Time for university educators to embrace student videography

References

• Allocca, K. (2018). Videocracy: How YouTube is changing the world… with double rainbows, singing foxes, and other trends we can’t stop watching. New York, NY: Bloomsbury USA.
   Google Scholar
• Attride-Stirling, J. (2001). Thematic networks: An analytic tool for qualitative research. Qualitative Research, 1(3), 385–405.
   Google Scholar
• Baepler, P., & Reynolds, T. (2014). The digital manifesto: Engaging student writers with digital video assignments. Computers and Composition, 34, 122–136.
   Google Scholar
• Baram-Tsabari, A., & Lewenstein, B. V. (2017). Science communication training: What are we trying to teach? International Journal of Science Education, Part B, 7, 285–300.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barber, W., King, S., & Buchanan, S. (2015). Problem based learning and authentic assessment in digital pedagogy: Embracing the role of collaborative communities. Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 13(2), 59–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barry, S. (2012). A video recording and viewing protocol for student group presentations: Assisting self-assessment through a Wiki environment. Computers & Education, 59(3), 855–860.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barwell, G., Moore, C., & Walker, R. (2011). Marking machinima: A case study in assessing student use of a Web 2.0 technology. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 27(5), 765–780.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bearman, M., Palermo, C., Allen, L. M., & Williams, B. (2015). Learning empathy through simulation: A systematic literature review. Simulation in Healthcare, 10(5), 308–319.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bondebjerg, I. (2014). Documentary and cognitive theory: Narrative, emotion and memory. Media and Communication, 2(1), 13.
   Google Scholar
• Bondebjerg, I. (2017). The creative mind: Cognition, society and culture. Palgrave Communications, 3(1), 19.
   Google Scholar
• Branigan, E. (1984). Point of view in the cinema: A theory of narration and subjectivity in classical film. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Bruce, D. L., & Chiu, M. M. (2015). Composing with new technology: Teacher reflections on learning digital video. Journal of Teacher Education, 66(3), 272–287.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chatterjee, A., & Vartanian, O. (2016). Neuroscience of aesthetics. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1369(1), 172–194.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chatti, M. A., Marinov, M., Sabov, O., Laksono, R., Sofyan, Z., Yousef, A. M. F., & Schroeder, U. (2016). Video annotation and analytics in CourseMapper. Smart Learning Environments, 3(1), 1–21.
   Google Scholar
• Coldwell-Neilson, J. (2017). Digital literacy–A driver for curriculum transformation. HERDA 2017: Research and development in higher education: Curriculum transformation. In Proceedings of the 40th HERDSA annual international conference. Hammondville, NSW: Higher Education Research and Development Society.
   Google Scholar
• Costa, P., de Carvalho-Filho, M. A., Schweller, M., Thiemann, P., Salgueira, A., Benson, J., … Quince, T. (2017). Measuring medical students’ empathy: Exploring the underlying constructs of and associations between two widely used self-report instruments in five countries. Academic Medicine, 92(6), 860–867.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crook, C., & Schofield, L. (2017). The video lecture. The Internet and Higher Education, 34, 56–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daniels, H. (2016). Vygotsky and pedagogy. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• De Vecchi, N., Kenny, A., Dickson-Swift, V., & Kidd, S. (2017). Exploring the process of digital storytelling in mental health research: A process evaluation of consumer and clinician experiences. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1), 1609406917729291.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dezuanni, M. (2015). The building blocks of digital media literacy: Socio-material participation and the production of media knowledge. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 47(3), 416–439.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dimitrova, V., Mitrovic, A., Piotrkowicz, A., Lau, L., & Weerasinghe, A. (2017). Using learning analytics to devise interactive personalised nudges for active video watching. In Proceedings of the 25th conference on user modeling, adaptation and personalization, 9–12 July 2017, Bratislava. New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Edmondson, A. (2012). Teaming: How organizations learn, innovate, and compete in the knowledge economy. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, R. A., Han, F., & Pardo, A. (2018). When does collaboration lead to deeper learning? Renewed definitions of collaboration for engineering students. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 1. DOI: 10.1109/TLT.2018.2836942
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erochko, J. (2015). Using micro-video projects in large engineering classes to differentiate assessment. In Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA) Conference, McMaster University, May 31–June 3, 2015. DOI: 10.24908/pceea.v0i0.5742.
   Google Scholar
• Eugeni, R. (2011). A semiotic theory of media experience. Amsterdam School for Cultural Analysis (ACSA), International Workshop ‘Practicing Theory’, University of Amsterdam.
   Google Scholar
• Gallese, V., & Guerra, M. (2012). Embodying movies: Embodied simulation and film studies. Cinema: Journal of Philosophy and the Moving Image, 3, 183–210.
   Google Scholar
• Gašević, D., Mirriahi, N., & Dawson, S. (2014). Analytics of the effects of video use and instruction to support reflective learning. In Proceedings of the fourth international conference on learning analytics and knowledge, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA, March 24–28, 2014. New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Graybill, J. K. (2015). Teaching energy geographies via videography. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 40, 55–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gubrium, A. C., Hill, A. L., & Flicker, S. (2014). A situated practice of ethics for participatory visual and digital methods in public health research and practice: A focus on digital storytelling. American Journal of Public Health, 104(9), 1606–1614.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo, P. J., Kim, J., & Rubin, R. (2014). How video production affects student engagement: An empirical study of mooc videos. In Proceedings of the first ACM conference on Learning @ scale conference, Atlanta, Georgia, USA, March 4–5, 2014. New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, L. W., & Zierler, B. K. (2015). Interprofessional Education and Practice Guide No. 1: Developing faculty to effectively facilitate interprofessional education. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 29(1), 3–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hecking, T., Dimitrova, V., Mitrovic, A., & Ulrich Hoppe, U. (2017). Using Network-Text Analysis to Characterise learner engagement in active video watching. In ICCE 2017 Main Conference Proceedings, Christchurch, New Zealand, December 4–8, 2017. Asia-Pacific Society for Computers in Education.  Available at http://www.apsce.net/icce/icce2017/140.115.135.84/icce/icce2017/proceedings_main.html.
   Google Scholar
• Hundey, E. J., Olker, J. H., Carreira, C., Daigle, R. M., Elgin, A. K., Finiguerra, M., … Roxanna Razavi, N. (2016). A shifting tide: Recommendations for incorporating science communication into graduate training. Limnology and Oceanography Bulletin, 25(4), 109–116.
   Google Scholar
• Illingworth, S., & Prokop, A. (2017). Science communication in the field of fundamental biomedical research. Seminars in Cell & Developmental Biology, 70, 1–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, C. (2018). After effects for designers: Graphic and interactive design in motion. New York/Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jess, M., Atencio, M., & Carse, N. (2012). Introducing conditions of complexity in the context of Scottish PE. In A. Ovens, T. Hopper, & J. Butler (Eds.), Complexity thinking in physical education: Reframing curriculum, pedagogy and research (pp. 27–41). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jorm, C., Nisbet, G., Roberts, C., Gordon, C., Gentilcore, S., & Chen, T. F. (2016). Using complexity theory to develop a student-directed interprofessional learning activity for 1220 healthcare students. BMC Medical Education, 16(1), 1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juhlin, O., Zoric, G., Engström, A., & Reponen, E. (2014). Video interaction: A research agenda. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 18(3), 685–692.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaufman, P., Lambert, C. I., Donovan, L. A., & Kaufman, K. (2017). The creation of videos by marketing students: An exploration of attitudes and motivations in a capstone course. creating marketing magic and innovative future marketing trends (pp. 1265–1273). Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Kearney, M. (2013). Learner-generated digital video: Using ideas videos in teacher education. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 21(3), 321–336.
   Google Scholar
• Kleftodimos, A., & Evangelidis, G. (2016). Using open source technologies and open internet resources for building an interactive video based learning environment that supports learning analytics. Smart Learning Environments, 3(1), 1–23.
   Google Scholar
• Krull, H. (2013). Video project brings new life to community engagement. The Journal of Nursing Education, 52(8), 480.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, S. H., Hoffman, K. D., Chowdhury, S. A., & Sergueeva, K. (2017). Creating a video documentary as a tool for reflection and assessment: Capturing guerilla marketing in action. Marketing Education Review, 28, 126–130.
   Google Scholar
• Leu, D. J., Kinzer, C. K., Coiro, J., Castek, J., & Henry, L. A. (2017). New literacies: A dual-level theory of the changing nature of literacy, instruction, and assessment. Journal of Education, 197(2), 1–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lombardi, M. M. (2007). Authentic learning for the 21st century: An overview. Educause Learning Initiative, 1(2007), 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Low, M., & LaScala, S. (2015). Medical memoir: A tool to teach empathy to nursing students. Nurse Education Today, 35(1), 1–3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mills, K. A. (2015). Literacy theories for the digital age: Social, critical, multimodal, spatial, material and sensory lenses. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Mirriahi, N., & Vigentini, L. (2017). Analytics of learner video use. In C. Lang, G. Siemens, A. Wise, & D. Gašević (eds.), Handbook of learning analytics (Chapter 22).
   Google Scholar
• Mitrovic, A., & Mathews, M. (2017). Using active video watching to teach presentation skills. Christchurch: Aotearoa National Centre for Tertiary Teaching Excellence.
   Google Scholar
• Moran, M. B., Frank, L. B., Chatterjee, J. S., Murphy, S. T., & Baezconde-Garbanati, L. (2016). A pilot test of the acceptability and efficacy of narrative and non-narrative health education materials in a low health literacy population. Journal of Communication in Healthcare, 9(1), 40–48.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Murray, M. C., & Pérez, J. (2014). Unraveling the digital literacy paradox: How higher education fails at the fourth literacy. Issues in Informing Science and Information Technology, 11, 85–100.
   Google Scholar
• Nicol, D. (2014). Guiding principles for peer review: Unlocking learners evaluative skills. In C. Kreber, C. Anderson, N. Entwistle, & J. McArthur (Eds.), Advances and innovations in university assessment and feedback (197–224). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nikolic, S., Stirling, D., & Ros, M. (2018). Formative assessment to develop oral communication competency using YouTube: Self-and peer assessment in engineering. European Journal of Engineering Education, 43(4), 538–551.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nisbet, G., Dunn, S., & Lincoln, M. (2015). Interprofessional team meetings: Opportunities for informal interprofessional learning. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 29(5), 426–432.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nisbet, G., Jorm, C., Roberts, C., Gordon, C. J., & Chen, T. F. (2017). Content validation of an interprofessional learning video peer assessment tool. BMC Medical Education, 17(1), 258.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliver, B., & Jorre de St Jorre, T. (2018). Graduate attributes for 2020 and beyond: Recommendations for Australian higher education providers. Higher Education Research & Development, 37(4), 821–836.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Omar, H., Khan, S. A., & Toh, C. G. (2013). Structured student-generated videos for first-year students at a dental school in Malaysia. Journal of Dental Education, 77(5), 640–647.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oparaocha, G., Pokidko, D., Adagbon, R., & Sutinen, E. (2014). Videography in the 21st century higher education: Insights and propositions from the entrepreneurship discipline. Creative Education, 5(13), 1213–1223.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Orús, C., Barlés, M. J., Belanche, D., Casaló, L., Fraj, E., & Gurrea, R. (2016). The effects of learner-generated videos for YouTube on learning outcomes and satisfaction. Computers & Education, 95, 254–269.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostashewski, N., Dickinson-Delaporte, S., & Martin, R. (2014). Reconceptualizing learning designs in higher education: Using mobile devices to engage. In J. Keengwe, & M. B. Maxfield (Eds.), Advancing higher education with mobile learning technologies: Cases, trends, and inquiry-based methods (pp. 220–237). Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference.
   Google Scholar
• Ostashewski, N., Dickinson-Delaporte, S., & Martin, R. (2017). Reconceptualizing learning designs in higher education. In Student engagement and participation: Concepts, methodologies, tools, and applications (pp. 319–337). Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference.
   Google Scholar
• Pangrazio, L. (2016). Reconceptualising critical digital literacy. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 37(2), 163–174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel, S., & Prokop, A. (2017). The Manchester Fly Facility: Implementing an objective-driven long-term science communication initiative. Seminars in Cell & Developmental Biology, 70, 38–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pereira, J., Echeazarra, L., Sanz-Santamaría, S., & Gutiérrez, J. (2014). Student-generated online videos to develop cross-curricular and curricular competencies in Nursing Studies. Computers in Human Behavior, 31, 580–590.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perrotta, C, Bailey, C, & Garside, C. (2018). Culture, technology and local networks: towards a sociology of ‘making’ in education. Cambridge Journal of Education, 48(5), 553–569.
   Google Scholar
• Petrucco, C. (2015). Digital storytelling as a reflective practice tool in a community of professionals. European Journal of Open, Distance and E-Learning, 18(2).
   Google Scholar
• Pierotti, F. (2016). Emotional screen: Color and moving images in digital media. In S. Tettegah, & S. Noble (Eds.), Emotions, technology, and design (pp. 3–18). London: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Quince, T., Thiemann, P., Benson, J., & Hyde, S. (2016). Undergraduate medical students’ empathy: Current perspectives. Advances in Medical Education and Practice, 7, 443.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ragupathi, K. (2015). Lights, camera, action!: Some tips on how to use videography as a learning tool, by Stephanie Lo-Philip. Technology in Pedagogy, 21, April 2015. Available at https://blog.nus.edu.sg/cdtkdr/2015/05/03/videography/.
   Google Scholar
• Ranker, J., & Mills, K. (2014). New directions for digital video creation in the classroom. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 57(6), 440–443.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rifkin, W., Longnecker, N., Leach, J., Davis, L., & Orthia, L. (2009). Motivate students by having them publish in new media: An invitation to science lecturers to share and test (pp. 105). Sydney: UniServe.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, G. D., Thistlethwaite, J. E., Anderson, E. S., Abrandt Dahlgren, M., Grymonpre, R. E., Moran, M., & Samarasekera, D. D. (2016). International consensus statement on the assessment of interprofessional learning outcomes. Medical Teacher, 39, 347–359.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seery, M. K., Agustian, H. Y., Doidge, E. D., Kucharski, M. M., O’Connor, H. M., & Price, A. (2017). Developing laboratory skills by incorporating peer-review and digital badges. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 18, 403–419.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shuldman, M., & Tajik, M. (2010). The role of media/video production in non‐media disciplines: The case of health promotion. Learning, Media and Technology, 35(3), 357–362.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sims, S., Hewitt, G., & Harris, R. (2015). Evidence of a shared purpose, critical reflection, innovation and leadership in interprofessional healthcare teams: A realist synthesis. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 29(3), 209–215.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, K. T. (2012). Equipping future marketers to meet the emerging demand for video communications. Business Education Innovation Journal, 4(2), 14–18.
   Google Scholar
• Tiernan, P. (2015). An inquiry into the current and future uses of digital video in university teaching. Education and Information Technologies, 20(1), 75–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tiernan, P., & Farren, M. (2017). Digital literacy and online video: Undergraduate students’ use of online video for coursework. Education and Information Technologies, 22, 3167–3185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Towns, M., Harwood, C. J., Robertshaw, M. B., Fish, J., & O’Shea, K. (2015). The digital pipetting badge: A method to improve student hands-on laboratory skills. Journal of Chemical Education, 92(12), 2038–2044.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trautrims, A., Defee, C., & Farris, T. (2016). Preparing business students for workplace reality–Using global virtual teams in logistics and SCM education. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 27(3), 886–907.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Meij, H. (2017). Reviews in instructional video. Computers & Education, 114, 164–174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veletsianos, G., & Shepherdson, P. (2016). A systematic analysis and synthesis of the empirical MOOC literature published in 2013–2015. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 17(2).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, T. J., & Huang, K. H. (2018). Pedagogy, philosophy, and the question of creativity. Teaching in Higher Education, 23(2), 261–273.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward, M. (2015). Art in noise: An embodied simulation account of cinematic sound design. In M. Coegnarts, & P. Kravanja (Eds.), Embodied cognition and cinema (pp. 155–186). Leuven: Leuven University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weilenmann, A., Säljö, R., & Engström, A. (2014). Mobile video literacy: Negotiating the use of a new visual technology. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 18(3), 737–752.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood-Charlson, E. M., Bender, S. J., Bruno, B. C., Diaz, J. M., Gradoville, M. R., Loury, E., & Viviani, D. A. (2015). Translating science into stories. Limnology and Oceanography Bulletin, 24(3), 73–76.
   Google Scholar
• Woolfitt, Z. (2015). The effective use of video in higher education. Lectoraat Teaching, Learning and Technology. Rotterdam: Inholland University of Applied Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Yousef, A. M. F., Chatti, M. A., Danoyan, N., Thüs, H., & Schroeder, U. (2015). Video-mapper: A video annotation tool to support collaborative learning in MOOCs. In Proceedings of the Third European MOOCs stakeholders summit EMOOCs, Mons (pp. 131–140).
   Google Scholar
• Yousef, A. M. F., Chatti, M. A., & Schroeder, U. (2014). The state of video-based learning: A review and future perspectives. International Journal on Advances in Life Sciences, 6(3/4), 122–135.
   Google Scholar
• Yuan, T., & Bakian-Aaker, L. (2015). Focus on technology: Classroom digital storytelling in grades K-2: Writers make a movie for the reader: Hani Morgan, Editor. Childhood Education, 91(5), 402–404.
   Google Scholar
• Zhu, M., Sari, A., & Lee, M. M. (2018). A systematic review of research methods and topics of the empirical MOOC literature (2014–2016). The Internet and Higher Education, 37, 31–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar