Comparison Study of Intraarticular and Intravenous Gadolinium-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Cartilage in a Canine Model

References

• Gold G. E., Beaulieu C. F. Future of MR imaging of articular cartilage. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 2001; 5: 313–27
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Swedberg J. A., Steinbauer J. R. Osteoarthritis. Am Fam Physician 1992; 45: 557–68
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandt K. D. Osteoarthritis. Clin Geriatr Med 1988; 4: 279–93
   Google Scholar
• Davis M. A. Epidemiology of osteoarthritis. Clin Geriatr Med 1988; 4: 241–55
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Peyron J. G. Epidemiological aspects of osteoarthritis. Scand J Rheumatol Suppl 1988; 77: 29–33
   Google Scholar
• Libicher M., Ivancic M., Hoffmann M., Wenz W. Early changes in experimental osteoarthritis using the Pond-Nuki dog model: technical procedure and initial results of in vivo MR imaging. Eur Radiol 2005; 15: 390–4
   Google Scholar
• Poole A. R. An introduction to the pathophysiology of osteoarthritis. Front Biosci 1999; 4: D662–70
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Martel-Pelletier J. Pathophysiology of osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 1999; 7: 371–3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hochberg M. C. Osteoarthritis: pathophysiology, clinical features, management. Hosp Pract (Off Ed) 1984; 19: 41–53
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Disler D. G., Recht M. P., McCauley T. R. MR imaging of articular cartilage. Skeletal Radiol 2000; 29: 367–77
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gold G. E., McCauley T. R., Gray M. L., Disler D. G. What's new in cartilage?. Radiographics 2003; 23: 1227–42
   Google Scholar
• Hodler J., Resnick D. Current status of imaging of articular cartilage. Skeletal Radiol 1996; 25: 703–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCauley T. R., Disler D. G. MR imaging of articular cartilage. Radiology 1998; 209: 629–40
   Google Scholar
• Schulte-Altedorneburg G., Gebhard M., Wohlgemuth W. A., Fischer W., Zentner J., Wegener R., et al. MR arthrography: pharmacology, efficacy and safety in clinical trials. Skeletal Radiol 2003; 32: 1–12
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harman M., Ipeksoy U., Dogan A., Arslan H., Etlik O. MR arthrography in chondromalacia patellae diagnosis on a low-field open magnet system. Clin Imaging 2003; 27: 194–9
   Google Scholar
• Loredo R., Sanders T. G. Imaging of osteochondral injuries. Clin Sports Med 2001; 20: 249–78
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giovagnoni A., Valeri G., Ercolani P., Paci E., Carloni S., Soccetti A. [Magnetic resonance arthrography in chondral disease of the knee.]. Radiol Med (Torino) 1995; 90: 219–25
   Google Scholar
• Kramer J., Stiglbauer R., Engel A., Prayer L., Imhof H. MR contrast arthrography (MRA) in osteochondrosis dissecans. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1992; 16: 254–60
   Google Scholar
• Flannigan B., Kursunoglu-Brahme S., Snyder S., Karzel R., Del Pizzo W., Resnick D. MR arthrography of the shoulder: comparison with conventional MR imaging. Am J Roentgenol 1990; 155: 829–32
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bashir A., Gray M. L., Boutin R. D., Burstein D. Glycosaminoglycan in articular cartilage: in vivo assessment with delayed Gd(DTPA)(2-)-enhanced MR imaging. Radiology 1997; 205: 551–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bock J. C., Kaufmann F., Felix R. Comparison of gadolinium-DTPA and macromolecular gadolinium-DTPA-polylysine for contrast-enhanced pulmonary time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography. Invest Radiol 1996; 31: 652–7
   Google Scholar
• Burstein D., Gray M. New MRI techniques for imaging cartilage. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2003; 85A Suppl 2: 70–7
   Google Scholar
• Kimelman T., Vu A., Storey P., McKenzie C., Burstein D., Prasad P. Three-dimensional T1 mapping for dGEMRIC at 3.0 T using the Look Locker method. Invest Radiol 2006; 41: 198–203
   Google Scholar
• McKenzie C. A., Williams A., Prasad P. V., Burstein D. Three-dimensional delayed gadolinium-enhanced MRI of cartilage (dGEMRIC) at 1.5T and 3.0T. J Magn Reson Imaging 2006; 24: 928–33
   Google Scholar
• Watanabe A., Wada Y., Obata T., Ueda T., Tamura M., Ikehira H., et al. Delayed gadolinium-enhanced MR to determine glycosaminoglycan concentration in reparative cartilage after autologous chondrocyte implantation: preliminary results. Radiology 2006; 239: 201–8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Boesen M., Jensen K. E., Qvistgaard E., Danneskiold-Samsoe B., Thomsen C., Ostergaard M., et al. Delayed gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (dGEMRIC) of hip joint cartilage: better cartilage delineation after intra-articular than intravenous gadolinium injection. Acta Radiol 2006; 47: 391–6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Link T. M., Stahl R., Woertler K. Cartilage imaging: motivation, techniques, current and future significance. Eur Radiol 2007; 17: 1135–46
   Google Scholar
• van Foreest A. W. [The application of tiletamine/zolazepam (Zoletil) anesthesia in dental treatments in dogs.]. Tijdschr Diergeneeskd 1991; 116: 1063–6
   Google Scholar
• Suga K., Yuan Y., Ogasawara N., Okada M., Matsunaga N. Visualization of normal and interrupted lymphatic drainage in dog legs with interstitial MR lymphography using an extracellular MR contrast agent, gadopentetate dimeglumine. Invest Radiol 2003; 38: 349–57
   Google Scholar
• Burstein D., Velyvis J., Scott K. T., Stock K. W., Kim Y. J., Jaramillo D., et al. Protocol issues for delayed Gd(DTPA)(2-)-enhanced MRI (dGEMRIC) for clinical evaluation of articular cartilage. Magn Reson Med 2001; 45: 36–41
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burstein D. M. G. MRI mapper. 2006, 7th ed. Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
   Google Scholar
• Ikehira H., Watanabe A., Obata T., Tsujii H., Jones K. M., Shun L., et al. The development of a three-dimensional T1 image calculation program in proportion to the DICOM data of any marketing clinical MRI systems. Magn Reson Imaging 2004; 22: 595–7
   Google Scholar
• Park Y., Choi D., Kim S. H., Kim S. H., Kim M. J., Lee J., et al. Changes in signal-to-noise ratios and contrast-to-noise ratios of hypervascular hepatocellular carcinomas on ferucarbotran-enhanced dynamic MR imaging. Eur J Radiol 2006; 59: 424–31
   Google Scholar
• Maubon A. J., Ferru J. M., Berger V., Soulage M. C., DeGraef M., Aubas P., et al. Effect of field strength on MR images: comparison of the same subject at 0.5, 1.0, and 1.5 T. Radiographics 1999; 19: 1057–67
   Google Scholar
• Bacic G., Liu K. J., Goda F., Hoopes P. J., Rosen G. M., Swartz H. M. MRI contrast enhanced study of cartilage proteoglycan degradation in the rabbit knee. Magn Reson Med 1997; 37: 764–8
   Google Scholar
• Paul P. K., O'Byrne E., Blancuzzi V., Wilson D., Gunson D., Douglas F. L., et al. Magnetic resonance imaging reflects cartilage proteoglycan degradation in the rabbit knee. Skeletal Radiol 1991; 20: 31–6
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lehner K. B., Rechl H. P., Gmeinwieser J. K., Heuck A. F., Lukas H. P., Kohl H. P. Structure, function, and degeneration of bovine hyaline cartilage: assessment with MR imaging in vitro. Radiology 1989; 170: 495–9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kiviranta I., Tammi M., Jurvelin J., Helminen H. J. Topographical variation of glycosaminoglycan content and cartilage thickness in canine knee (stifle) joint cartilage. Application of the microspectrophotometric method. J Anat 1987; 150: 265–76
   Google Scholar
• Olivier P., Loeuille D., Watrin A., Walter F., Etienne S., Netter P., et al. Structural evaluation of articular cartilage: potential contribution of magnetic resonance techniques used in clinical practice. Arthritis Rheum 2001; 44: 2285–95
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lammentausta E., Kiviranta P., Nissi M. J., Laasanen M. S., Kiviranta I., Nieminen M. T., et al. T2 relaxation time and delayed gadolinium-enhanced MRI of cartilage (dGEMRIC) of human patellar cartilage at 1.5 T and 9.4 T: relationships with tissue mechanical properties. J Orthop Res 2006; 24: 366–74
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodwin D. W., Zhu H., Dunn J. F. In vitro MR imaging of hyaline cartilage: correlation with scanning electron microscopy. Am J Roentgenol 2000; 174: 405–9
   Google Scholar
• Mlynarik V., Sulzbacher I., Bittsansky M., Fuiko R., Trattnig S. Investigation of apparent diffusion constant as an indicator of early degenerative disease in articular cartilage. J Magn Reson Imaging 2003; 17: 440–4
   Google Scholar
• Van Breuseghem I. Ultrastructural MR imaging techniques of the knee articular cartilage: problems for routine clinical application. Eur Radiol 2004; 14: 184–92
   Google Scholar
• Rand T., Brossmann J., Pedowitz R., Ahn J. M., Haghigi P., Resnick D. Analysis of patellar cartilage. Comparison of conventional MR imaging and MR and CT arthrography in cadavers. Acta Radiol 2000; 41: 492–7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kramer J., Recht M. P., Imhof H., Stiglbauer R., Engel A. Postcontrast MR arthrography in assessment of cartilage lesions. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1994; 18: 218–24
   Google Scholar
• Gagliardi J. A., Chung E. M., Chandnani V. P., Kesling K. L., Christensen K. P., Null R. N., et al. Detection and staging of chondromalacia patellae: relative efficacies of conventional MR imaging, MR arthrography, and CT arthrography. Am J Roentgenol 1994; 163: 629–36
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fetter N. L., Leddy H. A., Guilak F., Nunley J. A. Composition and transport properties of human ankle and knee cartilage. J Orthop Res 2006; 24: 211–9
   Google Scholar
• Ding C., Cicuttini F., Scott F., Cooley H., Jones G. Association between age and knee structural change: a cross sectional MRI based study. Ann Rheum Dis 2005; 64: 549–55
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woertler K., Buerger H., Moeller J., Rummeny E. J. Patellar articular cartilage lesions: in vitro MR imaging evaluation after placement in gadopentetate dimeglumine solution. Radiology 2004; 230: 768–73
   Google Scholar
• Kopka L., Funke M., Fischer U., Vosshenrich R., Schroder M., Grabbe E. [Signal characteristics of X-ray contrast media and their interaction with gadolinium-DTPA in MRT.]. Rofo 1994; 160: 349–52
   Google Scholar
• Hajek P. C., Sartoris D. J., Neumann C. H., Resnick D. Potential contrast agents for MR arthrography: in vitro evaluation and practical observations. Am J Roentgenol 1987; 149: 97–104
   Google Scholar
• Drape J. L., Thelen P., Gay-Depassier P., Silbermann O., Benacerraf R. Intraarticular diffusion of Gd-DOTA after intravenous injection in the knee: MR imaging evaluation. Radiology 1993; 188: 227–34
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yamato M., Tamai K., Yamaguchi T., Ohno W. MRI of the knee in rheumatoid arthritis: Gd-DTPA perfusion dynamics. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1993; 17: 781–5
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kursunoglu-Brahme S., Riccio T., Weisman M. H., Resnick D., Zvaifler N., Sanders M. E., et al. Rheumatoid knee: role of gadopentetate-enhanced MR imaging. Radiology 1990; 176: 831–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Modl J. M., Sether L. A., Haughton V. M., Kneeland J. B. Articular cartilage: correlation of histologic zones with signal intensity at MR imaging. Radiology 1991; 181: 853–5
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rubenstein J. D., Kim J. K., Morova-Protzner I., Stanchev P. L., Henkelman R. M. Effects of collagen orientation on MR imaging characteristics of bovine articular cartilage. Radiology 1993; 188: 219–26
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kim D. J., Suh J. S., Jeong E. K., Shin K. H., Yang W. I. Correlation of laminated MR appearance of articular cartilage with histology, ascertained by artificial landmarks on the cartilage. J Magn Reson Imaging 1999; 10: 57–64
   Google Scholar
• Paul P. K., Jasani M. K., Sebok D., Rakhit A., Dunton A. W., Douglas F. L. Variation in MR signal intensity across normal human knee cartilage. J Magn Reson Imaging 1993; 3: 569–74
   Google Scholar
• Link T. M., Sell C. A., Masi J. N., Phan C., Newitt D., Lu Y., et al. 3.0 vs 1.5 T MRI in the detection of focal cartilage pathology—ROC analysis in an experimental model. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2006; 14: 63–70
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramnath R. R. 3T MR imaging of the musculoskeletal system (part II): clinical applications. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 2006; 14: 41–62
   PubMedGoogle Scholar