A Dynamic Infrared Imaging-Based Diagnostic Process for Breast Cancer

References

• Kastberger G, Stachl R. Infrared imaging technology and biological applications. Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput 2003; 35: 429–39
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Button TM, Li H, Fisher P, Rosenblatt R, Dulaimy K, Li S, et al. Dynamic infrared imaging for the detection of malignancy. Phys Med Biol 2004; 49: 3105–16
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janicek MJ, Demetri G, Janicek MR, Shaffer K, Fauci MA. Dynamic infrared imaging of newly diagnosed malignant lymphoma compared with gallium-67 and fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography. Technol Cancer Res Treat 2003; 2: 571–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anbar M. Assessment of physiologic and pathologic radiative heat dissipation using infrared imaging. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2002; 972: 111–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agostini, V, Knaflitz, M, Molinari, F. Evaluation of different marker sets for motion artefact reduction in breast dynamic infrared imaging. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2007;3377–9.
   Google Scholar
• Thomsen LL, Miles DW. Role of nitric oxide in tumour progression: lessons from human tumours. Cancer Metastasis Rev 1998; 17: 107–18
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomsen LL, Miles DW, Happerfield L, Bobrov LG, Knowles RG, Moncada S. Nitric oxide synthase activity in human breast cancer. Br J Cancer 1995; 72: 41–4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joro R, Lääperi AL, Dastidar P, Soimakallio S, Kuukasjärvi T, Toivonen T, et al. Imaging of breast cancer with mid- and long-wave infrared camera. J Med Eng Technol 2008; 32: 189–97
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fanning, SR, Short, S, Coleman, K, Andersen, S, Budd, GT, Moore, H, , et al. Correlation on dynamic infrared imaging with radiologic and pathologic response for patients treated with primary systemic therapy for locally advanced breast cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology ASCO Annual Meeting Proceedings 2006; Part I.24, 18S:10696.
   Google Scholar
• Joro R, Lääperi AL, Soimakallio S, Järvenpää R, Kuukasjärvi T, Toivonen T, et al. Dynamic infrared imaging in identification of breast cancer tissue with combined image processing and frequency analysis. J Med Eng Technol 2008; 32: 325–35
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• American College of Radiology. Breast imaging reporting and data system, breast imaging atlas. Fourth ed. Reston, VA: American College of Radiology; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Silverstein MJ, Poller DN, Waisman JR, Colburn WJ, Barth A, Gierson ED, et al. Prognostic classification of breast ductal carcinoma-in-situ. Lancet 1995; 345: 1154–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fattaneh A, Tavassoli Devilee P. World Health Organization classification of tumours; pathology & genetics: tumours of the breast and female genital organs. IARC Press, Lyon 2003
   Google Scholar
• Bloom HJ, Richardson WW. Histological grading and prognosis in breast cancer; a study of 1409 cases of which 359 have been followed for 15 years. Br J Cancer 1957; 11: 359–77
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elston CW, Ellis IO. Pathological prognostic factors in breast cancer. The value of histological grade in breast cancer: experience from a large study with long-term follow-up. Histopathology 2002; 41: 151–3
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gonzales RC, Woods RE, Eddins SL. Digital image processing using Matlab®. Pearson Education, Inc, New Jersey 2004; 65–193
   Google Scholar
• The MathWorks Inc. Image processing toolbox, user's guide version 5. Natick: The MathWorks, Inc.; 2005. 50–150.
   Google Scholar
• Rogalski, A. Infrared photon detectors. Institute of Technical Physics, WAT. SPIE 1995;1. 21, , 61–63, 302, 351–475.
   Google Scholar
• Rogatto WD. The infrared & electro-optical systems handbook/electro-optical components. SPIE 1993; 3: p. 177–273
   Google Scholar
• Janesick, J, Putnam, G. Developments and applications of high-performance CCD and CMOS imaging arrays. Annu Rev Nucl Sci, 2003;263–300.
   Google Scholar
• Janesick, J. Charge coupled CMOS and hybrid detector arrays. SPIE, Focal Plane Arrays. 2003; paper 5167-1.
   Google Scholar
• Ng EY, Kee EC. Advanced integrated technique in breast thermography. J Med Eng Technol 2008; 32: 103–14
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Xie W, McCahon P, Jakobsen K, Prish C. Evaluation of the ability of digital infrared imaging to detect vascular changes in experimental animal tumours. Int J Cancer 2004; 108: 790–4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, C, Stephens, MJ. A combined corner and edge detector. In Alvey Vision Conference, 1988. 147–52.
   Google Scholar
• Berg WA, Gutierrez L, NessAivor MS, Carter WB, Bhargavan M, Lewis RS, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of mammography, clinical examination, US, and MR imaging in preoperative assessment of breast cancer. Radiology 2004; 233: 830–49
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyd NF, Guo H, Martin LJ, Sun L, Stone J, Fishell E, et al. Mammographic density and the risk of detection of breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2007; 356: 227–36
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bluemke DA, Gatsonis CA, Chen MH, DeAngeli GA, DeBruhl N, Harms S, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of the breast prior to biopsy. JAMA 2004; 292: 2735–42
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warner E, Plewes DB, Shumak RS, Catzavelos GC, Di Prospero LS, Yaffe MJ, et al. Comparison of breast magnetic resonance imaging, mammography, and ultrasound for surveillance of women at high risk for hereditary breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 2001; 19: 3524–31
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warner E, Plewes DB, Hill KA, Causer PA, Zubovits JT, Jong RA, et al. Surveillance of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers with magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound, mammography, and clinical breast examination. JAMA 2004; 292: 1317–25
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmutzler RK, Rhiem K, Breuer P, Wardelmann E, Lehnert M, Coburger S, et al. Outcome of structured surveillance programme in women with a familial predisposition for breast cancer. Eur J Cancer Prev 2006; 15: 483–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhl CK, Schmutzler RK, Leutner CC, Kempe A, Wardelmann E, Hocke A, et al. Breast MR imaging screening in 192 women proved or suspected to be carriers of a breast cancer susceptibility gene: preliminary results. Radiology 2000; 215: 267–79
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee JM, Kopans DB, McMahon PM, Halpern EF, Ryan PD, Weinstein MC, et al. Breast cancer screening in BRCA1 mutation carriers: effectiveness of MR-imaging-Markov Monte Carlo decision analysis. Radiology 2008; 246: 763–71
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koomen M, Pisano D, Kuzmiak C, Pavic D, McLelland R. Future directions in breast imaging. J Clin Oncol 2005; 23: 1674–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith JA, Andreopoulou E. An overview of the status of imaging screening technology for breast cancer. Ann Oncol 2004; 15: 118–26
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar