Prosthetic foot roll‐over shapes with implications for alignment of trans‐tibial prostheses

References

• Barth DG, Schumacher L., Sienko Thomas S. Gait analysis and energy cost of below‐knee amputees wearing six different prosthetic feet. J Prosthet Orthot 1992; 4((2))63–75
   Google Scholar
• Childress DS, Sandifier A, Knox E. The influence of shoes on forefoot mechanics of prosthetic feet. The 9th Scientific Meeting of the Japanese Society of Prosthetics and Orthotics, KobeJapan, November, 5–6, 1993
   Google Scholar
• Gitter A, Czerniecki JM, Degroot DM. Biomechanical analysis of the influence of prosthetic feet on below‐knee amputee walking. Am J Phy Med Rehabil 1991; 70: 142–148
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hannah RE, Morrison JB, Chapman AE. Prostheses alignment: effect on gait of persons with below‐knee amputations. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1984; 65: 159–162
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen AH. Influence of prosthetic foot mechanics on alignment of trans‐tibial prostheses. Northwestern University, USA 1998, MS Thesis
   Google Scholar
• Hansen AH, Childress DS, Knox EH. Roll‐over shapes of prosthetic feet. Gait Posture 1999; 9: 126
   Google Scholar
• Ju M. The modelling and simulation of constrained dynamical systems ‐ with application to human gait. Case Western Reserve University, USA 1986, Ph.D Thesis
   Google Scholar
• Ju M, Mansour JM. Simulation of the double limb support phase of human gait. Trans Asme J Biomech Eng 1988; 110: 223–229
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knox EH. The role of prosthetic feet in walking. Northwestern University, USA 1996, Ph.D Thesis
   Google Scholar
• Koopman HFJM. The three‐dimensional analysis and prediction of human walking. University of Twente, The Netherlands 1989, Ph.D Thesis
   Google Scholar
• Lehmann JF, Price R, Boswell‐Bessette S, Dralle A, Questad K. Comprehensive analysis of dynamic elastic response feet: Seattle Ankle/Lite Foot versus SACH Foot. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1993; 74: 853–861
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehmann JF, Price R, Boswell‐Bessette S, Dralle A, Questad K, Delateur BJ. Comprehensive analysis of dynamic elastic response feet: flex Foot vesus SACH Foot. Arch Phys Rehabil 1993; 74: 1225–1231
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGeer T. Passive dynamic walking. Int J Robot Res 1990; 9((2))62–82
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller LA, Childress DS. Analysis of a vertical compliance prosthetic foot. J Rehabil Res Dev 1997; 34: 52–57
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mitchelson DL. The Coda System: a brief history and current application. International Symposium on Gait Analysis, State‐of‐the‐Art of Measuring Systems and their Importance in Prosthetic and Orthotic Technology, U Boenick, M Nader, C. Mainke. Merke Druck and Verlag, Berlin 1990; 78–85
   Google Scholar
• Perry J. Gait Analysis: normal and pathological function. McGraw‐Hill, Inc., New York 1992
   Google Scholar
• Postema K, Hermens HJ, de Vries J, Koopman HFJM, Eisma WH. Energy storage and release of prosthetic feet. Part I: biomehanical analysis related to user benefits. Prosthet Orthot Int 1997; 21: 28–34
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Postema K, Hermens HJ, de Vries J, Koopman HFJM, Eisma WH. Energy storage and release of prosthetic feet. Part II: subjective ratings of 2 energy storing and 2 conventional feet, user choice of foot and deciding factor. Prosthet Orthot Int 1997; 21: 17–27
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powers CM, Torburn L, Perry J, Ayyappa E. Influence of prosthetic foot design on sound limb loading in adults with unilateral below‐knee amputations. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1994; 75: 825–829
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandifier AT. An experimental evaluation of footwear effects on the performance of energy storing prosthetic feet. Northwestern University, USA 1993, MS Thesis
   Google Scholar
• Snyder RD, Powers CM, Fontaine C, Perry J. The effect of five prosthetic feet on the gait and loading of the sound limb in dysvascular below‐knee amputees. J Rehabil Res Dev 1995; 32: 309–315
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stein JL, Flowers WC. Stance‐phase control of above‐knee prostheses: knee control versus SACH foot design. J Biomech 1987; 20: 19–28
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torburn L, Perry J, Ayyappa E, Shanfield SL. Below‐knee amputee gait with dynamic elastic response prosthetic feet: a pilot study. J Rehabil Res Dev 1990; 27: 369–384
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Torburn L, Powers CM, Guiterrez R, Perry J. Energy expenditure during ambulation in dysvascular and traumatic below‐knee amputees: a comparison of five prosthetic feet. J Rehabil Res Dev 1995; 32: 111–119
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Jaarsveld HWL, Grootenboer HJ, de Vries J, Koopman HFJM. Stiffness and hysteresis properties of some prosthetic feet. Prosthet Orthot Int 1990; 14: 117–124
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winter DA. Biomechanics and control of human movement. J Wiley, Toronto 1990
   Google Scholar
• Zahedi MS, Spence WD, Solomonidis SE, Paul JP. Repeatability of kinetic and kinematic measurements in gait studies of the lower limb amputee. Prosthet Orthot Int 1987; 11: 55–64
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zahedi MS, Spence WD, Solomonidis SE, Paul JP. Alignment of lower‐limb prostheses. J Rehabil Res Dev 1986; 23((2))2–19
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zahedi MS, Spence WD, Solomonidis SE. The influence of alignment on prosthetic gait. Amputation surgery and lower limb prosthetics, G Murdoch, RG Donovan. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford 1988; 367–378
   Google Scholar