The Morphology and Syntax of Individuals who use AAC: Research Review and Implications for Effective Practice

References

• Alpert C. L., Kaiser A. P. Training parents as milieu language teachers. Journal of Early Intervention 1992; 16: 31–52
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. Position statement facilitated communication. Asha March, 1995; 37(Suppl. 14)22
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Berninger V., Gans B. Language profiles in nonspeaking individuals of normal intelligence with severe cerebral palsy. Augmentative and Alternative Communication 1986; 2: 45–50
   Google Scholar
• Binger C., Light J. The effect of aided AAC modeling on the expression of multi-symbol messages by preschoolers who use AAC. Augmentative and Alternative Communication 2007; 23: 30–43
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Binger C., Kent-Walsh J., Del Campo S., Hickman S., Marquez C., Rivera D. Teaching educators and parents to support language development in AAC. Paper presented at the annual conference of the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association, Miami, FL, 2006
   Google Scholar
• Bishop D. V. M. Test for reception of grammar. Author, ManchesterEngland 1983
   Google Scholar
• Bishop D. V. M., Byers Brown B., Robson J. The relationship between phoneme discrimination, speech production, and language comprehension in cerebral-palsied individuals. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 1990; 33: 210–219
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Blockberger S., Johnston J. R. Grammatical morphology acquisition by children with complex communication needs. Augmentative and Alternative Communication 2003; 19: 207–221
   Google Scholar
• Blockberger S., Sutton A. Towards linguistic competence: The language experiencs and knowledge of children with extremely limited speech. Communicative competence for individuals who use augmentative and alternative communication, J. Light, D. Beukelman, J. Reichle. Paul H. Brookes, Baltimore, MD 2003
   Google Scholar
• Bruno J., Trembath D. Use of aided language stimulation to improve syntactic performance during a weeklong intervention program. Augmentative and Alternative Communication 2006; 22: 300–313
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Camarata S., Nelson K. Treatment efficiency as a function of target selection in the remediation of child language disorders. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics 1992; 6: 167–178
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen L., Whittington D. Organizing language intervention relative to the client's personal experience: A clinical case study. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics 2006; 20: 563–571
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cleave P. L., Fey M. Two approaches to the facilitation of grammar in children with language impairments: Rationale and description. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology 1997; 6: 22–32
   Google Scholar
• Dahlgren Sandberg A. Reading, spelling, phonological awareness, and working memory in children with severe speech impairments: A longitudinal study. Augmentative and Alternative Communication 2001; 17: 11–26
   Google Scholar
• DeCoste D. C. Effects of intervention on the writing and spelling skills of elementary school students with severe speech and physical impairments. The George Washington University, Washington, DC 1993, Unpublished doctoral dissertation
   Google Scholar
• Fey M. E., Cleave P. L., Long S. H., Hughes D. L. Two approaches to the facilitation of grammar in children with language impairment: An experimental evaluation. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 1993; 36: 141–157
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fey M. E., Cleave P. L., Long S. H. Two models of grammar facilitation in children with language impairments: Phase 2. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 1997; 40: 5–19
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goossens' C. Aided communication intervention before assessment: A case study of a child with cerebral palsy. Augmentative and Alternative Communication 1989; 5: 14–26
   Google Scholar
• Hancock T. B., Kaiser A. P. Enhanced milieu teaching. Treatment of language disorders in children, R. J. McCauley, M. E. Fey. Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co., Baltimore, MD 2006
   Google Scholar
• Hooper J., Connell T. M., Flett P. J. Blissymbols and manual signs: A multimodal approach to intervention in a case of multiple disability. Augmentative and Alternative Communication 1987; 3: 68–76
   Google Scholar
• Johnson R. The Picture Communication Symbols Combination. Mayer-Johnson Co., Solana Beach, CA 1994
   Google Scholar
• Kelford Smith A., Thruston S., Light J., Parnes P., O'Keefe B. The form and use of written communication produced by physically disabled individuals using microcomputers. Augmentative and Alternative Communication 1989; 4: 115–124
   Google Scholar
• Kent-Walsh J., Light J. General education teachers' experiences with inclusion of students who use augmentative and alternative communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication 2003; 19: 104–124
   Google Scholar
• Lund S. K. Fifteen years later: Long-term outcomes for individuals who use augmentative and alternative communication systems. The Pennsylvania State University. 2001, Unpublished doctoral dissertation
   Google Scholar
• Lund S. K., Light J. The effectiveness of grammar instruction for individuals who use augmentative and alternative communication systems: A preliminary study. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 2003; 46: 1110–1123
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lund S. K., Light J. Long-term outcomes for individuals who use augmentative and alternative communication: Part II: Communicative interaction. Augmentative and Alternative Communication 2007; 23: 1–15
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNaughton D., Bryen D. Enhancing participation in employment through AAC technologies. Assitive Technology 2002; 14: 58–70
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Morris C., Newell A., Booth L., Ricketts I., Arnott J. Syntax PAL: A system to improve the written syntax of language-impaired users. Assitive Technology 1992; 4: 51–59
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nakamura K., Newell A. F., Alm N., Waller A. How do members of different language communities compose sentences with a picture-based communication system?: A cross-cultural study of picture-based sentences constructed by English and Japanese speakers. Augmentative and Alternative Communication 1998; 14: 71–79
   Google Scholar
• Nelson N. W. Performance is the prize: Language competence and performance among AAC users. Augmentative and Alternative Communication 1992; 8: 3–18
   Google Scholar
• Nigam R., Schlosser R., Lloyd L. Concomitant use of the matrix strategy and the mand-model procedure in teaching graphic symbol combinations. Augmentative and Alternative Communication 2006; 22: 160–177
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owens R. E. J. Language development: An introduction5th ed. Allyn & Bacon, Needham Heights, MA 2001
   Google Scholar
• Redmond S. M., Johnston S. S. Evaluating the morphological competence of children with severe speech and physical impairments. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 2001; 44: 1362–1375
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romski M. A., Sevcik R. A. Language comprehension: Considerations for augmentative and alternative communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication 1993; 9: 281–285
   Google Scholar
• Sabbadini M., Bonanni R., Carlesimo G. A., Caltagirone C. Neuropsychological assessment of patients with severe neuromotor and verbal disabilities. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research 2001; 45: 169–179
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlosser R. The efficacy of augmentative and alternative communication: Toward evidence-based practice. Academic Press, San Diego, CA 2003
   Google Scholar
• Scott C. M. Spoken and written syntax. Later language development: Ages nine through nineteen, M. A. Nippold. Little, Brown, and Co., Boston, MA 1988; 49–95
   Google Scholar
• Semel E., Wiig E. H., Secord W. A. Clinical evaluation of language fundamentals3rd ed. Harcourt Brace and Company, Orlando, FL 1995
   Google Scholar
• Smith M. The medium or the message: A study of speaking children using communication boards. Augmentative and alternative communication: European perspectives, S. von Tetzchner, M. H. Jensen. Singular Publishing Group, Inc., San Diego, CA 1996; 119–136
   Google Scholar
• Smith M., Grove N. The bimodal situation of children learning language using manual and graphic signs. Augmentative and alternative communication: New directions in research and practice, F. T. Loncke, J. Clibbens, H. H. Arvidson, L. L. Lloyd. Whurr Publishers, London 1999; 8–30
   Google Scholar
• Smith M., Grove N. Asymmetry in input and output for individuals who use augmentative and alternative communication. Communicative competence of individuals who use augmentative and alternative communication, J. Light, D. Beukelman, J. Reichle. Paul H. Brookes, Baltimore, MD 2003
   Google Scholar
• Soto G. Understanding the impact of graphic sign use on the message structure. Augmentative and alternative communication: New directions in research and practice, F. T. Loncke, J. Clibbens, H. H. Arvidson, L. L. Lloyd. Whurr Publishers, London 1999; 40–48
   Google Scholar
• Soto G., Toro-Zambrana W. Investigation of Blissymbol use from a language research paradigm. Augmentative and Alternative Communication 1995; 11: 118–130
   Google Scholar
• Spiegel B. B., Benjamin B. J., Spiegel S. A. One method to increase spontaneous use of an assistive communication device: Case study. Augmentative and Alternative Communication 1993; 9: 111–118
   Google Scholar
• Sutton A. The social-verbal competence of AAC users. Augmentative and Alternative Communication 1989; 5: 150–164
   Google Scholar
• Sutton A. Children's comprehension performance prior to mastery of relative clauses. McGill University, Montreal 1997, Unpublished doctoral dissertation
   Google Scholar
• Sutton A., Dench C. Connected speech development in a child with limited language production experience. Journal of Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology 1998; 22: 133–140
   Google Scholar
• Sutton A., Gallagher T. Verb class distinctions and AAC language-encoding limitations. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 1993; 36: 1216–1226
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sutton A., Gallagher T. Comprehension assessment of a child using an AAC system: A comparison of two techniques. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology 1995; 4: 60–68
   Google Scholar
• Sutton A., Morford J. Constituent order in picture pointing sequences produced by speaking children using AAC. Applied Psycholinguistics 1998; 19: 525–536
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutton A., Gallagher T., Morford J., Shahnaz N. Relative clause sentence production using augmentative and alternative communication systems. Applied Psycholinguistics 2000; 21: 473–486
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutton A., Soto G., Blockberger S. Grammatical issues in graphic symbol communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication 2002; 18: 192–204
   Google Scholar
• Udwin O., Yule W. Augmentative communication systems taught to cerebral palsied children – a longitudinal study. I: The acquisition of signs and symbols, and syntactic aspects of their use over time. British Journal of Disorders of Communication 1990; 25: 295–309
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• van Balkom H., Donker-Gimbrère M. W. A psycholinguistic approach to graphic language use. Augmentative and alternative communication: European perspectives, S. von Tetzchner, M. H. Jensen. Singular Publishing Group, Inc., San Diego, CA 1996; 153–170
   Google Scholar
• Yorkston K. M., Beukelman D. R., Smith K., Tice R. Extended communication samples of augmented communicators II: Analysis of multiword sequences. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders 1990; 55: 225–230
   PubMedGoogle Scholar