Designing for Lived Informatics in Out-of-Clinic Physical Rehabilitation

REFERENCES

• Axelrod, L., Fitzpatrick, G., Burridge, J., Mawson, S., Smith, P., Rodden, T., & Ricketts, I. (2009). The reality of homes fit for heroes: Design challenges for rehabilitation technology at home. Journal of Assistive Technologies, 3(2), 35–43. doi:10.1108/17549450200900014
   Google Scholar
• Bagalkot, N. L. (2012). Embodied-self-monitoring ( Unpublished doctoral dissertation). IT-Universitetet i København, Copenhagen, Denmark.
   Google Scholar
• Bagalkot, N., Nazzi, E., & Sokoler, T. (2010). Facilitating continuity: Exploring the role of digital technology in physical rehabilitation. Proceedings of the 6th Nordic Conference on Human–Computer Interaction: Extending Boundaries. New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Bagalkot, N., & Sokoler, T. (2011). MyReDiary: Co-designing for collaborative articulation in physical rehabilitation. Proceedings of the ECSCW 2011 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work. London, UK: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Bagalkot, N., & Sokoler, T. (2012). Unboxing the tools for physical rehabilitation: Embracing the difference between the clinic and home. Proceedings of NordiCHI 2012 Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Making Sense Through Design. New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Bagalkot, N. L., & Sokoler, T. (2013). Embodied-self-monitoring: Embracing the context for adherence to physical rehabilitation in the design for self-monitoring. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare (pp. 192–199). ICST, Brussels, Belgium, Belgium: ICST (Institute for Computer Sciences, Social-Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering). Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.4108/icst.pervasivehealth.2013.252027
   Google Scholar
• Bagalkot, N. L., Sokoler, T., & Shaikh, R. (2012). Integrating physiotherapy with everyday life: Exploring the space of possibilities through ReHandles. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Tangible, Embedded and Embodied Interaction (pp. 91–98). New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Balaam, M., Rennick Egglestone, S., Fitzpatrick, G., Rodden, T., Hughes, A. M., Wilkinson, A., … Nind, T. (2011). Motivating mobility: Designing for lived motivation in stroke rehabilitation. Proceedings of the CHI 2011 Conference on Human Factors in Computer Systems. New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Brandt, E., & Grunnet, C. (2000). Evoking the future: Drama and props in user centered design. In T. Cherkasky, J. Greenboum, P. Mambrey, J. K. Pors (Eds.), Proceedings of PDC 2000 Conference on Participatory Design. New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Buxton, B. (2007). Sketching user experiences: Getting the design right and the right design. San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, R., Evans, M., Tucker, B., Quilty, B., & Donovan, J. L. (2001). Why don’t patients do their exercises? Understanding non-compliance with physiotherapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee. Journal Epidemiology Communicable Health, 55, 132–138. doi:10.1136/jech.55.2.132
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dourish, P. (2001). Where the action is: The foundations of embodied interaction. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Epstein, D. A., Ping, A., Fogarty, J., & Munson, S. A. (2015). A lived informatics model of personal informatics. Proceedings of the 2015 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing. New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Harrison, D., Marshall, P., Bianchi-Berthouze, N., & Bird, J. (2015). Activity tracking: Barriers, workarounds and customisation. Proceedings of the 2015 International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing. New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Koskinen, I., Zimmerman, J., Binder, T., Redstrom, J., & Wensveen, S. (2012). Design research through practice: From the lab, field, and showroom. Waltham, MA: Morgan Kaufmann.
   Google Scholar
• Law, M., Cooper, B., Strong, S., Stewart, D., Rigby, P., & Letts, L. (1996). The person-environment-occupation model: A transactive approach to occupational performance. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 63, 9–23. doi:10.1177/000841749606300103
   Google Scholar
• Li, I., Dey, A., & Forlizzi, J. (2010). A stage-based model of personal informatics systems. Proceedings of the CHI 2010 Conference on Human Factors in Computer Systems. New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Mastos, M., Miller, K., Eliasson, A. C., & Imms, C. (2007). Goal-directed training: linking theories of treatment to clinical practice for improved functional activities in daily life. Clinical Rehabilitation, 21(1), 47–55. doi:10.1177/0269215506073494
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McClain, C. (2005). Collaborative rehabilitation goal setting. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation, 12(4). doi:10.1310/ELB1-EGKF-QUQC-VFE9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• National Danish Whitepaper on Rehabilitation. (2004). Retrieved from http://www.marselisborgcentret.dk/fileadmin/filer/Publikationer/PDF_er/Hvidbog.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Nicholls, D. A., & Gibson, B. E. (2010). The body and physiotherapy. Physiotherapy Theory and Practice, 26, 497–509. doi:10.3109/09593981003710316
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Petursdottir, U., Arnadottir, S. A., & Halldorsdottir, S. (2010). Facilitators and barriers to exercising among people with osteoarthritis: A phenomenological study. Physical Therapy, 90, 1014–1025. doi:10.2522/ptj.20090217
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rooksby, J., Rost, M., Morrison, A., & Chalmers, M. C. (2014). Personal tracking as lived informatics. Proceedings of the CHI 2014 Conference on Human Factors in Computer Systems. New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Sluijs, E. M., Kok, G. J., & van der Zee, J. (1993). Correlates of exercise compliance in physical therapy. Physical Therapy, 73, 771–782. doi:10.1093/ptj/73.11.771
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sokoler, T. (2004). Going beyond the desktop computer with an attitude ( Dissertation Series no. 2004:04). Blekinge Institute of Technology, Karlskrona, Sweden. Retrieved from www.bth.se/fou
   Google Scholar
• Stolterman, E., & Wiberg, M. (2010). Concept-driven interaction design research. Human–Computer Interaction, 25, 95–118. doi:10.1080/07370020903586696
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suchman, L. (2007). Human–machine reconfigurations: Plans and situated actions. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. (2001). International Classification Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, R., Shin, E., Newman, M. W., & Ackerman, M. S. (2015). When fitness trackers don’t “fit”: End-user difficulties in the assessment of personal tracking device accuracy. Proceedings of the 2015 International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing. New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar