Biologically guided automated treatment planning and evaluation: potential for treatment adaptation in head and neck cancer

References

• Hawkins PG, Kadam AS, Jackson WC, et al. Organ-sparing in radiotherapy for head-and-neck cancer: improving quality of life. Semin Radiat Oncol. 2018;28(1):46–52. doi: 10.1016/j.semradonc.2017.08.002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holt A, Van Gestel D, Arends MP, et al. Multi-institutional comparison of volumetric modulated arc therapy vs. intensity-modulated radiation therapy for head-and-neck cancer: a planning study. Radiat Oncol. 2013;8:26. doi: 10.1186/1748-717X-8-26.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choudhury A, Budgell G, MacKay R, et al. The future of image-guided radiotherapy. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2017;29(10):662–666. doi: 10.1016/j.clon.2017.04.036.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelms BE, Robinson G, Markham J, et al. Variation in external beam treatment plan quality: an inter-institutional study of planners and planning systems. Pract Radiat Oncol. 2012;2(4):296–305. doi: 10.1016/j.prro.2011.11.012.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cilla S, Deodato F, Romano C, et al. Personalized automation of treatment planning in head-neck cancer: a step forward for quality in radiation therapy? Phys Med. 2021;82:7–16. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2020.12.015.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hazell I, Bzdusek K, Kumar P, et al. Automatic planning of head and neck treatment plans. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2016;17(1):272–282. doi: 10.1120/jacmp.v17i1.5901.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hussein M, Heijmen BJ, Verellen D, et al. Automation in intensity modulated radiotherapy treatment planning—a review of recent innovations. Br J Radiol. 2018;91(1092):20180270. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20180270.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Overgaard J, Aznar MC, Bacchus C, et al. Personalised radiation therapy taking both the tumour and patient into consideration. Radiother Oncol. 2022;166:A1–A5. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2022.01.010.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonomo P, Merlotti A, Olmetto E, et al. What is the prognostic impact of FDG PET in locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma treated with concomitant chemo-radiotherapy? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2018;45(12):2122–2138. doi: 10.1007/s00259-018-4065-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mankoff DA, Pantel AR, Viswanath V, et al. Advances in PET diagnostics for guiding targeted cancer therapy and studying in vivo cancer biology. Curr Pathobiol Rep. 2019;7(3):97–108. doi: 10.1007/s40139-019-00202-9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lilburn DM, Groves AM. The role of PET in imaging of the tumour microenvironment and response to immunotherapy. Clin Radiol. 2021;76(10):784.e1–784.e15. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2021.08.004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lazzeroni M, Ureba A, Wiedenmann N, et al. Evolution of the hypoxic compartment on sequential oxygen partial pressure maps during radiochemotherapy in advanced head and neck cancer. Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2021;17:100–105. doi: 10.1016/j.phro.2021.01.011.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Toma-Dasu I, Uhrdin J, Antonovic L, et al. Dose prescription and treatment planning based on FMISO-PET hypoxia. Acta Oncol. 2012;51(2):222–230. doi: 10.3109/0284186X.2011.599815.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toma-Daşu I, Daşu A, Brahme A. Dose prescription and optimisation based on tumour hypoxia. Acta Oncol. 2009;48(8):1181–1192. doi: 10.3109/02841860903188643.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou SM, Wong TZ, Marks LB. Using FDG‐PET activity as a surrogate for tumor cell density and its effect on equivalent uniform dose calculation. Med Phys. 2004;31(9):2577–2583. doi: 10.1118/1.1779372.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lomax A, Scheib SG. Quantifying the degree of conformity in radiosurgery treatment planning. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2003;55(5):1409–1419. doi: 10.1016/s0360-3016(02)04599-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu Q, Mohan R, Morris M, et al. Simultaneous integrated boost intensity-modulated radiotherapy for locally advanced head-and-neck squamous cell carcinomas. I: dosimetric results. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2003;56(2):573–585. doi: 10.1016/s0360-3016(02)04617-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kjellsson-Lindblom E, Ureba A, Dasu A, et al. Impact of SBRT fractionation in hypoxia dose painting—accounting for heterogeneous and dynamic tumor oxygenation. Med Phys. 2019;46(5):2512–2521. doi: 10.1002/mp.13514.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMahon SJ. The linear quadratic model: usage, interpretation and challenges. Phys Med Biol. 2018;64(1):01TR01. doi: 10.1088/1361-6560/aaf26a.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart RD, Li XA. BGRT: biologically guided radiation therapy—the future is fast approaching! Med Phys. 2007;34(10):3739–3751. doi: 10.1118/1.2779861.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glide-Hurst CK, Lee P, Yock AD, et al. Adaptive radiation therapy (ART) strategies and technical considerations: a state of the ART review from NRG oncology. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2021;109(4):1054–1075. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.10.021.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matuszak MM, Kashani R, Green M, et al. Functional adaptation in radiation therapy. Semin Radiat Oncol. 2019;29(3):236–244. doi: 10.1016/j.semradonc.2019.02.006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar