The Additional Burden of Auditory Processing Skill “Deficits” for a Young Person with Multiple Exceptionalities: A Case Study of a Twice-Exceptional Student

References

• American Psychological Association. (2022). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM-5-TR) (5th ed., Text rev ed.). https://www.appi.org/Products/dsm
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, K. L. (1989). SIFTER: Screening instrument for targeting educational risk in children identified by hearing screening or who have known hearing loss. Interstate Printers and Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Arehole, S., & Rigo, T. G. (1999). Auditory evoked potential in low-achieving gifted adolescents. Roeper Review, 22(1), 51–56. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783199909553999
   Google Scholar
• Assouline, S. G., Foley Nicpon, M., & Doobay, A. (2009). Profoundly gifted girls and autism spectrum disorder: A psychometric case study comparison. Gifted Child Quarterly, 53(2), 89–105. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986208330565
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Assouline, S. G., Foley Nicpon, M., & Whiteman, C. (2010). Cognitive and psychosocial characteristics of gifted students with specific learning disabilities. Gifted Child Quarterly, 54(2), 102–115. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986209355974
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Assouline, S. G., Foley Nicpon, M. F., & Whiteman, C. (2009). Cognitive and psychosocial characteristics of gifted students with written language disability. Gifted Child Quarterly, 20(2), 102–115. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986209355974
   Google Scholar
• Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership. (2017). Australian Professional Standards for Teachers. https://www.aitsl.edu.au/standards
   Google Scholar
• Barber, C., & Mueller, C. T. (2011). Social and self-perceptions of adolescents identified as gifted, learning disabled, and twice-exceptional. Roeper Review, 33(2), 109–120. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783193.2011.554158
   Google Scholar
• Baum, S. M., Cooper, C. R., & Neu, T. W. (2001). Dual differentiation: An approach for meeting the curricular needs of gifted students with learning disabilities. Psychology in the Schools, 38(5), 477–490. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.1036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baum, S. M., & Olenchak, F. R. (2002). The alphabet children: GT, ADHD, and more. Exceptionality: A Special Education Journal, 10(2), 77–91. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327035EX1002_3
   Google Scholar
• Baum, S. M., Schader, R. M., & Hébert, T. P. (2014). Through a different lens: Reflecting on a strengths-based, talent-focused approach for twice-exceptional learners. Gifted Child Quarterly, 58(4), 311–327. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986214547632
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borges, L. R., Paschoal, J. R., & Collela-Santos, M. F. (2013). (Central) auditory processing: The impact of otitis media. Clinics, 68(7), 954–959. https://doi.org/10.6061/clinics/2013(07)11
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
   Google Scholar
• Brewer, C. C., Zalewski, C. K., King, K. A., Zobay, O., Riley, A., Ferguson, M. A., Bird, J. E., McCabe, M. M., Hood, L. J., Drayna, D., Griffith, A. J., Morell, R. J., Friedman, T. B., & Moore, D. R. (2016). Heritability of non-speech auditory processing skills. European Journal of Human Genetics, 24(8), 1137–1144. https://doi.org/10.1038/ejhg.2015.277
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brody, L. E., & Mills, C. J. (1997). Gifted children with learning disabilities: A review of the issues. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 30(3), 282–296. https://doi.org/10.1177/002221949703000304
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cash, A. B. (1999). A profile of gifted individuals with autism: The twice-exceptional learner. Roeper Review, 22(1), 22–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783199909553993
   Google Scholar
• Chermak, G. D., Hall, J. W., & Musiek, F. E. (1999). Differential diagnosis and management of central auditory processing disorder and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 10(6), 289–303. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1748501
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chermak, G., & Musiek, F. J. G. (1997). Central auditory processing disorders: New perspectives. Singular.
   Google Scholar
• Commonwealth of Australia. (1988). The Education of Gifted and Talented Children: Report by the Senate Select Committee on the Education of Gifted and Talented Children. Australian Government Publishing Service. https://www.aph.gov.au/~/media/wopapub/senate/committee/eet_ctte/completed_inquiries/1999_02/gifted/report/c01_pdf.ashx
   Google Scholar
• Commonwealth of Australia. (2001). The Education of Gifted and Talented Children. Australian Government Publishing Service. https://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Committees/Senate/Education_Employment_and_Workplace_Relations/Completed_inquiries/1999-02/gifted/report/index
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative and quantitative methods & approaches. SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Crotty, M. (1998). The foundations of social research: Meaning and perspective in the research process. SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Cunah, P., Monteiro de Castro Silva, I., Neiva, E. R., & Tristão, R. M. (2019). Auditory processing disorder evaluations and cognitive profiles of children with specific learning disorder. Clinical Neurophysiology Practice, 31(4), 119–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cnp.2019.05.001
   Google Scholar
• Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2018). Part II paradigms and perspectives in contention. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (5th ed., pp. 195–212). SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Dubois, M. (2015). Sociology of ideology. In J. D. Wright (Ed.), International encyclopedia of the social & behavioral sciences (2nd ed., pp. 573–578). Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Eisner, E. W. (1998). The enlightened eye: Qualitative inquiry and the enhancement of educational practice. Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Ellingson, L. L. (2009). Engaging crystallization in qualitative research. SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Ferri, B. A., Gregg, N., & Heggoy, S. J. (1997). Profiles of college students demonstrating learning disabilities with and without giftedness. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 30(5), 552–559. https://doi.org/10.1177/002221949703000511
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foley Nicpon, M., Doobay, A., & Assouline, S. G. (2010). Parent, teacher, and self-perceptions of psychosocial functioning in intellectually gifted children and adolescents with autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 40(8), 1028–1038. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-010-0952-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gagné, F. (2021). Differentiating giftedness from talent: The DMGT perspective on talent development. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gerring, J. (2007). Case study research: Principles and practices. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gilman, B. J., Lovecky, D. V., Kearney, K., Peters, D. B., Wasserman, J. D., Silverman, L. K., Postma, M. G., Robinson, N. M., Amend, E. R., Ryder-Schoeck, M., Curry, P. H., Lyon, S. K., Rogers, K. B., Collins, L. E., Charlebois, G. M., Harsin, C. M., & Rimm, S. B. (2013). Critical issues in the identification of gifted students with co-existing disabilities: The twice-exceptional. SAGE Open, 3(3), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244013505855
   Google Scholar
• Gilman, B., Rimm, S. B., & Silverman, L. K. (2008, October 30–November 2). A quick guide to using the WISC–IV to identify gifted children. From “optimizing WISC–IV assessment of primary-aged gifted children. [Paper presentation]. National Association for Gifted Children 55th Annual Convention, Tampa, FL, United States.
   Google Scholar
• Gokula, R., Sharma, M., Cupples, L., & Valderrama, J. T. (2019). Comorbidity of auditory processing, attention, and memory in children with word reading difficulties. Frontiers in Psychology, 10(1–28), Article 2383. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02383
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Halliday, L. F., Tuomainen, O., & Rosen, S. (2017). Auditory processing deficits are sometimes necessary and sometimes sufficient for language difficulties in children: Evidence from mild to moderate sensorineural hearing loss. Cognition, 166, 139–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2017.04.014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henderson, L., & Jarvis, J. (2016). The gifted dimension of the Australian Professional Standards for Teachers: Implications for professional learning. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 41(8), 60–83. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2016v41n8.4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz, J., Zalewski, T. R., & Brenner, M. J. (2019). Otitis media and Central Auditory Processing Disorder (CAPD). In D. Geffner & D. Ross-Swain (Eds.), Auditory processing disorders: Assessment, management, and treatment (3rd ed., pp. 307–326). Plural.
   Google Scholar
• Keith, R. W. (2000). SCAN-C test for auditory processing disorders in children—Revised. The Psychological Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, P., Zhu, H., Chen, M., Hong, Q., & Chi, X. (2021). Electrophysiological screening for children with suspected auditory processing disorder: A systematic review. Frontiers in Neurology, 12(1–15), Article 692840. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2021.692840
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Maddocks, D. L. S. (2020). Cognitive and achievement characteristics of students from a national sample identified as potentially twice-exceptional (gifted with a learning disability). Gifted Child Quarterly, 64(1), 3–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986219886668
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Majkut, L., & Rogers, K. B. (2005). Who gets left behind in the WISC–IV? The impact of full-scale vs. index scores upon the identification of gifted and talented learners. Australasian Journal of Gifted Education, 14(2), 5–11.
   Google Scholar
• Mayes, S. D., & Calhoun, S. L. (2006). WISC–IV and WISC–III profiles in children with ADHD. Journal of Attention Disorders, 9(3), 486–493. https://doi.org/10.1177/1087054705283616
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McCoach, D. B., Kehle, T. J., Bray, M. A., & Siegle, D. (2001). Best practices in the identification of gifted students with learning disabilities. Psychology in the Schools, 38(5), 403–411. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.1029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miles, T. (1997). The Bangor dyslexia test. Learning Development Aids.
   Google Scholar
• Moon, S. M., Zentall, S. S., Grskovic, J. A., Hall, A., & Stormont, M. (2001). Emotional and social characteristics of boys with AD/HD and giftedness: A comparative case study. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 24(3), 207–247. https://doi.org/10.1177/016235320102400302
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, D. R., Campbell, N. G., Rosen, S., Bamiou, D., & Sirimanna, T. (2018). Position statement and practice guidance: Auditory Processing Disorder (APD). British Society of Audiology. https://getintoneurodiversity.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/Position-Statement-and-Practice-Guidance-APD-2018-with-logos.pdf
   Google Scholar
• National Association for Gifted Children. (2018). Use of the WISC–V for gifted and twice-exceptional identification. https://www.nagc.org/sites/default/files/Misc_PDFs/WISC-V%20Position%20Statement%20Aug2018.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Neilson, R. (2003). Sutherland Phonological Awareness Test–Revised (SPAT–R). Australian Council for Educational Research.
   Google Scholar
• Olenchak, R., Jacobs, L. T., Hussain, M., Lee, K., & Gaa, J. (2016). Giftedness plus talent plus disabilities: Twice-exceptional persons, the 21st century, and lifespan development as viewed through an affective lens. In D. Ambrose & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), Giftedness and talent in the 21st century: Adapting to the turbulence of globalization (pp. 255–279). Sense.
   Google Scholar
• Ormston, R., Spencer, L., Barnard, M., & Snape, D. (2014). The foundations of qualitative research. In J. Ritchie, J. Lewis, C. M. Nicholls, & R. Ormston (Eds.), Qualitative research practice: A guide for social science students and researchers (2nd ed., pp. 1–26). SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Quintão, C., & Almeida, F. (2020). How to improve the validity and reliability of a case study approach. Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies in Education, 9(2), 264–275. https://doi.org/10.32674/jise.v9i2.2026
   Google Scholar
• Ramus, F. (2001). Dyslexia: Talk of two theories. Nature, 412(6845), 393–395. https://doi.org/10.1038/35086683
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reis, S. M., Baum, S. M., & Burke, E. (2014). An operational definition of twice-exceptional learners: Implications and applications. Gifted Child Quarterly, 58(3), 217–230. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986214534976
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reis, S. M., Neu, T. W., & McGuire, J. M. (1995). Talents in two places: Case studies of high ability students with learning disabilities who have achieved. The National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented.
   Google Scholar
• Richardson, L. (2000). Writing: A method of inquiry. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 516–529). SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Ronksley-Pavia, M. (2015). A model of twice-exceptionality: Explaining and defining the apparent paradoxical combination of disability and giftedness in childhood. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 38(3), 318–340. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162353215592499
   Google Scholar
• Ronksley-Pavia, M. (2020). Twice-exceptionality in Australia: Prevalence estimates. Australasian Journal of Gifted Education, 29(2), 17–29. https://doi.org/10.21505/ajge.2020.0013
   Google Scholar
• Ronksley-Pavia, M. (2023). The fallacy of using the National Assessment Program—Literacy And Numeracy (NAPLAN) data to identify Australian high-potential gifted students. Education Sciences, 13(4), 421–438. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13040421
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ronksley-Pavia, M., Grootenboer, P., & Pendergast, D. (2019). Privileging the voices of twice-exceptional children: An exploration of lived experiences and stigma narratives. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 42(1), 4–34. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162353218816384
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ronksley-Pavia, M., & Hanley, J. (2022). Strength-based approaches for supporting twice-exceptional learners: A systematic literature review. In C. Kuo, H. Yu, W. Chen, & Y. Chen (Eds.), Proceedings of the 17th Asia Pacific Conference on Giftedness, Theme: Embracing Diversity, Blooming Talents (pp. 53–65). Department of Special Education, National Taiwan Normal University. https://www.apcgtaipei2022.org/news_content.php?news_id=15
   Google Scholar
• Ronksley-Pavia, M., & Ronksley-Pavia, S. (2023). The role of primary health care providers in supporting a gifted child. The Australian Journal of General Practice, 52(8), 522–527. https://doi.org/10.31128/AJGP-12-22-6638
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosner, J. (1993). Test of auditory analysis skills [ Unpublished master’s thesis]. University of Washington. http://courses.washington.edu/sop/Test%20of%20Auditory%20Analysis%20Skills.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Sheslow, D., & Adams, W. (2003). Wide Range Assessment of Memory And Learning, second edition (WRAML2). Pearson Assessments.
   Google Scholar
• Silverman, L. K. (1989). Invisible gifts, invisible handicaps. Roeper Review, 12(1), 37–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783198909553228
   Google Scholar
• Silverman, L. K., & Gilman, B. J. (2020). Best practices in gifted identification and assessment: Lessons from the WISC–V. Psychology in the Schools, 57(10), 1569–1581. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.22361
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song, K., & Porath, M. (2011). How giftedness coexists with learning disabilities: Understanding gifted students with learning disabilities (GLD) in an integrated model of human abilities. Talent Development & Excellence, 3(2), 215–227.
   Google Scholar
• Stake, R. E. (2009). The case study method in social inquiry. In R. Gomm, M. Hammersley, & P. Foster (Eds.), Case study method (pp. 18–25). SAGE. https://doi.org/10.4135/9780857024367
   Google Scholar
• Tomlinson, C. A. (2018). Differentiated instruction. In C. M. Callahan & H. L. Hertberg-Davis (Eds.), Fundamentals of gifted education: Considering multiple perspectives (pp. 279–292). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Vespi, L., & Yewchuk, C. (1992). A phenomenological study of the social/emotional characteristics of gifted learning disabled children. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 16(1), 55–72. https://doi.org/10.1177/016235329201600107
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Glasersfeld, E. (1998). Why constructivism must be radical. In M. Larochelle, N. Bednarz, & J. Garrison (Eds.), Constructivism and education (pp. 23–28). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Waldron, K. A., & Saphire, D. G. (1990). An analysis of WISC–R factors for gifted students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 23(8), 491–498. https://doi.org/10.1177/002221949002300807
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wechsler, D. (2003). Wechsler intelligence Scale for children–fourth edition (WISC–IV). Pearson Assessments.
   Google Scholar
• Wechsler, D. (2014). Wechsler intelligence Scale for children–fifth edition (WISC–V). Pearson Assessments.
   Google Scholar
• Wu, I., Lo, C. O., & Tsai, K. (2019). Learning experiences of highly able learners with ASD: Using a success case method. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 42(3), 216–242. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162353219855681
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study research: Design and methods (5th ed.). SAGE.
   Google Scholar