomo 1.0. TAD. 2012;24(4):293–302. doi:10.3233/TAD-120360.
   Google Scholar
• Keysor J, Jette A, Haley S. Development of the home and community environment (hace) instrument. J Rehabil Med. 2005;37(1):37–44. doi:10.1080/16501970410014830.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar A, Schmeler MR, Karmarkar AM, et al. Test-retest reliability of the functional mobility assessment (fma): a pilot study. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2013;8(3):213–219. doi:10.3109/17483107.2012.688240.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brandt A, Löfqvist C, Jónsdottir I, et al. Towards an instrument targeting mobility-related participation: Nordic cross-national reliability. J Rehabil Med. 2008;40(9):766–772. doi:10.2340/16501977-0244.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawson D, Chan R, Kaiserman E. Development of the power-mobility indoor driving assessment for residents of long-term care: A preliminary report. Can J Occup Ther. 1994;61(5):269–276. doi:10.1177/000841749406100507.
   Google Scholar
• Government of South Australia. Road Safety: Mobility Scooters, TaI Department of Planning, Editor. 2010; Department of Planning, Transport and Infrastructure: South Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Department for Communities and Social Inclusion Equipment program: Scooters clinical considerations for prescribers; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson K, Ozanne-Smith J, Clapperton A, et al. Targeted study of injury data involving motorised mobility scooters. Monash University: Victoria, Australia; 2011: 1–56.
   Google Scholar
• Richmond J, Chew A. Trauma resulting from motorised mobility scooter use in western Australia. 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Government of Western Australia, Pedestrains, RS Commission, Editor. 2015. Perth, Western Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Chew A, Richmond J, Cambetis S. User's perspectives on the impact of motorized mobility scooter education and training. 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Allen P, Bennett K, Heritage B. SPSS Statistics Version 22: A Practical Guide. 3rd ed. South Melbourne, Vic.: Cengage Learning; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Healthy aging. 2018. 10 Sept. 2018 [cited 2018]. https://www.aihw.gov.au/reports/older-people/older-australia-at-a-glance/contents/healthy-ageing.
   Google Scholar
• Lee J. Achieving best practice: a review of evidence linked to occupation-focused practice models. Occup Therapy Health Care. 2010;24(3):206–222. doi:10.3109/07380577.2010.483270.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wong SR, Fisher G. Comparing and using occupation-focused models. Occup Therapy Health Care. 2015;29(3):297–315. doi:10.3109/07380577.2015.1010130.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maywald A, Stanley M. Prescribing mobility scooters in Australia: occupational therapists' narratives. Aust Occup Ther J. 2015;62(2):86–92. doi:10.1111/1440-1630.12131.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• May E, Garrett R, Ballantyne A. Being mobile: electric mobility-scooters and their use by older people. Age Soc. 2010;30(7):1219–1237. doi:10.1017/S0144686X10000334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards KMc, Cluskey A. A survey of adult power wheelchair and scooter users. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2010;5(6):411–419. doi:10.3109/17483101003793412.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Desideri L, Trioschi D, Agusto R, et al. The provision of powered mobility devices in Italy: Linking process with outcomes. Technologies. 2016;4(3):31. doi:10.3390/technologies4030031.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mortenson WB, Miller WC, Boily J, et al. Perceptions of power mobility use and safety within residential facilities. Can J Occup Ther. 2005;72(3):142–152. doi:10.1177/000841740507200302.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wang RH, Korotchenko A, Clarke LH, et al. Power mobility with collision avoidance for older adults: User, caregiver, and prescriber perspectives. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2013;50(9):1287–1300. doi:10.1682/JRRD.2012.10.0181.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Department of Transport and Main Roads. Motorised Wheelchairs, Q Government, Editor. Department of Transport and Main Roads: Queensland; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Unsworth CA, Rawat V, Sullivan J, et al. I’m very visible but seldom seen”: Consumer choice and use of mobility aids on public transport au. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2017;14(2):1–11. doi:10.1080/17483107.2017.1407829.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar