‘I've Got Something to Say’: Interaction in a Focus Group of Adults with Cerebral Palsy and Complex Communication Needs

References

• Allan M. The language of augmented and alternative communication. ISAAC Bulletin 1999; 56: 1–7
   Google Scholar
• Alm N. Ethical issues in AAC research. International Society of Augmentative and Alternative Communication (ISAAC) Jönköping University Press, KerkradeHolland 1994; 98–104
   Google Scholar
• American Psychological Association. Publication manual of the American Psychological Association5th ed. American Psychological Association, Washington, DC 2001
   Google Scholar
• Altheide D. L., Johnson J. M. Criteria for assessing interpretive validity in qualitative research. Collecting and interpreting qualitative materials, N. K. Denzin, Y. S. Lincoln. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA 1998; 283–312
   Google Scholar
• Balandin S., Raghavendra P. Challenging oppression: Augmented communicators' involvement in AAC research. Augmentative and alternative communication: New directions in research and practice, F. T. Loncke, J. Clibbens, H. H. Arvidson, L. L. Lloyd. Whurr Publishers, London 1999; 262–277
   Google Scholar
• Barrett J., Kirk S. Running focus groups with elderly and disabled elderly participants. Applied Ergonomics 2000; 31: 621–629, 625
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bersani H., Jr. Nothing about me without me: A proposal for participatory action research in AAC. Augmentative and alternative communication: New directions in research and practice, F. T. Loncke, J. Clibbens, H. H. Arvidson, L. L. Lloyd. Whurr Publishers, London 1999; 278–289
   Google Scholar
• Beukelman D., Mirenda P. Augmentative and alternative communication: Supporting children and adults with complex communication needs3rd ed. Paul H. Brookes, Baltimore, MD 2005
   Google Scholar
• Bigby C., Fyffe C., Balandin S., Gordon M., McCubbery J. Day support services options for older adults with a disability. Report to the national disability administrators. Department of Human Services, Melbourne 2001
   Google Scholar
• Blackstone S., Williams W., Wilkins D. Key principles underlying research and practice in AAC. Augmentative & Alternative Communication 2007; 23: 191–203
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloor M., Wood F. Keywords in qualitative methods: A vocabulary of research concepts. Sage Publications, London 2006; 54
   Google Scholar
• Cambridge P., McCarthy M. User focus groups and best value in services for people with learning disabilities. Health and Social Care in the Community 2001; 9: 476–489, 481
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crossley M. L. ‘Could you please pass one of those health leaflets along?’: Exploring health, morality and resistance through focus groups. Social Science & Medicine 2002; 55: 1471–1483
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duggleby W. What about focus group interaction data?. Qualitative Health Research 2005; 15(6)832–840
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fraser M., Fraser A. Are people with learning disabilities able to contribute to focus groups on health promotion?. Journal of Advanced Nursing 2001; 33(2)225–233
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hemsley B., Balandin S. Without AAC: The stories of unpaid carers of adults with cerebral palsy and CCN in Hospital. Augmentative and Alternative Communication 2004; 20: 243–258
   Google Scholar
• Hemsley B., Balandin S., Togher L. Narrative analysis of the hospital experience for older parents of people who cannot speak. Journal of Aging Studies 2007; 21: 239–254
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hemsley B., Balandin S., Togher L. Staff views on the roles and needs of family carers of adults with cerebral palsy and complex communication needs in hospital. Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disabilities in press-a
   Google Scholar
• Hemsley B., Balandin S., Togher L. Family carers discuss roles and needs in supporting adults with cerebral palsy and complex communication needs in hospital. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities in press-b
   Google Scholar
• Hemsley B., Balandin S., Togher L. ‘We need to be the centrepiece’: Adults with cerebral palsy and complex communication needs discuss the roles and needs of family carers in hospital. Disability & Rehabilitation in press-c
   Google Scholar
• Higginbotham J. D., Wilkins D. Slipping through the timestream: Social issues of time and timing in augmented interactions. Constructing (in)competence: Disabling evaluations in clinical and social interaction, D. Kovarsky, J. F. Duchan. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Mahwah, NJ 1999; 49–82
   Google Scholar
• Iacono T., Balandin S., Cupples L. Focus group discussions of literacy assessment and world wide web-based reading intervention. Augmentative and Alternative Communication 2001; 17: 27–46
   Google Scholar
• Fontana A., Frey J. H. Interviewing: The art of science. Collecting and interpreting qualitative materials, N. K. Denzin, Y. S. Lincoln. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA 1998; 47–78
   Google Scholar
• M. D. Johns, Chen, S. L. S., Hall, G. J., 2004. Online social research: Methods, issues & ethics. New York, Peter Lang
   Google Scholar
• Joinson A. N. Self-disclosure in computer-mediated communication: The role of self-awareness and visual anonymity. European Journal of Social Psychology 2001; 31: 177–192
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kazdin A. E. Single case research designs: Methods for clinical and applied settings. Oxford University Press, New York 1982
   Google Scholar
• Kent-Walsh J., McNaughton D. Communication partner instruction in augmentative and alternative communication: Present practices and future directions. Augmentative and Alternative Communication 2005; 21(3)195–204
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kidd P. S., Parshall M. B. Getting the focus and the group: Enhancing analytical rigor in focus group research. Qualitative Health Research 2000; 10: 293–308
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitzinger J. The methodology of focus groups: the importance of interaction between research participants. Sociology of Health & Illness 1994; 16(1)103–121
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitzinger J., Barbour R. S. Introduction: The challenge and promise of focus groups. Developing focus group research: Politics, theory and practice, R. S. Barbour, J. Kitzinger. Sage Publications, London 1999; 1–20
   Google Scholar
• Krueger R. A. Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA 1994
   Google Scholar
• Krueger R. A. Moderating focus groups. The focus group kit, D. L. Morgan, R. A. Krueger. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA 1998; 4
   Google Scholar
• Landis J. R., Koch G. G. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977; 33: 159–174
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. Liamputtong, 2006. Health research in cyberspace: methodological, practical and personal issues. New York, Nova Science Publishers
   Google Scholar
• Light J. Interaction involving individuals using AAC systems: State of the art and future directions. Augmentative and Alternative Communication 1988; 4: 66–82
   Google Scholar
• Light J. Communication is the essence of human life: Reflections on communicative competence. Augmentative and Alternative Communication 1997; 13: 61–70
   Google Scholar
• Light J., Dattilo J., English J., Gutierrez L., Hartz J. Instructing facilitators to support the communication of people who use augmenting systems. Journal of Speech & Hearing Research 1992; 35: 865–875
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Madriz E. Focus groups in feminist research. Handbook of qualitative research2nd ed, N. Denzin, Y. Lincoln. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA 2000; 835–850
   Google Scholar
• McNaughton D., Light J., Arnold K. B. ‘Getting your wheel in the door’: Successful full-time employment experiences of individuals with cerebral palsy who use augmentative and alternative communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication 2002; 18: 59–76
   Google Scholar
• Merchen M. A. Some reasons for being passive from a personal perspective. Communication Outlook 1990; 12(1)10–11
   Google Scholar
• Morgan D. L., Krueger R. A. The focus group kit. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA 1998
   Google Scholar
• Murphy J. Perceptions of communication between people with communication disability and general practice staff. Health Expectations 2006; 9: 49–59
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myers G. Displaying opinions: Disagreement and topic shifts in focus groups. Language in Society 1998; 27: 85–111
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myers G., Macnaughten P. Can focus groups be analysed as talk?. Developing focus group research: Policy, theory and practice, R. S. Barbour, J. Kitzinger. Sage Publications, London 1999; 173–185
   Google Scholar
• O'Keefe B. M., Kozak N. B., Schuller R. Research priorities in augmentative and alternative communication as identified by people who use AAC. Augmentative & Alternative Communication 2007; 23: 89–96
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patton M. Q. Qualitative research and evaluation methods3rd ed. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA 2005
   Google Scholar
• QSR. QSR NVivo. QSR International Pty. Ltd., Melbourne, Victoria 1999
   Google Scholar
• Rackensperger T., Krezman C., McNaughton D., Williams M. B., D'Silva K. ‘‘When I first got it, I wanted to throw it off a cliff’’: The challenges and benefits of learning AAC technologies as described by adults who use AAC. Augmentative and Alternative Communication 2005; 21: 165–186
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlosser R. W. An introduction to consumer perspectives in AAC research: Approaches, techniques and their theoretical underpinnings. Augmentative and alternative communication: New directions in research and practice, F. T. Loncke, J. Clibbens, H. H. Arvidson, L. L. Lloyd. Whurr Publishers, London 1999; 257–261
   Google Scholar
• Sigafoos J. Creating opportunities for augmentative and alternative communication: Strategies for involving people with developmental disabilities. Augmentative and Alternative Communication 1999; 15: 183–190
   Google Scholar
• Stevens P. E. Focus groups: Collecting aggregate-level data to understand community health phenomena. Public Health Nursing 1996; 13: 170–176
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams M., Robson K. Reengineering focus group methodology for the online environment. Online social research: Methods, issues & ethics, M. D. Johns, S. L. S. Chen, J. Hall. Peter Lang Publishing Co., New York 2004; 25–46
   Google Scholar
• Zorn T. E., Roper J., Broadfoot K., Weaver C. K. Focus groups as sites of influential interaction: Building communicative self-efficacy and effecting attitudinal change in discussing controversial topics. Journal of Applied Communication Research 2006; 34(2)115–140
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar