Preparedness for side effects and bother in symptomatic men after radical prostatectomy in a prospective, non-randomized trial, LAPPRO

References

• Shakespeare W. Henry V. New York: E.P. Dutton & Company; 1935.
   Google Scholar
• Thorsteinsdottir T, Stranne J, Carlsson S, et al. LAPPRO: a prospective multicentre comparative study of robot-assisted laparoscopic and retropubic radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. Scand J Urol Nephrol 2011;45:102–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Persson J, Wilderang U, Jiborn T, et al. Interobserver variability in the pathological assessment of radical prostatectomy specimens: findings of the laparoscopic prostatectomy robot open (LAPPRO) study. Scand J Urol 2014;48:160–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haglind E, Carlsson S, Stranne J, et al. Urinary incontinence and erectile dysfunction after robotic versus open radical prostatectomy: a prospective, controlled, nonrandomised trial. Eur Urol 2015;68:216–25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steineck G, Bjartell A, Hugosson J, et al. Degree of preservation of the neurovascular bundles during radical prostatectomy and urinary continence 1 year after surgery. Eur Urol 2015;67:559–68.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steineck G, Helgesen F, Adolfsson J, et al. Quality of life after radical prostatectomy or watchful waiting. N Engl J Med 2002;347:790–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreicbergs U, Valdimarsdottir U, Onelov E, et al. Talking about death with children who have severe malignant disease. N Engl J Med 2004;351:1175–86.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunberger G, Lind H, Steineck G, et al. Fecal incontinence affecting quality of life and social functioning among long-term gynecological cancer survivors. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2010;20:449–60.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steineck G, Hunt H, Adolfsson J. A hierarchical step-model for causation of bias-evaluating cancer treatment with epidemiological methods. Acta Oncol 2006;45:421–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steineck G, Bergmark K, Henningsohn L, et al. Symptom documentation in cancer survivors as a basis for therapy modifications. Acta Oncol 2002;41:244–52.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sunny L, Hopfgarten T, Adolfsson J, et al. Economic conditions and marriage quality of men with prostate cancer. BJU Int 2007;99:1391–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brooks R. EuroQol: the current state of play. Health Policy 1996;37:53–72.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosen RC, Riley A, Wagner G, et al. The international index of erectile function (IIEF): a multidimensional scale for assessment of erectile dysfunction. Urology 1997;49:822–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood AM, White IR, Royston P. How should variable selection be performed with multiply imputed data? Stat Med 2008;27:3227–46.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manne SL, Topham N, Kirstein L, et al. Attitudes and decisional conflict regarding breast reconstruction among breast cancer patients. Cancer Nurs 2016. [Epub ahead of print]. doi: 10.1097/NCC.0000000000000320.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox J, Cormack C, Prendergast M, et al. Patient and provider experience with a new model of care for primary hip and knee arthroplasties. Int J Orthop Trauma Nurs 2016;20:13–27.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lepore SJ, Helgeson VS, Eton DT, et al. Improving quality of life in men with prostate cancer: a randomized controlled trial of group education interventions. Health Psychol 2003;22:443–52.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell LC, Keefe FJ, Scipio C, et al. Facilitating research participation and improving quality of life for African American prostate cancer survivors and their intimate partners. A pilot study of telephone-based coping skills training. Cancer 2007;109:414–24.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giesler RB, Given B, Given CW, et al. Improving the quality of life of patients with prostate carcinoma: a randomized trial testing the efficacy of a nurse-driven intervention. Cancer 2005;104: 752–62.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canada AL, Neese LE, Sui D, et al. Pilot intervention to enhance sexual rehabilitation for couples after treatment for localized prostate carcinoma. Cancer 2005;104:2689–700.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schover LR, Canada AL, Yuan Y, et al. A randomized trial of internet-based versus traditional sexual counseling for couples after localized prostate cancer treatment. Cancer 2012;118: 500–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber BA, Roberts BL, Resnick M, et al. The effect of dyadic intervention on self-efficacy, social support, and depression for men with prostate cancer. Psychooncology 2004;13:47–60.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mishel MH, Belyea M, Germino BB, et al. Helping patients with localized prostate carcinoma manage uncertainty and treatment side effects: nurse-delivered psychoeducational intervention over the telephone. Cancer 2002;94:1854–66.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson EA. Preoperative preparation for cardiac surgery facilitates recovery, reduces psychological distress, and reduces the incidence of acute postoperative hypertension. J Consult Clin Psychol 1987;55:513–20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galbraith ME, Arechiga A, Ramirez J, et al. Prostate cancer survivors' and partners' self-reports of health-related quality of life, treatment symptoms, and marital satisfaction 2.5-5.5 years after treatment. Oncol Nurs Forum 2005;32:E30–41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenkins V, Fallowfield L, Saul J. Information needs of patients with cancer: results from a large study in UK cancer centres. Br J Cancer 2001;84:48–51.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cassileth BR, Zupkis RV, Sutton-Smith K, et al. Information and participation preferences among cancer patients. Ann Intern Med 1980;92:832–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar