Iconicity in the Development of Picture skills: Typical Development and Implications for Individuals with Severe Intellectual Disabilities

References

• Alant E, Bornman J, Lloyd L. L. Issues in AAC research: How much do we really understand. Disability and Rehabilitation 2006; 28: 143–150
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beilin H. Understanding the photographic image. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology 1999; 20: 1–30
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beukelman D. R., Mirenda P. Augmentative and alternative communication: Supporting children and adults with complex communication needs3rd ed. Paul H. Brookes, Baltimore, MD 2005
   Google Scholar
• Bloomberg K, Karlan G, Lloyd L. L. The comparative translucency of initial lexical items represented in five graphic symbol systems and sets. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 1990; 33: 717–725
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bovet D, Vauclair J. Picture recognition in animals and humans. Behavioural Brain Research 2000; 109: 143–165
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brady N. C., McLean L. K. Simultaneous and delayed matching to sample in gesture users and speakers with mental retardation. Research in Developmental Disabilities 1998; 19: 409–421
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Callaghan T. C. Early understanding and production of graphic symbols. Child Development 1999; 70: 1314–1324
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Callaghan T. C. Factors affecting children's graphic symbol use in the third year: Language, similarity and iconicity. Cognitive Development 2000; 15: 185–214
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Callaghan T. C. The origins and development of pictorial symbol functioning. Children's understanding and production of pictures, drawings and art, C. Milbraith, H. M. Trauter. Hogrefe & Huber, Cambridge, MA 2008
   Google Scholar
• Callaghan T. C., Rankin M. P. Emergence of graphic symbol functioning and the question of domain specificity: A longitudinal study. Child Development 2002; 73: 359–376
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Callaghan T. C., Rochat P, MacGillivray T, MacLellan C. Modeling referential actions in 6 to 18-month-old infants: A precursor to symbolic understanding. Child Development 2004; 75: 1733–1744
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carr D, Wilkinson K. M., Blackman D, McIlvane W. J. Equivalence classes in individuals with minimal verbal repertoires. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior 2000; 74: 101–114
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeLoache J. Symbolic functioning in very young children: Understanding of pictures and models. Child Development 1991; 62: 736–752
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeLoache J. Early understanding and use of symbols: The model model. Current Directions in Psychological Science 1995; 4: 109–113
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeLoache J. Dual representation and young children's use of scale models. Child Development 2000; 71: 329–338
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeLoache J. Becoming symbol-minded. Trends in Cognitive Science 2004; 8: 66–70
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeLoache J. The Pygmalion problem in early symbol use. Symbol use and symbolic representation: Developmental and comparative perspectives, L. L. Namy. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ 2005; 47–67
   Google Scholar
• DeLoache J, Burns N. M. Symbolic development in young children: Understanding models and pictures. Systems of representation in children, C. Pratt, A. F. Garton. John Wiley & Sons, London 1993
   Google Scholar
• DeLoache J, Burns N. M. Early understanding of the representational function of pictures. Cognition 1994; 52: 83–110
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeLoache J, Kolstad V, Anderson K. N. Physical similarity and young children's understanding of scale models. Child Development 1991; 62: 111–126
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeLoache J. S., Peralta de Mendoza O. A., Anderson K. N. Multiple factors in early symbol use: Instructions, similarity, and age in understanding a symbol-referent relation. Cognitive Development 1999; 14: 299–312
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeLoache J, Pierroutsakos S. L., Uttal D. H. The origins of pictorial competence. Current Directions in Psychological Science 2003; 12: 114–118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeLoache J. S., Pierroutsakos S. L., Uttal D. H., Rosengren K. S., Gottlieb A. Grasping the nature of pictures. Psychological Science 1998; 9: 205–210
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeLoache J, Sharon T. Symbols and similarity: You can get too much of a good thing. Journal of Cognition and Development 2005; 6: 33–49
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeLoache J, Strauss M. S., Maynard J. Picture perception in infancy. Infant Behavior and Development 1979; 2: 77–89
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deregowski J. B. Illusions, patterns and pictures. Academic Press, LondonUK 1980a
   Google Scholar
• Deregowski J. B. Perception. Handbook of cross-cultural psychology (vol. 3): Basic processes, H. C. Triandes, W. Lonner. Allyn & Bacon, Boston, MA 1980b; 21–115
   Google Scholar
• Dixon L. S. A functional analysis of photo-object matching skills of severely retarded adolescents. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis 1981; 14: 465–478
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans D. G., Bowick L, Johnson M, Blenkhorn P. Using iconicity to evaluate symbol use. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 2006; 4061: 874–881
   Google Scholar
• Franklin N. K., Mirenda P, Phillips G. Comparisons of five symbol assessment protocols with nondisabled preschoolers and learners with severe intellectual disabilities. Augmentative and Alternative Communication 1996; 12: 73–77
   Google Scholar
• Fuller D. R., Lloyd L. L. Toward a common usage of iconicity terminology. Augmentative and Alternative Communication 1991; 7: 215–219
   Google Scholar
• Ganea P. A., Pickard M. B., DeLoache J. S. Transfer between picture books and the real world by very young children. Journal of Cognition and Development 2008; 8: 46–66
   Google Scholar
• Huer M. B. Examining perceptions of graphic symbols across cultures: Preliminary study of the impact of culture/ethnicity. Augmentative and Alternative Communication 2000; 16: 180–185
   Google Scholar
• Huer M. B. Individuals from diverse cultural and ethnic backgrounds may perceive graphic symbols differently: Response to Nigam. Augmentative and Alternative Communication 2003; 19: 137–140
   Google Scholar
• Hurlbut B. I., Iwata B. A., Green J. D. Nonvocal language acquisition in adolescents with severe physical disabilities: Blissymbol versus iconic stimulus formats. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis 1982; 15: 241–258
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ittelson W. H. Visual perception of markings. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 1996; 3: 171–187
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koppenhaver D. A., Erickson K. A., Harris B, McLellan J, Skotko B. G., Newton R. A. Storybook-based communication intervention for girls with Rett syndrome and their mothers. Disability and Rehabilitation 2001; 23: 149–159
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Light J. C., Binger C, Kelford Smith A. Story reading interactions between preschoolers who use AAC and their mothers. Augmentative and Alternative Communication 1994; 10: 255–268
   Google Scholar
• Lloyd L. L., Fuller D. R. The role of iconicity in augmentative and alternative communication-symbol learning. Key issues in mental retardation research, W. I. Fraser. Routledge, LondonUK 1990; 295–306
   Google Scholar
• Loncke F. T., Campbell J, England A, Haley T. Multimodality: A basis for augmentative and alternative communication – psycholinguistic, cognitive, and clinical/educational aspects. Disability and Rehabilitation 2006; 28: 169–174
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mineo Mollica B. Representational competence. Communicative competence for individuals who use AAC: From research to effective practice, J. C. Light, D. R. Beukelman, J. Reichle. Paul H. Brookes, Baltimore, MD 2003; 107–146
   Google Scholar
• Mirenda P, Locke P. A comparison of symbol transparency in nonspeaking persons with intellectual disability. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders 1989; 54: 131–140
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mizuko M. Transparency and ease of learning of symbols represented by Blissymbols, PCS, and Picsyms. Augmentative and Alternative Communication 1987; 3: 129–136
   Google Scholar
• Mizuko M, Reichle J. Transparency and recall of symbols among intellectual handicapped adults. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders 1989; 54: 627–633
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Musselwhite C, Ruscello D. Transparency of three symbol communication systems. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 1984; 27: 436–443
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Namy L. L. What's in a name when it isn't a word? 17-months-old's mapping of nonverbal symbols to object categories. Infancy 2001; 2: 73–86
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Namy L. L., Campbell A. L., Tomasello M. The changing role of iconicity on non-verbal symbol learning: A U-shaped trajectory in the acquisition of arbitrary gestures. Journal of Cognition and Development 2004; 5: 37–57
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Namy L. L., Waxman S. R. Words and gestures: Infant's interpretations of different forms of symbolic reference. Child Development 1998; 69: 295–308
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Namy L. L., Waxman S. R. Symbols redefined. Symbol use and symbolic representation: developmental and comparative perspectives, L. L. Namy. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ 2005; 269–277
   Google Scholar
• Nigam R. Do individuals from diverse cultural and ethnic backgrounds perceive graphic symbols differently. Augmentative and Alternative Communication 2003; 19: 135–136
   Google Scholar
• Pierroutsakos S. L., DeLoache J. Infant's manual exploration of pictorial objects varying in realism. Infancy 2003; 4: 141–156
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pierroutsakos S. L., DeLoache J, Gound M, Bernard E. N. Very young children are insensitive to picture- but not object-orientation. Developmental Science 2005; 8: 326–332
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romski M. A., Sevcik R. A. Breaking the speech barrier. Paul H. Brookes, Baltimore, MD 1996
   Google Scholar
• Romski M. A., Sevcik R. A., Pate J. L. Establishment of symbolic communication in persons with severe retardation. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders 1988; 53: 94–107
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Romski M. A., Sevcik R. A. Augmentative communication and early intervention: Myths and realities. Infants and Young Children 2005; 18: 174–185
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowland C, Schweigert P. Tangible symbols: Symbolic communication for individuals with multisensory impairments. Augmentative and Alternative Communication 1989; 5: 226–234
   Google Scholar
• Rowland C, Schweigert P. Cognitive skills and AAC. Communicative competence for individuals who use AAC, J. C. Light, D. R. Beukelman, J. Reichle. Paul H. Brookes, Baltimore, MD 2003; 241–276
   Google Scholar
• Salsa M. A., Peralta de Mendoza O. P. Routes to symbolization: Intentionality and correspondence in early understanding of pictures. Journal of Cognition and Development 2007; 8: 79–92
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. W. Schlosser, 2003a. The efficacy of augmentative and alternative communication. San Diego, CA, Academic Press
   Google Scholar
• Schlosser R. W. Selecting graphic symbols for an initial requesting lexicon. The efficacy of augmentative and alternative communication: Towards evidence-based practice, R. W. Schlosser. Academic Press, New York 2003b; 347–401
   Google Scholar
• Schlosser R. W. Effects of AAC on natural speech development. The efficacy of augmentative and alternative communication: Toward evidence-based practice, R. W. Schlosser. Academic Press, Boston 2003c; 403–425
   Google Scholar
• Schlosser R. W., Lee D. Evidence-based strategies for promoting generalization and maintenance. The efficacy of augmentative and alternative communication: Toward evidence-based practice, R. W. Schlosser. Academic Press, New York 2003; 533–552
   Google Scholar
• Schlosser R. W., Sigafoos J. Selecting graphic symbols for an initial request lexicon: Integrative review. Augmentative and Alternative Communication 2002; 18: 102–123
   Google Scholar
• Sevcik R. A. Comprehension: An overlooked component in augmented language development. Disability and Rehabilitation 2006; 28: 159–167
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sevcik R. A., Romski M. A. Representational skills of persons with severe retardation. Augmentative and Alternative Communication 1986; 2: 160–164
   Google Scholar
• Sevcik R. A., Romski M. A., Wilkinson K. M. Roles of graphic symbols in the language acquisition process for persons with severe cognitive disabilities. Augmentative and Alternative Communication 1991; 7: 161–170
   Google Scholar
• Siegel E, Cress C. J. Overview of the emergence of early AAC behavior: Progression from communicative to symbolic skills. Exemplary practices for beginning communicators: Implications for AAC, J. Reichle, D. R. Beukelman, J. C. Light. Paul H. Brookes, Baltimore, MD 2002; 25–58
   Google Scholar
• Sigel I. E. The development of pictorial comprehension. Visual learning, thinking and communication, B. S. Rhandhawa, W. E. Coffman. Academic Press, New York 1978; 95–106
   Google Scholar
• Simcock G, DeLoache J. Get the picture? The effects of iconicity on toddlers’ reenactment from picture books. Developmental Psychology 2006; 42: 1352–1357
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simcock G, Dooley M. Generalization of learning from picture books to novel test conditions by 180 and 24-month-old children. Developmental Psychology 2007; 43: 1568–1578
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snell M, Chen L, Hoover K. Teaching augmentative and alternative communication to students with severe disabilities: A review of the intervention research 1997–2003. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities 2006; 31: 203–214
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stephenson J, Linfoot K. Pictures as communication symbols for students with severe intellectual disability. Augmentative and Alternative Communication 1996; 12: 244–256
   Google Scholar
• Suddendorf T. Early representational insight: Twenty-four-month-olds can use a photo to find an object in the world. Child Development 2003; 74: 896–904
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tolar T. D., Lederberg A. R., Gokhale S, Tomasello M. The development of the ability to recognize the meaning of iconic signs. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education 2008; 13: 225–240
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomasello M, Striano T, Rochat P. Do young children use objects as symbols. British Journal of Developmental Psychology 1999; 17: 563–584
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Troseth G. L. Getting a clear picture: Young children's understanding of a televised image. Developmental Science 2003; 6: 247–253
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Troseth G. L., DeLoache J. The medium can obscure the message: Young children's understanding of video. Child Development 1998; 69: 950–965
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Tetzchner S, Grove N. The development of alternative language forms. Augmentative and alternative communication: Developmental issues, S. von Tetzchner, N. Grove. Whurr, LondonUK 2003; 1–27
   Google Scholar
• von Tetzchner S, Overeeide K. D., Jorgensen K. K., Ormhaug B. M., Oxholm B, Warme R. Acquisition of graphic communication by a young girl without comprehension of spoken language. Disability and Rehabilitation 2004; 26: 1335–1346
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Tetzchner S, Martinsen H. Augmentative and alternative communication. Whurr, LondonUK 2000
   Google Scholar
• Werner H, Kaplan B. Symbol formation: An organismic-developmental approach to the psychology of language. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ 1984
   Google Scholar
• Wetherby A. M., Reichle J, Pierce P. L. The transition to symbolic communication. Transitions in prelinguistic communication, A. M. Wetherby, S. F. Warren, J. Reichle. Paul H. Brookes, Baltimore, MD 1998; 197–230
   Google Scholar
• Wilkinson K. M., Hennig S. The state of research and practice in augmentative and alternative communication for children with developmental/intellectual disabilities. Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews 2007; 13: 58–69
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wilkinson K. M., McIlvane W. J. Considerations in teaching graphic symbols to beginning communicators. Exemplary practices for beginning communicators: Implications for AAC, J. Reichle, D. R. Beukelman, J. C. Light. Paul H. Brookes, Baltimore, MD 2002; 273–322
   Google Scholar