Norwegian general practitioners’ collaboration with municipal care providers – a qualitative study of structural conditions

References

• Bambling M, Kavanagh D, Lewis G, et al. Challenges faced by general practitioners and allied mental health services in providing mental health services in rural Queensland. Aust J Rural Health. 2007;15:126–130.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansson A, Friberg F, Segesten K, et al. Two sides of the coin–general practitioners' experience of working in multidisciplinary teams. J Interprof Care. 2008;22:5–16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Stampa M, Vedel I, Bergman H, et al. Fostering participation of general practitioners in integrated health services networks: incentives, barriers, and guidelines. BMC Health Serv Res. 2009;9:48.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Supper I, Catala O, Lustman M, et al. Interprofessional collaboration in primary health care: a review of facilitators and barriers perceived by involved actors. J Pub Health. 2014;37:716–727.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iversen T, Lurås H. Economic motives and professional norms: the case of general medical practice. J Econ Behav Org. 2000;43:447–470.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kann IC, Biørn E, Lurås H. Competition in general practice: prescriptions to the elderly in a list patient system. J Health Econ. 2010;29:751–764.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ministry of Health and Care Services. St.meld. nr. 47. Samhandlingsreformen. Rett behandling - på rett sted - til rett tid [White paper: the Coordination reform. In Norwegian, English summery]. 2009: Oslo.
   Google Scholar
• Schou A, Helgesen MK, Hofstad H. Samhandlingsreformens effekt på kommunen som helsefremmende og sykdomsforebyggende aktør. NIBR-rapport 2014: 21. [The effect of the Coordination Reform on the municipalities as health promoting actors]. Oslo: NIBR; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Health and Care Services [Internet]. Meld. St. 26. Fremtidens primaerhelsetjeneste - naerhet og helhet [The primary health and care services of tomorrow – localised and integrated]. Helse- og omsorgsdepartmentet. 2009 Available from: https://www.regjeringen.no/en/dokumenter/meld.-st.-26-20142015/id2409890/ In Norwegian, English summery
   Google Scholar
• Haggerty JL, Reid RJ, Freeman GK, et al. Continuity of care: a multidisciplinary review. BMJ. 2003;327:1219.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dieleman SL, Farris KB, Feeny D, et al. Primary health care teams: team members' perceptions of the collaborative process. J Interprof Care. 2004;18:75–78.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Romøren TI, Torjesen DO, Landmark B. Promoting coordination in Norwegian health care. Int J Integr Care. 2011;11. Available from: http://www.ijic.orgURN:NBN:NL:UI:10-1-101575 / ijic2011-127
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bjerkan J, Richter M, Grimsmo A, et al. Integrated care in Norway: the state of affairs years after regulation by law. Int J Integr Care. 2011;11. Available from: http://www.ijic.orgURN:NBN:NL:UI:10-1-101258, ijic2011-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holum LC. “It is a good idea, but…” A qualitative study of implementation of ‘Individual Plan’ in Norwegian mental health care. Int J Integr Care. 2012;12. Available from: http://www.ijic.orgURN:NBN:NL:UI:10-1-112887 / ijic2012-15
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’Amour D, Ferrada-Videla M, Rodriguez LS, et al. The conceptual basis for interprofessional collaboration: core concepts and theoretical frameworks. J Interprof Care. 2005;19(sup1):116–131.
   Google Scholar
• Tsasis P, Evans JM, Owen S. Reframing the challenges to integrated care: a complex-adaptive systems perspective. Int J Integr Care. 2012;12. Available from: http://www.ijic.orgURN:NBN:NL:UI:10-1-113786 / ijic2012-190
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Raak A, Paulus A, Mur-Veeman I. Why do health and social care providers co-operate?. Health Policy. 2005;74:13–23.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groot MM, Vernooij-Dassen MJ, Crul BJ, et al. General practitioners (GPs) and palliative care: perceived tasks and barriers in daily practice. Palliat Med. 2005;19:111–118.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xyrichis A, Lowton K. What fosters or prevents interprofessional teamworking in primary and community care? A literature review. Int J Nurs Stud. 2008;45:140–153.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hellesø R, Fagermoen MS. Cultural diversity between hospital and community nurses: implications for continuity of care. Int J Integr Care. 2010;10. Available from: http://doi.org/10.5334/ijic.508
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD. OECD reviews of health care quality: Norway 2014: raising standards. Paris: OECD Publishing; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Suter E, Oelke ND, Adair CD, et al. Ten key principles for successful health systems integration. HCQ. 2009;13:(Spec No):16.
   Google Scholar
• Chell E. Critical Incident Technique, In: Cassel C, Symon D, editors. Essential guide to qualitative methods in organizational research. London: Sage Publications; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Strauss A, Corbin J. Basics of qualitative research. Vol. 15. Newbury Park (CA): Sage; 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Steihaug S, Loeb M. De ressurskrevende brukerne innen psykisk helsearbeid – samhandling og organisering [Resource demanding users within mental healthcare – collaboration and organisation] SINTEF Helse 2007, SINTEF A1367. In Norwegian, summary in English.
   Google Scholar
• Hafting M, Garløv I. Fastlegen og psykisk sykdom hos barn og unge [The GP and mental illness among children and adolescents]. Tidsskr Nor Legeforen. 2006;126:299–301. In Norwegian, summary in English.
   Google Scholar
• Davidsen AS, Reventlow S. Narratives about patients with psychological problems illustrate different professional roles among general practitioners. J Health Psychol. 2011;6:959–968.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winthereik A, Neergaard M, Vedsted P, et al. Danish general practitioners' self-reported competences in end-of-life care. Scand J Prim Health Care. 2016;34:420–427.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atwal A, Caldwell K. Do all health and social care professionals interact equally: a study of interactions in multidisciplinary teams in the United Kingdom. Scand J Caring Sci. 2005;19:268–273.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johannessen AK, Steihaug S. The significance of professional roles in collaboration on patients' transitions from hospital to home via an intermediate unit. Scand J Caring Sci. 2014;28:364–372.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kharicha K, Iliffe S, Levin E, et al. Tearing down the Berlin wall: social workers' perspectives on joint working with general practice. Family Pract. 2005;22:399–405.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vabø M. Norwegian home care in transition - heading for accountability, off-loading responsibilities. Health Soc Care Community. 2012;20:283–291. 2012;
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawn S, Lloyd A, King A, et al. Integration of primary health services: being put together does not mean they will work together. BMC Res Notes. 2014;7:66.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Steihaug S, Lippestad JW, Werner A. Between ideals and reality in home-based rehabilitation. Scand J Prim Health Care. 2016;34:46–54.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahgren B. The path to integrated healthcare: various Scandinavian strategies. Int J Care Coord. 2014;17:52–58.
   Google Scholar