REFERENCES
- Baines M G, Cai F, Backman H A. Adsorption and removal of protein bound to hydrogel contact lenses. Optom Vis Sci 1990; 67: 807–810, [INFOTRIEVE], [CSA]
- Bohnert J, Horbett T, Ratner B, Royce F. Adsorption of proteins from artificial tear solutions to contact lens materials. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1988; 29: 362–373, [INFOTRIEVE], [CSA]
- Minarik L, Rapp J. Protein deposits on individual hydrophilic contact lenses: effects of water and ionicity. CLAO J 1989; 15: 185–188, [INFOTRIEVE], [CSA]
- Minno G E, Eckel L, Groemminger S, et al. Quantitative analysis of protein deposits on hydrophilic soft contact lenses: 1. Comparison to visual methods of analysis. 2. Deposit variation among FDA lens material groups. Optom Vis Sci 1991; 68: 865–872, [INFOTRIEVE], [CSA], [CROSSREF]
- Myers R I, Larsen D W, Tsao M, et al. Quantity of protein deposited on hydrogel contact lenses and its relation to visible protein deposits. Optom Vis Sci 1991; 68: 776–782, [INFOTRIEVE], [CSA], [CROSSREF]
- Sack R A, Jones B, Antignani A, et al. Specificity and biological activity of the protein deposited on the hydrogel surface. Relationship of polymer structure to biofilm formation. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1987; 28: 842–849, [INFOTRIEVE], [CSA]
- Bontempo A R, Rapp J. Protein-lipid interaction on the surface of a hydrophilic contact lens in vitro. Curr Eye Res 1997; 16: 776–781, [INFOTRIEVE], [CSA], [CROSSREF]
- Jones L, Evans K, Sariri R, et al. Lipid and protein deposition of N-vinyl pyrrolidone-containing group II and group IV frequent replacement contact lenses. CLAO J 1997; 23: 122–126, [INFOTRIEVE], [CSA]
- Jones L, Franklin V, Evans K, et al. Spoilation and clinical performance of monthly vs. three monthly group II disposable contact lenses. Optom Vis Sci 1996; 73: 16–21, [INFOTRIEVE], [CSA]
- Maissa C, Franklin V, Guillon M, Tighe B. Influence of contact lens material surface characteristics and replacement frequency on protein and lipid deposition. Optom Vis Sci 1998; 75: 697–705, [INFOTRIEVE], [CSA]
- Rapp J, Broich J. Lipid deposits on worn soft contact lenses. CLAO J 1984; 10: 235–239, [INFOTRIEVE], [CSA]
- Castillo E J, Koenig J L, Anderson J M, Jentoft N. Protein adsorption on soft contact lenses. III. Mucin. Biomaterials 1986; 7: 9–16, [INFOTRIEVE], [CSA], [CROSSREF]
- Gellatly K W, Brennan N A, Efron N. Visual decrement with deposit accumulation of HEMA contact lenses. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1988; 65: 937–941, [INFOTRIEVE], [CSA]
- Pritchard N, Fonn D, Weed K. Ocular and subjective responses to frequent replacement of daily wear soft contact lenses. CLAO J 1996; 22: 53–59, [INFOTRIEVE], [CSA]
- Bleshoy H, Guillon M, Shah D. Influence of contact lens material surface characteristics on replacement frequency. Int Contact Lens Clin 1994; 21: 82–94, [CSA], [CROSSREF]
- Refojo M, Holly F. Tear protein adsorption on hydrogels: a possible cause of contact lens allergy. Contact Intraoc Lens Med J 1977; 3: 23–35, [CSA]
- Donshik P C. Contact lens chemistry and giant papillary conjunctivitis. Eye Contact Lens 2003; 29: S37–39, discussion S57-39, S192–194[INFOTRIEVE], [CSA], [CROSSREF]
- Porazinski A D, Donshik P C. Giant papillary conjunctivitis in frequent replacement contact lens wearers: a retrospective study. CLAO J 1999; 25: 142–147, [INFOTRIEVE], [CSA]
- Brennan N A, Coles M L, Comstock T L, Levy B. A 1-year prospective clinical trial of balafilcon a (PureVision) silicone hydrogel contact lenses used on a 30-day continuous wear schedule. Ophthalmology 2002; 109: 1172–1177, [INFOTRIEVE], [CSA], [CROSSREF]
- Nilsson S E. Seven-day extended wear and 30-day continuous wear of high oxygen transmissibility soft silicone hydrogel contact lenses: a randomized 1-year study of 504 patients. CLAO J 2001; 27: 125–136, [INFOTRIEVE], [CSA]
- Stern J, Wong R, Naduvilath T J, et al. Comparison of the performance of 6 or 30 night extended wear schedules with silicone hydrogel lenses over 3 years. Optom Vis Sci 2004; 81: 398–406, [INFOTRIEVE], [CSA], [CROSSREF]
- Jones L, Senchyna M, Glasier M A, et al. Lysozyme and lipid deposition on silicone hydrogel contact lens materials. Eye Contact Lens 2003; 29: S75–79, discussion S83-74,S192–194[INFOTRIEVE], [CSA], [CROSSREF]
- Senchyna M, Jones L, Louie D, et al. Quantitative and conformational characterization of lysozyme deposited on balafilcon and etafilcon contact lens materials. Curr Eye Res 2004; 28: 25–36, [INFOTRIEVE], [CSA], [CROSSREF]
- McNally J, McKenney C. A clinical look at a silicone hydrogel extended wear lens. Contact Lens Spectrum 2002; 38–41, [CSA]
- Subbaraman L N, Glasier M, Senchyna M, Jones L. Stabilization of lysozyme mass extracted from lotrafilcon silicone hydrogel contact lenses. Optom Vis Sci 2005; 82: 209–214, [INFOTRIEVE], [CSA], [CROSSREF]
- Subbaraman L N, Bayer S, Glasier M A, et al. Rewetting drops containing surface active agents improve the clinical performance of silicone hydrogel contact lenses. Optom Vis Sci 2006; 83: 143–151, [INFOTRIEVE], [CSA], [CROSSREF]
- Lin S T, Mandell R B, Leahy C D, Newell J O. Protein accumulation on disposable extended wear lenses. CLAO J 1991; 17: 44–50, [INFOTRIEVE], [CSA]
- Fowler S A, Korb D R, Allansmith M R. Deposits on soft contact lenses of various water contents. CLAO J 1985; 11: 124–127, [INFOTRIEVE], [CSA]
- Yan G Y, Nyquist G, Caldwell K D, et al. Quantitation of total protein deposits on contact lenses by means of amino acid analysis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1993; 34: 1804–1813, [INFOTRIEVE], [CSA]
- Lord M S, Stenzel M H, Simmons A, Milthorpe B K. The effect of charged groups on protein interactions with poly(HEMA) hydrogels. Biomaterials 2006; 27: 567–575, [INFOTRIEVE], [CSA], [CROSSREF]
- Soltys-Robitaille C E, Ammon D M, Jr., Valint P L, Jr., Grobe G L, III. The relationship between contact lens surface charge and in-vitro protein deposition levels. Biomaterials 2001; 22: 3257–3260, [INFOTRIEVE], [CSA], [CROSSREF]
- Garrett Q, Garrett R W, Milthorpe B K. Lysozyme sorption in hydrogel contact lenses. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1999; 40: 897–903, [INFOTRIEVE], [CSA]
- Castillo E J, Koenig J L, Anderson J M, Lo J. Protein adsorption on hydrogels. II. Reversible and irreversible interactions between lysozyme and soft contact lens surfaces. Biomaterials 1985; 6: 338–345, [INFOTRIEVE], [CSA], [CROSSREF]
- Castillo E J, Koenig J L, Anderson J M, Lo J. Characterization of protein adsorption on soft contact lenses. I. Conformational changes of adsorbed human serum albumin. Biomaterials 1984; 5: 319–325, [INFOTRIEVE], [CSA], [CROSSREF]
- Garrett Q, Milthorpe B K. Human serum albumin adsorption on hydrogel contact lenses in vitro. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1996; 37: 2594–2602, [INFOTRIEVE], [CSA]
- Gachon A M, Bilbaut T, Dastugue B. Adsorption of tear proteins on soft contact lenses. Exp Eye Res 1985; 40: 105–116, [INFOTRIEVE], [CSA], [CROSSREF]
- Kidane A, Szabocsik J M, Park K. Accelerated study on lysozyme deposition on poly(HEMA) contact lenses. Biomaterials 1998; 19: 2051–2055, [INFOTRIEVE], [CSA], [CROSSREF]
- Monfils J, Tasker H, Townley L, et al. Laboratory simulation of protein deposition of vifilcon and etafilcon soft contact lens materials. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1992; 33(S)1292, [CSA]
- Jones L, Mann A, Evans K, et al. An in vivo comparison of the kinetics of protein and lipid deposition on group II and group IV frequent-replacement contact lenses. Optom Vis Sci 2000; 77: 503–510, [INFOTRIEVE], [CSA], [CROSSREF]
- Alongi S, Rolando M, Marci A, et al. Bacterial load and protein deposits on 15 day versus 1 day disposable hydrophilic contact lenses. Cornea 1998; 17: 146–151, [INFOTRIEVE], [CSA], [CROSSREF]
- Keith D J, Christensen M T, Barry J R, Stein J M. Determination of the lysozyme deposit curve in soft contact lenses. Eye Contact Lens 2003; 29: 79–82, [INFOTRIEVE], [CSA], [CROSSREF]
- Leahy C D, Mandell R B, Lin S T. Initial in vivo tear protein deposition on individual hydrogel contact lenses. Optom Vis Sci 1990; 67: 504–511, [INFOTRIEVE], [CSA], [CROSSREF]
- Sack R A, Sathe S, Hackworth L A, et al. The effect of eye closure on protein and complement deposition on Group IV hydrogel contact lenses: relationship to tear flow dynamics. Curr Eye Res 1996; 15: 1092–1100, [INFOTRIEVE], [CSA]
- Tripathi P C, Tripathi R C. Analysis of glycoprotein deposits on disposable soft contact lenses. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1992; 33: 121–125, [INFOTRIEVE], [CSA]
- Keith D, Christensen M, Tudor M. The effect of multi-purpose solutions on the lysozyme deposit curve with soft contact lenses. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2001; 42: s594, [CSA]
- Keith D, Hong B, Christensen M. A novel procedure for the extraction of protein deposits from soft hydrophilic contact lenses for analysis. Curr Eye Res 1997; 16: 503–510, [INFOTRIEVE], [CSA], [CROSSREF]
- Mirejovsky D, Patel A S, Rodriguez D D, Hunt T J. Lipid adsorption onto hydrogel contact lens materials. Advantages of Nile red over oil red O in visualization of lipids. Optom Vis Sci 1991; 68: 858–864, [INFOTRIEVE], [CSA], [CROSSREF]
- Prager M D, Quintana R P. Radiochemical studies on contact lens soilation. I. Lens uptake of 14C-lysozyme from simple and complex artificial tear solutions. J Biomed Mater Res 1997; 36: 119–124, [INFOTRIEVE], [CSA], [CROSSREF]
- Prager M D, Quintana R P. Radiochemical studies on contact lens soilation. II. Lens uptake of cholesteryl oleate and dioleoyl phosphatidylcholine. J Biomed Mater Res 1997; 37: 207–211, [INFOTRIEVE], [CSA], [CROSSREF]
- Jung J, Rapp J. The efficacy of hydrophilic contact lens cleaning systems in removing protein deposits. CLAO J 1993; 19: 47–49, [INFOTRIEVE], [CSA]
- Boot N, Kok J, Kijlstra A. The role of tears in preventing protein deposition on contact lenses. Curr Eye Res 1989; 8: 185–188, [INFOTRIEVE], [CSA]
- Hong B, Bilbaut T, Chowhan M, et al. Cleaning capability of citrate-containing versus non-citrate contact lens cleaning solutions: an in vitro comparative study. Int Contact Lens Clin 1994; 21: 237–240, [CSA]
- Ho C, Hlady V. Fluorescence assay for measuring lipid deposits on contact lens surfaces. Biomaterials 1995; 16: 479–482, [INFOTRIEVE], [CSA], [CROSSREF]
- Rebeix V, Sommer F, Marchin B, et al. Artificial tear adsorption on soft contact lenses: methods to test surfactant efficacy. Biomaterials 2000; 21: 1197–1205, [INFOTRIEVE], [CSA], [CROSSREF]
- Guerrieri A, Sabbatini L, Zambonin P G, et al. Effect of anti-denaturant drugs on lysozyme deposit formation on soft contact lenses by liquid chromatography-electrochemical detection. Biomaterials 1995; 16: 1025–1030, [INFOTRIEVE], [CSA], [CROSSREF]
- Richard N R, Anderson J A, Tasevska Z G, Binder P S. Evaluation of tear protein deposits on contact lenses from patients with and without giant papillary conjunctivitis. CLAO J 1992; 18: 143–147, [INFOTRIEVE], [CSA]
- Versura P, Maltarello M C, Caramazza R, Laschi R. Immunocytochemical analysis of contact lens surface deposits in transmission electron microscopy. Curr Eye Res 1988; 7: 277–286, [INFOTRIEVE], [CSA]
- Wedler F C. Analysis of biomaterials deposited on soft contact lenses. J Biomed Mater Res 1977; 11: 525–535, [INFOTRIEVE], [CSA], [CROSSREF]
- Bardenstein D S, Sauer S, Szczotka L, Medof E M. Detection of complement regulatory proteins on soft contact lenses. Curr Eye Res 1997; 16: 1270–1273, [INFOTRIEVE], [CSA], [CROSSREF]
- Horbett T A, Weathersby P K. Adsorption of proteins from plasma to a series of hydrophilic-hydrophobic copolymers. I. Analysis with the in situ radioiodination technique. J Biomed Mater Res 1981; 15: 403–423, [INFOTRIEVE], [CSA], [CROSSREF]
- Weathersby P K, Horbett T A, Hoffman A S. A new method for analysis of the adsorbed plasma protein layer on biomaterial surfaces. Trans Am Soc Artif Intern Organs 1976; 22: 242–252, [INFOTRIEVE], [CSA]
- Chinn J A, Posso S E, Horbett T A, Ratner B D. Post-adsorptive transitions in fibrinogen adsorbed to polyurethanes: changes in antibody binding and sodium dodecyl sulfate elutability. J Biomed Mater Res 1992; 26: 757–778, [INFOTRIEVE], [CSA], [CROSSREF]
- Uniyal S, Brash J L. Patterns of adsorption of proteins from human plasma onto foreign surfaces. Thromb Haemost 1982; 47: 285–290, [INFOTRIEVE], [CSA]
- Ceska M, Sjodin A V, Grossmuller F. Some quantitative aspects of the labelling of proteins with 125I by the iodine monochloride method. Biochem J 1971; 121: 139–143, [INFOTRIEVE], [CSA]
- Regoeczi E. Iodine-labeled plasma proteins. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida 1984
- Horbett T A. Adsorption of proteins from plasma to a series of hydrophilic-hydrophobic copolymers. II. Compositional analysis with the prelabeled protein technique. J Biomed Mater Res 1981; 15: 673–695, [INFOTRIEVE], [CSA], [CROSSREF]
- Tighe B J, Jones L, Evans K, Franklin V. Patient-dependent and material-dependent factors in contact lens deposition processes. Adv Exp Med Biol 1998; 438: 745–751, [INFOTRIEVE], [CSA]
- Sariri R, Sabbaghzadeh R. Competitive adsorption of proteins on hydrogel contact lenses. CLAO J 2001; 27: 159–162, [INFOTRIEVE], [CSA]
- Garrett Q, Laycock B, Garrett R W. Hydrogel lens monomer constituents modulate protein sorption. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2000; 41: 1687–1695, [INFOTRIEVE], [CSA]
- Willis S, Court J L, Redman R P, et al. A novel phosphorylcholine-coated contact lens for extended wear use. Biomaterials 2001; 22: 3261–3272, [CSA], [CROSSREF]
- Young G, Bowers R, Hall B, Port M. Clinical comparison of Omafilcon A with four control materials. CLAO J 1997; 23: 249–258, [INFOTRIEVE], [CSA]
- Nicolson P C. Continuous wear contact lens surface chemistry and wearability. Eye Contact Lens 2003; 29: S30–32, discussion S57-39, S192–194[INFOTRIEVE], [CSA], [CROSSREF]
- Steffen R, Schnider C M. A next generation silicone hydrogel lens for daily wear. Part 1—Material properties. Optician 2004; 227: 23–25, [CSA]
- Jones L, Long J, Chen P. The impact of contact lens care regimens on the in vitro wettability of conventional and silicone-hydrogel contact lens materials. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2002, ARVO abstract #3097, [CSA]
- Bruinsma G M, van der Mei H C, Busscher H J. Bacterial adhesion to surface hydrophilic and hydrophobic contact lenses. Biomaterials 2001; 22: 3217–3224, [INFOTRIEVE], [CSA], [CROSSREF]
- Tighe B. Silicone hydrogel materials—how do they work?. Silicone Hydrogels: The Rebirth of Continuous Wear Contact Lenses., D Sweeney. Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford 2000; 1–21
- Prime K L, Whitesides G M. Self-assembled organic monolayers: model systems for studying adsorption of proteins at surfaces. Science 1991; 252: 1164–1167, [INFOTRIEVE], [CSA], [CROSSREF]
- Andrade J. Surface and Interfacial Aspects of Biomedical Polymers. Plenum Press, New York 1985; Vol. 1 and 2
- Chen J, Dong D, Andrade J. Effect of reductive methylation on the adsorption of hen lysozyme. J Colloid Interface Sci 1982; 89: 577–580, [CSA], [CROSSREF]
- Norde W, Lyklema J. Why proteins prefer interfaces. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed 1991; 2: 183–202, [INFOTRIEVE], [CSA]
- Lopez-Alemany A, Compan V, Refojo M F. Porous structure of Purevision versus Focus Night&Day and conventional hydrogel contact lenses. J Biomed Mater Res 2002; 63: 319–325, [INFOTRIEVE], [CSA], [CROSSREF]
- Yasuda H. Biocompatibility of nanofilm-encapsulated silicone and silicone hydrogel contact lenses. Macromol Biosci 2006; 6: 121–138, [INFOTRIEVE], [CSA], [CROSSREF]
- Yasuda H. Luminous Chemical Vapor Deposition and Interface Engineering. Surfactant Science Series, Marcel Dekker, New York 2005; Vol. 122
- Hart D E, DePaolis M, Ratner B D, Mateo N B. Surface analysis of hydrogel contact lenses by ESCA. CLAO J 1993; 19: 169–173, [INFOTRIEVE], [CSA]
- Hart D, Lane B, Josephson J, et al. Spoilage of hydrogel contact lenses by lipid deposits—tear film potassium depression, fat, protein, and alcohol consumption. Ophthalmology 1987; 94: 1315–1321, [INFOTRIEVE], [CSA]