Message retrieval for survivors of traumatic brain injury

References

• Asikainen I., Kaste M., Sarna S. Predicting later outcome for patients with traumatic brain injury referred to a rehabilitation programme: A study of 508 Finnish patients 5 years or more after injury. Brain Injury 1998; 12: 95–107
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bayles Kathryn A., Tomoeda Cheryl K. Arizona Battery for communication disorder of dementia. Canyonlands Publishing, Inc., Tucson, AZ 1991
   Google Scholar
• Beukelman D. R., Mirenda P. Augmentative & alternative communication: Supporting children & adults with complex communication needs3rd ed. Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co., Baltimore, MD 2005
   Google Scholar
• Beukelman D. R., McGinnis J., Morrow D. Vocabulary selection in augmentative and alternative communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication 1991; 7: 171–185
   Google Scholar
• Burke R., Beukelman D. R., Ullman C. Older Adults' accuracy, efficiency, and preferences using three organization strategies to retrieve words. University of Nebraska-Lincoln at Lincoln, Nebraska 2000, Unpublished manuscript
   Google Scholar
• Burke R., Beukelman D. R., Hux K. Accuracy, efficiency and preferences of survivors of traumatic brain injury when using three organization strategies to retrieve words. Brain Injury 2004; 18: 497–507
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell L., Balandin S., Togher L. Augmentative and alternative communication use by people with traumatic brain injury: A review. Advances in Speech-Language Pathology 2002; 24: 89–94
   Google Scholar
• Cherney L. R., Miller T. K. A classification system for cognitive, linguistic, speech, and swallowing disorders in traumatic brain injured adults. Clinical management of communication problems in adults with traumatic brain injury, A. S. Halper, L. R. Cherney, T. K. Miller. An Aspen Publication, Gaithersburg, MA 1991; 9–18
   Google Scholar
• DeRuyter F., Kennedy M. Augmentative communication following traumatic brain injury. Communication disorders following traumatic brain injury: Management of cognitive, language, and motor impairments, D. Beukelman, K. Yorkston. Pro-Ed, Austin, TX 1991; 317–365
   Google Scholar
• Dietz A. R., McKelvey M., Beukelman D., Weissling K., Hux K. Visual scenes display: A new AAC interface for persons with severe chronic aphasia. Poster session at the American Speech Language and Hearing Association Convention, San Diego, CA 2005
   Google Scholar
• Dongilli P. A., Hakel M. E., Beukelman D. R. Recovery of functional speech following traumatic brain injury. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 1992; 7: 91–101
   Google Scholar
• Fishman I. Electronic communication aids: Selection and use. College Hill Press, San Diego, CA 1987
   Google Scholar
• Fried-Oken M., Doyle M. Language representation for the augmentative and alternative communication of adults with traumatic brain injury. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 1992; 7(3)59–69
   Google Scholar
• Fuller D. R., Lloyd L. L. Forum: Toward a common usage of iconicity terminology. Augmentative and Alternative Communication 1991; 7: 215–220
   Google Scholar
• Hux K., Mannasse N. Assessment and treatment of cognitive-communication Impairments. Assisting survivors of traumatic brain injury: Therole of speech-language pathologists, K. Hux. Pro-Ed, Austin, TX 2003; 93–133
   Google Scholar
• Hux K., Burke R., Ross M., Elliot J., Hrnicek T. Communication interaction differences between natural speakers and AAC users with traumatic brain injury. Journal of Medical Speech-Language Pathology 2001; 9: 69–86
   Google Scholar
• Katz D. I., Alexander M. P. Predicting course of recovery and outcome for patients admitted to rehabilitation. Archives of Neurology 1994; 51: 661–670
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kertesz A. The Western Aphasia Battery. Grune & Stratton, New York 1982
   Google Scholar
• Ladtkow M. Traumatic brain injury and severe expressive communication impairment: The role of augmentative communication. Seminars in Speechand Language 1993; 14: 61–73
   Google Scholar
• Light J., Beesley M., Collier B. Transition through multiple augmentative and alternative communication systems: A three-year case study of a head injured adolescent. Augmentative and Alternative Communication 1988; 4(1)2–14
   Google Scholar
• Light J., Lindsay P., Siegel L., Parnes P. The effects of message encoding techniques on recall by literate adults using AAC systems. Augmentative and Alternative Communication 1990; 6: 184–201
   Google Scholar
• Olsson E., Wik K., Ostling A., Johansson M., Andersson G. Everyday memory self-assessed by adult patients with acquired brain damage and their significant others. Neuropscyhological Rehabilitation 2006; 16: 257–271
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pickett J. M. The sounds of speech communication. University Park Press, Baltimore, MD 1980
   Google Scholar
• Schretlen D. J., Shapiro A. M. A quantitative review of the effects of traumatic brain injury on cognition. International Review of Psychiatry 2003; 15: 341–349
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkinson K. M., Jagaroo. Contributions of principles of visual cognitive science to AAC system display design. Augmentative and Alternative Communication 2004; 20(3)123–136
   Google Scholar
• Woodcock R. W., Johnson M. B. Woodcock Johnson Tests of Achievement: Standard and Supplemental Batteries. Riverside Publishing Co., Itasca, IL 1989, 1990
   Google Scholar