229
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

Striving for Relationality: Teacher Responsiveness to Relational Cues When Eliciting Students’ Science Ideas

ORCID Icon

References

  • Antrop‐González, R., & De Jesús, A. (2006). Toward a theory of critical care in urban small school reform: Examining structures and pedagogies of caring in two Latino community‐based schools. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 19(4), 409–433. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518390600773148
  • Ball, D. L. (1993). With an eye on the mathematical horizon: Dilemmas of teaching elementary school mathematics. The Elementary School Journal, 93(4), 373–397. https://doi.org/10.1086/461730
  • Ball, D. L., & Forzani, F. M. (2009). The work of teaching and the challenge for teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 60(5), 497–511. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487109348479
  • Bang, M., Faber, L., Gurneau, J., Marin, A., & Soto, C. (2016). Community-based design research: Learning across generations and strategic transformations of institutional relations toward axiological innovations. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 23(1), 28–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/10749039.2015.1087572
  • Bang, M., Warren, B., Rosebery, A. S., & Medin, D. (2012). Desettling expectations in science education. Human Development, 55(5-6), 302–318. https://doi.org/10.1159/000345322
  • Berland, L. K., & Reiser, B. J. (2011). Classroom communities’ adaptations of the practice of scientific argumentation. Science Education, 95(2), 191–216. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20420
  • Berland, L. K., Schwarz, C. V., Krist, C., Kenyon, L., Lo, A. S., & Reiser, B. J. (2016). Epistemologies in practice: Making scientific practices meaningful for students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 53(7), 1082–1112. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21257
  • Biesta, G. (2016). The Rediscovery of Teaching: On robot vacuum cleaners, non-egological education and the limits of the hermeneutical world view. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 48(4), 374–392. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2015.1041442
  • Blumenfeld, P. C., Soloway, E., Marx, R. W., Krajcik, J. S., Guzdial, M., & Palincsar, A. (1991). Motivating project-based learning: Sustaining the doing, supporting the learning. Educational Psychologist, 26(3-4), 369–398. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep2603&4_8
  • Boaler, Jo. (2008). Promoting ‘relational equity’ and high mathematics achievement through an innovative mixed‐ability approach. British Educational Research Journal, 34(2), 167–194. https://doi.org/10.1080/01411920701532145
  • Carlone, H. B., Benavides, A., Huffling, L. D., Matthews, C. E., Journell, W., & Tomasek, T. (2016). Field ecology: A modest, but imaginable, contestation of neoliberal science education. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 23(3), 199–211. https://doi.org/10.1080/10749039.2016.1194433
  • Chen, V. (2015). The construction of Chinese American women’s identity. In Women making meaning (pp. 225–243). Routledge.
  • Cole, M. (1998). Can cultural psychology help us think about diversity? Mind, Culture, and Activity, 5(4), 291–304. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327884mca0504_4
  • Conlin, L. D., & Scherr, R. E. (2018). Making space to sensemake: Epistemic distancing in small group physics discussions. Cognition and Instruction, 36(4), 396–423. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2018.1496918
  • Cuzzolino, M. P. (2021). The Awe is In the Process”: The nature and impact of professional scientists’ experiences of awe. Science Education, 105(4), 681–706. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21625
  • Dadvand, B., & Cuervo, H. (2020). Pedagogies of care in performative schools. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 41(1), 139–152. https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2018.1486806
  • Daniels, J. R., & Varghese, M. (2020). Troubling practice: Exploring the relationship between Whiteness and practice-based teacher education in considering a raciolinguicized teacher subjectivity. Educational Researcher, 49(1), 56–63. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X19879450
  • DiGiacomo, D. K., & Gutiérrez, K. D. (2016). Relational equity as a design tool within making and tinkering activities. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 23(2), 141–153. https://doi.org/10.1080/10749039.2015.1058398
  • Duschl, R. (2008). Science education in three-part harmony: Balancing conceptual, epistemic, and social learning goals. Review of Research in Education, 32(1), 268–291. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X07309371
  • Dutro, E., & Cartun, A. (2016). Cut to the core practices: Toward visceral disruptions of binaries in PRACTICE-based teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 58, 119–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.05.001
  • Erickson, F. (2004). Talk and social theory: Ecologies of speaking and listening in everyday life. Polity.
  • Flyvbjerg, B. (2006). Five misunderstandings about case-study research. Qualitative Inquiry, 12(2), 219–245. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800405284363
  • Ford, M. (2008). Grasp of practice’ as a reasoning resource for inquiry and nature of science understanding. Science & Education, 17(2-3), 147–177. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-006-9045-7
  • Freire, P. (2018). Pedagogy of the oppressed. Bloomsbury Publishing. (Original work published 1970)
  • Gilligan, C. (1977). In a different voice: Women’s conceptions of self and of morality. Harvard Educational Review, 47(4), 481–517. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.47.4.g6167429416hg5l0
  • Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. Harvard University Press.
  • Goffman, E. (1979). Footing. Semiotica, 25(1-2), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.1979.25.1-2.1
  • Goffman, E. (1981). Forms of talk. University of Pennsylvania Press.
  • Goodwin, C. (2013). The co-operative, transformative organization of human action and knowledge. Journal of Pragmatics, 46(1), 8–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2012.09.003
  • Greeno, J. G. (2011). A situative perspective on cognition and learning in interaction. In Theories of learning and studies of instructional practice (pp. 41–71). Springer.
  • Grinath, A. S., & Southerland, S. A. (2019). Applying the ambitious science teaching framework in undergraduate biology: Responsive talk moves that support explanatory rigor. Science Education, 103(1), 92–122. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21484
  • Hammer, D. (1997). Discovery learning and discovery teaching. Cognition and Instruction, 15(4), 485–529. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci1504_2
  • Hand, V. M. (2010). The co-construction of opposition in a low-track mathematics classroom. American Educational Research Journal, 47(1), 97–132. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831209344216
  • Harré, R. (2015). Positioning theory. In The Wiley Handbook of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology: Methods, Approaches, and New Directions for Social Sciences (pp. 263–276). Wiley-Blackwell.
  • Hepburn, A., & Bolden, G. B. (2012). The conversation analytic approach to transcription. In The Handbook of Conversation Analysis (pp. 57–76). John Wiley & Sons.
  • Hooks, B. (2014). Teaching to transgress. Routledge.
  • Hufnagel, E. (2018). Frames for emotional expressions across discourse forms in an ecology course. International Journal of Science Education, 40(16), 1957–1979. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2018.1515512
  • Hutchison, P., & Hammer, D. (2010). Attending to student epistemological framing in a science classroom. Science Education, 94(3), 506–524. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20373
  • Jaber, L. Z., & Hammer, D. (2016). Engaging in science: A feeling for the discipline. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 25(2), 156–202. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2015.1088441
  • Jacobs, V. R., Lamb, L., L, &., & Philipp, R. A. (2010). Professional noticing of children's mathematical thinking. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 41(2), 169–202. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.41.2.0169
  • Kang, H., & Zinger, D. ( 2019). What do core practices offer in preparing novice science teachers for equitable instruction.,103(4),823-853. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21507
  • Kang, H. (2021). Teacher Responsiveness that Promotes Equity in Secondary Science Classrooms. Cognition and Instruction, 40(2), 206–232. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2021.1972423
  • Ke, L., & Schwarz, C. V. (2021). Supporting students’ meaningful engagement in scientific modeling through epistemological messages: A case study of contrasting teaching approaches. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 58(3), 335–365. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21662
  • Kelly, G. J., & Chen, C. (1999). The sound of music: Constructing science as sociocultural practices through oral and written discourse. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(8), 883–915. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199910)36:8<883::AID-TEA1>3.0.CO;2-I
  • Kelly, G. J., & Licona, P. (2018). Epistemic practices and science education. In History, philosophy and science teaching (pp. 139–165). Springer.
  • Kelly, S. B. (2020). Characterizing epistemic messages in the classroom [Doctoral dissertation]. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
  • Khishfe, R., Alshaya, F. S., BouJaoude, S., Mansour, N., & Alrudiyan, K. I. (2017). Students’ understandings of nature of science and their arguments in the context of four socio-scientific issues. International Journal of Science Education, 39(3), 299–334. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2017.1280741
  • King, D., Ritchie, S. M., Sandhu, M., Henderson, S., & Boland, B. (2017). Temporality of emotion: Antecedent and successive variants of frustration when learning chemistry. Science Education, 101(4), 639–672. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21277
  • Ko, M. L.M., & Krist, C. ( 2019). Opening up curricula to redistribute epistemic agency: A framework for supporting science teaching. Science Education, 103(4), 979–1010. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21511
  • Kohlberg, L., & Hersh, R. H. (1977). Moral development: A review of the theory. Theory into Practice, 16(2), 53–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405847709542675
  • Krajcik, J., McNeill, K. L., & Reiser, B. J. (2008). Learning‐goals‐driven design model: Developing curriculum materials that align with national standards and incorporate project‐based pedagogy. Science Education, 92(1), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20240
  • Krajcik, J., Reiser, B., Sutherland, L. M., & Fortus, D. (2011). IQWST: Investigating and questioning our world through science and technology (middle school science curriculum materials). Sangari Active Science.
  • Kramer, R. M. (Ed.). (2006). Organizational trust: A reader. Oxford University Press on Demand.
  • Kriewaldt, J. A. (2015). Strengthening learners’ perspectives in professional standards to restore relationality as central to teaching. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 40(40), 83–98. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2015v40n8.5
  • Krist, C. (2016). Meaningful engagement in scientific practices: How classroom communities develop authentic epistemologies for science [Doctoral dissertation]. Northwestern University.
  • Krist, C. (2020a). Building trust: Supporting vulnerability for doing science in school. In M. Gresalfi and I. S. Horn (Eds.), The interdisciplinarity of the learning sciences, 14th International Conference of the Learning Sciences (ICLS) 2020 (Vol. 1, pp. 270–277). International Society of the Learning Sciences. https://repository.isls.org//handle/1/6647
  • Krist, C. (2020b). Examining how classroom communities developed practice-based epistemologies for science through analysis of longitudinal video data. Journal of Educational Psychology, 112(3), 420–443. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000417
  • Krist, C., & Novak, M. (2016). Developing a culture of caring to support epistemic agency [Paper presentation]. Investigating Epistemic Agency: Creating Space for Students and Teachers to Actively Construct Scientific Knowledge. NARST 2016 Annual International Conference, April 3–6). In E. Suarez & C. Krist (Related paper set organizers), Baltimore, MD.
  • Krist, C., & Suárez, E. (2018). Doing science with fidelity to persons: Instantiations of caring participation in science practices. In J. Kay and R. Luckin (Eds.), Rethinking learning in the digital age: Making the learning sciences count, 13th International Conference of the Learning Sciences (ICLS) 2018 (Vol. 1, pp. 424–431). International Society of the Learning Sciences. https://repository.isls.org//handle/1/875
  • Kumpulainen, K., & Rajala, A. (2017). Dialogic teaching and students’ discursive identity negotiation in the learning of science. Learning and Instruction, 48, 23–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.05.002
  • Ladson‐Billings, G. (1995). But that’s just good teaching! The case for culturally relevant pedagogy. Theory into Practice, 34(3), 159–165. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405849509543675
  • Lampert, M., Franke, M., Kazemi, E., Ghousseini, H., Turrou, A., Beasley, H., Cunard, A., & Crowe, K. (2013). Keeping it complex: Using rehearsals to support novice teacher learning of ambitious teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 64(3), 226–243. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487112473837
  • Lampert, M. (2010). Learning teaching in, from, and for practice: What do we mean? Journal of Teacher Education, 61(1-2), 21–34. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487109347321
  • Langer-Osuna, J. (2016). The social construction of authority among peers and its implications for collaborative mathematics problem solving. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 18(2), 107–124. https://doi.org/10.1080/10986065.2016.1148529
  • Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge university press.
  • Lee, C. D. (2001). Is October Brown Chinese? A cultural modeling activity system for underachieving students. American Educational Research Journal, 38(1), 97–141. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312038001097
  • Lehrer, R., Schauble, L., & Lucas, D. (2008). Supporting development of the epistemology of inquiry. Cognitive Development, 23(4), 512–529. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2008.09.001
  • Looney, S. D., & Kim, J. (2018). Humor, uncertainty, and affiliation: Cooperative and co-operative action in the university science lab. Linguistics and Education, 46, 56–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2018.06.003
  • Louie, N. L. (2018). Culture and ideology in mathematics teacher noticing. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 97(1), 55–69. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-017-9775-2
  • Madkins, T. C., & De Royston, M. M. (2019). Illuminating political clarity in culturally relevant science instruction. Science Education, 103(6), 1319–1346. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21542 37868331
  • Maheux, J. F., & Roth, W. M. (2011). Relationality and mathematical knowing. For the Learning of Mathematics, 31(3), 36–41.
  • Maheux, J. F., & Roth, W. M. (2014). The relationality in/of teacher–student communication. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 26(3), 503–529. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-013-0096-1
  • Manz, E. (2012). Understanding the codevelopment of modeling practice and ecological knowledge. Science Education, 96(6), 1071–1105. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21030
  • Manz, E., Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2020). Rethinking the classroom science investigation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 57(7), 1148–1174. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21625
  • Martin, F., & Pirbhai-Illich, F. (2016). Towards decolonising teacher education: Criticality, relationality and intercultural understanding. Journal of Intercultural Studies, 37(4), 355–372. https://doi.org/10.1080/07256868.2016.1190697
  • Martin, J. (2016). The grammar of agency: Studying possibilities for student agency in science classroom discourse. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 10, 40–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2016.01.003
  • Martin, J. (2020). Researching teacher agency in elementary school science using positioning theory and grammar of agency. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 31(1), 94–113. https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560X.2019.1666628
  • Maskiewicz, A. C. (2015). Navigating the challenges of teaching responsively: An insider’s perspective. In Responsive teaching in science and mathematics (pp. 123–143). Routledge.
  • Maskiewicz, A. C., & Winters, V. A. (2012). Understanding the co‐construction of inquiry practices: A case study of a responsive teaching environment. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(4), 429–464. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21007
  • McClain, K., & Cobb, P. (2001). An analysis of development of sociomathematical norms in one first-grade classroom. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 32(3), 236–266. https://doi.org/10.2307/749827
  • McKinney, De Royston, M., Vakil, S., Nasir, N., I, S., Ross, K. M., Givens, J., & Holman, A. (2017). He's more like a ‘brother’than a teacher”: Politicized caring in a program for African American Males. Teachers College Record, 119(4), 1–40. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811711900401
  • McKinney De Royston, M., Madkins, T. C., Givens, J. R., & Nasir. N. I. S. (2021). “I’m a Teacher, I’m Gonna Always Protect You”: Understanding Black Educators’ Protection of Black Children. American Educational Research Journal, 58, 68–106. 1https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831220921119
  • Michaels, S., & O’Connor, C. (2012). Talk science primer. TERC.
  • Michaels, S., & O’Connor, C. (2015). Conceptualizing talk moves as tools: Professional development approaches for academically productive discussion. In Socializing Intelligence through Talk and Dialogue (pp. 347–362). American Educational Research Association.
  • Monroe, C. R. (2005). Why are" bad boys" always Black?: Causes of disproportionality in school discipline and recommendations for change. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 79(1), 45–50. https://doi.org/10.3200/TCHS.79.1.45-50
  • Morales‐Doyle, D., Childress Price, T., & Chappell, M. J. (2019). Chemicals are contaminants too: Teaching appreciation and critique of science in the era of Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS). Science Education, 103(6), 1347–1366. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21546
  • National Research Council (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. National Academies Press.
  • Nersessian, N. J. (1992). How do scientists think? Capturing the dynamics of conceptual change in science. Cognitive Models of Science, 15, 3–44.
  • NGSS Lead States (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. The National Academy Press.
  • Noddings, N. (1986). Fidelity in teaching, teacher education, and research for teaching. Harvard Educational Review, 56(4), 496–511. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.56.4.34738r7783h58050
  • Noddings, N. (1988). An ethic of caring and its implications for instructional arrangements. American Journal of Education, 96(2), 215–230. https://doi.org/10.1086/443894
  • Noddings, N. (2013). Caring: A relational approach to ethics and moral education. Univ of California Press.
  • OpenSciEd (2019). OpenSciEd Classroom Norms. https://www.openscied.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/Handout-Classroom-Norms-from-1st-Units-in-OSE-OpenSciEd-2.pdf
  • Penuel, W. R., & Watkins, D. A. (2019). Assessment to promote equity and epistemic justice: A use-case of a research-practice partnership in science education. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 683, 201–216. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716219843249
  • Philip, T. (2019). Principled improvisation to support novice teacher learning. Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education, 121(6), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811912100607
  • Philip, T. M., Souto-Manning, M., Anderson, L., Horn, I., J. Carter Andrews, D., Stillman, J., & Varghese, M. (2019). Making justice peripheral by constructing practice as “core”: How the increasing prominence of core practices challenges teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 70(3), 251–264. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487118798324
  • Pierson, A. E., Brady, C. E., Clark, D. B., & Sengupta, P. (2022). Students’ epistemic commitments in a heterogeneity-seeking modeling curriculum. Cognition and Instruction, 41(2), 125–157. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2022.2111431
  • Pierson, A. E., Clark, D. B., & Sherard, M. K. (2017). Learning progressions in context: Tensions and insights from a semester‐long middle school modeling curriculum. Science Education, 101(6), 1061–1088. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21314
  • Quigley, C. (2016). Emotions in teaching environmental science. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 11(3), 817–822. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-014-9657-1
  • Quigley, C. F., & Herro, D. (2016). Finding the joy in the unknown”: Implementation of STEAM teaching practices in middle school science and math classrooms. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 25(3), 410–426. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-016-9602-z
  • Randler, C., Hummel, E., & Wüst-Ackermann, P. (2013). The influence of perceived disgust on students’ motivation and achievement. International Journal of Science Education, 35(17), 2839–2856. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2012.654518
  • Ritchie, S. M., & Newlands, J. B. (2017). Emotional events in learning science. In Exploring Emotions, Aesthetics and Wellbeing in Science Education Research (pp. 107–119). Springer.
  • Rivera-McCutchen, R. L. (2021). Radical care: Leading for justice in urban schools. Teachers College Press.
  • Robertson, A. D., Scherr, R., & Hammer, D. (2016). Responsive teaching in science and mathematics. Routledge.
  • Rogoff, B. (2003). The cultural nature of human development. Oxford university press.
  • Rogoff, B., Callanan, M., Gutiérrez, K. D., & Erickson, F. (2016). The Organization of Informal Learning. Review of Research in Education, 40(1), 356–401. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X16680994
  • Rosebery, A. S., Warren, B., & Tucker‐Raymond, E. (2016). Developing interpretive power in science teaching. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 53(10), 1571–1600. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21267
  • Rosebery, A. S., Warren, B., Ballenger, C., & Ogonowski, M. (2005). The generative potential of students’ everyday knowledge in learning science. In Understanding mathematics and science matters (pp. 55–79). Routledge.
  • Rouse, J. (2002). How scientific practices matter: Reclaiming philosophical naturalism. University of Chicago press.
  • Salmon, W. C. (1984). Scientific explanation and the causal structure of the world. Princeton University Press.
  • Sandoval, W. A. (2005). Understanding students’ practical epistemologies and their influence on learning through inquiry. Science Education, 89(4), 634–656. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20065
  • Sandoval, W. A., Enyedy, N., Redman, E. H., & Xiao, S. (2019). Organising a culture of argumentation in elementary science. International Journal of Science Education, 41(13), 1848–1869. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2019.1641856
  • Schindel, A., & Tolbert, S. (2017). Critical caring for people and place. The Journal of Environmental Education, 48, 26–34. 110.1080/00958964.2016.1249326
  • Schwarz, C. V., Braaten, M., Haverly, C., & de los Santos, E. X. (2021). Using sense-making moments to understand how elementary teachers’ interactions expand, maintain, or shut down sense-making in science. Cognition and Instruction, 39(2), 113–148. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2020.1763349
  • Schwarz, C. V., Passmore, C., & Reiser, B. J. (2017). Moving beyond “knowing about” science to making sense of the world. In Helping Students Make Sense of the World Using Next Generation Science and Engineering Practices (pp. 3–21). NSTA Press.
  • Scott, C. L. (1999). Teachers’ biases toward creative children. Creativity Research Journal, 12(4), 321–328. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326934crj1204_10
  • Sfard, A. (1998). On two metaphors for learning and the dangers of choosing just one. Educational Researcher, 27(2), 4–13. https://doi.org/10.2307/1176193
  • Shah, N., & Coles, J. A. (2020). Preparing teachers to notice race in classrooms: Contextualizing the competencies of preservice teachers with antiracist inclinations. Journal of Teacher Education, 71(5), 584–599. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487119900204
  • Shah, N., Christensen, J. A., Ortiz, N. A., Nguyen, A. K., Byun, S., Stroupe, D., & Reinholz, D. L. (2020). Racial hierarchy and masculine space: Participatory in/equity in computational physics classrooms. Computer Science Education, 30(3), 254–278. https://doi.org/10.1080/08993408.2020.1805285
  • Sharma, A., & Alvey, E. M. (2021). The undercurrents of neoliberal ethics in science curricula: a critical appraisal. Ethics and Education, 16(1), 122–136. https://doi.org/10.1080/17449642.2020.1860316
  • Sheth, M. J. (2019). Grappling with racism as foundational practice of science teaching. Science Education, 103(1), 37–60. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21450
  • Sohr, E. R., Gupta, A., & Elby, A. (2018). Taking an escape hatch: Managing tension in group discourse. Science Education, 102(5), 883–916. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21448
  • Strong, L., Adams, J. D., Bellino, M. E., Pieroni, P., Stoops, J., & Das, A. (2016). Against neoliberal enclosure: Using a critical transdisciplinary approach in science teaching and learning. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 23(3), 225–236. https://doi.org/10.1080/10749039.2016.1202982
  • Stroupe, D. (2014). Examining classroom science practice communities: How teachers and students negotiate epistemic agency and learn science‐as‐practice. Science Education, 98(3), 487–516. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21112
  • Stroupe, D. (2015). Describing “science practice” in learning settings. Science Education, 99(6), 1033–1040. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21191
  • Stroupe, D., Moon, J., & Michaels, S. (2019). Introduction to special issue: Epistemic tools in science education. Science Education, 103(4), 948–951. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21512
  • Suárez, E., & Krist, C. (2023). Proceedings of the 17th International Conference of the Learning Sciences-ICLS 2023, Designing for Justice-Oriented Critical Caring in Science Methods Courses.International Society of the Learning Sciences, 2023, 553, 560
  • Suárez, E. (2020). Estoy Explorando Science”: Emergent bilingual students problematizing electrical phenomena through translanguaging. Science Education, 104(5), 791–826. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21588
  • TeachingWorks (n.d). https://www.teachingworks.org/
  • Tekkumru‐Kisa, M., Preston, C., Kisa, Z., Oz, E., & Morgan, J. (2021). Assessing instructional quality in science in the era of ambitious reforms: A pilot study. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 58(2), 170–194. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21651
  • Thagard, P. (1993). Conceptual revolutions. Princeton University Press.
  • Valenzuela, A. (1999). Subtractive schooling: Issues of caring in education of US-Mexican youth. State University of New York Press.
  • Valenzuela, A. (2005). Subtractive schooling, caring relations, and social capital in the schooling of US-Mexican youth. In Beyond Silenced Voices: Class, Race, and Gender in United States Schools (pp. 83–94). SUNY Press.
  • Velasquez, A., West, R., Graham, C., & Osguthorpe, R. (2013). Developing caring relationships in schools: A review of the research on caring and nurturing pedagogies. Review of Education, 1(2), 162–190. https://doi.org/10.1002/rev3.3014
  • Vossoughi, S., Jackson, A., Chen, S., Roldan, W., & Escudé, M. (2020). Embodied pathways and ethical trails: Studying learning in and through relational histories. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 29(2), 183–223. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2019.1693380
  • Ward, N. G. (2019). Prosodic patterns in English conversation. Cambridge University Press.
  • Watkins, J., Hammer, D., Radoff, J., Jaber, L. Z., & Phillips, A. M. (2018). Positioning as not‐understanding: The value of showing uncertainty for engaging in science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 55(4), 573–599. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21431
  • Weinstein, M. (2017). NGSS, disposability, and the ambivalence of science in/under neoliberalism. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 12(4), 821–834. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-017-9844-y
  • Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning as a social system. Systems Thinker, 9(5), 2–3.
  • Wilson, J., Nazemi, M., Jackson, K., & Wilhelm, A. G. (2019). Investigating teaching in conceptually oriented mathematics classrooms characterized by African American student success. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 50(4), 362–400. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.50.4.0362
  • Windschitl, M. (2002). Framing constructivism in practice as the negotiation of dilemmas: An analysis of the conceptual, pedagogical, cultural, and political challenges facing teachers. Review of Educational Research, 72(2), 131–175. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543072002131
  • Windschitl, M., Thompson, J., & Braaten, M. (2020). Ambitious science teaching. Harvard Education Press.
  • Wingert, K. (2016). http://stemteachingtools.org/brief/35
  • Wright, C., Wendell, K. B., & Paugh, P. P. (2018). Just put it together to make no commotion:” Re-imagining Urban Elementary Students’ Participation in Engineering Design Practices. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 6(3), 285–301. https://doi.org/10.18404/ijemst.428192
  • Yackel, E., & Cobb, P. (1996). Sociomathematical norms, argumentation, and autonomy in mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 27(4), 458–477. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.27.4.0458

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.