Grammatical issues in graphic symbol communication

References

• Adamson, L. (1997). Order and disorder: Classical developmental theories and atypical communication development. In L. Adam-son & M. Romski (Eds.), Communication and language acqui-sition: Discoveries from atypical development (pp. 3–24). Balti-more: Paul H. Brookes.
   Google Scholar
• Adamson, L., Romski, M., Deffebach, K., & Sevcik, R. (1992). Symbol vocabulary and the focus of conversations: Augmenting language development for youth with mental retardation. Jour-nal of Speech and Hearing Research, 35, 1333–1344.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrett, M. (1999). An introduction to the nature of language and to the central themes and issues in the study of language devel-opment. In M. Barrett (Ed.), The development of language (pp. 1–24). East Sussex, UK: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bates, E., Bretherton, I., & Snyder, L. (1988). From first words to grammar: Individual differences and dissociable mechanisms. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bedrosian, J. (1995). Limitations in the use of nondisabled subjects in AAC research. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 11, 6–10.
   Google Scholar
• Bedrosian, J. L. (1997). Language acquisition in young AAC sys-tem users: Issues and directions for future research. Augmen-tative and Alternative Communication, 13, 179–185.
   Google Scholar
• Beukelman, D., & Mirenda, P. (1998). Augmentative and alterna-tive communication: Management of severe communication dis-orders in children and adults. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
   Google Scholar
• Beukelman, D., Mirenda, P., & Sturm, J. (1998). Literacy develop-ment of AAC users. In D. Beukelman & P. Mirenda (Eds.), Aug-mentative and alternative communication: Management of severe communication disorders in children and adults (pp. 355–390). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
   Google Scholar
• Bishop, D. (1993). Language development in children with abnor-mal structure or function of the speech apparatus. In D. Bishop & K. Mogford (Eds.), Language development in exceptional cir-cumstances (pp. 220–238). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Blockberger, S., & Johnston, J. (2001). Grammatical morphology acquisition by children with extremely limited speech. Manu-script submitted for publication.
   Google Scholar
• Bloom, L. (1994). Meaning and expression. In W. Overton & D. Palermo (Eds.), The nature and ontogenesis of meaning (pp. 215–235). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Bloom, L., & Lahey, M. (1978). Language development and lan-guage disorders. New York: Wiley and Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Brady, N. (2001). Comprehension and production in AAC. Special Interest Division 12 Newsletter, 10(2), 17–19.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, R. (1973). A first language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Uni-versity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Calculator, S. N. (1997). Fostering early language acquisition and AAC use: Exploring reciprocal influences between children and their environments. Augmentative and Alternative Communica-tion, 13, 149–157.
   Google Scholar
• Chamberlain, C., Morford, J., & Mayberry, R. (Eds.). (2000). Lan-guage acquisition by eye. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, R., Hutcheson, S., & Van Buren, P. (1974). Comprehension and production in language acquisition. Journal of Linguistics, 10, 39–54.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, S. (1996). Referring expressions in conversations between aided and natural speakers. In S. von Tetzchner & M. H. Jensen (Eds.), Augmentative and alternative communication: European perspectives (pp. 89–100). London: Whurr.
   Google Scholar
• Crain, S., & Fodor, J. (1993). Competence and performance in child language. In E. Dromi (Ed.), Language and cognition: A developmental perspective (pp. 141–171). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
   Google Scholar
• Crain, S., & Thornton, R. (1998). Investigations in universal gram-mar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dubuisson, C., & Vercaigne-Ménard, A. (1998). Au-dela du mod-ele: Acquisition de la morpho-syntaxe de la langue des signes québécoise (LSQ) par deux enfants sou rds. Revista Latina de Pensamiento y Len guaje, 6, 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Elman, J., Bates, E., Johnson, M., Karmiloff-Smith, A., Parisi, D., & Plunkett, K. (1996). Rethinking innateness: A connectionist perspective on development. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fletcher, P., & MacWhinney, B. (Eds.). (1995). The handbook of child language. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Fried-Oken, M., & Bersani, H. (Eds.). (2000). Speaking up and spelling it out: Personal essays on augmentative and alternative communication. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
   Google Scholar
• Fuller, D., & Lloyd, L. (1997). AAC model and taxonomy. In L. Lloyd, D. Fuller, & H. Arvidson (Eds.), Augmentative and alter-native communication: A handbook of principles and practices (pp. 27–37). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Glennen, S., & DeCoste, D. (Eds.). (1997). Handbook of aug-mentative and alternative communication. San Diego: Singular.
   Google Scholar
• Gopnik, A., & Meltzoff, A. (1997). Words, thoughts, and theories. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, L., Skarakis, E., & Haaf, R. (1996). Language treatment approach for users of AAC: Experimental single-subject inves-tigation. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 12, 230–243.
   Google Scholar
• Heim, M., & Baker-Mills, A. (1996). Early development of symbolic communication and linguistic complexity through augmentative and alternative communication. In S. von Tetzchner & M. H. Jensen (Eds.), Augmentative and alternative communication: European perspectives (pp. 232–248). London: Whurr.
   Google Scholar
• Higginbotham, D. J. (1995). Subject selection in AAC research: Decision points. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 11, 11–13.
   Google Scholar
• Hirsh-Pasek, K., & Golinkoff, R. (1996). The intermodal preferen-tial looking paradigm: A window onto emerging language com-prehension. In D. McDaniel, C. McKee, & H. Smith Cairns (Eds.), Methods for assessing children's syntax (pp. 105–124). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hjelmquist, E. (1999). Form and meaning in alternative language development. In F. Loncke, J. Clibbens, & L. Lloyd (Eds.), New directions in AAC: Research and practice (pp. 31–39). London: Whurr.
   Google Scholar
• Hohn, R. (1997). More than a watchmaker. Vista, CA: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Hunt Berg, M. (2001). Exploring CHILDES for multi-modal tran-scription in augmentative and alternative communication. In S. von Tetzchner & J. Clibbens (Eds.), Understanding the theo-retical and methodological bases of augmentative and alterna-tive communication (pp. 42–51). Toronto, ON: ISAAC.
   Google Scholar
• Hunt-Berg, M., & Schick, B. (1995, December). Learning graphic symbols: Do children have a categorical bias? Poster session presented at the annual convention of the American Speech and Hearing Association, Orlando, FL.
   Google Scholar
• Johnston, J., Blatchley, M., & Streit, G. (1990). Miniature language system acquisition by children with different learning proficien-cies. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 33,335–342.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Johnston, J., & Slobin, D. (1979). The development of locative expressions in English, Italian, Serbo-Croatian, and Turkish. Journal of Child Language, 6, 529–545.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnston, S., & Redmond, S. (1999, November). Grammaticality judgments of children with severe speech and physical impair-ments. Poster session presented at the meeting of the Ameri-can Speech-Language-Hearing Association, San Francisco.
   Google Scholar
• Kail, M., & Fayol, M. (Eds.). (2000). L'aquisition du langage: Le langage en emergence de la naissance a trois ans. Paris: Presses universitaires de la France.
   Google Scholar
• Kelford Smith, A., Thurston, S., Light, J., Parnes, P., & O'Keefe, B. (1989). The form and use of written communication produced by physically disabled individuals using microcomputers. Aug-mentative and Alternative Communication, 5,115–124.
   Google Scholar
• Kraat, A. (1985). Communication interaction between aided and natural speakers: A state of the art report. Toronto, ON: Cana-dian Rehabilitation Council for the Disabled.
   Google Scholar
• Kraat, A. (1990). Methodological issues in the study of language development among children using aided language: Reactant paper 1. In J. Brodin & E. Björck-Akesson (Eds.), Methodolog-ical issues in research in augmentative and alternative com-munication (pp. 118–123). Vällingby, Sweden: The Swedish Handicap Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Layton, T., Crais, E., & Watson, L. (2000). Handbook of early lan-guage impairment in children: Nature. Albany, NY: Delmar.
   Google Scholar
• Lepot-Froment, C. (2000). L'acquisition d'une langue des signes: données empiriques et questions apparentées. In M. Kail & M. Fayol (Eds.), L'aquisition du langage: Le langage en emergence de la naissance a trois ans (pp. 193–230). Paris: Presses uni-versitaires de la France.
   Google Scholar
• Light, J. (1997). "Let's go star fishing": Reflections on the contexts of language learning for children who use aided AAC. Aug-mentative and Alternative Communication, 13, 158–171.
   Google Scholar
• Lloyd, L., Fuller, D., & Arvidson, H. (Eds.). (1997). Augmentative and alternative communication: A handbook of principles and practices. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Locke, J. (1998). Are developmental language disorders primarily grammatical? Speculations from an evolutionary model. In R. Paul (Ed.), Exploring the speech-language connection (pp. 53–72). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
   Google Scholar
• Locke, J. (1999). Towards a biological science of language devel-opment. In M. Barrett (Ed.) The development of language (pp. 373–396). East Sussex, UK: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lonke, F., Vander Beken, K., & Lloyd, L. (1997). Toward a theo-retical model of symbol processing and use. In E. Björck-Akesson and P. Lindsay (Eds.), Communication... naturally (pp. 102-112). Västeras, Sweden: Mälardalen University Press.
   Google Scholar
• MacWhinney, B. (1993). The (il)logical problem of language acqui-sition. In: Proceedings of the Fifteenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Maratsos, M. (1999). Some aspects of innateness and complexity in grammatical acquisition. In M. Barrett (Ed.), The development of language (pp. 191–224). East Sussex, UK: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marcus, G., Pinker, S., Ullman, M., Hollander, M., Rosen, T., & Xu, F. (1992). Over-regularization in language acquisition. Mono-graphs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 57(4, Serial No. 228).
   Google Scholar
• Martinsen, H., & von Tetzchner, S. (1996). Situating augmentative and alternative communication intervention. In S. von Tetzchner & M. H. Jensen (Eds.), Augmentative and alternative commu-nication: European perspectives (pp. 51–68). London: Whurr.
   Google Scholar
• McDaniel, D., McKee, C., & Cairns, H. (1996). Methods for assess-ing children's syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Muller, E., & Soto, G. (2000, August). Conversational strategies used by adults with augmentative communication needs. Paper presented at the biennial conference of the International Soci-ety for Augmentative and Alternative Communication, Wash-ington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Muller, E., & Soto, G. (2001) Capturing the complexity of aided interactions: A conversation analysis perspective. In S. von Tet-zchner & J. Clibbens (Eds.), Understanding the theoretical and methodological bases of augmentative and alternative commu-nication (pp. 64–83). Toronto, ON: ISAAC.
   Google Scholar
• Nakamura, K., Newell, A. F., Alm, N., & Waller, A. C. (1998). How do members of different language communities compose sen-tences with a picture-based communication system? A cross-cultural study of picture-based sentences constructed by Eng-lish and Japanese speakers. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 14, 71–80.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, K. E. (1981). Toward a rare-event cognitive comparison theory of syntax acquisition. In P. Dale & D. Ingram (Eds), Child language: An international perspective (pp. 229–240). Balti-more: University Park Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, N. W. (1992). Performance is the prize: Language com-petence and performance among AAC users. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 8, 3–18.
   Google Scholar
• Neville, H., Mills, D., & Lawson, D. (1992). Fractioning language: different neural subsystems with different sensitive periods. Cerebral Cortex, 2, 244–258.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ninio, A., & Snow, C. (1988). Language acquisition through lan-guage use: The functional sources of children's early utterances. In I. Schlesinger & M. Braine (Eds.), Categories and processes in language acquisition (pp. 1–30). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Paul, R. (1997). Facilitating transitions in language development for children using AAC. Augmentative and Alternative Commu-nication, 13, 141–148.
   Google Scholar
• Paul, R. (1998). Communicative development in augmented modalities: Language without speech? In R. Paul (Ed.), Explor-ing the speech-language connection (pp. 139–162). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
   Google Scholar
• Petitto, L. (1987). On the autonomy of language and gesture: Evi-dence from the acquisition of personal pronouns in American Sign Language. Cognition, 27, 1–52.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petitto, L. (1992). Modularity, and constraints in early lexical acqui-sition: Evidence from children's early language and gesture. Minnesota Symposium on Child Psychology, 25. Language acquisition: Core readings (pp. 95–126), (Reprinted by P. Bloom, Ed., 1993, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.)
   Google Scholar
• Pinker, S. (1994). The language instinct: How the mind creates language. New York: Morrow.
   Google Scholar
• Romski, M. A., & Sevcik, R. A. (1991). Patterns of language learn-ing by instruction: Evidence from nonspeaking persons with mental retardation. In N. S. Krasnegor, D. M. Rumbaugh, R. L. Schiefelbush, & M. Studdert-Kennedy (Eds.), Biological and behavioral determinants of language development (pp. 429–445). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Romski, M. A., & Sevcik, R. A. (1992). Developing augmented lan-guage in children with severe mental retardation. In S. F. War-
   Google Scholar
• Ren & J. Reichle (Eds.), Causes and effects in communication and language intervention (pp. 113–130). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
   Google Scholar
• Romski, M. A., & Sevcik, R. A. (1996). Breaking the speech bar-rier: Language development through augmented means. Balti-more: Paul H. Brookes.
   Google Scholar
• Romski, M. A., Sevcik, R. A., & Adamson, L. B. (1997). Framework for studying how children with developmental disabilities develop language through augmented means. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 13, 172–178.
   Google Scholar
• Rush, W. (1986). Journey out of silence. Lincoln, NE: Media Pub-lishing and Marketing.
   Google Scholar
• Savage-Rumbaugh, S., Murphy, J., Sevcik, R., Brakke, K., Williams, S., & Rumbaugh, D. (1993). Comprehension in ape and child. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 58(3–4, Serial No. 233).
   Google Scholar
• Sevcik, R. A., & Romski, M. A. (1997). Comprehension and lan-guage acquisition: evidence from youth with severe cognitive disabilities. In L. Adamson & M. Romski (Eds.), Communication and language acquisition: Discoveries from atypical develop-ment (pp. 187–202). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
   Google Scholar
• Slobin, D. (1973). Cognitive prerequisites for the development of grammar. In C. Ferguson & D. Slobin (Eds.), Studies in child language development (pp. 175–211). New York: Holt Reinhart & Winston.
   Google Scholar
• Slobin, D. (1985). Crosslinguistic evidence for the language-mak-ing capacity. In D. Slobin (Ed.), The crosslinguistic study of lan-guage acquisition volume 2: Theoretical issues (pp. 1157–1256). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum
   Google Scholar
• Smith, M. M. (1996). The medium or the message: A study of speaking children using communication boards. In S. von Tet-zchner & M. H. Jensen (Eds.), Augmentative and alternative communication: European perspectives (pp. 119–136). London: Whurr.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, M. (1997). The bimodal situation of children developing alternative modes of language. In E. Bjorck-Akesson & P. Lind-say (Eds.), Communication... naturally (pp. 12-18). Västeras, Sweden: Mälardalen University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, M., & Grove, N. (1999).The bimodal situation of children learning language using manual and graphic signs. In F. Lon-cke, J. Clibbens, & L. Lloyd (Eds.), New directions in AAC: Research and practice (pp. 9–30). London: Whurr.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, M., & Grove, N. (2001). Determining utterance boundaries: Problems and strategies. In S. von Tetzchner & J. Clibbens (Eds.), Understanding the theoretical and methodological bases of augmentative and alternative communication (pp. 15–42). Toronto, ON: ISAAC.
   Google Scholar
• Soto, G. (1997). Multi-unit utterances and syntax in graphic com-munication. In E. Bjorck-Akesson & P. Lindsay (Eds.), Com-munication.... naturally: Theoretical and methodological issues in augmentative and alternative communication (pp. 26-32). Västeras, Sweden: Mälardalen University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Soto, G. (1999). Understanding the impact of graphic sign use on the message structure. In F. Loncke, J. Clibbens, H. Arvidson, & L. Lloyd (Eds.), Augmentative and alternative communication: New directions in research and practice. London: Whurr.
   Google Scholar
• Soto, G., & Grove, N. (2001). Multi-modal transcription in aug-mentative and alternative communication: Theoretical and methodological considerations. In S. von Tetzchner & J. Clibbens (Eds.), Understanding the theoretical and method-ological bases of augmentative and alternative communication (pp. 12–15). Toronto, ON: ISAAC.
   Google Scholar
• Soto, G., & Toro-Zambrana, W. (1995). Investigation of Blissym-bol use from a language research paradigm. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 11, 118–130.
   Google Scholar
• Stromswold, K. (1994, November). Language comprehension with-out production: Implications for theories of language acquisition. Paper presented at the Boston Child Language Conference, Boston, MA.
   Google Scholar
• Sutton, A. (1989). The social-verbal competence of AAC users. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 5,150–164.
   Google Scholar
• Sutton, A. (1996). Evidence of sensitivity to structural contrasts in the literature on children's language comprehension. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 39, 1304–1314.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sutton, A., & Dench, C. (1998). Connected speech development in a child with limited language production experience. Journal of Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology, 22, 134–141.
   Google Scholar
• Sutton, A., & Gallagher, T. (1993). Verb class distinctions and AAC language encoding limitations. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 36, 1216–1226.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sutton, A., & Gallagher, T. (1995). Comprehension assessment of a child using an AAC system: A comparison of two techniques. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 4, 60–68.
   Google Scholar
• Sutton, A., Gallagher, T., Morford, J., & Shahnaz, N. (2000). Rel-ative clause sentence production using augmentative and alter-native communication systems. Applied Psycholinguistics, 21, 473–486.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutton, A., & Morford, J. (1998). Constituent order in picture point-ing sequences produced by speaking children using AAC. Applied Psycholinguistics, 19, 525–536.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomasello, M., & Brooks, P. (1999). Early syntactic development: A Constructionist Grammar approach. In M. Barrett (Ed.), The development of language (pp. 161–190). East Sussex, UK: Psy-chology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Udwin, O., & Yule, W. (1990). Augmentative and alternative com-munication systems taught to cerebral palsied children: A lon-gitudinal study: I. The acquisition of signs and symbols, and syn-tactic aspects of their use overtime. British Journal of Disorders of Communication, 25, 295–309.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• van Balkom, H. (1998, August). Enhancing natural language com-pensation (NLC) through augmentative communication. Paper presented at the meeting of the International Society for Aug-mentative and Alternative Communication (ISAAC), Dublin.
   Google Scholar
• van Balkom, H., & Welle Donker-Gimbrere, M. (1996). A psy-cholinguistic approach to graphic language use. In S. von Tet-zchner & M. H. Jensen (Eds.), Augmentative and alternative communication: European perspectives (pp. 153–170). London: Whurr.
   Google Scholar
• Veneziano, E. (2000). Interaction, conversation et acquisition du langage dans les trois premieres années. In M. Kail & M. Fayol (Eds.), L'aquisition du langage: Le langage en emergence de la naissance a trois ans (pp. 231–266). Paris: Presses universi-taires de la France.
   Google Scholar
• von Tetzchner, S., Grove, N., Loncke, F., Barnett, S., Woll, B., & Clibbens, J. (1996). Preliminaries to a comprehensive model of augmentative and alternative communication. In S. von Tetzch-ner & M. H. Jensen (Eds.), Augmentative and alternative com-munication: European perspectives (pp. 19–36). London: Whurr.
   Google Scholar
• von Tetzchner, S., & Jensen, M.H. (Eds.). (1996). Augmentative and alternative communication: European perspectives. Lon-don: Whurr.
   Google Scholar
• von Tetzchner, S., & Martinsen, H. (1992). Introduction to sign teaching and the use of communication aids. London: Whurr.
   Google Scholar
• von Tetzchner, S., & Martinsen, H. (1996). Words and strategies: Communicating with young children who use aided language. In S. von Tetzchner & M. H. Jensen (Eds.), Augmentative and alternative communication: European perspectives (pp. 65–88). London: Whurr.
   Google Scholar
• von Tetzchner, S., & Martinsen, H. (2000). Introduction to aug-mentative and alternative communication (2nd ed.). Philadel-phia: Taylor Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, M., & Krezman, C. (Eds.). (2000). Beneath the surface: Creative expressions of augmented communicators (ISAAC Series, Vol. 2). Toronto, ON: ISAAC Press.
   Google Scholar