Engineering industrial yeast for improved tolerance and robustness

References

• Demain AL, Newcomb M, Wu JH. Cellulase, clostridia, and ethanol. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2005;69:124–154. doi: 10.1128/MMBR.69.1.124-154.2005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu H, Qi Y, Zhou P, et al. Microbial physiological engineering increases the efficiency of microbial cell factories. Crit Rev Biotechnol. 2021;41:339–354. doi: 10.1080/07388551.2020.1856770.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moshood TD, Nawanir G, Mahmud F. Sustainability of biodegradable plastics: a review on social, economic, and environmental factors. Crit Rev Biotechnol. 2022;42:892–912. doi: 10.1080/07388551.2021.1973954.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamada R, Kashihara T, Ogino H. Improvement of lipid production by the oleaginous yeast Rhodosporidium toruloides through UV mutagenesis. World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2017;33:99. doi: 10.1007/s11274-017-2269-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gong Z, Nielsen J, Zhou YJ. Engineering robustness of microbial cell factories. Biotechnol J. 2017;12:1–9. doi: 10.1002/biot.201700014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohedano MT, Konzock O, Chen Y. Strategies to increase tolerance and robustness of industrial microorganisms. Synth Syst Biotechnol. 2022;7:533–540. doi: 10.1016/j.synbio.2021.12.009.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li MJ, Borodina I. Application of synthetic biology for productionof chemicals in yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEMS Yeast Res. 2015;15:1–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hussain MH, Mohsin MZ, Zaman WQ, et al. Multiscale engineering of microbial cell factories: a step forward towards sustainable natural products industry. Synth Syst Biotechnol. 2022;7:586–601. doi: 10.1016/j.synbio.2021.12.012.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sitepu IG, Sestric R, Levin D, et al. Oleaginous yeasts for biodiesel: current and future trends in biology and production. Biotechnol Adv. 2014;32:1336–1360. doi: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2014.08.003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ageitos JM, Vallejo JA, Veiga-Crespo P, et al. Oily yeasts as oleaginous cell factories. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2011;90:1219–1227. doi: 10.1007/s00253-011-3200-z.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lam FH, Turanl-Yldz B, Resch MG, et al. Engineered yeast tolerance enables efficient production from toxified lignocellulosic feedstocks. Sci Adv. 2021;7:eabf7613. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abf7613.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shimizu K, Yu M. Redox rebalance against genetic perturbations and modulation of central carbon metabolism by the oxidative stress regulation. Biotechnol Adv. 2019;37:107441. doi: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2019.107441.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mans R, Daran J, Pronk JT. Under pressure: evolutionary engineering of yeast strains for improved performance in fuels and chemicals production. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2017;50:47–56. doi: 10.1016/j.copbio.2017.10.011.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith J, Rensburg EV, Rgens JB. Simultaneously improving xylose fermentation and tolerance to lignocellulosic inhibitors through evolutionary engineering of recombinant Saccharomyces cerevisiae harbouring xylose isomerase. BMC Biotechnol. 2014;14:41. doi: 10.1186/1472-6750-14-41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li J, Zhu K, Miao L, et al. Simultaneous improvement of limonene production and tolerance in Yarrowia lipolytica through tolerance engineering and evolutionary engineering. ACS Synth. Biol. 2021;10:884–896. doi: 10.1021/acssynbio.1c00052.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferreira DJM, Noble J. Yeast strain optimization for enological applications: advances in grape and wine biotechnology. J Biosci Bioeng. 2019;12:622–629.
   Google Scholar
• Yang X, Zheng S, Ali Shah SB, et al. Advances in pharmacology, biosynthesis, and metabolic engineering of Scutellaria-specialized metabolites. Crit Rev Biotechnol. 2022;35:1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Barrick JE, Lenski RE. Genome dynamics during experimental evolution. Nat Rev Genet. 2013;14:827–839. doi: 10.1038/nrg3564.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rostron KA, Rolph CE, Lawrence CL. Nile red fluores cence screening facilitating neutral lipid phenotype determination in budding yeast, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, and the fission yeast Schiz osaccharomyces pombe. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 2015;108:97–106. doi: 10.1007/s10482-015-0467-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuan HL, Dong LB, Tu R, et al. Micro-droplets characterization and its application for amino acid detection in droplet microfluidic system. Chin J Biotech. 2014;30:139–146.
   Google Scholar
• Markovitsi D, Gustavsson T, Banyasz A. Absorption of UV radiation by DNA: spatial and temporal features. Mutat Res. 2010;704:21–28. doi: 10.1016/j.mrrev.2009.11.003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henderson CM, Block DE. Examining the role of membrane lipid composition in determining the ethanol tolerance of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2014;80:2966–2972. doi: 10.1128/AEM.04151-13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watanabe T, Watanabe I, Nakamura TJBT, et al. A UV-induced mutant of Pichia stipitis with increased ethanol production from xylose and selection of a spontaneous mutant with increased ethanol tolerance. Bioresour Technol. 2011;102:1844–1848. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2010.09.087.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kadeba A, Wilgers DJ. Enhanced mutation through exposure to EMS affects the evolution of ethanol tolerance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. BIOS. 2020;91:1789–1797. doi: 10.1893/BIOS-D-18-00030.
   Google Scholar
• Posas F, Chambers JR, Heyman JA, et al. The transcriptional response of yeast to saline stress. J Biol Chem. 2000;275:17249–17255. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M910016199.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tekarslan-Sahin SH, Alkim C, Sezgin T. Physiological and transcriptomic analysis of a salt-resistant Saccharomyces cerevisiae mutant obtained by evolutionary engineering. Bosnian J Basic Med. 2018;18:55–65.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao S, Zhou X, Jin W, et al. Improving of lipid productivity of the oleaginous microalgae Chlorella pyrenoidosa via atmospheric and room temperature plasma (ARTP). Bioresour Technol. 2017;244:1400–1406. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2017.05.039.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo J-L, Fan J, Suyama T, et al. Improving RNA content of salt-tolerant Zygosaccharomyces rouxii by atmospheric and room temperature plasma (ARTP) mutagenesis and its application in soy sauce brewing. World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2019;35:180. doi: 10.1007/s11274-019-2743-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu L, Li Y, Chen J, et al. Enhancement of pyruvate productivity in Torulopsis glabrata: increase of NAD + availability. J Biotechnol. 2006;126:173–185. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2006.04.014.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yi S, Zhang X, Li H-X, et al. Screening and Mutation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae UV-20 with a High Yield of Second Generation Bioethanol and High Tolerance of Temperature, Glucose and Ethanol. Indian J Microbiol. 2018;58:440–447. doi: 10.1007/s12088-018-0741-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bajwa PK, Shireen T, D'Aoust F, et al. Mutants of the pentose-fermenting yeast Pichia stipitis with improved tolerance to inhibitors in hardwood spent sulfite liquor. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2009;104:892–900. doi: 10.1002/bit.22449.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumari R, Pramanik K. Improvement of multiple stress tolerance in yeast strain by sequential mutagenesis for enhanced bioethanol production. J Biosci Bioeng. 2012;114:622–629. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiosc.2012.07.007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao J, Li Y, Yu W, et al. Rescuing yeast from cell death enables overproduction of fatty acids from sole methanol. Nat Metab. 2022;4:932–943. doi: 10.1038/s42255-022-00601-0.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zeng WZ, Guo LK, Xu S, et al. High-throughput screening technology in industrial biotechnology. Trends Biotechnol. 2020;38:888–906. doi: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2020.01.001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu Q, Li Y, Wu B, et al. Novel mutagenesis and screening technologies for food microorganisms: advances and prospects. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2020;104:1517–1531. doi: 10.1007/s00253-019-10341-z.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ikehata H, Ono T. The Mechanisms of UV mutagenesis. J Radiat Res. 2011;52:115–125. doi: 10.1269/jrr.10175.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo M, Cheng S, Chen G, et al. Improvement of lipid production in oleaginous yeast Rhodosporidium toruloides by ultraviolet mutagenesis. Eng Life Sci. 2019;19:548–556. doi: 10.1002/elsc.201800203.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Almeida JR, Petersson A, Gorwa-Grauslund M, et al. Increased tolerance and conversion of inhibitors in lignocellulosic hydrolysates by Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J of Chemical Tech & Biotech. 2010;82:340–349. doi: 10.1002/jctb.1676.
   Google Scholar
• González-Ramos D, Gorter D, Grijseels S-S, et al. A new laboratory evolution approach to select for constitutive acetic acid tolerance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and identification of causal mutations. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2016;9:173. doi: 10.1186/s13068-016-0583-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shirasawa K, Hirakawa H, Nunome T, et al. Genome-wide survey of artificial mutations induced by ethyl methanesulfonate and gamma rays in tomato. Plant Biotechnol J. 2015;14:51–60. doi: 10.1111/pbi.12348.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sega GA. A review of the genetic effects of ethyl methanesulfonate. Mutat Res. 1984;134:113–142. doi: 10.1016/0165-1110(84)90007-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Su Y, Shao W, Zhang A, et al. Improving isobutanol tolerance and titers through EMS mutagenesis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEMS Yeast Res. 2021;21:foab012. doi: 10.1093/femsyr/foab012.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang X, Zhang X-F, Li H-P, et al. Atmospheric and room temperature plasma (ARTP) as a new powerful mutagenesis tool. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2014;98:5387–5396. doi: 10.1007/s00253-014-5755-y.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei F-L, Wang M, Li H-X, et al. A C6/C5 co‐fermenting Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain with the alleviation of antagonism between xylose utilization and robustness. Glob Change Biol Bioenergy. 2021;13:83–97. doi: 10.1111/gcbb.12778.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Y, Chen J, Lun S-Y, et al. Efficient pyruvate production by a multi-vitamin auxotroph of Torulopsis glabrata: key role and optimization of vitamin levels. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2001;55:680–685. doi: 10.1007/s002530100598.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuan W, Lin X, Zhong S, et al. Enhanced pyruvic acid yield in an osmotic stress-resistant mutant of Yarrowia lipolytica. Electron J Biotechnol. 2020;44:19–24. doi: 10.1016/j.ejbt.2020.01.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang W, Xu Y, Li C, et al. Effect of inorganic salts on the growth and Cd2+ bioaccumulation of Zygosaccharomyces rouxii cultured under Cd2+ stress. Bioresour Technol. 2013;128:831–834. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2012.10.090.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu X, Williams TC, Divne C, et al. Evolutionary engineering in Saccharomyces cerevisiae reveals a TRK1-dependent potassium influx mechanism for propionic acid tolerance. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2019;12:97. doi: 10.1186/s13068-019-1427-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clomburg JM, Crumbley AM, Gonzalez R. Industrial biomanufacturing: the future of chemical production. Science. 2017;355:aag0804. doi: 10.1126/science.aag0804.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Majidian P, Tabatabaei M, Zeinolabedini M, et al. Metabolic engineering of microorganisms for biofuel production. Renew Sust Energ Rev. 2018;82:3863–3885. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2017.10.085.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuyper M, Hartog M, Toirkens MJ, et al. Metabolic engineering of a xylose-isomerase-expressing Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain for rapid anaerobic xylose fermentation. FEMS Yeast Res. 2005;5:399–409. doi: 10.1016/j.femsyr.2004.09.010.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kobayashi Y, Sahara T, Ohgiya S, et al. Systematic optimization of gene expression of pentose phosphate pathway enhances ethanol production from a glucose/xylose mixed medium in a recombinant Saccharomyces cerevisiae. AMB Express. 2018;8:139. doi: 10.1186/s13568-018-0670-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cotgreave IA, Gerdes RG. Recent trends in glutathione biochemistry–glutathione-protein interactions: a molecular link between oxidative stress and cell proliferation. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1998;242:1–9. doi: 10.1006/bbrc.1997.7812.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qi Y, Liu H, Chen X, et al. Engineering microbial membranes to increase stress tolerance of industrial strains. Metab Eng. 2019;53:24–34. doi: 10.1016/j.ymben.2018.12.010.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang YM, Rock CO. Membrane lipid homeostasis in bacteria. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2008;6:222–233. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro1839.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Besada-Lombana PB, Fernandez-Moya R, Fenster J, et al. Engineering Saccharomyces cerevisiae fatty acid composition for increased tolerance to octanoic acid. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2017;114:1531–1538. doi: 10.1002/bit.26288.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alper H, Moxley J, Tephanopoulos GJS, et al. Engineering yeast transcription machinery for improved ethanol tolerance and production. ACS Synth Biol. 2006;314:1565–1568.
   Google Scholar
• Liu R, Garst AD, Eckert CA, et al. Multiplex navigation of global regulatory networks (MINR) in yeast for improved ethanol tolerance and production. Metab Eng. 2019;51:50–58. doi: 10.1016/j.ymben.2018.07.007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li J, Du L-L. piggyBac transposon-based insertional mutagenesis for the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Methods Mol Biol. 2014;1163:213–222. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-0799-1_16.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chen D-W, Li J-H. Microbiology and molecular biology reviews. J Phys Chem C. 2007;111:355–599.
   Google Scholar
• Shen Y, Abramczyk D, Walker R, et al. Deep functional analysis of synII, a 770-kilobase synthetic yeast chromosome. Science. 2017;355:4791. doi: 10.1126/science.aaf4791.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith JD, Schlecht U, Xu W, et al. A method for high‐throughput production of sequence‐verified DNA libraries and strain collections. Mol Syst Biol. 2017;13:913.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mukherjee V, Lind U, Blomberg A, et al. A CRISPR interference screen of essential genes reveals that proteasome regulation dictates acetic acid tolerance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. mSystems. 2021;6:e00418-00421. doi: 10.1128/mSystems.00418-21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aylon YK, Kupiec M. DSB repair: the yeast paradigm. DNA Repair (Amst). 2004;3:797–815. doi: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2004.04.013.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho C, Choi SY, Luo Z-W, et al. Recent advances in microbial production of fuels and chemicals using tools and strategies of systems metabolic engineering. Biotechnol Adv. 2015;33:1455–1466. doi: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2014.11.006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nevoigt E, Kohnke J, Fischer CR, et al. Engineering of promoter replacement cassettes for fine-tuning of gene expression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2006;72:5266–5273. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00530-06.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helalat SH, Bidaj S, Samani S, et al. Producing alcohol and salt stress tolerant strain of Saccharomyces cerevisiae by heterologous expression of pprI gene. Enzyme Microb Technol. 2019;124:17–22. doi: 10.1016/j.enzmictec.2019.01.008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou Z, Tang H, Wang W, et al. A cold shock protein promotes high-temperature microbial growth through binding to diverse RNA species. Cell Discov. 2021;7:15. doi: 10.1038/s41421-021-00246-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ishii JY, Hasunuma T, Kondo A, et al. Reduction of furan derivatives by overexpressing NADH-dependent Adh1 improves ethanol fermentation using xylose as sole carbon source with Saccharomyces cerevisiae harboring XR–XDH pathway. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2013;97:2597–2607. doi: 10.1007/s00253-012-4376-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sies H. Glutathione and its role in cellular functions - structural analysis of an engineered change in substrate specificity. Free Radic Biol Med. 1999;27:916–921. doi: 10.1016/s0891-5849(99)00177-x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Zhang Z, Lu X, et al. Transcription factor Hap5 induces gsh2 expression to enhance 2-phenylethanol tolerance and production in an industrial yeast Candida glycerinogenes. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2020;104:4093–4107. doi: 10.1007/s00253-020-10509-y.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raghavendran V, Marx C, Olsson L, et al. The protective role of intracellular glutathione in Saccharomyces cerevisiae during lignocellulosic ethanol production. AMB Express. 2020;10:219. doi: 10.1186/s13568-020-01148-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rojas ER, Billings G, Odermatt PD, et al. The outer membrane is an essential load-bearing element in Gram-negative bacteria. Nature. 2018;559:617–621. doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0344-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nasution OL, Lee YJ, Kim WK, et al. Overexpression of OLE1 enhances stress tolerance and constitutively activates the MAPK HOG pathway in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2017;114:620–631. doi: 10.1002/bit.26093.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandoval NP, Papoutsakis ET. Engineering membrane and cell-wall programs for tolerance to toxic chemicals: beyond solo genes. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2016;33:56–66. doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2016.06.005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Zhang Z, Lu X, et al. Genetic engineering of an industrial yeast Candida glycerinogenes for efficient production of 2-phenylethanol. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2020a;104:10481–10491. doi: 10.1007/s00253-020-10991-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latchman DS. Transcription factors: an overview. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 1997;29:1305–1312. doi: 10.1016/s1357-2725(97)00085-x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deparis Q, Claes A, Foulquié-Moreno MR, et al. Engineering tolerance to industrially relevant stress factors in yeast cell factories. FEMS Yeast Res. 2017;17:36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liang L-Y, Liu R-M, Freed EF, et al. Transcriptional regulatory networks involved in C3–C4 alcohol stress response and tolerance in yeast. ACS Synth Biol. 2021;10:19–28. doi: 10.1021/acssynbio.0c00253.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu H, Liu K, Yan M, et al. gTME for improved adaptation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to corn cob acid hydrolysate. Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2011;164:1150–1159. doi: 10.1007/s12010-011-9201-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner JM, Williams EV, Alper HS. Developing a piggybac transposon system and compatible selection markers for insertional mutagenesis and genome engineering in Yarrowia lipolytica. J Biotechnol. 2018;13:1800022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dujon B, Sherman D, Fischer G, et al. Others: genome evolution in yeasts. Nature. 2004;430:35–44. doi: 10.1038/nature02579.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma L, Chen X, Yuan Y-J, et al. SCRaMbLE generates evolved yeasts with increased alkali tolerance. Microb Cell Fact. 2019;18:52. doi: 10.1186/s12934-019-1102-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jianping K, Jieyi L, Zhou G, et al. Enhancement and mapping of tolerance to salt stress and 5-fluorocytosine in synthetic yeast strains via SCRaMbLE. Synth. Syst. Biotechnol. 2022;7:869–877.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xia L, Wen J. Available strategies for improving the biosynthesis of surfactin: a review. Crit Rev Biotechnol. 2022;43:1111–1128. doi: 10.1080/07388551.2022.2095252.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qi L-S, Larson MH, Gilbert LA, et al. Repurposing CRISPR as an RNA-guided platform for sequence-specific control of gene expression. Microb Cell Factories. 2013;152:1173–1183.
   Google Scholar
• Miller JT, Meng XD, Paschon DE, et al. A TALE nuclease architecture for efficient genome editing. Nat Biotechnol. 2011;29:143–148. doi: 10.1038/nbt.1755.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitsui R, Yamada R, Ogino H. Improved stress tolerance of Saccharomyces cerevisiae by CRISPR-Cas-mediated genome evolution. Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2019;189:810–821. doi: 10.1007/s12010-019-03040-y.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gan Y, Lin Y, Guo Y, et al. Metabolic and genomic characterization of stress tolerant industrial Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains from TALENs-assisted multiplex editing. FEMS Yeast Res. 2018;18:45–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pines G, Freeman A. Immobilization and characterization of Saccharomyces cerevisiae in crosslinked, prepolymerized polyacrylamide-hydrazide. European J. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 1982;16:75–80. doi: 10.1007/BF00500730.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moon YM, Gurav R, Kim J, et al. Whole-cell Immobilization of engineered Escherichia coli JY001 with barium-alginate for itaconic acid production. Biotechnol Bioproc E. 2018;23:442–447. doi: 10.1007/s12257-018-0170-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao Y, Uhrich KE. Biodegradable and biocompatible polymers for electronic applications: a review. J Bioact Compat Polym. 2018;34:3–15. doi: 10.1177/0883911518818075.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winkelhausen E, Jovanovic-Malinovska R, Kuzmanova S, et al. Hydrogels based on u.v.-crosslinked poly(ethylene oxide) – matrices for immobilization of Candida boidinii cells for xylitol production. World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2008;24:2035–2043. doi: 10.1007/s11274-008-9707-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petrov KK, Yankov DS, Beschkov VN. Lactic acid fermentation by cells of Lactobacillus rhamnosus immobilized in polyacrylamide gel. World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2006;22:337–345. doi: 10.1007/s11274-005-9039-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marre SJ, Jensen KF. Synthesis of micro and nanostructures in microfluidic systems. Chem Soc Rev. 2010;39:1183–1202. doi: 10.1039/b821324k.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone HA, Stroock AD, Ajdari A. Engineering flows in small devices. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 2004;36:381–411. doi: 10.1146/annurev.fluid.36.050802.122124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Díez-Antolínez R, Hijosa-Valsero M, Paniagua-García AI, et al. Yeast screening and cell immobilization on inert supports for ethanol production from cheese whey permeate with high lactose loads. PLoS One. 2018;13:e0210002. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0210002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ding S, Fang D, Pang Z, et al. Immobilization of powdery calcium silicate hydrate via PVA covalent cross-linking process for phosphorus removal. Sci Total Environ. 2018;645:937–945. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.07.197.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azhar SM, Abdulla RJB. Bioethanol production from galactose by immobilized wild-type Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biocatal Agric Biotechnol. 2018;14:457–465. doi: 10.1016/j.bcab.2018.04.013.
   Google Scholar
• Yao W-W, Zhu J, Sun B, et al. In vitro enzymatic conversion of γ-aminobutyric acid immobilization of glutamate decarboxylase with bacterial cellulose membrane (BCM) and non-linear model establishment. Enzyme Microb Technol. 2013;52:258–264. doi: 10.1016/j.enzmictec.2013.01.008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu L, Tschirner U. Immobilized anaerobic fermentation for bio-fuel production by Clostridium co-culture. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng. 2014;37:1551–1559. doi: 10.1007/s00449-014-1127-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang W, Bai A, Chen X, et al. Ethanol production from lignocelluloses hydrolyzates with immobilized multi-microorganisms. Energ Source Part A. 2012;34:1206–1212. doi: 10.1080/15567031003681960.
   Google Scholar
• Duarte JC, Rodrigues JAR, Moran PJS, et al. Effect of immobilized cells in calcium alginate beads in alcoholic fermentation. AMB Express. 2013;3:31. doi: 10.1186/2191-0855-3-31.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belgrano FDS, Diegel O, Pereira N, et al. Cell immobilization on 3D-printed matrices: a model study on propionic acid fermentation. Bioresour Technol. 2018;249:777–782. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2017.10.087.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang SY, Choi TR, Jung HR, et al. Production of glutaric acid from 5-aminovaleric acid by robust whole-cell immobilized with polyvinyl alcohol and polyethylene glycol. Enzyme Microb Technol. 2019;128:72–78. doi: 10.1016/j.enzmictec.2019.05.003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baroud CN, Gallaire F, Dangla R. Dynamics of microfluidic droplets. Lab Chip. 2010;10:2032–2045. doi: 10.1039/c001191f.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gong Z, Nielsen JC, Zhou YJ. Engineering robustness of microbial cell factories. J Biotechnol. 2017;12:1700268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kyriakou M, Chatziiona VK, Costa CN, et al. Biowaste-based biochar: a new strategy for fermentative bioethanol overproduction via whole-cell immobilization. Appl Energy. 2019;242:480–491. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.03.024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen D, Wang G, Li J. Interfacial bioelectrochemistry: fabrication, properties and applications of functional nanostructured biointerfaces. J. Phys. Chem. C. 2006;111:2351–2367. doi: 10.1021/jp065099w.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar