Exploring validation of a graphic symbol questionnaire to measure participation experiences of youth in activity settings

References

• Assistive Devices Program. (2014). Ontario Augmentative and Alternative Communication Services designated by the Assistive Devices Program. Retrieved from http://www.bridgepointhealth.ca/en/what-we-do/resources/AAC_Clinic_Mandates_2014.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Batorowicz, B., Campbell, F., von Tetzchner, S., King, G., & Missiuna, C. (2014). Social participation of school-aged children who use communication aids: The views of children and parents. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 30, 237–251. doi: https://doi.org/10.3109/07434618.2014.940464
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batorowicz, B., King, G., Mishra, L., & Missiuna, C. (2016a). An integrated model of social environment and social context for pediatric rehabilitation. Disability and Rehabilitation, 38, 1204–1215. doi: https://doi.org/10.3109/09638288.2015.1076070
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batorowicz, B., Stadskleiv, K., von Tetzchner, S., & Missiuna, C. (2016b). Children who use communication aids instructing peer and adult partners during play-based activity. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 32, 105–119. doi: 10.3109/07434618.2016.1160150
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blackstone, S.W., William, M.B., & Wilkins, D.P. (2007). Key principles underlying research and practice in AAC. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 23, 191–203. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/07434610701553684
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Browne, K. (2005). Snowball sampling: Using social networks to research non-heterosexual women. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8, 47–60. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/1364557032000081663
   Google Scholar
• Bronfenbrenner, U. (2005). Making human beings human: Bioecological perspectives on human development. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, M., McConachie, H., Price, K., & Wood, P. (2001). Views of young people using augmentative and alternative communication systems. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 36, 107–115. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/13682820119446
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke, M.T., Newton, C., Griffiths, T., Price, K., Lysely, A., & Perrides, K.V. (2011). Factors associated with the participation of children with complex communication needs. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 32, 774–780. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2010.11.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke, M., Newton, C., Petrides, K., Griffiths, T., Lysley, A., & Price, K. (2012). An examination of relations between participation, communication and age in children with complex communication needs. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 28, 44–51. doi: https://doi.org/10.3109/07434618.2011.653605
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins, D. (2003). Pretesting survey instruments: An overview of cognitive methods. Quality of Life Research, 12, 229–238. doi: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023254226592
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collier, B., Blackstone, S.W., & Taylor, A. (2012). Communication access to businesses and organizations for people with complex communication needs. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 28, 205–218. doi: https://doi.org/10.3109/07434618.2012.732611
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, L., Balandin, S., & Trembath, D. (2009). The loneliness experiences of young adults with cerebral palsy who use alternative and augmentative communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 25, 154–164. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/07434610903036785
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dattilo, J., Estrella, G., Estrella, L.J., Light, J., McNaughton, D., & Seabury, M. (2008). “I have chosen to live life abundantly”: Perceptions of leisure by adults who use augmentative and alternative communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 24, 16–28. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/07434610701390558
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeVellis, R.F. (2003). Scale development: Theory and applications (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Dickerson, S.S., Stone, V.I., Panchura, C., & Usiak, D.J. (2002). The meaning of communication: Experiences with augmentative communication devices. Rehabilitation Nursing, 27, 215–220. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2048-7940.2002.tb02016.x
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dunn, O.J. (1964). Multiple comparisons using rank sums. Technometrics, 6, 241–252.doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/1266041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eadie, T.L., Yorkston, K.M., Klasner, E.R., Dugeon, B.J., Deitz, J.C., Baylor, C.R., … Amtmann, D. (2006). Measuring communicative participation: A review of self-report instruments in speech-language pathology. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 15, 307–320. doi: https://doi.org/10.1044/1058-0360(2006/030)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eccles, J.S. (2005). The present and future of research on activity settings as developmental contexts. In J. L. Mahoney, R. W. Larson, & J. S. Eccles (Eds.), Organized activities as contexts of development: Extracurricular activities, after-school and community programs (pp. 353–371). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Eyssen, I.C., Steultjens, M.P., Dekker, J., & Terwee, C.B. (2011). A systematic review of instruments assessing participation: Challenges in defining participation. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 92, 983–997. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2011.01.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson, B.E., King, G., Kushki, A., Mistry, B., Thompson, L., Teachman, G., … McMain-Klein, M. (2014). A multi-method approach to studying activity setting participation: Integrating standardized questionnaires, qualitative methods and physiological measures. Disability and Rehabilitation, 36, 1652–1660. doi: https://doi.org/10.3109/09638288.2013.863393
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Granlund, M. (2013). Participation-challenges in conceptualization, measurement and intervention. Child: Care, Health and Development, 39, 470–473. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/cch.12080
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenstock, L., & Wright, J. (2011). Collaborative implementation: Working together when using graphic symbols. Child Language Teaching and Therapy, 27, 331–343. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0265659010396778
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammel, J., Magasi, S., Heinemann, A., Whiteneck, G., Bogner, J., & Rodriguez, E. (2008). What does participation mean? An insider perspective from people with disabilities. Disability and Rehabilitation, 30, 1445–1460. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09638280701625534
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen, D.M., & Larson, R. (2005). The youth experience survey 2.0: Instrument revisions and validity testing (Unpublished manuscript). University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Retrieved from: http://web.aces.uiuc.edu/youthdev/
   Google Scholar
• Huer, M.B. (2000). Examining perceptions of graphic symbols across cultures: Preliminary study of the impact of culture/ethnicity. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 16, 180–185. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/07434610012331279034
   Google Scholar
• Imms, C., Adair, B., Keen, D., Ullenhag, A., Rosenbaum, P., & Granlund, M. (2016). 'Participation': a systematic review of language, definitions, and constructs used in intervention research with children with disabilities. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 58, 29–38. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/dmcn.12932
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, G. (2013). Perspectives on measuring participation: Going forward. Child: Care, Health and Development, 39, 466–469. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/cch.12083
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, G., Batorowicz, B., Rigby, P., McMain-Klein, M., Thompson, L., & Pinto, M. (2014a). Development of a measure to assess youth Self-reported Experiences of Activity Settings (SEAS). International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 61, 44–66. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/1034912X.2014.878542
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, G., Batorowicz, B., Rigby, P., Pinto, M., Thompson, L., & Goh, F. (2014b). The leisure activity settings and experiences of youth with severe disabilities. Developmental Neurorehabilitation, 17, 259–269. doi: 10.3109/17518423.2013.799244
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, G., Gibson, B.E., Mistry, B., Pinto, M., Goh, F., Teachman, G., & Thompson, L. (2014c). An integrated methods study of the experiences of youth with severe disabilities in leisure activity settings: The importance of belonging, fun, and control and choice. Disability and Rehabilitation, 36, 1626–1635. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2013.863389
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, G., Petrenchik, T., Law, M., & Hurley, P. (2009). The enjoyment of formal and informal recreation and leisure activities: A comparison of school-aged children with and without physical disabilities. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 56, 109–130. doi: 10.1080/10349120902868558
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, G., Rigby, P., & Avery, L. (2016). Revised Measure of Environmental Qualities of Activity Settings (MEQAS) for youth leisure and life skills activity settings. Disability and Rehabilitation, 38, 1509–1520. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2015.1103792
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, G., Rigby, P., & Batorowicz, B. (2013). Conceptualizing participation in context for children and youth with disabilities: An activity setting perspective. Disability and Rehabilitation, 35, 1578–1585. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2012.748836 http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/09638288.2012.748836
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, G., Rigby, P., Batorowicz, B., McMain-Klein, M., Petrenchik, T., Thompson, L., & Gibson, M. (2014d). Development of a direct observation Measure of Environmental Qualities of Activity Settings. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology, 56, 763–769. doi: 10.1111/dmcn.12400
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Light, J., & McNaughton, D. (2015). Designing AAC research and intervention to improve outcomes for individuals with complex communication needs. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 31, 85–96. doi: 10.3109/07434618.2015.1036458
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNaughton, D., Light, J., & Arnold, K. (2002). “Getting your wheel in the door”: Successful full-time employment experiences of individuals with cerebral palsy who use augmentative and alternative communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 18, 59–76. doi: 10.1080/07434610212331281171
   Google Scholar
• McNaughton, D., Light, J., & Groszyk, L. (2001). “Don’t give up”: Employment experiences of individuals with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis who use augmentative and alternative communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 17, 179–195. doi: 10.1080/aac.17.3.179.195
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, C. (2007). Young minds in social worlds: Experience meaning, and memory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Noreau, L., & Boschen, K. (2010). Intersection of participation and environmental factors: A complex interactive process. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 91, S44–S53. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2009.10.037
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norman, G.R., & Streiner, D.L. (2003). PDQ statistics. Hamilton, ON: BC Decker Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Ontario Ministry of Education (2006). The Ontario Curriculum Grade 1–8: Language. Retrieved from http://www.edu.gov.on.ca/eng/curriculum/elementary/language18currb.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Owens, J.S. (2006). Accessible information for people with complex communication needs. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 22, 196–208. doi: 10.1080/07434610600649971
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Keefe, B.M., Kozak, N.B., & Schuller, R. (2007). Research priorities in augmentative and alternative communication as identified by people who use AAC and their facilitators. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 23, 89–96. doi: 10.1080/07434610601116517
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rabiee, P., Sloper, P., & Beresford, B. (2005). Doing research with children and young people who do not use speech for communication. Children & Society, 19, 385–396. doi: 10.1002/chi.841
   Google Scholar
• Rackensperger, T., Krezman, C., McNaughton, D., Williams, M.B., & D’silva, K. (2005). When I first got it, I wanted to throw it off a cliff": The challenges and benefits of learning AAC technologies as described by adults who use AAC. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 21, 165–186. doi: 10.1080/07434610500140360
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raghavendra, P., Olsson, C., Sampson, J., McInerney, R., & Connell, T. (2012). School participation and social networks of children with complex communication needs, physical disabilities, and typically developing peers. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 28, 33–43. doi: 10.3109/07434618.2011.653604
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raghavendra, P., Virgo, R., Olsson, C., Connell, T., & Lane, A.E. (2011). Activity participation of children with complex communication needs, physical disabilities and typically-developing peers. Developmental Neurorehabilitation, 14, 145–155. doi: 10.3109/17518423.2011.568994
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sameroff, A. (2010). A unified theory of development: A dialectic integration of nature and nurture. Child Development, 81, 6–22. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2009.01378.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheskin, D.J. (2011). Handbook of parametric and nonparametric statistical procedures (5th ed.). Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall/CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, M. (2005). The dual challenges of aided communication and adolescence. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 21, 67–79. doi: 10.1080/10428190400006625
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, M. (2006). Speech, language and aided communication: Connections and questions in a developmental context. Disability and Rehabilitation, 28, 151–157. doi: 10.1080/09638280500077747
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stephenson, J. (2009). Iconicity in the development of picture skills: Typical development and implications for individuals with severe intellectual disabilities. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 25, 187–201. doi: 10.1080/07434610903031133
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutton, A., Soto, G., & Blockberger, S. (2002). Grammatical issues in graphic symbol communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 18, 192–204. doi: 10.1080/07434610212331281271
   Google Scholar
• Thirumanickam, A., Raghavendra, P., & Olsson, C. (2011). Participation and social networks of school-age children with complex communication needs: A descriptive study. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 27, 195–204. doi: 10.3109/07434618.2011.610818
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trudeau, N., Sutton, A., Dagenais, E., de Broeck, S., & Morford, J. (2007). Construction of graphic symbol utterances by children, teenagers, and adults: The effect of structure and task demands. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 50, 1314–1329. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2007/092)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valiquette, C., Sutton, A., & Ska, B. (2010). A graphic symbol tool for the evaluation of communication, satisfaction and priorities of individuals with intellectual disability who use a speech generating device. Children Language Teaching and Therapy, 26, 303–319. doi: 10.1177/0265659010369281
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vargha, A., & Delaney, H.D. (1998). Kruskal-Wallis test and stochastic homogeneity. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 23, 170–192. doi: 10.3102/10769986023002170
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, M.B., Krezman, C., & McNaughton, D. (2008). “Reach for the stars”: Five principles for the next 25 years of AAC. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 24, 194–206. doi: 10.1080/08990220802387851
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar