460
Views
34
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Influence of communicative competence and Augmentative and Alternative Communication technique on children's attitudes toward a peer who uses AAC

, , &
Pages 217-227 | Published online: 12 Jul 2009

References

  • Beck, A., & Dennis, M. (1996). Attitudes of children toward a sim-ilar-aged child who uses augmentative communication. Aug-mentative and Alternative Communication, 12, 78–87.
  • Beck, A., Fritz, H., Keller, A., & Dennis, M. (2000). Attitudes of school-aged children toward their peers who use AAC. Aug-mentative and Alternative Communication, 16, 13–26.
  • Beck, A., Kingsbury, K., Neff, A., & Dennis, M. (2000). The influ-ence of length of augmented message on children's attitudes toward peers who use AAC. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 16, 239–249.
  • Beck, A., Rennels, K., & Bova, L. (1997, November). Integration of children in special education: A case study. Poster session presented at the American Speech-Language-Hearing Con-vention, Boston.
  • Beukelman, D., & Mirenda, P. (1998). Augmentative and alterna-tive communication: Management of severe communication dis-orders in children and adults (2nd ed.). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
  • Blockberger, S., Armstrong, R., O'Connor, A., & Freeman, R. (1993). Children's attitudes toward a nonspeaking child using various augmentative and alternative communication tech-niques. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 9, 243–250.
  • Boardmaker for Windows [Computer software]. (1994). Solona Beach, CA: Mayer-Johnson Co.
  • Brown, L., Ford, A., Nisbet, J., Sweet, M., Donnellan, A., & Grue-newald, L. (1983). Opportunities available when severely hand-icapped students attend chronologically age appropriate regu-lar schools. Journal of the Association for People with Severe Handicaps, 8, 16–24.
  • Burke, V. (1994). Children's perceptions of peers who demon-strate phonological, voice, or fluency disorders: Implications for caseload inclusion. Unpublished master's thesis, Illinois State University, Normal, Illinois.
  • Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C. (1966). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Chicago: Rand McNally. Cohen, J. (1977). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (rev. ed.). New York: Academic Press.
  • Cook, B. G., Tankersley, M., Cook, L., & Landrum, T. J. (2000). Teachers' attitudes toward their included students with disabil-ities. Exceptional Children, 67, 115–135.
  • Downing, J. (1999). Teaching communication skills to students with severe disabilities. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
  • Eagly, A., & Chaiken, S. (1993). The psychology of attitudes. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College.
  • Fazio, R. (1990). Multiple processes by which attitudes guide behaviors: The MODE model as an integrated framework. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (vol. 23, pp. 75–108). New York: Academic Press.
  • Fritz, H., Keller, A., & Beck, A. (1999, November). Intervention pro-grams and children's attitudes toward peer who use AAC. Poster session presented at the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association Convention, San Francisco, CA.
  • Glennen, S., & DeCoste, D. (1997). Handbook of augmentative and alternative communication. San Diego, CA: Singular Pub-lishing Group.
  • Gorenflo, C., & Gorenflo, D. (1991). The effects of information and augmentative communication technique on attitudes toward nonspeaking individuals. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 34, 19–26.
  • Gottlieb, J., Gorman, L., & Curci, R. (1984). Attitudes toward men-tally retarded children. In R. Jones (Ed.), Attitudes and attitude change in special education: Theory and practice (pp. 143–156). Reston, VA: Council for Exceptional Children.
  • Hegde, M. (1994). Clinical research in communicative disorders: Principles and strategies (2nd ed.). Austin, TX: Pro-ed.
  • Hoag, L., & Bedrosian, J. (1992). Effects of speech output type, message length, and reauditorization on perceptions of the communicative competence of an adult AAC user. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 35,1363–1366.
  • Hymel, S. (1986). Interpretations of peer behavior: Affective bias in childhood and adolescence. Child Development, 57, 431–445.
  • Krajewski, J., & Flaherty, T. (2000). Attitudes of high school stu-dents toward individuals with mental retardation. Mental Retar-dation, 38, 154–162.
  • Kraus, S. (1995). Attitudes and the prediction of behavior: A meta-analysis of the empirical literature. Personality and Social Psy-chology Bulletin, 21, 58–75.
  • Light, J. (1989). Toward a definition of communicative competence for individuals using augmentative and alternative communication systems. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 5, 137–144.
  • Paul, R. (2001). Language disorders from infancy through ado-lescence: Assessment and intervention (2nd ed.). St. Louis, MO: Mosby.
  • Prizant, B., & Wetherby, A. (1990). Toward an integrated view of early language and communication development and socioe-motional development. Topics in Language Disorders, 10, 1–16.
  • Reeder, G. (1993). Trait-behavior relations and dispositional infer-ence. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 19, 586–593.
  • Rosenbaum, P., Armstrong, R., & King, S. (1986). Children's atti-tudes toward disabled peers: A self-report measure. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 11,517–530.
  • Schiavetti, N., & Metz, D. (2002). Evaluating research in commu-nicative disorders (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
  • Siller, J. (1984). Attitudes toward the physically disabled. In R. Jones (Ed.), Attitudes and attitude change in special education: Theory and practice (pp. 184–205). Reston, VA: Council for Exceptional Children.
  • Specht, J. A., Polgar, J. M., Willoughby, C., King, G., & Brown, E. (2000). A retrospective look at the educational experiences of individuals with disabilities. Exceptionality-Education-Canada, 10, 25–39.
  • Todman, J. (2000). Rate and quality of conversations using a text-storage AAC system: Single-case training study. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 16, 164–179.
  • Williams, B. (2001, March). The Edwin and Ester Prentke AAC Dis-tinguished Lecture. Asha Special Interest Division 12 Augmen-tative and Alternative Communication Newsletter, 10, 15–16.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.