Age period cohort analysis: a review of what we should and shouldn’t do

References

• Bell A. 2014. Life course and cohort trajectories of mental health in the UK, 1991–2008: a multilevel age-period-cohort analysis. Soc Sci Med 120:21–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell A, Jones K. 2014a. Another ‘futile quest’? A simulation study of Yang and Land’s Hierarchical Age-Period-Cohort model. Dem Res 30:333–360.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell A, Jones K. 2014b. Current practice in the modelling of age, period and cohort effects with panel data: a commentary on Tawfik et al (2012), Clarke et al (2009), and McCulloch (2012). Qual Quant 48(4):2089–2095.
   Google Scholar
• Bell A, Jones K. 2014c. Don’t birth cohorts matter? A commentary and simulation exercise on Reither, Hauser and Yang’s (2009) age-period-cohort study of obesity. Soc Sci Med 101:176–180.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell A, Jones K. 2018. The hierarchical age–period–cohort model: why does it find the results that it finds? Qual Quant 52(2):783–799.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bell A, Jones K. 2020. Multilevel models for age-period-cohort analysis. In: Bell A, editor. Age, period and cohort effects: the identification problem, and what to do about it. London Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Carstensen B. 2007. Age–period–cohort models for the Lexis diagram. Statist Med 26(15):3018–3045.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chauvel L, Leist AK, Ponomarenko V. 2016. Testing persistence of cohort effects in the epidemiology of suicide: an age-period-cohort hysteresis model. Plos One 11(7):e0158538–20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chauvel L, Leist AK, Smith HL. 2020. Detecting the ‘Black Hole’ of age-period excess mortality in 25 countries: age-period-cohort residual analysis. In: Bell A, editor. Age, period and cohort effects: the identification problem, and what to do about it. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Clayton D, Schifflers E. 1987. Models for temporal variation in cancer rates. II: age–period–cohort models. Statist Med 6(4):469–481.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delaruelle K, Buffel V, Bracke P. 2015. Educational expansion and the education gradient in health: a hierarchical age-period-cohort analysis. Soc Sci Med 145:79–88.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dimock M. 2019. Where millennials end and generation Z begins | Pew Research Center. [accessed 2019 Aug 19]. https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2019/01/17/where-millennials-end-and-generation-z-begins/.
   Google Scholar
• Fienberg SE. 2013. Cohort analysis’ unholy quest: a discussion. Demography 50(6):1981–1984.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Firebaugh G. 1989. Methods for estimating cohort replacement effects. Sociol Methodol 19:243–262.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Firebaugh G. 1990. Replacement effects, cohort and otherwise: response to Rodgers. Sociol Methodol 20:439–446.
   Google Scholar
• Firebaugh G. 2008. Seven rules for social research. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fosse E, Winship C. 2019a. Analyzing age-period-cohort data: a review and critique. Annu Rev Sociol 45(1):467–492.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fosse E, Winship C. 2019b. Bounding analyses of age-period-cohort models. Demography in press. [accessed 2018 Oct 31)]. https://q-aps.princeton.edu/sites/default/files/q-aps/files/apcanalysis.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Frost WH. 1940. The age selection of mortality from tuberculosis in successive decades. Milbank Mem Fund Q 18(1):61–66.
   Google Scholar
• Fu WJJ. 2018. A practical guide to age period cohort analysis. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Glenn ND. 1976. Cohort analysts’ futile quest: statistical attempts to separate age, period and cohort effects. Am Soc Rev 41(5):900–904.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glenn ND. 2005. Cohort analysis. 2nd ed. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Goldstein H. 1979. Age, period and cohort effects – a confounded confusion. Appl Stat 6(1):19–24.
   Google Scholar
• Hanson M, Gluckman P. 2016. Commentary: developing the future: life course epidemiology, DOHaD and evolutionary medicine. Int J Epidemiol 45(4):993–996.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holford TR. 1983. The estimation of age, period and cohort effects for vital rates. Biometrics 39(2):311–324.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holford TR. 1985. An alternative approach to statistical age-period-cohort analysis. J Chronic Dis 38(10):831–840.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Holford TR. 1991. Understanding the effects of age, period, and cohort on incidence and mortality rates. Annu Rev Public Health 12(1):425–457.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holford TR. 2006. Approaches to fitting age-period-cohort models with unequal intervals. Statist Med 25(6):977–993.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones PM, Minton J, Bell A. 2018. Period and cohort changes in mortality risk over the twentieth century in the UK: an exploratory analysis. OSF Preprints. [accessed 2020 Jan 2]. https://osf.io/4f7jr/.
   Google Scholar
• Keiding N. 2011. Age-period-cohort analysis in the 1870s: diagrams, stereograms, and the basic differential equation. Can J Statistics 39(3):405–420.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luo L. 2013. Assessing validity and application scope of the intrinsic estimator approach to the age-period-cohort problem. Demography 50(6):1945–1967.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luo L, Hodges JS. 2016. Block constraints in age-period-cohort models with unequal-width intervals. Soc Method Res 45(4):700–726.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luo L, Hodges JS. 2019. Constraints in random effects age-period-cohort models. arXiv. [accessed 2019 Aug 19]. http://arxiv.org/abs/1904.07672.
   Google Scholar
• Mannheim K. 1928. The problem of generations. In: Kecskemeti P (ed.) Karl mannheim: essays on the sociology of knowledge. London: Routledge; p. 276–322. [accessed 2019 Aug 21] http://marcuse.faculty.history.ucsb.edu/classes/201/articles/27MannheimGenerations.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Mason K O, Mason W M, Winsborough H. H, Poole W. K. 1973. Some methodological issues in cohort analysis of archival data. Am Sociol Rev 38(2):242–258.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mason WM, Smith HL. 1985. Age-period-cohort analysis and the study of deaths from pulmonary tuberculosis. In: Cohort analysis in social research. New York, NY: Springer New York; p. 151–227.
   Google Scholar
• Minton J. 2016. Visualising data in 3D: Handling complexity through visceral and tactile experiences of data. [accessed 2019 Aug 19]. https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2016/07/01/visualising-data-through-3d-sculptures/.
   Google Scholar
• O’Brien RM. 2011. Constrained estimators and age-period-cohort models. Sociol Method Res 40(3):419–452.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Brien RM. 2014. Estimable functions in age-period-cohort models: a unified approach. Qual Quant 48(1):457–474.
   Google Scholar
• O’Brien RM. 2015a. Age-period-cohort models: approaches and analyses with aggregate data. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• O’Brien RM. 2015b. Age–period–cohort models and the perpendicular solution. Epidemiol Method 4(1):87–99.
   Google Scholar
• O’Brien RM. 2016. Model misspecification when eliminating a factor in age-period-cohort multiple classification models. Sociol Methodol 46(1):358–372.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Brien RM. 2020. The line of solutions and understanding age-period-cohort models. In: Bell A, editor. Age, period and cohort effects: the identification problem, and what to do about it2. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Osmond C, Gardner MJ. 1989. Age, period, and cohort models: non-overlapping cohorts dont resolve the identification problem. Am J Epidemiol 129(1):31–35.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pelzer B, Te Grotenhuis M, Eisinga R, Schmidt-Catran AW. 2015. The non-uniqueness property of the intrinsic estimator in APC models. Demography 52(1):315–327.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robertson C, Boyle P. 1986. Age, period and cohort models: the use of individual records. Statist Med 5(5):527–538.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robertson C, Boyle P. 1998. Age-period-cohort analysis of chronic disease rates. I: modelling approach. Statist Med 17(12):1305–1323.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robertson C, Gandini S, Boyle P. 1999. Age-period-cohort models: a comparative study of available methodologies. J Clin Epidemiol 52(6):569–583.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodgers WL. 1982. Estimable functions of age, period, and cohort effects. Am Sociol Rev 47(6):774–787.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodgers WL. 1990. Interpreting the components of time trends. Sociol Methodol 20(1990):421–438.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rosenberg PS, Check DP, Anderson WF. 2014. A web tool for age-period-cohort analysis of cancer incidence and mortality rates. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 23(11):2296–2302.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryder NB. 1965. The cohort as a concept in the study of social-change. Am Sociol Rev 30(6):843–861.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith HL. 2020. Age-period-cohort analysis: what is it good for? In: Bell A, editor. Age, period and cohort effects: the identification problem, and what to do about it. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Te Grotenhuis M, Pelzer B, Luo L, Schmidt-Catran AW. 2016. The intrinsic estimator, alternative estimates, and predictions of mortality trends: a comment on masters, hummer, powers, Beck, Lin, and Finch. Demography 53(4):1245–1252.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thijs P, Te Grotenhuis M, Scheepers P. 2020. The Pros and Cons of Constraining Variables. In: Bell A, editor. Age, period and cohort effects: the identification problem, and what to do about it. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Tu YK, Smith GD, Gilthorpe MS. 2011. A new approach to age-period-cohort analysis using partial least squares regression: the trend in blood pressure in the Glasgow alumni cohort. Plos One 6(4):e19401.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winship C, Harding DJ. 2008. A mechanism-based approach to the identification of age-period-cohort models. Sociol Method Res 36(3):362–401.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang Y, Land KC. 2006. A mixed models approach to the age-period-cohort analysis of repeated cross-section surveys, with an application to data on trends in verbal test scores. Sociol Methodol 36(1):75–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang Y, Land KC. 2013. Age-period-cohort analysis: new models, methods, and empirical applications. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yang Y, Fu WJJ, Land KC. 2004. A methodological comparison of age-period-cohort models: the intrinsic estimator and conventional generalized linear models. Sociol Methodol 34(1):75–110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang Y, Schulhofer-Wohl S, Fu WJ, Land KC. 2008. The intrinsic estimator for age-period-cohort analysis: what it is and how to use it. Am J Sociol 113(6):1697–1736.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar