Long-term outcomes for individuals who use augmentative and alternative communication: Part II – communicative interaction

References

• Beukelman D. R., Yorkston K. M. Nonvocal communication: Performance evaluation. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 1980; 61: 272–275
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calculator S. N., Dollaghan C. The use of communication boards in a residential setting: An evaluation. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders 1982; 47: 281–287
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Calculator S. N., Luchko C. D. A. Evaluating the effectiveness of a communication board training program. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders 1983; 48: 185–191
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Clarke M., Kirton A. Patterns of interaction between children with physical disabilities using augmentative and alternative communication systems and their peers. Child Language Teaching and Therapy 2003; 19: 135–151
   Google Scholar
• Dalton B. M., Bedrosian J. L. Communicative performance of adolescents with severe speech impairment: Influence of context. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders 1989; 54: 403–421
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dunn L. M., Dunn L. M. Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test – Revised. American Guidance Service, Circle Pines, MN 1981
   Google Scholar
• Harris D. Communicative interaction processes involving nonvocal physically handicapped children. Topics in Language Disorders 1982; 2: 21–37
   Google Scholar
• Kelford Smith A., Thurston S., Light J., Parnes P., O'Keefe B. The form and use of written communication produced by physically disabled individuals using microcomputers. Augmentative and Alternative Communication 1989; 5: 115–124
   Google Scholar
• Light J. The communicative interaction patterns of young nonspeaking physically disabled children and their primary caregivers. Blissymbolics Communication Institute, Toronto 1985
   Google Scholar
• Light J. Interaction involving individuals using augmentative and alternative communication systems: State of the art and future directions. Augmentative and Alternative Communication 1988; 4: 66–82
   Google Scholar
• Light J. Toward a definition of communicative competence for individuals using augmentative and alternative communication systems. Augmentative and Alternative Communication 1989; 5: 17–144
   Google Scholar
• Light J., Collier B., Parnes P. Communicative interaction between young nonspeaking physically disabled children and their primary caregivers: Part I – discourse patterns. Augmentative and Alternative Communication 1985a; 1: 74–83
   Google Scholar
• Light J., Collier B., Parnes P. Communicative interaction between young nonspeaking physically disabled children and their primary caregivers: Part II – communicative function. Augmentative and Alternative Communication 1985b; 1: 98–106
   Google Scholar
• Light J., Collier B., Parnes P. Communicative interaction between young nonspeaking physically disabled children and their primary caregivers: Part III – modes of communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication 1985c; 1: 125–133
   Google Scholar
• Light J., Dattilo J., English J., Guitierrez L., Hartz J. Instructing facilitators to support the communication of people who use augmentative communication systems. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 1992; 35: 865–875
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Light J., Binger C., Bailey M., Millar D. Acquisition, generalization, and maintenance of nonobligatory turns by individuals who use AAC. Paper presented at the annual convention of the American Speech-Language Hearing Association, Boston, MA, November, 1997
   Google Scholar
• Light J., Binger C., Agate T. L., Ramsay K. N. Teaching partner-focused questions to individuals who use augmentative and alternative communication to enhance their communicative competence. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 1999; 42: 241–255
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Light J., Arnold K., Clark E. A. Finding a place in the “social circle of life”: The development of sociorelational competence by individuals who use AAC. Communicative competence for individuals who use AAC: From research to effective practice, J. Light, D. R. Beukelman, J. Reichle. Paul H. Brookes, Baltimore, MD 2003; 361–397
   Google Scholar
• Lund N. J., Duchan J. F. Assessing children's language in naturalistic contexts (2nd ed.). Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ 1988
   Google Scholar
• Lund S. K. Fifteen years later: Long-term outcomes for individuals who use augmentative and alternative communication systems. The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 2001, Unpublished doctoral dissertation
   Google Scholar
• Lund S. K., Light J. Fifteen years later: Long-term outcomes for individuals who use augmentative and alternative communication. The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 2001, (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED458727 No. Report No. HB24B990069)
   Google Scholar
• Lund S. K., Light J. Long-term outcomes for individuals who use AAC: Part I – What is a “good” outcome?. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, in press
   Google Scholar
• Mirenda P. AAC: Bonding the uncertain mosaic. Augmentative and Alternative Communication 1993; 9: 3–9
   Google Scholar
• Müller E., Soto G. Conversation patterns of three adults using aided speech: Variations across partners. Augmentative and Alternative Communication 2002; 18: 77–90
   Google Scholar
• Pennington L., McConachie H. Mother-child interaction revisited: Communication with non-speaking physically disabled children. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders 1999; 34: 391–416
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith M. M. Speech by any other name: The role of communication aids in interaction. European Journal of Disorders of Communication 1994; 29: 225–240
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Udwin O., Yule W. Augmentative communication systems taught to cerebral palsied children – a longitudinal study. I. The acquisition of signs and symbols, and syntactic aspects of their use over time. British Journal of Disorders of Communication 1990; 25: 295–309
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Udwin O., Yule W. Augmentative communication systems taught to cerebral-palsied children – A longitudinal study. II. Pragmatic features of sign and symbol use. British Journal of Disorders of Communication 1991; 26: 137–148
   PubMedGoogle Scholar