Analysis and evaluation of the systems used for the assessment of the cervical spine function: a systematic review

References

• James SL, Abate D, Abate KH, et al. Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 354 Diseases and Injuries for 195 countries and territories, 1990–2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet. 2018;392(10159):1789–1858.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoy DG, Protani M, De R, et al. The epidemiology of neck pain. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2010;24(6):783–792.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gangavelli R, Sreekumaran NN, Bhat AK, et al. Cervicobrachial pain – how often is it neurogenic? J Clin Diagnostic Res. 2016;10:14–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gellhorn AC. Cervical facet-mediated pain. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2011;22(3):447–458.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy DR, Hurwitz EL. A theoretical model for the development of a diagnosis-based clinical decision rule for the management of patients with spinal pain. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2007;8:75.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alexander EP. History, physical examination, and differential diagnosis of neck pain. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2011;22(3):383–393.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salt E, Wright C, Kelly S, et al. A systematic literature review on the effectiveness of non-invasive therapy for cervicobrachial pain. Man Ther. 2011;16(1):53–65.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hurwitz EL, Carragee EJ, van der Velde G, et al. Treatment of neck pain: noninvasive interventions: results of the Bone and Joint Decade 2000–2010 Task Force on neck pain and its associated disorders. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2009;32(2 Suppl):S141–S175.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aguiar Salazar ED, Alcivar Carmigniani AS, Aldaz Luna BP, et al. Design of a glove controlled by electromyographic signals for the rehabilitation of patients with rheumatoid arthritis. In: Communications in Computer and Information Science. Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH; 2020. p. 3–11.
   Google Scholar
• Mannion AF, Klein GN, Dvorak J, et al. Range of global motion of the cervical spine: intraindividual reliability and the influence of measurement device. Eur Spine J. 2000;9(5):379–385.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jordan K. Assessment of published reliability studies for cervical spine range-of-motion measurement tools. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2000;23(3):180–195.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castro WHM, Sautmann A, Schilgen M, et al. Noninvasive three-dimensional analysis of cervical spine motion in normal subjects in relation to age and sex: an experimental examination. Spine. 2000;25(4):443–449.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo L-Y, Yang C-C, Yang C-H, et al. The feasibility of using electromagnetic motion capture system to measure primary and coupled movements of cervical spine. J Med Biol Eng. 2011;31(4):245–253.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cloete T, Scheffer C. Repeatability of an off-the-shelf, full body inertial motion capture system during clinical gait analysis In: 2010 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, EMBC10; 2010. p. 5125–5128.
   Google Scholar
• Grip H, Sundelin G, Gerdle B, et al. Cervical helical axis characteristics and its center of rotation during active head and upper arm movements-comparisons of whiplash-associated disorders, non-specific neck pain and asymptomatic individuals. J Biomech. 2008;41(13):2799–2805.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferrario VF, Sforza C, Serrao G, et al. Active range of motion of the head and cervical spine: a three-dimensional investigation in healthy young adults. J Orthop Res. 2002;20(1):122–129.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kong W, Sessa S, Cosentino S, et al. Development of a real-time IMU-based motion capture system for gait rehabilitation. In: 2013 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics, ROBIO 2013. IEEE Computer Society; 2013. p. 2100–2105.
   Google Scholar
• Mayagoitia RE, Nene AV, Veltink PH. Accelerometer and rate gyroscope measurement of kinematics: an inexpensive alternative to optical motion analysis systems. J Biomech. 2002;35(4):537–542.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Acht V, Bongers E, Lambert N, et al. Miniature wireless inertial sensor for measuring human motions In: Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology – Proceedings. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2007. p. 6278–6281.
   Google Scholar
• Cutti AG, Giovanardi A, Rocchi L, et al. Ambulatory measurement of shoulder and elbow kinematics through inertial and magnetic sensors. Med Bio Eng Comput. 2008;46(2):169–178.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou H, Stone T, Hu H, et al. Use of multiple wearable inertial sensors in upper limb motion tracking. Med Eng Phys. 2008;30(1):123–133.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riaz Khan M, Shafi H, Amjad I, et al. Efficacy of Cervical Spine Mobilization Versus Peripheral Nerve Slider Techniques (Neurodynamics) in Cervicobrachial Pain Syndrome. J Islam Int Med Coll. 2015;10(4):262–265.
   Google Scholar
• Dyszkiewicz AJ, Kępiński P, Połeć P, et al. Changeability of tissue’s magnetic remanence after galvanic-magnetostimulation in upper-back pain treatment. Comput Biol Med. 2015;66:242–251.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chandan S, Sen S, Arfath U. Effect of cervical lateral glide over neural tissue mobilization for median nerve in case of patients with cervico-brachial pain syndrome. Int J Health Rehabil Sci. 2015;4(1):37.
   Google Scholar
• Salt E, Kelly S, Soundy A. Randomised controlled trial for the efficacy of cervical lateral glide mobilisation in the management of cervicobrachial pain. Open J Ther Rehabil. 2016;04(03):132–145.
   Google Scholar
• Sanz DR, Solano FU, López DL, et al. Effectiveness of median nerve neural mobilization versus oral ibuprofen treatment in subjects who suffer from cervicobrachial pain: a randomized clinical trial. Arch Med Sci. 2017;14:871–879.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodríguez-Sanz D, Calvo-Lobo C, Unda-Solano F, et al. Cervical lateral glide neural mobilization is effective in treating Cervicobrachial pain: a randomized waiting list controlled clinical trial. Pain Med. 2017;18(12):2492–2503.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jordan S, Iovine JJ, Kuhn T, et al. Neurogenic thoracic outlet syndrome and other forms of cervical brachial syndrome treated with plasma concentrate enriched for alpha 2 macroglobulin. Pain Physician. 2020;23:229–233.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costello M, Puentedura E’, Louie’ J, Cleland J, et al. The immediate effects of soft tissue mobilization versus therapeutic ultrasound for patients with neck and arm pain with evidence of neural mechanosensitivity: a randomized clinical trial. J Man Manip Ther. 2016;24(3):128–140.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayashi T, Daubs MD, Suzuki A, et al. The compensatory relationship of upper and subaxial cervical motion in the presence of cervical spondylosis. Clin Spine Surg. 2016;29(4):E196–E200.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tawde P, Dabadghav R, Bedekar N, et al. Assessment of cervical range of motion, cervical core strength and scapular dyskinesia in violin players. Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2016;22(4):572–576.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Copurgensli C, Gur G, Tunay VB. A comparison of the effects of Mulligan’s mobilization and Kinesio taping on pain, range of motion, muscle strength, and neck disability in patients with Cervical Spondylosis: a randomized controlled study. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2016;30(1):51–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferracini GN, Florencio LL, Dach F, et al. Musculoskeletal disorders of the upper cervical spine in women with episodic or chronic migraine. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2017;53:342–350.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Girasol CE, Dibai-Filho AV, de Oliveira AK, et al. Correlation between skin temperature over myofascial trigger points in the upper trapezius muscle and range of motion, electromyographic activity, and pain in chronic neck pain patients. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2018;41(4):350–357.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sessumpun K, Paholpak P, Hindoyan KN, et al. Characteristics of cervical spine motion in different types of cervical Alignment: Kinematic MRI Study. Clin Spine Surg. 2018;31(4):E239–E244.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moreno AJ, Utrilla G, Marin J, et al. Cervical spine assessment using passive and active mobilization recorded through an optical motion capture. J Chiropr Med. 2018;17(3):167–181.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemmers GPG, Heijmans MWM, Scafoglieri A, et al. Three-dimensional kinematics of the cervical spine using an electromagnetic tracking device: differences between healthy subjects and subjects with non-specific neck pain and the effect of age. Clin Biomech. 2018;54:111–117.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swanson BT, Craven AB, Jordan J, et al. Comparison of range of motion during the cervical flexion rotation versus the side-bending rotation test in individuals with and without hyperlaxity. J Man Manip Ther. 2019;27(1):24–32.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park DJ, Park SY. Long-term effects of diagonal active stretching versus static stretching for cervical neuromuscular dysfunction, disability and pain: an 8 weeks follow-up study. BMR. 2019;32(3):403–410.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alsultan F, Cescon C, De Nunzio AM, et al. Variability of the helical axis during active cervical movements in people with chronic neck pain. Clin Biomech. 2019;62:50–57.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahlaee AH, Ghamkhar L, Nourbakhsh MR, et al. Strength and range of motion in the contralateral side to pain and pain-free regions in unilateral chronic nonspecific neck pain patients. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2020;99(2):133–141.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim DH, Kim SY. Comparison of immediate effects of sling-based manual therapy on specific spine levels in subjects with neck pain and forward head posture: a randomized clinical trial. Disabil Rehabil. 2019;42(19):2735–2742.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qu N, Lindstrøm R, Hirata RP, et al. Origin of neck pain and direction of movement influence dynamic cervical joint motion and pressure pain sensitivity. Clin Biomech. 2019;61:120–128.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qu N, Graven-Nielsen T, Lindstrøm R, et al. Recurrent neck pain patients exhibit altered joint motion pattern during cervical flexion and extension movements. Clin Biomech. 2020;71:125–132.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ojoawo A, Nihinlola B. Effects of sustained natural apophyseal glides in the management of cervical radiculopathy. Int J Med Rev Case Rep. 2019;1(0):1.
   Google Scholar
• Barrett JM, McKinnon C, Callaghan JP. Cervical spine joint loading with neck flexion. Ergonomics. 2020;63(1):101–108.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niewiadomski C, Bianco RJ, Arnoux PJ, et al. Isometric osteopathic manipulation influences on cervical ranges of motion and correlation with osteopathic palpatory diagnosis: a randomized trial. Complement Ther Med. 2020;48:102278.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mingels S, Granitzer M. Habitual cervical posture in women with episodic cervicogenic headache versus asymptomatic controls. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2020;43(2):171–178.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alqhtani RS, Jones MD, Theobald PS, et al. Reliability of an accelerometer-based system for quantifying multiregional spinal range of motion. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2015;38(4):275–281.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inokuchi H, Tojima M, Mano H, et al. Neck range of motion measurements using a new three-dimensional motion analysis system: validity and repeatability. Eur Spine J. 2015;24(12):2807–2815.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song YS, Yang KY, Youn K, et al. Validation of attitude and heading reference system and microsoft kinect for continuous measurement of cervical range of motion compared to the optical motion capture system. Ann Rehabil Med. 2016;40(4):568–574.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Allahyari T, Sahraneshin Samani A, Khalkhali HR. Validity of the Microsoft Kinect for measurement of neck angle: comparison with electrogoniometry. Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2017;23(4):524–532.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrow MMB, Lowndes B, Fortune E, et al. Validation of inertial measurement units for upper body kinematics. J Appl Biomech. 2017;33(3):227–232.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li X, González Navas C, Garrido-Castro JL. Fiabilidad y validez de la medida de la movilidad cervical en pacientes con espondiloartritis axial utilizando un sensor inercial. Rehabilitacion. 2017;51(1):17–21.
   Google Scholar
• Raya R, Garcia-Carmona R, Sanchez C, et al. An inexpensive and easy to use cervical range of motion measurement solution using inertial sensors. Sensors. 2018;18(8):2582–2517.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Rosario H, Vivas MJ, Sinovas MI, et al. Relationship between neck motion and self-reported pain in patients with whiplash associated disorders during the acute phase. Musculoskelet Sci Pract. 2018;38:23–29.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park J, Yang KY, Lee J, et al. Objective evaluation of cervical dystonia using an inertial sensor-based system. J Med Biol Eng. 2019;39(3):305–314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoon TL, Kim HN, Min JH. Validity and reliability of an inertial measurement unit-based 3-dimensional angular measurement of cervical range of motion. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2019;42(1):75–81.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang J, Chen G, Zhai X, et al. In vivo three-dimensional kinematics of the cervical spine during maximal active head rotation. PLoS One. 2019;14(4):e0215357-16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feng M, Liang L, Sun W, et al. Measurements of cervical range of motion using an optical motion capture system: repeatability and validity. Exp Ther Med. 2019;18(6):4193–4202.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Presti D, Lo Carnevale A, D’Abbraccio J, et al. A multi-parametric wearable system to monitor neck movements and respiratory frequency of computer workers. Sensors. 2020;20(2):536.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cagnie B, Cools A, De Loose V, et al. Reliability and normative database of the Zebris cervical range-of-motion system in healthy controls with preliminary validation in a group of patients with neck pain. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2007;30(6):450–455.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Medical Assiociation (AMA). 2011. AMA Guides-Sixth Edition: evolving concepts, challenges and opportunities. Chicago: AMA.
   Google Scholar
• Williams MA, Williamson E, Gates S, et al. Reproducibility of the cervical range of motion (CROM) device for individuals with sub-acute whiplash associated disorders. Eur Spine J. 2012;21(5):872–878.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hickey ER, Rondeau MJ, Corrente JR, et al. Reliability of the Cervical Range of Motion (CROM) device and plumb-line techniques in measuring resting head posture (RHP). J Man Manip Ther. 2000;8(1):10–17.
   Google Scholar
• Audette I, Dumas J-P, Côté JN, et al. De Serres SJ (2010) Validity and between-day reliability of the cervical range of motion (CROM) device. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2010;40(5):318–323.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kubas C, Chen YW, Echeverri S, et al. Reliability and validity of cervical range of motion and muscle strength testing. J Strength Cond Res. 2017;31(4):1087–1096.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tousignant M, De Bellefeuille L, O’Donoughue S, et al. Criterion validity of the Cervical Range of Motion (CROM) goniometer for cervical flexion and extension. Spine. 2000;25:324–330.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Law EYH, Chiu TTW. Measurement of Cervical Range of Motion (CROM) by electronic CROM goniometer: a test of reliability and validity. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2013;26(2):141–148.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaves TC, Nagamine HM, Belli JFC, et al. Reliability of fleximetry and goniometry for assessing cervical range of motion among children. Rev Bras Fisioter. 2008;12(4):283–289.
   Google Scholar
• Pfister A, West AM, Bronner S, et al. Comparative abilities of Microsoft Kinect and Vicon 3D motion capture for gait analysis. J Med Eng Technol. 2014;38(5):274–280.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Capuano-Pucci D, Rheault W, Aukai J, et al. Intratester and intertester reliability of the cervical range of motion device. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1991;72(5):338–340.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Youdas JW, Carey JR, Garrett TR. Reliability of measurements of cervical spine range of motion-comparison of three methods. Phys Ther. 1991;71(2):98–106.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rheault W, Albright B, Beyers C, et al. Intertester reliability of the cervical range of motion device. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1992;15(3):147–150.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gugliotti M, Tau J, Gallo K, et al. Between-week reliability of the cervical range of motion (CROM) device for upper cervical rotation. J Man Manip Ther. 2020;18:1–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliveira-Souza AIS, Carvalho GF, Florêncio LL, et al. Intrarater and interrater reliability of the flexion rotation test and cervical range of motion in people with migraine. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2020;43(9):874–881.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Theobald PS, Jones MD, Williams JM. Do inertial sensors represent a viable method to reliably measure cervical spine range of motion? Man Ther. 2012;17(1):92–96.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodvin C, Park EJ, Huang K, et al. Development of a real-time three-dimensional spinal motion measurement system for clinical practice. Med Biol Eng Comput. 2006;44(12):1061–1075.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar