Attitudes toward Individuals Who Use Augmentative and Alternative Communication: Research Review

References

• Antonak, R., & Livneh, H. (1988). The measurement of attitudes toward people with disabilities. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, A., Bock, S., Thompson, J. R., & Kosuwan, K. (2002). Influence of communicative competence and augmenta-tive and alternative communication technique on chil-dren's attitudes toward a peer who uses AAC. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 18, 217 — 227.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, A., & Dennis, M. (1996). Attitudes of children toward a similar-aged child who uses augmentative and alter-native communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 12, 78–87.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, A., Fritz, H., Keller, A., & Dennis, M. (2000). Attitudes of school-aged children toward their peers who use augmentative and alternative communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 16, 13— 26.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, A., Kingsbury, K., Neff, A., & Dennis, M. (2000). Influence of length of augmented message on children's attitudes toward peers who use augmentative and alternative communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 16, 239–249.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, A., Thompson, J., Clay, S., Hutchins, M., Vogt, W. P., Romaniak, B., & Sokolowski, B. (2001). Preservice professionals' attitudes toward children who use augmen-tative/alternative communication. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 36, 255–271.
   Google Scholar
• Bedrosian, J., Hoag, L., Calculator, S., & Molineux, B. (1992). Variables influencing perceptions of the commu-nicative competence of an adult augmentative and alternative communication system user. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 35, 1105–1113.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bedrosian, J., Hoag, L., Johnson, D., & Calculator, S. (1998). Communicative competence as perceived by adults with severe speech impairments associated with cerebral palsy. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 41, 667–675.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beukelman, D., & Mirenda, P. (1998). Augmentative and alternative communication: Management of severe com-munication disorders in children and adults. (2nd edn.). Baltimore, MD: Paul Brookes.
   Google Scholar
• Blockberger, S., Armstrong, R., O'Connor, A., & Freeman, R. (1993). Children's attitudes toward a nonspeaking child using various augmentative and alternative com-munication techniques. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 9, 243–250.
   Google Scholar
• Calculator, S. (1996). Introduction. In S. Calculator & C. Jorgensen (Eds.), Including students with severe disabilities in school (pp. xxiii-xxvii). San Diego: Singular Press.
   Google Scholar
• Calculator, S. (1999). AAC outcomes for children and youths with severe disabilities: When seeing is believ-ing. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 15, 4–12.
   Google Scholar
• Dada, S., & Alant, E. (2002). A comparative study of the attitudes of teachers at special and educationally inclusive schools towards learners with little or no functional speech using communication devices. South African Journal of Education, 22(3), 223–228.
   Google Scholar
• Diamond, K., Hestenes, L., Carpenter, E., & Innes, F. (1997). Relationship between enrollment in an inclusive class and preschool children's ideas about people with disabilities. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 17, 520–536.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eiser, J. R. (1986). Social psychology: Attitudes, cognition and social behaviour. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gerson, S. (1996). Student attitudes toward people with disabilities: A comparison of three settings. Unpublished Dissertation, University of Maryland, College Park, MD.
   Google Scholar
• Gorenflo, C. W., & Gorenflo, D. (1991). The effects of information and augmentative communication technique on attitudes toward nonspeaking individuals. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 34, 19–26.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gorenflo, C. W., & Gorenflo, D. (1997). Effects of synthetic speech, gender, and perceived similarity on attitudes toward the augmented communicator. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 13, 87–91.
   Google Scholar
• Gorenflo, C. W., Gorenflo, D., & Santer, S. (1994). Effects of synthetic voice output on attitudes toward the augmented communicator. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 37, 64–68.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hegde, M. N. (1994). Clinical research in communicative disorders: Principles and strategies. San Diego, CA: Singular.
   Google Scholar
• Heider, F. (1983). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Hustad, K. (2001). Unfamiliar listeners' evaluation of speech supplementation strategies for improving the effectiveness of severely dysarthric speech. Augmentative and Alter-native Communication, 17, 213–220.
   Google Scholar
• Kirk, R. (1996). Practical significance: A concept whose time has come. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 56, 746–759.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krajewski, J., & Hyde, M. (2000). Comparison of teen attitudes toward individuals with mental retardation between 1987 and 1998: Has inclusion made a difference? Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 35, 284–293.
   Google Scholar
• Kraus, S. J. (1995). Attitudes and the prediction of behavior: A meta-analysis of the empirical literature. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 58–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lasker, J., & Beukelman, D. (1999). Peers' perceptions of storytelling by an adult with aphasia. Aphasiology, 1, 857–869.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Light, J. (1989). Toward a definition of communicative competence for individuals using augmentative and alternative communication systems. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 5, 137–144.
   Google Scholar
• Light, J. (1999). Do augmentative and alternative commu-nication interventions really make a difference?: The challenges of efficacy research. Augmentative and Alter-native Communication, 15, 13–24.
   Google Scholar
• Lilienfeld, M., & Alant, E. (2002). Attitudes of children toward an unfamiliar peer using an AAC device with and without voice output. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 18, 91–101.
   Google Scholar
• Livneh, H. (1988). A dimensional perspective on the origin of negative attitudes toward persons with disabilities. In H. E. Yuker (Ed.), Attitudes toward persons with disabilities (pp. 35–46). New York: Springer Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Macke, R. (1992). Preservice teacher attitudes towards nonvocal individuals using high-technology augmentative alternative communication devices versus low-technology communication boards. Unpublished Dissertation, Uni-versity of North Texas, Denton, TX.
   Google Scholar
• Maras, P., & Brown, R. (1996). Effects of contact on children's attitudes toward disability: A longitudinal study. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 26, 2113–2134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCarthy, J., Light, J., & McNaughton, D. (2002). Consumers perspectives on social relationships: Lessons for professionals. Paper presented at the Tenth Biennial Conference of the International Society for Augmentative and Alternative Communication, Odense, DK.
   Google Scholar
• McNaughton, D., Light, J., & Arnold, K. B. (2002). "Getting your wheel in the door": Successful full-time employment experiences of individuals with cerebral palsy who use augmentative and alternative communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 18, 59–76.
   Google Scholar
• McNaughton, D., Light, J., & Groszyk, L. (2001). "Don't give up": The employment experiences of adults with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis who use augmentative and alternative communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 17, 179–195.
   Google Scholar
• O'Keefe, B. (1992). Effects of communication outputs on attitudes toward individuals who use augmentative and alternative communication and on output preferences. Unpublished Dissertation, The Pennsylvania State Uni-versity, University Park.
   Google Scholar
• Popich, E., & Alant, E. (1997). Interaction between a teacher and the non-speaking as well as speaking children in the classroom. South African Journal of Communication Disorders, 44, 31–40.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Raney, C., & Silverman, F. (1992). Attitudes toward nonspeaking individuals who use communication boards. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 35, 1269–1271.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rosenbaum, P., Armstrong, R., & King, S. (1986a). Children's attitudes toward disabled peers: A self-report measure. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 11(4), 517–530.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum, P., Armstrong, R., & King, S. (1986b). Improving attitudes toward the disabled: A randomized controlled trial of direct contact versus kids-on-the-block. Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics, 7, 302–307.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlosser, R. (1999). Social validation of interventions in augmentative and alternative communication. Augmenta-tive and Alternative Communication, 15, 234–237.
   Google Scholar
• Schlosser, R. W. (2003a). Roles of speech output in augmentative and alternative communication: Narrative review. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 19, 5–27.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schlosser, R. W. (2003b). Validity. In R. W. Schlosser (Ed.), The efficacy of augmentative and alternative communica-tion: Toward evidence-based practice (pp. 27–42). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schlosser, R. W., Blischak, D. M., & Koul, R. K. (2003). Roles of speech output in AAC: An integrative review. In R. W. Schlosser (Ed.), The efficacy of augmentative and alternative communication (pp. 471–532). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shaver, J., Curtis, C., & Strong, C. (1989). The modification of attitudes toward persons with disabilities: Is there a best way? International Journal of Special Education, 4, 33–57.
   Google Scholar
• Soto, G. (1997). Special education teacher attitudes toward AAC: Preliminary survey. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 13, 186— 197.
   Google Scholar
• Triandis, H. C. (1971). Attitudes and attitude change. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Triandis, H. C., Adamopoulos, J., & Brinberg, D. (1984). Perspectives and issues in the study of attitudes. In R. L. Jones (Ed.), Attitudes and attitude change in special education: Theory and practice. Reston, VA: Council for Exceptional Children.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, K. (1993). Interactions between normally devel-oping adolescents and nonspeaking male peers with mental retardation using augmented communication: Attitudes, behaviors, and experience. Unpublished Dissertation, Georgia State University.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, B. (1988). Attitudes and the fundamental negative bias: Conditions and corrections. In H. E. Yuker (Ed.), Attitudes toward persons with disabilities (pp. 3–21). New York: Springer Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Young, M. (1993). Supplementing tests of statistical significance: Variation accounted for. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 36, 644–656.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yuker, H. E. (1994). Variables that influence attitudes toward people with disabilities: Conclusions from the data. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 9(5), 3 — 22.
   Google Scholar
• Yuker, H. E., Block, J. R., & Younng, G. H. (1966). The measurement of attitudes toward disabled persons. Albert-son, NY: Human Resources Center.
   Google Scholar