Effects of different organic nutrient solution formulations and supplementation on tomato fruit quality and aromatic volatiles

References

• Alagoz G, Ozer H. 2019. The effects of planting systems on soil biology and quality attributes of tomatoes. Arch Agron Soil Sci. 65(3):421–433. doi:10.1080/03650340.2018.1533246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antony R, Willoughby AS, Grannas AM, Catanzano V, Sieighter RL, Thamban M, Hatcher GP, Nair S. 2017. Molecular insights on dissolved organic matter transformation by supraglacial microbial communities. Environ Sci Technol. 51(8):4328–4337. doi:10.1021/acs.est.6b05780.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baldwin EA, Scott JW, Shewmaker CK, Schuch W. 2000. Flavor trivia and tomato aroma: biochemistry and possible mechanisms for control of important aroma components. HortScience. 35(6):1013–1022. doi:10.21273/HORTSCI.35.6.1013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beckles DM. 2012. Factors affecting the postharvest soluble solids and sugar content of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) fruit. Postharvest Biol Technol. 63(1):129–140. doi:10.1016/j.postharvbio.2011.05.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borguini RG, Torres EAFDS. 2009. Tomatoes and tomato products as dietary sources of antioxidants. Food Rev Int. 25(4):313–325. doi:10.1080/87559120903155859.
   Google Scholar
• Chappell J, Wolf F, Proulx J, Cuellar R, Saunders C. 1995. Is the reaction catalyzed by 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme a reductase a rate-limiting step for isoprenoid biosynthesis in plants? Plant Physiol. 109(4):1337–1343. doi:10.1104/pp.109.4.1337.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen J, L  üJ, He Z, Zhang F, Zhang S, Zhang H. 2020. Investigations into the production of volatile compounds in Korla fragrant pears (Pyrus sinkiangensis Yu). Food Chem. 302:125337. doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.2019.125337.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies BH. 1976. Chemistry and biochemistry of plant pigments. London (UK): Academic Press. Carotenoids; p. 38–165.
   Google Scholar
• El Hadi MAM, Zhang FJ, Wu FF, Zhou CH, Tao J. 2013. Advances in fruit aroma volatile research. Molecules. 18(7):8200–8229. doi:10.3390/molecules18078200.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enfissi EMA, Nogueira M, Bramley PM, Fraser PD. 2017. The regulation of carotenoid formation in tomato fruit. Plant J. 89(4):774–788. doi:10.1111/tpj.13428.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Felemban A, Braguy J, Zurbriggen MD, Al-Babili S. 2019. Apocarotenoids involved in plant development and stress response. Front Plant Sci. 10:1168. doi:10.3389/fpls.2019.01168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garbowicz K, Liu Z, Alseekh S, Tieman D, Taylor M, Kuhalskaya A, Ofner I, Zamir D, Klee HJ, Fernie AR, et al. 2018. Quantitative trait loci analysis identifies a prominent gene involved in the production of fatty acid-derived flavor volatiles in tomato. Mol Plant. 11(9):1147–1165. doi:10.1016/j.molp.2018.06.003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goff SA, Klee HJ. 2006. Plant volatile compounds: sensory cues for health and nutritional value? Science. 311(5762):815–819. doi:10.1126/science.1112614.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goswami L, Nath A, Sutradhar S, Bhattacharya SS, Kalamdhad A, Vellingiri K, Kim KH. 2017. Application of drum compost and vermicompost to improve soil health, growth, and yield parameters for tomato and cabbage plants. J Environ Manage. 200:243–252. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.05.073.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He X, Qiao Y, Liu Y, Dendler L, Yin C, Martin F. 2016. Environmental impact assessment of organic and conventional tomato production in urban greenhouses of Beijing city, China. J Clean Prod. 134:251–258. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.12.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hou LY, Ehrlich M, Thormahlen I, Lehmann M, Krahnert I, Obata T, Cejudo FJ, Fernie AR, Geigenberger P. 2019. NTRC plays a crucial role in starch metabolism, redox balance, and tomato fruit growth. Plant Physiol. 181(3):976–992. doi:10.1104/pp.19.00911.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ilahy R, Tlili I, Siddiqui MW, Hdider C, Lenucci MS. 2019. Inside and beyond color: comparative overview of functional quality of tomato and watermelon fruits. Front Plant Sci. 10:769. doi:10.3389/fpls.2019.00769.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jian W, Cao HH, Yuan S, Liu YD, Lu JF, Lu W, Li N, Wang JH, Zou J, Tang N, et al. 2019. SlMYB75, an MYB-type transcription factor, promotes anthocyanin accumulation and enhances volatile aroma production in tomato fruits. Hortic Res. 6(1):22. doi:10.1038/s41438-018-0098-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaur H, Bedi S, Sethi VP, Dhatt AS. 2018. Effects of substrate hydroponic systems and different N and K ratios on yield and quality of tomato fruit. J Plant Nutr. 41(12):1547–1554. doi:10.1080/01904167.2018.1459689.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klee HJ. 2010. Improving the flavor of fresh fruits: genomics, biochemistry, and biotechnology. New Phytol. 187(1):44–56. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2010.03281.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kučerová K, Henselová M, Slováková L, Hensel K. 2019. Effects of plasma activated water on wheat: germination, growth parameters, photosynthetic pigments, soluble protein content, and antioxidant enzymes activity. Plasma Processes Polym. 16(3):1–14. doi:10.1002/ppap.201800131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li HS. 1999. Principal and technique of physiological-biochemical experiments of plant. Beijing (CN): Higher Education Press; p. 89–158.
   Google Scholar
• Li L, Song J, Kalt W, Forney C, Tsao R, Pinto D, Chisholm K, Campbell L, Fillmore S, Li X. 2013. Quantitative proteomic investigation employing stable isotope labeling by peptide dimethylation on proteins of strawberry fruit at different ripening stages. J Proteomics. 94:219–239. doi:10.1016/j.jprot.2013.09.004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li X, Wang Y, Chen S, Tian H, Fu D, Zhu B, Luo Y, Zhu H. 2018. Lycopene is enriched in tomato fruit by CRISPR/Cas9-mediated multiplex genome editing. Front Plant Sci. 9:559. doi:10.3389/fpls.2018.00559.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Y, Qi H, Jin Y, Tian X, Sui L, Qiu Y. 2016. Role of ethylene in biosynthetic pathway of related-aroma volatiles derived from amino acids in oriental sweet melons (Cucumis melo var. makuwa Makino). Sci Hortic. 201:24–35. doi:10.1016/j.scienta.2015.12.053.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Y, Sun Y, Liao S, Zou G, Zhao T, Chen Y, Yang J, Zhang L. 2017. Effects of two slow-release nitrogen fertilizers and irrigation on yield, quality, and water-fertilizer productivity of greenhouse tomato. Agric Water Manage. 186:139–146. doi:10.1016/j.agwat.2017.02.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lovelli S, Potenza G, Castronuovo D, Perniola M, Candido V. 2017. Yield, quality and water use efficiency of processing tomatoes produced under different irrigation regimes in Mediterranean environment. Ital J Agron. 12(1):795. doi:10.4081/ija.2016.795.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mellidou I, Kanellis AK. 2017. Genetic control of ascorbic acid biosynthesis and recycling in horticultural crops. Front Chem. 5:50. doi:10.3389/fchem.2017.00050.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mikkelsen RL. 2005. Tomato flavor and plant nutrition: a brief review. Better Crops Plant Food. 89(2):14–15.
   Google Scholar
• Mirondo R, Barringer S. 2015. Improvement of flavor and viscosity in hot and cold break tomato juice and sauce by peel removal. J Food Sci. 80(1):S171–S179. doi:10.1111/jfds.2015.80.issue-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murmu K, Ghosh BC, Swain DK. 2013. Yield and quality of tomato grown under organic and conventional nutrient management. Arch Agron Soil Sci. 59(10):1311–1321. doi:10.1080/03650340.2012.711472.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naccarato A, Pawliszyn J. 2016. Matrix compatible solid phase microextraction coating, a greener approach to sample preparation in vegetable matrices. Food Chem. 206:67–73. doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.2016.03.036.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paolo D, Bianchi G, Morelli CF, Speranza G, Campanelli G, Kidmose U, Scalzo RL. 2019. Impact of drying techniques, seasonal variation and organic growing on flavor compounds profiles in two Italian tomato varieties. Food Chem. 298:125062. doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.2019.125062.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pontiggia D, Spinelli F, Fabbri C, Licursi V, Negri R, De Lorenzo G, Mattei B. 2019. Changes in the microsomal proteome of tomato fruit during ripening. Sci Rep. 9(1):14350. doi:10.1038/s41598-019-50575-5.
   Google Scholar
• Pott DM, Osorio S, Vallarino JG. 2019. From central to specialized metabolism: an overview of some secondary compounds derived from the primary metabolism for their role in conferring nutritional and organoleptic characteristics to fruit. Front Plant Sci. 10:835. doi:10.3389/fpls.2019.00835.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rambla JL, Tikunov YM, Monforte AJ, Bovy AG, Granell A. 2014. The expanded tomato fruit volatile landscape. J Exp Bot. 65(16):4613–4623. doi:10.1093/jxb/eru128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ronga D, Zaccardelli M, Lovelli S, Perrone D, Francia E, Milc J, Ulrici A, Pecchioni N. 2017. Biomass production and dry matter partitioning of processing tomato under organic vs conventional cropping systems in a Mediterranean environment. Sci Hortic. 224:163–170. doi:10.1016/j.scienta.2017.05.037.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider JR, Caverzan A, Chavarria G. 2019. Water deficit stress, ROS involvement, and plant performance. Arch Agron Soil Sci. 65(8):1160–1181. doi:10.1080/03650340.2018.1556789.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma SK, Le Maguer M. 1996. Lycopene in tomatoes and tomato pulp fractions. Ital J Food Sci. 8(2):107–113.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smirnoff N. 2018. Ascorbic acid metabolism and functions: a comparison of plants and mammals. Free Radical Biol Med. 122:116–129. doi:10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2018.03.033.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smirnoff N, Wheeler GL. 2000. Ascorbic acid in plants: biosynthesis and function. Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol. 35(4):291–314. doi:10.1080/10409230008984166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spiro RG. 1966. Analysis of sugars found in glycoproteins. New York (USA): Academic Press; p. 3–26.
   Google Scholar
• Tao JJ, Wu H, Li ZY, Huang CH, Xu XB. 2018. Molecular evolution of GDP-D-mannose epimerase (GME), a key gene in plant ascorbic acid biosynthesis. Front Plant Sci. 9:1293. doi:10.3389/fpls.2018.01293.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ullah I, Hanping M, Chuan Z, Javed Q, Azeem A. 2017. Optimization of irrigation and nutrient concentration based on economic returns, substrate salt accumulation and water use efficiency for tomato in greenhouse. Arch Agron Soil Sci. 63(12):1748–1762. doi:10.1080/03650340.2017.1306641.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang L, Baldwin EA, Bai J. 2016. Recent advance in aromatic volatile research in tomato fruit: the metabolisms and regulations. Food Bioprocess Technol. 9(2):203–216. doi:10.1007/s11947-015-1638-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang X, Xing Y. 2017. Evaluation of the effects of irrigation and fertilization on tomato fruit yield and quality: a principal component analysis. Sci Rep. 7(1):350. doi:10.1038/s41598-017-00373-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang YT, Huang SW, Liu RL, Jin JY. 2007. Effects of nitrogen application on flavor compounds of cherry tomato fruits. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci. 170(4):461–468. doi:10.1002/jpln.200700011.
   Google Scholar
• Wu Q, Tao XY, Ai XZ, Luo ZS, Mao LC, Ying TJ, Li L. 2018. Effect of exogenous auxin on aroma volatiles of cherry tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) fruit during postharvest ripening. Postharvest Biol Technol. 146:108–116. doi:10.1016/j.postharvbio.2018.08.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiao X, Xi BD, He XS, Zhang H, Li D, Zhao XY, Zhang XH. 2019. Hydrophobicity-dependent electron transfer capacities of dissolved organic matter derived from chicken manure compost. Chemosphere. 222:757–765. doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.01.173.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xie BX, Wei JJ, Zhang YT, Song SW, Su W, Sun GW, Hao YW, Liu HC. 2019. Supplemental blue and red light promote lycopene synthesis in tomato fruits. J Integr Agric. 18(3):590–598. doi:10.1016/S2095-3119(18)62062-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xing MY, Li XW, Yang J, Huang ZD, Lu YS. 2012. Changes in the chemical characteristics of water-extracted organic matter from vermicomposting of sewage sludge and cow dung. J Hazard Mater. 205–206:24–31. doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.11.070.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu XK, Luo XB, Jiang SH, Xu ZJ. 2012. Biodegradation of dissolved organic carbon in soil extracts and leachates from a temperate forest stand and its relationship to ultraviolet absorbance. Chin Sci Bull. 57(8):912–920. doi:10.1007/s11434-011-4923-z.
   Google Scholar
• Yang L, Zhao F, Chang Q, Li T, Li F. 2015. Effects of vermicomposts on tomato yield and quality and soil fertility in greenhouse under different soil water regimes. Agric Water Manage. 160:98–105. doi:10.1016/j.agwat.2015.07.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang C, Cao S, Jin Y, Ju L, Chen Q, Xing Q, Qi H. 2017. Melon13-lipoxygenase CmLOX18 may be involved in C6 volatiles biosynthesis in fruit. Sci Rep. 7(1):2816. doi:10.1038/s41598-017-02559-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, Li Z, Tu Y, Cheng W, Yang Y. 2018. Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) SIIPT4, encoding an isopentenyltransferase, is involved in leaf senescence and lycopene biosynthesis during fruit ripening. BMC Plant Biol. 18(1):107. doi:10.1186/s12870-018-1327-0.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zheng J, Pan Z, Ma J, Wang Y, Yan F, Yin L. 2019. Animal based biogas digestate application frequency effects on growth and water-nitrogen use efficiency in tomato. Int J Agric Biol. 22(4):748–756. doi:10.17957/IJAB/15.1125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zou J, Chen J, Tang N, Gao YQ, Hong MS, Wei W, Cao HH, Jian W, Li N, Deng W, et al. 2018. Transcriptome analysis of aroma volatile metabolism change in tomato (solanum lycopersicum) fruit under different storage temperatures and 1-MCP treatment. Postharvest Biol Technol. 135:57–67. doi: 10.1016/j.postharvbio.2017.08.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar