Mucoadhesive Dosage form of Lidocaine Hydrochloride: I. Mucoadhesive and Physicochemical Characterization

REFERENCES

• Artusi M., Santi P., Colombo P., Junginger H. Buccal delivery of thiocolchicoside: In vitro and in vivo permeation studies. Int. J. Pharm. 2003; 250: 203–213
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bommareddya G., Paker-Leggs, Saripella K., Neaua S. Extruded and spheronized beads containing Carbopol 974P to deliver nonelectrolytes and salts of weakly basic drugs. Int. J. Pharm. 2006; 321: 62–71
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Burgalassi S., Panichi L., Saettone M. F., Jacobsen J. B., Rassing M. R. Development and in vitro/in vivo testing of mucoadhesive buccal patches releasing benzydamine and lidocaine. Int. J. Pharm. 1996; 133: 1–7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cui Z., Mumper R. Bilayer films for mucosal (genetic) immunization via the buccal route in rabbits. Pharm. Res. 2002; 19(7)947–953
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elkheshen S. Interaction of verapamil hydrochloride with Carbopol 934P and its effect on the release rate of the drug and the water uptake of the polymer matrix. Drug Dev. Ind. Pharm. 2001; 27(9)925–934
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eouani C., Piccerelle P. H., Prinderre P., Bourret E., Joachim J. In-vitro comparative study of buccal mucoadhesive performance of different polymeric films. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 2001; 52: 45–55
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo J. Bioadhesive polymer buccal patches for buprenorphine controlled delivery: Formulation, in vitro adhesion and release properties. Drug Dev. Ind. Pharm. 1994; 20(18)2809–2821
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jay S., Fountain W., Cui Z., Mumper R. Transmucosal delivery of testosterone in rabbits using novel bi-layer mucoadhesive wax film composite disks. J. Pharm. Sci. 2002; 91(9)2016–2025
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jimenez-Kairuz A., Allemandi D., Manzo R. Mechanism of Lidocaine Release From Carbomer – Lidocaine. J. Pharm. Sci. 2002; 91(1)267–272
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones D., Woolfson A., Brown A. Textural analysis and flow rheometry of novel, bioadhesive antimicrobial oral gels. Pharm. Res. 1997; 14(4)450–457
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kabanov A., Batrakova E., Miller D. Pluronic block copolymers as modulators of drug efflux transporter activity in the blood-brain barrier. Adv. Drug Del. Rev. 2003; 55: 151–164
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang L., Jun H., McCall J. HPLC assay of Lidocaine in plasma with solid phase extraction and UV detection. J. Pharm. Bio. Anal. 1999; 19: 737–745
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katzung B. Basic and clinical pharmacology7th. 1998, Chapter 14
   Google Scholar
• Khan T., Peh K., Ch'ng H. Mechanical, bioadhesive strength and biological evaluations of chitosan films for wound dressing. J. Pharm. Pharmaceut. Sci. 2000; 3(3)303–311
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khanna R., Agarwal S., Ahuja A. Muco-adhesive buccal tablets of clotrimazole for oral candidiasis. Drug Dev. Ind. Pharm. 1997; 23(8)831–837
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kohda Y., Kobayashi H., Baba Y., Yuasa H., Ozeki T., Kanaya Y., Sagara E. Controlled release of lidocaine hydrochloride from buccal mucosa-adhesive films with solid dispersion. Int. J. Pharm. 1997; 158: 147–155
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liabot J., Manzo R., Allemandi D. Double layered mucoadhesive tablets containing nystatin. AAPS. Pharm. Sci. Tech. 2002; 3(3), article 22
   Google Scholar
• Minghetti P., Colombo A., Montanari L., Gaeta G., Gombos F. Buccoadhesive slow release tablets of acitretin: Design and in vivo evaluation. Int. J. Pharm. 1998; 169: 195–202
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nurkeeva Z., Mun G., Khutoryanskiy V., Bitekenova A., Dzhusupbekova A. Polymeric complexes of lidocaine hydrochloride with poly(acrylic acid) and poly(2-hydroxyethyl vinyl ether). J. Biomater. Sci. Polymer Edn. 2002; 13(7)759–768
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parodi B., Russo E., Caviglioli G., Cafaggi S., Bingnardi G. Development and characterization of a buccoadhesive dosage form of Oxycodone Hydrochloride. Drug Dev. Ind. Pharm. 1996; 22(5)445–450
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paulsson M., Edsman K. Controlled drug release from gels using surfactant aggregates: I. Effect of lipophilic interactions for a series of uncharged substances. J. Pharm. Sci. 2001; 90(9)1216–1225
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peh K., Wong C. Polymeric films as vehicle for buccal delivery: Swelling, Mechanical, and Bioadhesive properties. J. Pharm. Pharmaceut. Sci. 1999; 2(2)53–61
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perry D. A., Gansky S. A., Loomer P. M. Effectiveness of a transmucosal lidocaine delivery system for local anaesthesia during scaling and root planing. J. Clin. Periodontol. 2005; 32(6)590–4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pharmaceutical Excipients. Published jointly by the Pharmaceutical Press and the American Pharmacists Association, Raymond C Rowe, Paul J Sheskey, Siân C Owen, 2006
   Google Scholar
• Repka M., Gutta K., Prodduturi S., Munjal M., Stodghill S. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 2005; 59(1)189–196
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salamat-Miller N., Chittchang M., Johnston T. The use of mucoadhesive polymers in buccal drug delivery. Adv. Drug Del. Rev. 2005; 57: 1666–1691
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shojaei A., Paulson J., Honary S. Evaluation of poly(acrylic acid-co-ethylhexyl acrylate) films for mucoadhesive transbuccal drug delivery: factors affecting the force of mucoadhesion. J. Control. Rel. 2000; 67: 223–232
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shojaei A., Zhou S., Li X. Transbuccal delivery of acyclovir (II): Feasibility, system design, and in vitro permeation studies. J. Pharm. and Pharmaceut. Sci. 1998; 1(2)66–73
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Singh B., Ahuja N. Development of controlled release buccoadhesive hydrophilic matrices of diltiazem hydrochloride: optimization of bioadhesion, dissolution, and diffusion parameters. Drug Dev. Ind. Pharm. 2002; 28(4)431–442
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singla A., Chawla M., Singh A. Potential applications of Carbomer in oral mucoadhesive controlled drug delivery system: Review. Drug Dev. Ind. Pharm. 2000; 26(9)913–924
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tamburic S., Craig D. A comparison of different in vitro methods for measuring mucoadhesive performance. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 1997; 44: 159–167
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tiwari D., Sause R., Madan P. Evaluation of polyoxyethylene homopolymers for buccal bioadhesive drug delivery device formulations. AAPS Pharmsci. 1999; 1(3), article 13
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Torres-lugo M., Peppas N. Transmucosal delivery systems for calcitonin: A review. Biomaterials 2000; 21: 1191–1196
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wise D. Handbook of pharmaceutical controlled release technology (chap. 12). Marcel Dekker. 2000
   Google Scholar
• Wong C., Yuen K., Peh K. Formulation and evaluation of controlled release Eudragit buccal patches. Int. J. Pharm. 1999; 178: 11–22
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong C., Yuen K., Peh K. An in-vitro method for buccal adhesion studies: importance of instrument variables. Int. J. Pharm. 1999; 180: 47–57
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiang J., Fang X., Li X. Transbuccal delivery of 2′,3′-dideoxycytidine: In vitro permeation study and histological investigation. Int. J. Pharm. 2002; 231: 57–66
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar