The effect of the communication output method on augmented interaction

References

• American National Standards Institute. Specification for Audiometers. ANSI, NY 1969, (ANSI S3: 6 – 1969)
   Google Scholar
• Beukelman D. R., Yorkston K. M., Poblete M., Naranjo C. Frequency of word occurrence in communication samples produced by adult communication aid users. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders 1984; 49(4)360–367
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Blau A. F. Communication in the back-channel: Social structural analyses of nonspeech/speech conversations. Dissertation Abstracts International 1987; 47(3237a), DA 8629674
   Google Scholar
• Buzolich M. J., Wiemann J. W. Turn taking in atypical conversations: The case of the speaker/augmented communicator dyad. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 1988; 31: 3–18
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chapanis A., Ochsman R. B., Parrish R. N., Weeks G. D. Studies in interactive communication: I. The effects of four communication modes on the behavior of teams during cooperative problem-solving. Human Factors 1972; 14(6)487–509
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chapanis A., Parrish R. N., Ochsman R. B., Weeks G. D. Studies in interactive communication: II. The effects of four communication modes on the linguistic performance of teams during cooperative problem solving. Human Factors 1977; 19(2)101–126
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark H. H. Using language. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1996
   Google Scholar
• Clark H. H., Brennan S. E. Grounding in communication. Perspectives on socially shared cognition, L. B. Resnick, J. M. Levine. American Psychological Association, Washington, DC 1991; 127–149
   Google Scholar
• Drager K. D. R., Reichle J. E. Effects of discourse context on the intelligibility of synthesized speech for young adult and older adult listeners: Applications for AAC. Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research 2001; 44: 1052–1057
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duffy S. A., Pisoni D. B. Comprehension of synthetic speech produced by rule: A review and theoretical interpretation. Language and Speech 1992; 35: 351–389
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farrier L. D., Yorkston K. M., Marriner N. A., Beukelman D. R. Conversational control in nonimpaired speakers using an augmentative communication system. Augmentative and Alternative Communication 1985; 1(2)65–73
   Google Scholar
• File P., Todman J. An evaluation of the coherence of computer-aided conversations. Augmentative and Alternative Communication 2002; 18: 228–241
   Google Scholar
• Higginbotham D. J. The interplay of communication device output mode and interaction style between nonspeaking persons and their speaking partners. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders 1989; 54(3)320–333
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Higginbotham D. J. Formulating research questions: Linking theory to the research process. The efficacy of augmentative and alternative communication: toward evidence-based practices, R. W. Schlosser. Elsevier, St. Louis 2003; 43–55
   Google Scholar
• Higginbotham D. J., Baird E. Analysis of listeners' summaries of synthesized speech passages. Augmentative and Alternative Communication 1995; 11(2)101–112
   Google Scholar
• Higginbotham D. J., Bedrosian J. L. Subject selection in AAC research: Decision points. Augmentative and Alternative Communication 1995; 11(1)11–13
   Google Scholar
• Higginbotham D. J., Caves K. AAC performance and usability issues: the effect of AAC technology on the communicative process. Assistive Technology 2002; 14(1)45–57
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Higginbotham D. J., Wilkins D. P. Slipping through the timestream: Time and timing issues in augmentative communication. The social construction of language incompetence, J. Duchan, D. Kovarsky, M. Maxwell. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ 1999
   Google Scholar
• Higginbotham D. J., Mathy-Laikko P., Yoder D. E. Studying conversations of augmented communicators. The vocally impaired: clinical practice and research, L. Bernstein. Grune and Stratton, New York 1988; 265–294
   Google Scholar
• Higginbotham D. J., DeRoo W. E., Johnson K. Technical report: The social interaction transcription system. State University of New York, Communication and Assistive Device Laboratory, Buffalo, NY 1992, (SITS) (Version 2.1)
   Google Scholar
• Higginbotham D. J., Drazek A. L., Kowarsky K., Scally C., Segal E. Discourse comprehension of synthetic speech delivered at normal and slow presentation rates. Augmentative and Alternative Communication 1994; 10(3)191–202
   Google Scholar
• Higginbotham D. J., Scally C. A., Lundy D. C., Kowarsky K. Discourse comprehension of synthetic speech across three augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) output methods. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 1995; 38(4)889–901
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Keenan J. S., Brassell E. G. Aphasia language performance scales. Pinnacle Press, Murfreesboro 1975
   Google Scholar
• Kim K. E. Effect of speech-rate on the comprehension and subjective judgments of synthesized narrative discourse. University at Buffalo, NY, 2001, Unpublished doctoral dissertation
   Google Scholar
• Kim K. E., Higginbotham D. J., Gavin W. Effect of speech rate on the comprehension and subjective judgments of synthesized narrative discourse. 2005, (2007)
   Google Scholar
• Light J. Interaction involving individuals using augmentative and alternative communication systems: State of the art and future directions. Augmentative and Alternative Communication 1988; 4(2)66–82
   Google Scholar
• Logan J. S., Greene B. G., Pisoni D. B. Segmental intelligibility of synthetic speech produced by rule. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1989; 86: 566–581
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacWhinney B. The childes project: tools for analyzing talk. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ 1990
   Google Scholar
• Marascuilo L., Serlin R. Statistical methods for the social and behavioral sciences. Freeman, New York 1988
   Google Scholar
• Mathy-Laikko P. A. Comprehension of augmentative and alternative communication device output methods. University of Wisconsin-Madison, WI, 1992, Unpublished doctoral dissertation
   Google Scholar
• McNaughton D., Fallon K., Tod J., Weiner F. Effect of repeated listening experiences on the intelligibility of synthesized speech. Augmentative and Alternative Communication 1994; 10(3)161–168
   Google Scholar
• Mirenda P., Beukelman D. A comparison of intelligibility among natural speech and seven speech synthesizers with listeners from three age groups. Augmentative and Alternative Communication 1990; 6: 61–68
   Google Scholar
• Mirenda P., Beukelman D. R. A comparison of speech synthesis intelligibility with listeners from three age groups. Augmentative and Alternative Communication 1987; 3(3)120–128
   Google Scholar
• Müller E., Soto G. Capturing the complexity of aided interactions: a conversation analysis perspective. Proceedings of the Sixth Research Symposium of the International Society for Augmentative and Alternative Communication, S. von Tetzchner, J. Clibbens. ISAAC, TorontoCanada 2002, Understanding the theoretical and methodological bases of augmentative and alternative communication
   Google Scholar
• Nelson N. W. Performance is the prize: Language competence and performance among AAC users. Augmentative and Alternative Communication 1992; 8(1)3–18
   Google Scholar
• Raghavendra P., Allen G. D. Comprehension of synthetic speech with three text-to-speech systems using a sentence verification paradigm. Augmentative and Alternative Communication 1993; 9: 126–133
   Google Scholar
• Ralston J. V., Pisoni S. E., Lively S. E., Greene B. G., Mullenix J. W. Comprehension of synthetic speech produced by rule: Word monitoring and sentence-by-sentence listening times. Human Factors 1991; 33: 471–491
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scally C. The effects of synthesized speech output method on interactions involving augmentative systems users. University at Buffalo, NY, 1994, Unpublished master's thesis
   Google Scholar
• Shriberg L., Kwiatkowski J., Hoffmann K. A procedure for phonetic transcription by consensus. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 1984; 27(3)456–465
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sweidel G. Management strategies in the communication of speaking persons and persons with a speech disability. Research on Language and Social Interaction 1991; 25: 195–214
   Google Scholar
• Talbot M. Reaction time as a metric for the intelligibility of synthetic speech. Speech and language-based interaction with machines: towards the conversational computer, J. A. Waterworth. Ellis Horwood, Chichester 1987
   Google Scholar