1,347
Views
8
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

GPs’ perspectives of the patient encounter – in the context of standardized cancer patient pathways

, , &
Pages 238-247 | Received 22 Oct 2019, Accepted 25 Mar 2020, Published online: 21 Apr 2020

References

  • Johansen M-L, Holtedahl KA, Rudebeck CE. How does the thought of cancer arise in a general practice consultation? Interviews with GPs. Scand J Prim Health Care. 2012;30(3):135–140.
  • Wagland R, Brindle L, Ewings S, et al. Promoting help-seeking in response to symptoms amongst primary care patients at high risk of lung cancer: a mixed method study.(Research Article)(Report). PLoS One. 2016;11(11):e0165677.
  • Andersen RS, Vedsted P. Juggling efficiency. An ethnographic study exploring healthcare seeking practices and institutional logics in Danish primary care settings. Soc Sci Med. 2015;128:239–245.
  • Månsson J. The diagnostic process of cancer from the general practitioner’s point of view. [Dissertation] (sammanfattning). Göteborg: Göteborg University; 1999.
  • Ingebrigtsen SG, Scheel BI, Hart B, et al. Frequency of ‘warning signs of cancer’ in Norwegian general practice, with prospective recording of subsequent cancer. Fam Pract. 2013;30(2):153–160.
  • Green T, Atkin K, Macleod U. Cancer detection in primary care: insights from general practitioners. Br J Cancer. 2015;112(S1):S41–S49.
  • Rubin G, Berendsen A, Crawford SM, et al. The expanding role of primary care in cancer control. The Lancet Oncology. 2015;16(12):1231–1272.
  • Rosendal M, Jarbøl DE, Pedersen AF, et al. Multiple perspectives on symptom interpretation in primary care research. BMC Fam Pract. 2013;14(1):167.
  • Brown S, Castelli M, Hunter DJ, et al. How might healthcare systems influence speed of cancer diagnosis: A narrative review. Soc Sci Med. 2014;116(3):56–63.
  • Andersen RS, Tørring ML, Vedsted P. Global health care–seeking discourses facing local clinical realities: exploring the case of cancer. Med Anthropol Quart. 2015;29(2):237–255.
  • Jensen H, Merrild CH, Møller H, et al. Association between GPs’ suspicion of cancer and patients’ usual consultation pattern in primary care: a cross-sectional study. Br J Gen Pract. 2019;69(679):e80–e87.
  • Ewing M, Naredi P, Nemes S, et al. Increased consultation frequency in primary care, a risk marker for cancer: a case–control study. Scand J Prim Health Care. 2016;34(2):205–212.
  • Dommett RM, Redaniel MT, Stevens MCG, et al. Features of childhood cancer in primary care: a population-based nested case–control study. Br J Cancer. 2012;106(5):982–987.
  • Jensen H, Vedsted P, Møller H. Consultation frequency in general practice before cancer diagnosis in relation to the patient’s usual consultation pattern: a population-based study. Cancer Epidemiol. 2018;55:142–148.
  • Ingeman ML, Christensen MB, Bro F, et al. The Danish cancer pathway for patients with serious non-specific symptoms and signs of cancer-a cross-sectional study of patient characteristics and cancer probability. BMC Cancer. 2015;15(1):421.
  • Pedersen AF, Ingeman ML, Vedsted P. Empathy, burn-out and the use of gut feeling: a cross-sectional survey of Danish general practitioners. BMJ Open. 2018;8(2):e020007.
  • Hultstrand C, Coe A-B, Lilja M, et al. Negotiating bodily sensations between patients and GPs in the context of standardized cancer patient pathways - an observational study in primary care. BMC Health Serv Res. 2020;20(1):46.
  • Jensen H, Tørring ML, Olesen F, et al. Cancer suspicion in general practice, urgent referral and time to diagnosis: a population-based GP survey and registry study. BMC Cancer. 2014;14(1):636.
  • Wilkens J, Thulesius H, Schmidt I, et al. The 2015 National Cancer Program in Sweden: Introducing standardized care pathways in a decentralized system. Health Policy. 2016;120(12):1378–1382.
  • Mulka O. NICE suspected cancer guidelines. Br J Gen Pract. 2005;55(517):580.
  • Jones R, Rubin G, Hungin P. Is the two week rule for cancer referrals working? BMJ. 2001;322(7302):1555–1556.
  • Probst HB, Hussain ZB, Andersen O. Cancer patient pathways in Denmark as a joint effort between bureaucrats, health professionals and politicians – a national Danish project. Health Policy. 2012;105(1):65–70.
  • Hamilton W. Cancer diagnosis in primary care. Br J Gen Pract. 2010;60(571):121–128.
  • Svendsen RP, Stovring H, Hansen BL, et al. Prevalence of cancer alarm symptoms: a population-based cross-sectional study. Scand J Prim Health Care. 2010;28(3):132–137.
  • Ewing M, Naredi P, Zhang C, et al. Identification of patients with non-metastatic colorectal cancer in primary care: a case-control study. Br J Gen Pract. 2016;66(653):e880–e886.
  • Hamilton W. The CAPER studies: five case-control studies aimed at identifying and quantifying the risk of cancer in symptomatic primary care patients. Br J Cancer. 2009;101(S2):S80–S86.
  • Shapley M, Mansell G, Jordan J, et al. Positive predictive values of > = 5% in primary care for cancer: systematic review. Br J Gen Pract. 2010;60(578):e366–e377.
  • Guldbrandt LM, Fenger-Gran M, Rasmussen TR, et al. The role of general practice in routes to diagnosis of lung cancer in Denmark: a population-based study of general practice involvement, diagnostic activity and diagnostic intervals. (Report.). BMC Health Serv Res. 2015;15(1):21.
  • Tørring ML, Frydenberg M, Hansen RP, et al. Evidence of increasing mortality with longer diagnostic intervals for five common cancers: a cohort study in primary care. Eur J Cancer. 2013;49(9):2187–2198.
  • Nörgaard Nielsen T, Pilegaard Hansen R, Vedsted P. Symptom presentation in cancer patients in general practice. Ugeskr Laeger. 2010;172(41):2827–2831.
  • Charmaz K. Constructing grounded theory. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 2014.
  • Blumer H. Symbolic interactionism: perspective and method. Berkeley: Berkeley: University of California Press; 1986.
  • Burbank PM, Martins DC. Symbolic interactionism and critical perspective: divergent or synergistic? Nurs Philos. 2010;11(1):25–41.
  • van Boven K, Uijen AA, van de Wiel N, et al. The diagnostic value of the patient’s reason for encounter for diagnosing cancer in primary care. J Am Board Fam Med. 2017;30(6):806–812.
  • Kostopoulou O, Sirota M, Round T, et al. The role of physicians’ first impressions in the diagnosis of possible cancers without alarm symptoms. (Report). Med Decis Making. 2017;37(1):9–16.
  • Cocksedge S, May C. The listening loop: a model of choice about cues within primary care consultations. Med Educ. 2005;39(10):999–1005.
  • Rose PW, Rubin G, Perera-Salazar R, et al. Explaining variation in cancer survival between 11 jurisdictions in the International Cancer Benchmarking Partnership: a primary care vignette survey. BMJ Open. 2015;5(5):e007212.
  • Wagland R, Brindle L, James E, et al. Facilitating early diagnosis of lung cancer amongst primary care patients: the views of GPs. Eur J Cancer Care. 2017;26(3):e12704.
  • Baun M-L, Jensen H, Falborg AZ, et al. Ovarian cancer suspicion, urgent referral and time to diagnosis in Danish general practice: a population-based study. Fam Pract. 2019;36(6):751–7.
  • Delilovic S, Hasson H, Åhström M, et al. Implementing standardized cancer patient pathways (CPPs) - a qualitative study exploring the perspectives of health care professionals. BMC Health Serv Res. 2019;19(1):577.
  • Yin RK. Case study research: design and methods. 4th ed. London: SAGE; 2009.