References
- Andrade-González, N., & Fernández-Liria, A. (2015a). Spanish adaptation of the revised Helping Alliance Questionnaire (HAq-II). Journal of Mental Health, 24(3), 155–161. https://doi.org/10.3109/09638237.2015.1036975
- Andrade-González, N., & Fernández-Liria, A. (2015b). Spanish adaptation of the Working Alliance Inventory (WAI). Psychometric properties of the patient and therapist forms (WAI-P and WAI-T). Anales de Psicología, 31(2), 524. https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.31.2.177961
- Anker, M. G., Duncan, B. L., & Sparks, J. A. (2009). Using client feedback to improve couple therapy outcomes: A randomized clinical trial in a naturalistic setting. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 77(4), 693–704. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016062
- Anker, M., Owen, J., Duncan, B., & Sparks, J. (2010). The alliance in couple therapy: Partner influence, early change, and alliance patterns in naturalistic sample. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 78(5), 635–645. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020051
- Ardito, R. B., & Rabellino, D. (2011). Therapeutic alliance and outcome of psychotherapy: Historical excursus, measurements, and prospects for research. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 270. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00270
- Bordin, E. S. (1979). The generalizability of the psychoanalytic concept of the working alliance. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research & Practice, 16(3), 252–260. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0085885
- Burns, D. D., & Nolen-Hoeksema, S. (1992). Therapeutic empathy and recovery from depression in cognitive-behavioral therapy: A structural equation model. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 60(3), 441–449. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.60.3.441
- Campbell, A., & Hemsley, S. (2009). Outcome Rating Scale and Session Rating Scale in psychological practice: Clinical utility of ultra-brief measures. Clinical Psychologist, 13(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/13284200802676391
- Corbella, S., & Botella, L. (2004). Caracteristicas psicometricas de la version espanola del inventario de la alianza terapeutica y teoria del cambio [Psychometric properties of the Spanish version of the Working Alliance Theory of Change Inventory (WATOCI)]. Psicothema, 16(1), 702–705.
- Corbella, S., Botella, L., Gómez, A. M., Herrero, O., & Pacheco, M. (2011). Psychometric propierties of Spanish versión of Working Alliance Inventory-Short (WAI-S). Anales de Psicología/Annals of Psychology, 27(2), 298–301. http://revistas.um.es/analesps/article/view/122881
- Core System Group. (1998). CORE system (information management) handbook.
- Crits-Christoph, P., Gibbons Connolly, M.-B., & Mukherjee, D. (2013). Psychotherapy process-outcome research. In M. J. Lambert (Ed.), Bergin and Garfield’s handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change (6th ed., pp. 298–340). John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
- Del Re, A. C., Flückiger, C., Horvath, A. O., Symonds, D., & Wampold, B. E. (2012). Therapist effects in the therapeutic alliance–outcome relationship: A restricted-maximum likelihood meta-analysis. Clinical Psychology Review, 32(7), 642–649. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2012.07.002
- Duncan, B. L., & Miller, S. D. (1999). Working Alliance Theory of Change Inventory (WATOCI). http://www.talkingcure.com/.
- Duncan, B. L., & Miller, S. D. (2000). The client's theory of change: Consulting the client in the integrative process. Journal of Psychotherapy Integration, 10, 169–187. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009448200244
- Duncan, B. L., Miller, S. D., Sparks, J. A., Claud, D. A., Reynolds, L. R., Brown, J., & Johnson, L. D. (2003). The Session Rating Scale: Preliminary psychometric properties of a “working” alliance measure. Journal of Brief Therapy JBT, 3(1), 3–12. https://doi.org/10.1.1.463.8178
- Feixas i Viaplana, G., Evans, C., Trujillo, A., Gutiérrez, S., Ángel, L., Botella, L., Corbella, S., González, E., Bados López, A., García Grau, E., & López-González, M. (2012). La versión española del CORE-om: Clinical outcomes in routine evaluation – outcome measure. Revista de Psicoterapia, 23(89), 109–135. http://revistadepsicoterapia.com/catalog/product/view/id/1005/s/la-version-espa-ola-del-core-om-clinical-outcomes-in-routine-evaluation-outcome-measure/category/3/ doi: https://doi.org/10.33898/rdp.v23i89.641
- Feldt, L. S. (1965). The approximate sampling distribution of Kuder-Richardson reliability coefficient twenty. Psychometrika, 30, 357–370. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02289499
- Fluckiger, C., Del Re, A. C., Wampold, B. E., & Horvath, A. O. (2019). Alliance in adult psychotherapy. In J. C. Norcross & M. J. Lambert (Eds.), Psychotherapy relationships that work. Vol. I: Evidence-based therapist contributions (3rd ed., pp. 24–78). Oxford University Press.
- Flückiger, C., Del Re, A. C., Wampold, B. E., & Horvath, A. O. (2018). The alliance in adult psychotherapy: A meta-analytic synthesis. Psychotherapy, 55(4). https://doi.org/10.1037/pst0000172
- Friedlander, M. L., Escudero, V., Welners-van de Poll, M. J., & Hatherington, L. (2019). Alliances in couple and family therapy. In J. C. Norcross & M. J. Lambert (Eds.), Psychotherapy relationships that work. Vol. I: Evidence-based therapist contributions (pp. 117–166). Oxford University Press.
- Hafkenscheid, A., Duncan, B. L., & Miller, S. D. (2010). The outcome and Session Rating Scales : A cross-cultural examination of the psychometric properties of the Dutch translation. Journal of Brief Therapy, 7, 1–12.
- Harris, R. S. (2010). Encuesta de Cita 3.0. Center for clinical excellence. https://scott-d-miller-ph-d.myshopify.com/collections/performance-metrics/products/performance-metrics-licenses-for-the-ors-and-srs
- Hatcher, R. L., & Barends, A. W. (1996). Patients’ view of the alliance in psychotherapy: Exploratory factor analysis of three alliance measures. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 64(6), 1326–1336. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.64.6.1326
- Horvath, A. O., Del Re, A. C., Flückiger, C., & Symonds, D. (2011). Alliance in individual psychotherapy. Psychotherapy, 48(1), 9–16. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022186
- Horvath, A. O., & Greenberg, L. S. (1989). Development and validation of the Working Alliance Inventory. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 36(2), 223–233. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.36.2.223
- Janse, P., Boezen-hilberdink, L., Dijk, M. K. V., Verbraak, M. J. P. M., & Hutschemaekers, G. J. M. (2014). Measuring feedback from clients the psychometric properties of the Dutch Outcome Rating Scale and Session Rating Scale. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 30(2), 86–92. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000172
- Lambert, M. J., & Barley, D. E. (2001). Research summary on the therapeutic relationship and psychotherapy outcome. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training, 38(4), 357–361. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-3204.38.4.357
- Miller, S. D., Duncan, B. L., & Sorrell, R. (2006). Using formal client feedback to improve retention and outcome: Making ongoing, real-time assessment feasible. Journal of Brief Therapy, 5(1), 5–22.
- Miller, S. D., Duncan, B. L., Sparks, J. A., & Claud, D. A. (2003). The outcome rating scale: A preliminary study of the reliability, validity, and feasibility of a brief visual analog measure. Journal of Brief Therapy, 2(2), 91–100.
- Moggia, D., Niño-Robles, N., Miller, S. D., & Feixas, G. (2018). Psychometric properties of the Outcome Rating Scale (ORS) in a Spanish clinical sample. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 21(e30), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1017/sjp.2018.32
- Overington, L., & Ionita, G. (2012). Progress monitoring measures: A brief guide progress monitoring measures: A brief guide. Canadian Psychology, 53(2), 82–92. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028017
- Owen, J., Duncan, B., Reese, R. J., Anker, M., & Sparks, J. (2014). Accounting for therapist variability in couple therapy outcomes: What really matters? Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 40(6), 488–502. https://doi.org/10.1080/0092623X.2013.772552
- Prescott, D. S., Maeschalck, C. L., & Miller, S. D. (2017). Feedback-informed treatment in clinical practice. Reaching for excellence. American Psychological Association (APA). http://www.apa.org/pubs/books/4317449.aspx
- Reese, R. J., Norsworthy, L. A., & Rowlands, S. R. (2009a). Does a continuous feedback system improve psychotherapy outcome? Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training, 46(4), 418–431. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017901
- Reese, R. J., Usher, E., Bowman, D., Norsworthy, L., Halstead, J., Rowlands, S., & Chisholm, R. (2009). Using client feedback in psychotherapy training: An analysis of its influence on supervision and counselor self-efficacy. Training and Education in Professional Psychology, 3(3), 157–168. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015673
- Stiles, W. B., & Snow, J. S. (1984). Counseling session impact as viewed by novice counselors and their clients. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 31(1), 3–12. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.31.1.3
- Tracey, T. J., & Kokotovic, A. M. (1989). Factor structure of the Working Alliance Inventory. Psychological Assessment, 1(3), 207–210. https://doi.org/10.1037//1040-3590.1.3.207 doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.1.3.207
- Trujillo, A., Feixas, G., Bados, A., García-Grau, E., Salla, M., Medina, J. C., Montesano, A., Soriano, J., Medeiros-Ferreira, L., Cañete, J., & Corbella, S. (2016). Psychometric properties of the Spanish version of the clinical outcomes in routine evaluation – outcome measure. Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, 12, 1457–1466. https://www.dovepress.com/psychometric-properties-of-the-spanish-version-of-the-clinical-outcome-peer-reviewed-article-NDT
- Wampold, B. E., & Imel, Z. E. (2015). The great psychotherapy debate. The evidence for what makes psychotherapy work (2nd ed.). Routledge.
- Zilcha-Mano, S., & Errázuriz, P. (2015). One size does not fit all: Examining heterogeneity and identifying moderators of the alliance-outcome association. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 62(4), 579–591. https://doi.org/10.1037/cou0000103
- Zilcha-Mano, S., & Errázuriz, P. (2017). Early development of mechanisms of change as a predictor of subsequent change and treatment outcome: The case of working alliance. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 85(5), 508–520. https://doi.org/10.1037/ccp0000192