Conformational and Quantitative Characterization of Lysozyme Extracted from Galyfilcon and Senofilcon Silicone Hydrogel Contact Lenses

REFERENCES

• Baines M G, Cai F, Backman H A. Adsorption and removal of protein bound to hydrogel contact lenses. Optom Vis Sci 1990; 67: 807–810
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bohnert J L, Horbett T A, Ratner B D, Royce F H. Adsorption of proteins from artificial tear solutions to contact lens materials. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1988; 29: 362–373
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myers R I, Larsen D W, Tsao M, Castellano C, Becherer L D, Fontana F, Ghormley N R, Meier G. Quantity of protein deposited on hydrogel contact lenses and its relation to visible protein deposits. Optom Vis Sci. 1991; 68: 776–782
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sack R A, Jones B, Antignani A, Libow R, Harvey H. Specificity and biological activity of the protein deposited on the hydrogel surface. Relationship of polymer structure to biofilm formation. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1987; 28: 842–849
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keith D, Hong B, Christensen M. A novel procedure for the extraction of protein deposits from soft hydrophilic contact lenses for analysis. Curr Eye Res. 1997; 16: 503–510
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bontempo A R, Rapp J. Protein and lipid deposition onto hydrophilic contact lenses in vivo. CLAO J. 2001; 27: 75–80
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jones L, Evans K, Sariri R, Franklin V, Tighe B. Lipid and protein deposition of N-vinyl pyrrolidone-containing group II and group IV frequent replacement contact lenses. CLAO J. 1997; 23: 122–126
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rapp J, Broich J R. Lipid deposits on worn soft contact lenses. CLAO J. 1984; 10: 235–239
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Castillo E J, Koenig J L, Anderson J M, Jentoft N. Protein adsorption on soft contact lenses. III. Mucin. Biomaterials 1986; 7: 9–16
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berry M, Harris A, Corfield A P. Patterns of mucin adherence to contact lenses. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003; 44: 567–572
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mirejovsky D, Patel A S, Rodriguez D D. Effect of proteins on water and transport properties of various hydrogel contact lens materials. Curr Eye Res. 1991; 10: 187–196
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pritchard N, Fonn D, Weed K. Ocular and subjective responses to frequent replacement of daily wear soft contact lenses. CLAO J. 1996; 22: 53–59
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bleshoy H, Guillon M, Shah D. Influence of contact lens material surface characteristics on replacement frequency. Int Contact Lens Clin. 1994; 21: 82–94
   Google Scholar
• Gellatly K W, Brennan N A, Efron N. Visual decrement with deposit accumulation of HEMA contact lenses. Am J Optom Physiol Opt. 1988; 65: 937–941
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Richard N R, Anderson J A, Tasevska Z G, Binder P S. Evaluation of tear protein deposits on contact lenses from patients with and without giant papillary conjunctivitis. CLAO J. 1992; 18: 143–147
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jones B, Sack R. Immunoglobulin deposition on soft contact lenses: Relationship to hydrogel structure and mode of use and giant papillary conjunctivitis. CLAO J. 1990; 16: 43–48
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Donshik P C, Porazinski A D. Giant papillary conjunctivitis in frequent replacement contact lens wearers: A retrospective study. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc 1999; 97: 205–216, Discussion 216–220
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Alvord L, Court J, Davis T, Morgan C F, Schindhelm K, Vogt J, Winterton L. Oxygen permeability of a new type of high Dk soft contact lens material. Optom Vis Sci. 1998; 75: 30–36
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tighe B. Silicone hydrogels: Structure, properties and behaviour. Silicone Hydrogels: Continuous-wear Contact Lenses, D F Sweeney. Butterworth-Heinemann, London 2004; 1–27
   Google Scholar
• Jones L. Modern contact lens materials: A clinical performance update. Contact Lens Spectrum. 2002; 17: 24–35
   Google Scholar
• Garrett Q, Garrett R W, Milthorpe B K. Lysozyme sorption in hydrogel contact lenses. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1999; 40: 897–903
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garrett Q, Griesser H J, Milthorpe B K, Garrett R W. Irreversible adsorption of human serum albumin to hydrogel contact lenses: A study using electron spin resonance spectroscopy. Biomaterials. 1999; 20: 1345–1356
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sariri R, Sabbaghzadeh R. Competitive adsorption of proteins on hydrogel contact lenses. CLAO J. 2001; 27: 159–162
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Garrett Q, Chatelier R C, Griesser H J, Milthorpe B K. Effect of charged groups on the adsorption and penetration of proteins onto and into carboxymethylated poly(HEMA) hydrogels. Biomaterials. 1998; 19: 2175–2186
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minarik L, Rapp J. Protein deposits on individual hydrophilic contact lenses: Effects of water and ionicity. CLAO J. 1989; 15: 185–188
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Garrett Q, Laycock B, Garrett R W. Hydrogel lens monomer constituents modulate protein sorption. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2000; 41: 1687–1695
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomlinson A, Caroline P. Comparative evaluation of surface deposits on high water content hydrogel contact lens polymers. CLAO J. 1990; 16: 121–127
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Leahy C D, Mandell R B, Lin S T. Initial in vivo tear protein deposition on individual hydrogel contact lenses. Optom Vis Sci. 1990; 67: 504–511
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minno G E, Eckel L, Groemminger S, Minno B, Wrzosek T. Quantitative analysis of protein deposits on hydrophilic soft contact lenses: I. Comparison to visual methods of analysis. II. Deposit variation among FDA lens material groups. Optom Vis Sci 1991; 68: 865–872
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keith D J, Christensen M T, Barry J R, Stein J M. Determination of the lysozyme deposit curve in soft contact lenses. Eye Contact Lens. 2003; 29: 79–82
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Subbaraman L N, Glasier M A, Senchyna M, Sheardown H, Jones L. Kinetics of in vitro lysozyme deposition on silicone hydrogel, PMMA, and FDA groups I, II, and IV contact lens materials. Curr Eye Res. 2006; 31: 787–796
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fonn D, Dumbleton K, Jones L, du Toit R, Sweeney D. Silicone hydrogel material and surface properties. Contact Lens Spectrum 2002; 17(24)26–28
   Google Scholar
• Kunzler J. Silicone-based hydrogels for contact lens applications. Contact Lens Spectrum. 1999; 14: 9–11
   Google Scholar
• McNally J, McKenney C. A clinical look at a silicone hydrogel extended wear lens. Contact Lens Spectrum. 2002; 17: 38–41
   Google Scholar
• Jones L, Senchyna M, Glasier M A, Schickler J, Forbes I, Louie D, May C. Lysozyme and lipid deposition on silicone hydrogel contact lens materials. Eye Contact Lens 2003; 29: S75–79, Discussion S83–74, S192–194
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Senchyna M, Jones L, Louie D, May C, Forbes I, Glasier M. Quantitative and conformational characterization of lysozyme deposited on balafilcon and etafilcon contact lens materials. Curr Eye Res. 2004; 28: 25–36
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suwala M, Glasier M A, Subbaraman L N, Jones L. Quantity and conformation of lysozyme deposited on conventional and silicone hydrogel contact lens materials using an in vitro model. Eye Contact Lens. 2007; 33: 138–143
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nicolson P C, Vogt J. Soft contact lens polymers: An evolution. Biomaterials. 2001; 22: 3273–3283
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weikart C M, Matsuzawa Y, Winterton L, Yasuda H K. Evaluation of plasma polymer-coated contact lenses by electrochemical impedance spectroscopy. J Biomed Mater Res. 2001; 54: 597–607
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lopez-Alemany A, Compan V, Refojo M F. Porous structure of Purevision versus Focus Night&Day and conventional hydrogel contact lenses. J Biomed Mater Res. 2002; 63: 319–325
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steffen R, Schnider C. A next-generation silicone hydrogel lens for daily wear. Optician. 2004; 227: 23–25
   Google Scholar
• Jones L, Dumbleton K. Contact lens fitting today Part 5: Silicone hydrogels Part 1: Tehnological developments. Optometry Today 2005; 23–29, November 18
   Google Scholar
• Lin S T, Mandell R B, Leahy C D, Newell J O. Protein accumulation on disposable extended wear lenses. CLAO J. 1991; 17: 44–50
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tripathi P C, Tripathi R C. Analysis of glycoprotein deposits on disposable soft contact lenses. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1992; 33: 121–125
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wedler F C. Analysis of biomaterials deposited on soft contact lenses. J Biomed Mater Res. 1977; 11: 525–535
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan G, Nyquist G, Caldwell K D, Payor R, McCraw E C. Quantitation of total protein deposits on contact lenses by means of amino acid analysis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1993; 34: 1804–1813
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canfield R E, Kammerman S, Sobel J H, Morgan F J. Primary structure of lysozymes from man and goose. Nat New Biol. 1971; 232: 16–17
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lu J R, Su T J, Thirtle P N, Thomas R K, Rennie A R, Cubitt R. The denaturation of lysozyme layers adsorbed at the hydrophobic solid/liquid surface studied by neutron reflection. J Colloid Interface Sci. 1998; 206: 212–223
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang J Y, Li L. The unfolding mechanism and the disulfide structures of denatured lysozyme. FEBS Lett. 2002; 511: 73–78
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gekko K, Ohmae E, Kameyama K, Takagi T. Acetonitrile-protein interactions:amino acid solubility and preferential solvation. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1998; 1387: 195–205
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shugar D. The measurement of lysozyme activity and the ultra-violet inactivation of lysozyme. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1952; 8: 302–309
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morsky P. Turbidimetric determination of lysozyme with Micrococcus lysodeikticus cells: Reexamination of reaction conditions. Anal Biochem. 1983; 128: 77–85
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorin G, Wang S F, Papapavlou L. Assay of lysozyme by its lytic action on M. lysodeikticus cells. Anal Biochem 1971; 39: 113–127
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Houser M T. Improved turbidimetric assay for lysozyme in urine. Clin Chem. 1983; 29: 1488–1493
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kingshott P, St John H A, Griesser H J. Direct detection of proteins adsorbed on synthetic materials by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-mass spectrometry. Anal Biochem. 1999; 273: 156–162
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McArthur S L, McLean K M, St John H A, Griesser H J. XPS and surface-MALDI-MS characterisation of worn HEMA-based contact lenses. Biomaterials. 2001; 22: 3295–3304
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meadows D L, Paugh J R. Use of confocal microscopy to determine matrix and surface protein deposition profiles in hydrogel contact lenses. CLAO J 1994; 20: 237–241
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bhatia S, Goldberg E P, Enns J B. Examination of contact lens surfaces by Atomic Force Microscope (AFM). CLAO J 1997; 23: 264–269
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Baguet J, Sommer F, Claudon-Eyl V, Duc T M. Characterization of lacrymal component accumulation on worn soft contact lens surfaces by atomic force microscopy. Biomaterials 1995; 16: 3–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bontempo A R, Rapp J. Protein-lipid interaction on the surface of a hydrophilic contact lens in vitro. Curr Eye Res 1997; 16: 776–781
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cerulli L, Pocobelli A, Ricci F, Missiroli A, Sabbatini L, Zambonin P. Two methods of examining protein deposits on hydrophilic contact lenses. CLAO J. 1992; 18: 101–104
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Morris C A, Holden B A, Papas E, Griesser H J, Bolis S, Anderton P, Carney F. The ocular surface, the tear film, and the wettability of contact lenses. Adv Exp Med Biol. 1998; 438: 717–722
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Subbaraman L N, Glasier M A, Senchyna M, Jones L. Stabilization of lysozyme mass extracted from lotrafilcon silicone hydrogel contact lenses. Optom Vis Sci. 2005; 82: 209–214
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Subbaraman L N, Glasier M A, Lorentz H, Senchyna M, Jones L. Rewetting drops containing surface active agents improve the clinical performance of silicone hydrogel contact lenses. Optom Vis Sci. 2006; 83: 143–151
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Starcher B. A ninhydrin-based assay to quantitate the total protein content of tissue samples. Anal Biochem. 2001; 292: 125–129
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pande S V, Murthy M S. A modified micro-Bradford procedure for elimination of interference from sodium dodecyl sulfate, other detergents, and lipids. Anal Biochem. 1994; 220: 424–426
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zuo S S, Lundahl P. A micro-Bradford membrane protein assay. Anal Biochem. 2000; 284: 162–164
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Glasier M A, Subbaraman L N, Senchyna M, Jones L. A solid-phase assay for the quantitation of total protein eluted from balafilcon, lotrafilcon and etafilcon contact lenses. Curr Eye Res 2007, in submission
   Google Scholar
• Osserman E F, Canfield R E, Beychok S. Lysozyme. Academic Press, New York 1974
   Google Scholar
• Blake C C, Koenig D F, Mair G A, North A C, Phillips D C, Sarma V R. Structure of hen egg-white lysozyme. A three-dimensional Fourier synthesis at 2 Angstrom resolution. Nature 1965; 206: 757–761
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blake C C, Swan I D. X-ray analysis of structure of human lysozyme at 6 A resolution. Nat New Biol. 1971; 232: 12–15
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Halper J P, Latovitzki N, Bernstein H, Beychok S. Optical activity of human lysozyme. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1971; 68: 517–522
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ikeda K, Hamaguchi K, Miwa S, Nishina T. Circular dichroism of human lysozyme. J Biochem (Tokyo) 1972; 71: 371–378
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saint-Blancard J, Chuzel P, Mathieu Y, Perrot J, Jolles P. Influence of pH and ionic strength of the lysis of Micrococcus lysodeikticus cells by six human and four avian lysozymes. Biochim Biophys Acta 1970; 220: 300–306
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maiden A C, Vanderlann D G, Turner D C, Love R N, Ford J D, Molock F F, Steffen R B, Hill G A, Alli A, McCabe K P. Hydrogel with internal wetting agent. US Patent No. 6,367,929, 2002
   Google Scholar
• Molyneux P. Water-Soluble Synthetic Polymers: Properties and Behavior. Vol. 1 of 2. CRC Press, Inc., Boca Raton, Florida 1983
   Google Scholar
• McDonald C C, Phillips W D, Glickson J D. Nuclear magnetic resonance study of the mechanism of reversible denaturation of lysozyme. J Am Chem Soc. 1971; 93: 235–246
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies R C, Neuberger A, Wilson B M. The dependence of lysozyme activity on pH and ionic strength. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1969; 178: 294–305
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonincontro A, De Francesco A, Onori G. Influence of pH on lysozyme conformation revealed by dielectric spectroscopy. Colloids and Surfaces B, Biointerfaces. 1998; 12: 1–5
   Google Scholar
• Singh S, Singh J. Effect of polyols on the conformational stability and biological activity of a model protein lysozyme. AAPS Pharm Sci Tech 2003; 4: E42
   Google Scholar
• Castillo E J, Koenig J L, Anderson J M, Lo J. Protein adsorption on hydrogels. II. Reversible and irreversible interactions between lysozyme and soft contact lens surfaces. Biomaterials 1985; 6: 338–345
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castillo E J, Koenig J L, Anderson J M, Lo J. Characterization of protein adsorption on soft contact lenses. I. Conformational changes of adsorbed human serum albumin. Biomaterials 1984; 5: 319–325
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Su T J, Lu J R, Thomas R K, Cui Z F, Penfold J. The Adsorption of Lysozyme at the Silica-Water Interface:A Neutron Reflection Study. J Colloid Interface Sci. 1998; 203: 419–429
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fullard R J, Kissner D M. Purification of the isoforms of tear specific prealbumin. Curr Eye Res. 1991; 10: 613–628
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bright A M, Tighe B J. The composition and interfacial properties of tears, tear substitutes and tear models. J Brit Contact Lens Assoc. 1993; 16: 57–66
   Google Scholar