Relationship between abortion and contraception: A comparative socio-demographic analysis of Czech and Slovak populations

References

• Agadjanian, V. 2002. Is “abortion culture” fading in the former Soviet Union? Views about abortion and contraception in Kazakhstan. Studies in Family Planning 33:237–48. doi:10.1111/sifp.2002.33.issue-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bahr, S. J., and A. C. Marcos. 2003. Cross-cultural attitudes toward abortion: Greeks versus Americans. Journal of Family Issues 24:402–24. doi:10.1177/0192513X02250892.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benagiano, G., C. Bastianelli, and M. Farris. 2007. Contraception: A social revolution. The European Journal of Contraception & Reproductive Health Care 12:3–12. doi:10.1080/13625180601012311.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bongaarts, J., and C. F. Westoff. 2000. The potential role of contraception in reducing abortion. Studies in Family Planning 31:193–202. doi:10.1111/sifp.2000.31.issue-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Claridge, A. M., and C. L. Chaviano. 2013. Consideration of abortion in pregnancy: Demographic characteristics, mental health, and protective factors. Women & Health 53:777–94. doi:10.1080/03630242.2013.831018.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• David, H. P., and A. A. Popov. 1999. Russian federation and USSR successor states. In From abortion to contraception: A resource to public policies and reproductive behaviour in Central and Eastern Europe from 1917 to the present, ed. H. P. David, 23–37. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
   Google Scholar
• Denisov, B. P., V. I. Sakevich, and A. Jasilioniene. 2012. Divergent trends in abortion and birth control practices in Belarus, Russia and Ukraine. Plos One 7:1–10. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0049986.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EVS. 2010. European values study 2008: GESIS data archive, Cologne. ZA4770 Data file Version 1.1.0, Czech Republic. doi:10.4232/1.10165. ZA4771 Data file Version 1.1.0, Slovak Republic. doi:10.4232/1.10166.
   Google Scholar
• EVS. 2011. EVS—European values study 1990—Integrated dataset. GESIS Data Archive, Cologne. ZA4460 Data file Version 3.0.0. doi:10.4232/1.10790.
   Google Scholar
• EVS, GESIS. 2013. European value study—Variable report. GESIS—Variable Reports 2013/25.
   Google Scholar
• Frejka, T. 2008. Birth regulation in Europe: Completing the contraceptive revolution. Demographic Research 19:73–84. doi:10.4054/DemRes.2008.19.5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson, C. 1976. The U.S. fertility decline, 1961–1975: The contribution of changes in marital status and marital fertility. Family Planning Perspectives 8:249–52. doi:10.2307/2134321.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Heino, A., M. Gissler, D. Apter, and C. Fiala. 2013. Conscientious objection and induced abortion in Europe. The European Journal of Contraception & Reproductive Health Care 18:231–33. doi:10.3109/13625187.2013.819848.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henshaw, S. K. 1986. Induced abortion: A worldwide perspective. Family Planning Perspectives 18:250–54. doi:10.2307/2134947.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kocourková, J., and T. Fait. 2009. Induced abortions: Still important reproduction loss in the Czech Republic? Neuroendocrinology Letters 30:111–18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kocourková, J., and T. Fait. 2011. Changes in contraceptive practice and the transition of reproduction pattern in the Czech population. The European Journal of Contraception & Reproductive Health Care 16:161–72. doi:10.3109/13625187.2011.574750.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kozinsky, Z., I. Devosa, J. Sikovanyecz, D. Szabó, Z. Pál, K. Barabás, and A. Pál. 2011. Predictive model of repeat induced abortion in Hungary. Central European Journal of Medicine 6:701–09.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kragelund, N. K., S. M. Nielsen, R. Butler, and J. Lazarus. 2012. Key barriers to the use of modern contraceptives among women in Albania: A qualitative study. Reproductive Health Matters 20:158–65. doi:10.1016/S0968-8080(12)40681-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levchuk, N. B., and B. Perelli-Haris. 2009. Declining fertility in Ukraine: What is the role of abortion and contraception? MPIDR Working Paper WP 2009-045.
   Google Scholar
• Marston, C., and J. Cleland. 2003. Relationships between contraception and abortion: A review of the evidence. International Family Planning Perspectives 29:6–13. doi:10.2307/3180995.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Moreau, C., J. Trussell, and N. Bajos. 2013. Religiosity, religious affiliation, and patterns of sexual activity and contraceptive use in France. The European Journal of Contraception & Reproductive Health Care 18:168–80. doi:10.3109/13625187.2013.777829.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nowicka, W. 2011. Sexual and reproductive rights and the human rights agenda: Controversial and contested. Reproductive Health Matters 19:119–28. doi:10.1016/S0968-8080(11)38574-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Potančoková, M., B. Vaňo, V. Pilinská, and D. Jurčová. 2008. Slovakia: Fertility between tradition and modernity. Demographic Research 19:973–1018. doi:10.4054/DemRes.2008.19.25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Regushevskaya, E., T. Dubikaytis, M. Nikula, O. Kuznetsova, and E. Hemminki. 2009. Contraceptive use and abortion among women of reproductive age in St. Petersburg, Russia. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health 41:51–58. doi:10.1363/psrh.2009.41.issue-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reproductive Health Report. 2011. The Reproductive Health Report: The state of sexual and reproductive health within the European Union. The European Journal of Contraception & Reproductive Health Care 16 (Suppl. 1):S1–S70. doi:10.3109/13625187.2011.607690.
   Google Scholar
• Sedgh, G. A., B. S. Singh, and M. Eilers. 2012. Legal abortion levels and trends by woman’s age at termination. International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health 38:143–53. doi:10.1363/3814312.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sedgh, G., S. Singh, S. K. Henshaw, and A. Bankole. 2011. Legal abortion worldwide in 2008: Levels and recent trends. International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health 37:84–94. doi:10.1363/3708411.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sobotka, T. 2008. The diverse faces of the second demographic transition in Europe. Demographic Research 19:171–224. doi:10.4054/DemRes.2008.19.8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sobotka, T., A. Šťastná, K. Zeman, D. Hamplová, and V. Kantorová. 2008. Czech Republic: A rapid transformation of fertility and family behaviour after the collapse of state socialism. Demographic Research 19:403–54. doi:10.4054/DemRes.2008.19.14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Srb, V. 1992. Romové podle předběžných výsledků Sčítání lidu 3.3.1991. Demografie 34:173–75.
   Google Scholar
• Stloukal, L. 1995. Demographic aspects of abortion in Eastern Europe: A study with special reference to the Czech Republic and Slovakia. Doctor thesis, The Australian National University, 420.
   Google Scholar
• Stloukal, L. 1999. Understanding the “abortion culture” in Central and Eastern Europe. In From abortion to contraception: A resource to public policies and reproductive behaviour in Central and Eastern Europe from 1917 to the present, ed. H. P. David, 23–37. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
   Google Scholar
• van de Kaa, D. J. 2011. On the societal impact of modern contraception. In The future of motherhood in Western societies—Late fertility and its consequences, ed. G. Beets, J. Schippers, and E. R. Te Velde, 49–60. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Westoff, C. F., C. R. Hammerslough, and L. Paul. 1987. The potential impact of improvements in contraception on fertility and abortion in Western countries. European Journal of Population/Revue Européenne de Démographie 3:7–32. doi:10.1007/BF01797090.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar