The Effect of Remnant and Pictographic Books on the Communicative Interaction of Individuals with Global Aphasia

References

• Barlow, D. H., & Hayes, S. C. (1979). Alternating treatments design: One strategy for comparing the effects of two treatments in a single subject. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 12, 199–210.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bellaire, K. J., Georges, J. B., & Thompson, C. K. (1991). Establishing functional communication board use for nonverbal aphasic subjects. Clinical Aphasiology, 19, 219–227.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, A. R., & Fritz, H. (1998). Can individuals who have aphasia learn iconic codes? Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 14, 184–196.
   Google Scholar
• Bertoni, B., Stoffel, A., & Weneger, D. (1991). Commu-nicating with pictographs: A graphic approach to the improvement of communicative interactions. Aphasiol-ogy, 5, 341–353.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beukelman, D., & Mirenda, P. (1998). AAC strategies for beginning communicators — Symbolic approaches to communication). In D. Beukelman & P. Mirenda (Eds.), Augmentation and alternative communication: Management of severe communication disorders in children and adults (pp. 295–329). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
   Google Scholar
• Beukelman, D. R., Yorkston, K., & Dowden, P. (1985). Communicative augmentation: A casebook of clinical management. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
   Google Scholar
• Boller, F., Cole, M., Vrtunski, P., Patterson, M., & Kim, Y. (1979). Paralinguistic aspects of auditory comprehension in aphasia. Brain and language, 7, 164–174.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boser, K. I., & Weinrich, M. (1998). Functional categories in agrammatic production: Evidence for access to tense projections. Brain and Language, 65, 207–210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chenery, H. J., Ingram, J. C. L., & Murdoch, B. E. (1990). Automatic and vocational semantic processing in apha-sia. Brain and Language, 38, 215–232.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coelho, C., & Duffy, R. J. (1987). The relationship of the acquisition of manual signs to severity of aphasia: A training study. Brain and Language, 31, 328–345.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox, L. E., & Fried-Oken, M. (1996). AAC aphasiology: Partnership for future research. Augmentative and Alter-native Communication, 12, 257–271.
   Google Scholar
• Fox, L. E., Sohlberg, M. M., & Fried-Oken, M. (2001). Effects of conversational topic choice on outcomes of an augmentative communication intervention for adults with aphasia. Aphasiology, 15, 171— 200.
   Google Scholar
• Funnel, E., & Allport, A. (1989). Symbolically speaking: Communicating with blissymbols in aphasia. Aphasiol-ogy, 3, 279–300.
   Google Scholar
• Gardner, H., Zurif, E., Berry, T., & Baker, E. (1976). Visual communication in aphasia. Neuropsychologia, 14, 275–292.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garrett, K. L. (1993). Changes in the interaction patterns of individuals with severe aphasia given three types of partner support. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Nebraska-Lincoln.
   Google Scholar
• Garrett, K. (1996, August). AAC interventions and aphasia: Cognitive-linguistic considerations. Paper presented at the meeting of the International Society of Augmentative and Alternative Communication, Vancouver, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Garrett, K. L., & Beukelman, D. R. (1992). Augmentative and alternative communication approaches for indivi-duals with severe aphasia. In K. M. Yorkston (Ed.), Augmentative and alternative communication in the med-ical setting (pp. 245–321). Communication Skill Builders: Tucson, AZ.
   Google Scholar
• Garrett, K. L., & Beukelman, D. R. (1998). Adults with severe aphasia. In D. Beukelman & P. Mirenda (Eds.), Augmentative and alternative communication: Manage-ment of severe communication disorders in children and adults (pp. 465–499). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
   Google Scholar
• Garrett, K., Beukelman, D., & Low-Morrow, D. (1989). A comprehensive augmentative communication system for an adult with Broca's aphasia. Augmentative and Alter-native Communication, 5, 55–61.
   Google Scholar
• Garrett, K., & Huth, C. (2002). The impact of graphic contextual information and instruction on the conversa-tional behaviors of an individual with severe aphasia. Clinical Aphasiology, 16, 523–536.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garrett, K., & Kimelman, M. (2000). Cognitive-linguistic considerations in the application of alternative commu-nication strategies for aphasia. In D., Beukelman, K., Yorkston, & J. Reichle, (Eds.), Augmentative communica-tion for adults with neurogenic and neuromuscular dis-abilities (pp. 339–374). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
   Google Scholar
• Goodglass, H., & Kaplan, E. (1983). Boston diagnostic aphasia examination. Media, PA: Williams & Wilkins.
   Google Scholar
• Helm-Estabrooks, N., Ramsberger, G., Morgan, A., & Nicholas, M. (1989b). Boston assessment of severe aphasia. Chicago: Riverside Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kagan, A. (1995). Revealing the competence of aphasic adults through conversation: A challenge to health professionals. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation, 2, 15–28.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kazdin, A. (1982). Single-case research designs: Methods for clinical and applied settings. New York: Oxford Uni-versity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Keenan, E., & Schieffelin, B. (1976) Topic as a discourse notion: A study of topic in the conversation of children and adults. In C. Li (Ed.), Subject and topic (pp. 336–384). New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Koul, R., & Harding, R. (1998). Identification and produc-tion of graphic symbols by individuals with aphasia: Efficacy of a software application. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 14, 11–23.
   Google Scholar
• Koul, R., & Corwin, M. (2003). Efficacy of AAC interven-tion in individuals with chronic severe aphasia. In R. W. Schlosser (Ed.), The efficacy of augmentative and alter-native Communication: Towards evidence-based practice (pp. 449–470). New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Koul, R., & Lloyd, L. L. (1998). Comparison of graphic symbol learning in individuals with aphasia and right hemisphere brain damage. Brain and Language, 62, 398–421.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landis, T., Graves, R., & Goodglass, H. (1982). Aphasic reading and writing: Possible evidence for right hemi-sphere participation. Cortex, 18, 105–112.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Light, J. (1988). Interaction involving individuals using augmentative and alternative communication systems: State of the art and future directions. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 4, 66–82.
   Google Scholar
• Light, J., & Lindsay, P. (1991). Cognitive science and augmentative and alternative communication. Augmenta-tive and Alternative Communication, 7, 186–203.
   Google Scholar
• Lund, S., & Light, J. (1999, November). AAC symbol learning - There's more to it than just iconicity. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Speech-Language Hearing Association, San Francisco, CA.
   Google Scholar
• McCall, D., Shelton, J. R., Weinrich, M., & Cox, D. (2000). The utility of computerized visual communication for improving natural language in chronic global aphasia: Implications for approaches to treatment in global aphasia. Aphasiology, 14, 795–826.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osberg, J. S., Haley, S. M., McGinnis, G. E., & DeJong, G. (1990). Characteristics of cost outliers who did not benefit from stroke rehabilitation. American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 69, 117–125.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacWhinney, B. (2001). From CHILDES to Talk Bank. In M. Almgren, A. Barrefia, M. Eveizaberrena, I. Idiazabal, & B. MacWhinney (Eds.), Research on child language acquisition (pp. 17–34). Sommerville, MA: Cascadilla.
   Google Scholar
• McNeil, M. (1983) Aphasia: Neurological considerations. Topics in Language Disorders, 3, 1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer-Johnson, R. (1992). The picture communication symbols. Book III. Solana Beach, CA: Mayer-Johnson Company.
   Google Scholar
• Nicholas, M., Elliot, S., Baker, E., & Weiss, S. (1994, November). Computerized AAC system for severe aphasia. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Speech-Language Hearing Association, New Orleans, LA.
   Google Scholar
• Reuterskiold, C. (1991). The effects of emotionality on auditory comprehension in aphasia. Cortex, 27, 595–604.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers, M., Schegel, E., Alacron, N., Olswang, L., & Klingenberg, M. (1999, May). Quantifying the quality of communication between individuals with aphasia and conversational partners. Paper presented at meeting of the Clinical Aphasiology Conference, Santa Fe, NM.
   Google Scholar
• Sevcik, R. A., Romski, M. A., & Wilkinson, K. M. (1991). Roles of graphic symbols in the language acquisition process for individuals with severe cognitive disabilities. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 7, 161–170.
   Google Scholar
• Shelton, J. R., Weinrich, M., McCall, D., & Cox, D. M. (1996). Differentiating globally aphasic patients: Data from in-depth language assessments and production training using C-VIC. Aphasiology, 10, 319–342.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steele, R. D., Kleczewska, M. K., Carlson, G. S., & Weinrich, M. (1992). Computers in the rehabilitation of chronic, severe aphasia: C-VIC 2.0 cross-modal studies. Aphasiology, 6, 185–194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The United States General Accounting Office (GAO). (1996). Skilled nursing facilities: Approval process for certain services may result in higher Medicare costs (No. GAO/ HEHS-97-18). Gaithersburg, MD: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Van Lancker, D., & Nicklay, C. (1992). Comprehension of personally relevant (PERL) versus novel language in two globally aphasic patients. Aphasiology, 6, 37–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallace, G., & Canter, G. (1985). Effects of individually relevant language materials on the performance of severely aphasic individuals. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 50, 385–390.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Waaland, P. K. (1998). Families of children with traumatic brain injury. In M. Ylvisaker (Ed.), Traumatic brain injury rehabilitation: Children and adolescents (pp. 345–368). Boston, MA: Butterworth-Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Weinrich, M., Boser, K. I., McCall, D., & Bishop, V. (2001). Training agrammatic subjects on passive sentences: Implications for syntactic deficit theories. Brain and Language, 76, 45–61.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weinrich, M., McCall, D., Shoosmith, L, Thomas, K., Katzenberger, K., & Weber, C. (1993). Locative preposi-tional phrases in severe aphasia. Brain and Language, 45, 21–45.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weinrich, M., Shelton, J. R., McCall, D., & Cox, D. M. (1997). Generalization from single sentence to multi-sentence production in severely aphasic patients. Brain and Language, 58, 327–352.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiss, S., & Ho, K. (1997, November). Remnant books in Aphasia: AAC strategies for patients in the acute rehabilitation setting. Poster session presented at the annual meeting of the American Speech Language Hearing Association, Boston, MA.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, L. A., Lasker, J., Siegel-Causey, E., Beukelman, D. R., & Ball, L. (1998). Input framework for augmentative and alternative communication. Augmentative and Alter-native Communication, 14, 261–267.
   Google Scholar