Participation behaviour following a false positive test in the Copenhagen mammography screening programme

References

• Olsen AH, Njor SH, Vejborg I, Scwartz W, Dalgaard P, Jensen M-B, et al. Breast cancer mortality in Copenhagen after introduction of mammography screening: Cohort study. BMJ 2005; 330: 220–4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brett J, Bankhead C, Henderson B, Watson E, Austoker J. The psychological impact of mammographic screening. A systematic review. Psychooncology 2005; 14: 917–38
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lampic C, Thurfjell E, Sjödén P-O. The influence of a false-positive mammogram on a woman's subsequent bahaviour for detecting breast cancer. Eur J Cancer 2003; 39: 1730–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olsson P, Armelius K, Nordahl G, Lenner P, Westman G. Women with false positive screening mammograms: How do they cope?. J Med Screen 1999; 6: 89–93
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cockburn J, Staples M, Hurley SF, De Luise T. Psychological consequences of screening mammography. J Med Screen 1994; 1: 7–12
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Aro AR, Absetz SP, van Elderen TM, van der Ploeg E, van der Kamp LJT. False-positive findings in mammography screening induces short-term distress – breast cancer-specific concern prevails longer. Eur J Cancer 2000; 36: 1089–97
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brewer NT, Salz T, Lillie SE. Systematic review: The long-term effects of false-positive mammograms. Ann Intern Med 2007; 146: 502–10
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Njor SH, Olsen AH, Scwartz W, Vejborg I, Lynge E. Predicting the risk of a false-positive test for women following a mammography screening programme. J Med Screen 2007; 14: 94–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vejborg I, Olsen AH, Jensen M-B, Rank F, Tange UB, Lynge E. Early outcome of mammography screening in Copenhagen 1991–99. J Med Screen 2002; 9: 115–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burman ML, Taplin SH, Douglas FH, Elmore JG. Effect of false-positive mammograms on interval breast cancer screening in a health maintenance organization. Ann Intern Med 1999; 131: 1–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipkus IM, Halabi S, Strigo TS, Rimer BK. The impact of abnormal mammograms on psychosocial outcomes and subsequent screening. Psychooncology 2000; 9: 402–10
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinckney RG, Geller BM, Burman M, Littenberg B. Effect of false-positive mammograms on return for subsequent screening mammography. Am J Med 2003; 114: 1230–5
   Google Scholar
• Lerman C, Trock B, Rimer BK, Boyce A, Jepson C, Engstrom PF. Psychological and behavioral implications of abnormal mammograms. Ann Intern Med 1991; 15: 657–61
   Google Scholar
• McCann J, Stockton D, Godward S. Impact of false-positive mammography on subsequent screening attendance and risk of cancer. Breast Cancer Res 2002; 4: R11
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Sullivan I, Sutton S, Dixon S, Perry N. False positive results do not have a negative effect on reattendance for subsequent breast screening. J Med Screen 2001; 8: 145–8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pisano ED, Earp JA, Gallant TL. Screening mammography behavior after a false positive mammogram. Cancer Detect Prev 1998; 22: 161–7
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hofvind SS, Wang H, Thoresen S. The Norwegian Breast Cancer Screening Program: Re-attendance related to the women's experiences, intentions and previous screening result. Cancer Causes Control 2003; 14: 391–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brett J, Austoker J. Women who are recalled for further investigation for breast screening: Psychological consequences 3 years after recall and factors affecting re-attendance. J Public Health Med 2001; 23: 292–300
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chiarelli AM, Morovan V, Halapy E, Majpruz V, Mai V, Tatla RK. False-positive result and reattendance in the Ontario Breast Screening Program. J Med Screen 2003; 10: 129–33
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kerlikowske K, Grady D, Barclay J, Sickles EA, Ernster V. Likelihood ratios for modern screening mammography. Risk of breast cancer based on age and mammographic interpretation. JAMA 1996; 276: 39–43
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission. European guidelines for quality assurance in breast cancer screening and diagnosis. 4th ed. European Communities; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Scaf-Klomp W, Sanderman R, van de Wiel HB, Otter R, van den Heuvel WJ. Distressed or relieved? Psychological side effects of breast cancer screening in The Netherlands. J Epidemiol Community Health 1997; 51: 705–10
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brodersen J, Thorsen H, Cockburn J. The adequacy of measurement of short and long-term consequences of false-positive screening mammography. J Med Screen 2004; 11: 39–44
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Euler-Chelpin M. Regelmæssig selvundersøgelse eller klinisk undersøgelse for tidlig opsporing af brystkræft. Ugeskr Læger 2005; 167: 1274–8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Christensen LB, Rank FE, Blichert-Toft M, Christiansen T, Jørgensen T, Dunn S, et al. Mammografiscreening i Københavns Kommune 1991–1997. Ugeskr Læger 2002; 164: 191–4
   PubMedGoogle Scholar