A hierarchical step-model for causation of bias-evaluating cancer treatment with epidemiological methods

References

• Sackett DL. Bias in analytic research. J Chron Dis 1979; 32: 51–63
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Norell S. A workbook of epidemiology. Oxford University Press, Oxford 1995
   Google Scholar
• Rothman KJ, Greenland S. Modern Epidemiology2nd ed. Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia 1998
   Google Scholar
• Steineck G, Kass P, Ahlbom A. A comprehensive clinical epidemiological theory based on the concept of the source person-time and four distinct study stages. Acta Oncol 1998; 37: 15–23
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maclure M, Schneeweiss S. Causation of bias: The episcope. Epidemiology 2001; 12: 114–22
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miettinen OS. Design options in epidemiologic research: An update. Scand J Work Environ Health 1982; 8: 159–68
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miettinen OS. Theoretical epidemiology: Principles of occurrence research in medicine. John Wiley and Sons, New York 1985
   Google Scholar
• Hernán MA, Hernandez-Diaz S, Robins JM. A structural approach to selection bias. Epidemiology 2004; 15: 615–25
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adami HO. What can epidemiological methods mean to surgical research?. Ups J Med Sci 1988; 93: 155–60
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rothman KJ. Epidemiology in clinical settings. Epidemiology: An introduction, KJ Rothman. Oxford University Press, New York 2002; 211
   Google Scholar
• Rothman KJ. Measuring disease occurrence and causal effects. Epidemiology: An introduction, KJ Rothman. Oxford University Press, New York 2002; 45–6
   Google Scholar
• Hernán MA. A definition of causal effect for epidemiological research. J Epidemiol Community Health 2004; 58: 265–71
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steineck G, Adolfsson J. Bias due to observation of different parts of a hazard curve over time. Urology 1996; 448: 105–9
   Google Scholar
• Datta M. You cannot exclude the explanation you have not considered. Lancet 1993; 342: 345–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miettinen OS. Efficacy of therapeutic practice: Will epidemiology provide the answers?. Drug therapeutics – concepts for physicians, KL Melmon. Elsevier-North Holland, New York 1980; 201–8
   Google Scholar
• Norell S. A short course in epidemiology. Raven Press, New York 1992
   Google Scholar
• Hernán MA. Causal knowledge as a prerequisite for confounding evaluation: An application to birth defects epidemiology. Am J Epidemiol 2002; 155: 176–84
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmberg L, Steineck G. Indications for treatment can introduce bias in observational studies of surgical treatment. Eur J Surg Oncol 1993; 19: 223–5
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hutchinson GB, Shaprio S. Lead time gained by diagnostic screening for breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 1968; 41: 665–81
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Feinleib M, Zelen M. Some pitfalls in the evaluation of screening programs. Arch Environ Health 1969; 19: 412–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leon DA. Failed or misleading adjustment for confounding. Lancet 1993; 342: 479–81
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feinstein AR. Epidemiologic analyses of causation: The unlearned scientific lessons of randomized trials. J Clin Epidemiol 1989; 42: 481–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gleser LJ, Olkin I. Models for estimating the number of unpublished studies. Stat Med 1996; 15: 2493–507
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mertens TE. Estimating the effects of misclassification. Lancet 1993; 342: 418–21
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steineck G, Whitmore WF, Jr, Adolfsson J. “Local recurrence” and “disease-free survival”; doubtful parameters when comparing non-randomized studies of prostate cancer. Scand J Urol Nephrol 1991; 138: 121–6
   Google Scholar
• Greenland S. Summarization, smoothing, and inference in epidemiologic analyses. Scand J Soc Med 1993; 21: 227–32
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Greenland S. Modeling and variable selection in epidemiologic analyses. Am J Public Health 1989; 79: 340–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenland S. Concepts of validity in epidemiological research. Oxford Textbook of Public Health Volume 2, Methods of Public Health2nd ed, WW Holland, R Detels, G Knox. Oxford University Press, New York 1991; 253–70
   Google Scholar