Environmental DNA based biomonitoring for hatchery-raised fish in riverine habitats before and after recordable flood event

References

• Abe S, Yodo T, Matsubara N, Iguchi K. 2007. Distribution of two sympatric amphidromous grazing fish Plecoglossus altivelis Temminck & Schlegel and Sicyopterus japonicus (Tanaka) along the course of a temperate river. Hydrobiologia. 575(1):415–422. doi: 10.1007/s10750-006-0389-4.
   Google Scholar
• Darling JA, Mahon AR. 2011. From molecules to management: adapting DNA-based methods for monitoring biological invasions in aquatic environments. Environ Res. 111(7):978–988. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2011.02.001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doi H, Inui R, Akamatsu Y, Kanno K, Yamanaka H, Takahara T, Minamoto T. 2017. Environmental DNA analysis for estimating the abundance and biomass of stream fish. Freshwater Biol. 62(1):30–39. doi: 10.1111/fwb.12846.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gido KB, Propst DL, Molles MC.Jr. 1997. Spatial and temporal variation of fish communities in secondary channels of the San Juan River, New Mexico and Utah. Environ Biol Fishes. 49(4):417–434. doi: 10.1023/A:1007371019190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harada M, Nagayama S. 2022. Impacts of flood disturbance on the dynamics of basin-scale swimming fish migration in mountainous streams. Water. 14(4):538. doi: 10.3390/w14040538.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heard TC, Perkin JS, Bonner TH. 2012. Intra-annual variation in fish communities and habitat associations in a Chihuahua Desert reach of the Rio Grande/Rio Bravo Del Norte. West N Am Naturalist. 72(1):1–15. doi: 10.3398/064.072.0101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inui R, Akamatsu Y, Kono T, Saito M, Miyazono S, Nakao R. 2021. Spatiotemporal changes of the environmental DNA concentrations of amphidromous fish Plecoglossus altivelis altivelis in the spawning grounds in the Takatsu River, western Japan. Front Ecol Evol. 9:622149. doi: 10.3389/fevo.2021.622149.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janosik AM, Johnston CE. 2015. Environmental DNA as an effective tool for detection of imperiled fishes. Environ Biol Fish. 98(8):1889–1893. doi: 10.1007/s10641-015-0405-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katano O, Aonuma Y, Nakamura T, Yamamoto S. 2003. Indirect contramensalism through trophic cascades between two omnivorous fishes. Ecology. 84(5):1311–1323. doi: 10.1890/0012-9658(2003)084[1311:ICTTCB]2.0.CO;2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koizumi I, Kanazawa Y, Tanaka Y. 2013. The fishermen were right: experimental evidence for tributary refuge hypothesis during floods. Zoolog Sci. 30(5):375–379. doi: 10.2108/zsj.30.375.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lytle DA, Poff NL. 2004. Adaptation to natural flow regimes. Trends Ecol Evol. 19(2):94–100. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2003.10.002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLeod AI. 2015. Kendall rank correlation and Mann-Kendall trend test. R Package Version 2.2.
   Google Scholar
• Minagawa T, Akiyama H, Hazama S, Kodama S. 2018. Basic research on the evaluation of habitat and spawning bed of Ayu (Plecoglossus altivelis) by environmental data analysis. J Jpn Soc Civ Eng Ser Ser B1 (Hydraulic Engineering). 74:427–432. in Japanese
   Google Scholar
• Miyazono S, Kodama T, Akamatsu Y, Nakao R, Saito M, Tsuji S. 2022. Evaluation of the tributaries as habitats for Ayu in the Gonokawa River using environmental DNA analysis. ECE. 24(2):259–266. in Japanese) doi: 10.3825/ece.21-00011.
   Google Scholar
• Miyazono S, Pease AA, Fritts S, Grabowski TB. 2020. Ontogenetic shifts in mesohabitat use of young-of-year Rio Grande blue sucker in the big bend region of the Rio Grande. Environ Biol Fish. 103(12):1471–1480. doi: 10.1007/s10641-020-01038-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagayama S, Sueyoshi M, Fujii R, Harada M. 2022. Basin-scale spatiotemporal distribution of ayu Plecoglossus altivelis and its relationship with water temperature from summer growth to autumn spawning periods. Landscape Ecol Eng. 19(1):21–31. doi: 10.1007/s11355-022-00509-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagumo K, Sawahara K, Kitamura H, Mori I, Shirao T. 2006. Report on the influence that sediment-flushing from dams exercises over ayu (Plecoglossus altivelis altivelis) in the Kurobe River. Environ Eng Res. 43:473–482.
   Google Scholar
• Naito D, Akamatsu Y, Inui R, Goto M, Kobayashi T, Imamura F. 2018. Habitats of Plecoglossus altivelis in the Tama River Basin by environmental DNA. J Jpn Soc Civ Eng Ser Ser B1 (Hydraulic Engineering). 74:517–522. (in Japanese).
   Google Scholar
• Pohlert T. 2022. Calculate pairwise multiple comparisons of mean rank sums extended. R Package Version 1.9.4.
   Google Scholar
• Queen LE, Mote PW, Rupp DE, Chegwidden O, Nijssen B. 2021. Ubiquitous increases in flood magnitude in the Columbia River basin under climate change. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci. 25(1):257–272. doi: 10.5194/hess-25-257-2021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Core Team. 2019. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
   Google Scholar
• Tabari H. 2020. Climate change impact on flood and extreme precipitation increases with water availability. Sci Rep. 10(1):13768. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-70816-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takahashi S, Taniguchi N. 2012. Assessment of river-bed composition and population density of ayu Plecoglossus altivelis to estimate minimum flow charge. ECE. 15(2):197–206. (in Japanese). doi: 10.3825/ece.15.197.
   Google Scholar
• Thornbrugh DJ, Gido KB. 2010. Influence of spatial positioning within stream networks on fish assemblage structure in the Kansas River Basin, USA. Can J Fish Aquat Sci. 67(1):143–156. doi: 10.1139/F09-169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsuboi J, Takagi Y. 2016. Essential characteristics of aquatic environment for ayu habitats. Nippon Suisan Gakkaishi. 82(1):12–17. doi: 10.2331/suisan.15-00027.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsuji S, Nakao R, Saito M, Minamoto T, Akamatsu Y. 2022. Pre-centrifugation before DNA extraction mitigates extraction efficiency reduction of environmental DNA caused by the preservative solution (benzalkonium chloride) remaining in the filters. Limnol. 23(1):9–16. doi: 10.1007/s10201-021-00676-w.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsuji S, Takahara T, Doi H, Shibata N, Yamanaka H. 2019. The detection of aquatic macroorganisms using environmental DNA analysis—a review of methods for collection, extraction, and detection. Environ DNA. 1(2):99–108. doi: 10.1002/edn3.21.
   Google Scholar
• Yamanaka H, Minamoto T. 2016. The use of environmental DNA of fishes as an efficient method of determining habitat connectivity. Ecol Indic. 62:147–153. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.11.022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamanaka H, Minamoto T, Matsuura J, Sakurai S, Tsuji S, Motozawa H, Hongo M, Sogo Y, Kakimi N, Teramura I, et al. 2017. A simple method for preserving environmental DNA in water samples at ambient temperature by addition of cationic surfactant. Limnol. 18(2):233–241. doi: 10.1007/s10201-016-0508-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar