A Case Study of Team Supports for a Student with Autism's Communication and Engagement within the General Education Curriculum: Preliminary Report of the Beyond Access Model

References

• Beukelman, D., & Mirenda, P. (1998). Augmentative and alternative communication: Management of severe com-munication disorders in children and adults (2nd Edn). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
   Google Scholar
• Blackstone, S. (1989). The 3 R's: Reading, writing, and reasoning. Augmentative Communication News, 2(10), 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Bogdan, R., & Biklen, S. (2003). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theories and methods (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson Education Group, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Broderick, A., & Kasa-Hendrickson, C. (2001). Say just one word at a time: The emergence of reliable speech in a student labeled with autism. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 26, 13–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, L., Branston, M., Hamre-Nietupski, S., Pumpian, I., Certo, N., & Gruenwald, L. (1979). A strategy for developing chronological age appropriate and functional curricular content for severely handicapped adolescents and young adults. Journal of Special Education, 13, 81–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, L., Long, E., Udvari-Solner, A., Schwartz, P., Van Devetner, P., Ahlgren, C., et al. (1989). Should students with severe intellectual disabilities be based in regular or special education classrooms in home schools? Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 14, 8–12.
   Google Scholar
• Bruno, J. (1999). Gateway to language and learning:_ Application program for the DynaVox and DynaMyte' communication devices. Pittsburgh, PA: DynaVox Sys-tems, LLC.
   Google Scholar
• Calculator, S., & Jorgensen, C. (1994). Including students with severe disabilities in schools: Fostering communica-tion, interaction, and participation. San Diego, CA: Singular Publishing Group, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Carrow-Woolfolk, E. (1999). Test for Auditory Comprehen-sion of Language. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Danielson, C. (1996). Enhancing professional practice: A framework for teaching. Alexandria, VA: The Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
   Google Scholar
• Donnellan, A. (1984). The criterion of the least dangerous assumption. Behavioral Disorders, 9, 141–150.
   Google Scholar
• Downing, J. (2002). Including students with severe and multiple disabilities in typical classrooms: Practical strate-gies for teachers (2nd ed.). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes. .
   Google Scholar
• Edelman, S., & Giangreco, M. (1995). VISTA: A process for planning educationally necessary support services. Lan-guage Learning and Education (Special Interest Division Newsletter of the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association), 2(2), 17–18.
   Google Scholar
• Erickson, K., Koppenhaver, D., Yoder, D., & Nance, J. (1997). Integrated communication and literacy instruction for a child with multiple disabilities. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 12, 142–150.
   Google Scholar
• Falvey, M. (1995). Inclusive and heterogeneous schooling: Assessment, curriculum, and instruction. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
   Google Scholar
• Frost, L., & Bondy, A. (1994). The Picture Exchange Communication System training manual. Cherry Hill, NJ: PECs, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Fullan, M. (2001). The new meaning of educational change (3rd Edn). New York: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fullan, M., & Miles, M. (1992). Getting reform right: What works and what doesn't. Phi Delta Kappan, 745–752.
   Google Scholar
• Garmston, R., & Wellman, B. (1999). The adaptive school: A sourcebook for developing collaborative groups. Norwood, MA: Christopher-Gordon Publishers, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Giangreco, M., Cloninger, C., Dennis, R., & Edelman, S. (1994). Problem-solving methods to facilitate inclusive education. In J. Thousand, R. Villa, & A. Nevin (Eds.), Creativity and cooperative learning: A practical guide to empowering students and teachers (pp. 321–346). Balti-more, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
   Google Scholar
• Giangreco, M., Cloninger, C., & Iverson, V. (1998). Choosing outcomes and accommodations for children: A guide to educational planning for students with disabilities (2nd Edn). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
   Google Scholar
• Giangreco, J., & Meyer, L. (1988). Expanding service delivery options in regular schools and classrooms for students with severe disabilities. In J. Graden, J. Zins, & M. Curtis (Eds.), Alternate educational delivery systems: Enhancing instructional options for all students (pp. 241–267). Washington, DC: National Association of School Psychologists.
   Google Scholar
• Giangreco, M., & Putnam, J. (1991). Supporting the education of students with severe disabilities in regular education environments. In L. Meyer, C. Peck, & L. Brown (Eds.), Critical issues in the lives of people with severe disabilities (pp. 245–270). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
   Google Scholar
• Goossens', C. (1989). Aided communication intervention before assessment: A case study of a child with cerebral palsy. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 5, 14–26.
   Google Scholar
• Goossens', C., Crain, S., & Elder, P. (1992). Engineering the preschool environment for interactive, symbolic commu-nication. Birmingham, AL: Southeast Augmentative Communication Conference Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Hunt, P., Soto, G., Maier, J., Muller, E., & Goetz, L. (2002). Collaborative teaming to support students with augmen-tative and alternative communication needs in general education classrooms. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 18, 20–35.
   Google Scholar
• Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) Amend-ments of 1997, PL 105–17, 20 U.S.C. 1400 et seq.
   Google Scholar
• Janney, R., & Snell, M. (2000). Modifying schoolwork. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
   Google Scholar
• Jorgensen, C., Fisher, D., Sax, C., & Skoglund, K. (1998). Innovative scheduling, new roles for teachers, and heterogeneous grouping: The organizational factors related to student success in inclusive, restructuring schools. In C. Jorgensen (Ed.), Restructuring high schools for all students: Taking inclusion to the next level (pp. 29–48). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
   Google Scholar
• Jorgensen, C., McSheehan, M., & Sonnenmeier, R. (2002a). Best practices that promote the learning of the general education curriculum content by students with significant disabilities. Unpublished manuscript, University of New Hampshire.
   Google Scholar
• Jorgensen, C., McSheehan, M., & Sonnenmeier, R. (2002b). Mentor skills that promote the learning of the general education curriculum content by students with significant disabilities. Unpublished manuscript, University of New Hampshire.
   Google Scholar
• Jorgensen, C., McSheehan, M., & Sonnenmeier, R. (2002c). Structures, processes, and skills in teaming that promote the learning of the general education curriculum content by students with significant disabilities. Unpublished manu-script, University of New Hampshire.
   Google Scholar
• Jorgensen, C., Schuh, M., & Nisbet, J. (in press). The inclusion facilitator book. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
   Google Scholar
• Kaner, S. (1996). Facilitator's guide to participatory decision-making. Gabriola Island, BC: Canada:New Society Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Kleinert, H., & Kearns, J. (2001). Alternate assessment: Measuring outcomes and supports for students with disabilities. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
   Google Scholar
• Koppenhaver, D., Erickson, K., Harris, B., McLellan, J., Skotko, B., & Newton, R. (2001). Storybook-based communication intervention for girls with Rett Syndrome and their mothers. Disability and Rehabilitation, 23, 149–159.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Light, J. C., Roberts, B., DiMarco, R., & Greiner, N. (1998). Augmentative and alternative communication to support receptive and expressive communication for people with autism. Journal of Communication Disorders, 31, 153–180.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCarthy, C., McLean, L., Miller, J., Paul-Brown, D., Romski, M., Rourk, J., et al. (1998). Communication supports checklist for programs serving individuals with severe disabilities. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
   Google Scholar
• McEwen, I., & Karlan, G. (1990). Case studies: Why and how. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 6, 69–75.
   Google Scholar
• McGregor, G., & Vogelsberg, R. (1998). Inclusive schooling practices: Pedagogical and research foundations. A synth-esis of the literature that informs best practices about inclusive schooling. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
   Google Scholar
• McSheehan, M., & Sonnenmeier, R. (2001). Developing augmentative communication to support participation in general education classrooms. 2000 TASH Conference Yearbook, 11–19.
   Google Scholar
• McSheehan, M., Sonnenmeier, R., & Jorgensen, C. (2002, May). Communication and learning: Creating systems of support for students with significant disabilities. TASH Connections, 28(2), 9–13.
   Google Scholar
• Merriam, S. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Montie, J., York-Barr, J., Kronberg, R., Stevenson, J., Vallejo, B., & Lunders, C. (n.d.). Reflective practice: Creating capacities for school improvement. Minneapolis, MN: Institute on Community Integration, University of Minnesota.
   Google Scholar
• National Joint Committee on the Communication Needs of Persons with Severe Disabilities(2002). Access to com-munication services and supports: Concerns regarding the application of restrictive "eligibility" policies (Technical Report). Communication Disorders Quarterly, 23, 145–153.
   Google Scholar
• Olson, L. (1994, May 4). Critical friends. Education Week, 20–27.
   Google Scholar
• Rainforth, B., York, J., & Macdonald, C. (1992). Collabora-tive teams for students with severe disabilities: Integrating therapy and educational services. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
   Google Scholar
• Romski, M. A., & Sevcik, R. (1996). Breaking the speech barrier: Language development through augmented means. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
   Google Scholar
• Ryndak, D., & Alper, S. (1996). Curriculum content for students with moderate and severe disabilities in inclusive settings. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Ryndak, D., Morrison, A., & Sommerstein, L. (1999). Literacy before and after inclusion in general education settings: A case study. Journal of The Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 24, 5–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snell, M. E., Caves, K., McLean, L., Mollica, B. M., Mirenda, P., Paul-Brown, D., et al. (2003). Concerns regarding the application of restrictive "eligibility" policies to individuals who need communication services and supports: A response by the National Joint Commit-tee for the Communication Needs of Persons with Severe Disabilities. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 28, 70–78.
   Google Scholar
• Snell, M., & Janney, R. (2000). Collaborative teaming. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co., Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Sonnenmeier, R., & McSheehan, M. (2003). Yea but what about? Supporting students with the most significant disabilities in general education classrooms. In V. Gaylord, T. Vandercook, & J. York-Barr (Eds.), Impact: Feature Issue on Revisiting Inclusive K-12 Education, 16(1) (pp. 6–7). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota, Institute on Community Integration.
   Google Scholar
• Soto, G., Muller, E., Hunt, P., & Goetz, L. (2001). Critical issues in the inclusion of students who use augmentative and alternative communication: An educational team perspective. Augmentative and Alternative Communica-tion, 17, 62–72.
   Google Scholar
• Tashie, C., Jorgensen, C., Shapiro-Barnard, S., Martin, J., & Schuh, M. (1996). High school inclusion: Strategies/ barriers. TASH Connections, 22, 19–22.
   Google Scholar
• Udvari-Solner, A. (1995). A process for adapting curriculum in inclusive classrooms. In R. Villa & J. Thousand (Eds.), Creating an inclusive school (pp. 110–124). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Devel-opment.
   Google Scholar
• Villa, R., & Thousand, J. (Eds.) (1995). Creating an inclusive school. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
   Google Scholar
• Villa, R., Thousand, J., Stainback, W., & Stainback, S. (1992). Restructuring for caring and effective education: An administrative guide to creating heterogeneous schools. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
   Google Scholar
• Wehmeyer, M., Sands, D., Knowlton, E., & Kozleski, E. (2002). Teaching students with mental retardation: Provid-ing access to the general curriculum. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
   Google Scholar
• Weir, C., Jorgensen, C., & Dowd, J. (Eds.). (2002). Promoting excellence in college teaching: A "reflective practice" toolkit for coaches. Durham, NH: University of New Hampshire, Institute in Disability.
   Google Scholar