Communicating the unknown: descriptions of pictured scenes and events presented on video by children and adolescents using aided communication and their peers using natural speech

References

• Baker, B. (1982). Minspeak: a semantic compaction system that makes self expression easier for communicatively disabled individuals. Byte, 7, 186–202. Retrieved from https://ia802700.us.archive.org/31/items/byte-magazine-1982-09-rescan/1982_09_BYTE_07-09_Computers_and_the_Disabled.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Benigno, J.P., & McCarthy, J.W. (2012). Aided symbol-infused joint engagement. Child Development Perspectives, 6, 181–186. doi:10.1111/j.1750-8606.2012.00237.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Binger, C., & Light, J. (2007). The effect of aided AAC modeling on the expression of multi-symbol messages by preschoolers who use AAC. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 23, 30–43. doi:10.1080/07434610600807470
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Binger, C., & Light, J. (2008). The morphology and syntax of individuals who use AAC: Research review and implications for effective practice. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 24, 123–138. doi:10.1080/07434610701830587
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bishop, D. (2003). Test for Reception of Grammar (2nd ed.). London: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Bliss, C. (1965). Semantography (Blissymbolics). Sydney: Semantography Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Bornman, J., Alant, E., & Du Preez, A. (2009). Translucency and learnability of Blissymbols in Setswana-speaking children: an exploration. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 25, 287–298. doi:10.3109/07434610903392456
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brekke, K.M., & von Tetzchner, S. (2003). Co-construction in graphic language development. In S. von Tetzchner & N. Grove (Eds.), Augmentative and alternative communication: Developmental issues (pp. 176–210). London, UK: Whurr/Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, M., & Kirton, A. (2003). Patterns of interaction between children with physical disabilities using augmentative and alternative communication systems and their peers. Child Language Teaching and Therapy, 19, 135–151. doi:10.1191/0265659003ct248oa
   Google Scholar
• Dada, S., Huguet, A., & Bornman, J. (2013). The iconicity of Picture Communication Symbols for children with English additional language and mild intellectual disability. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 29, 360–373. doi:10.3109/07434618.2013.849753
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeLoache, S., & Burns, N.M. (1994). Early understanding of the representational function of pictures. Cognition, 52, 83–110. doi:10.1016/0010-0277(94)90063-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunn, L.M., & Dunn, D.M. (2007). The Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test (4th ed.). San Antonio, TX: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Dunn, L.M., Dunn, L.M., Whetton, C., & Burley, J. (1997). The British Picture Vocabulary Scale (2nd ed.). UK, London: NFER Nelson.
   Google Scholar
• Eaton, J.H., Collis, G.M., & Lewis, V.A. (1999). Evaluative explanations in children’s narratives of a video sequence without dialogue. Journal of Child Language, 26, 699–720. doi:10.1017/S0305000999003967
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eliasson, A.C., Krumlinde-Sundholm, L., Rosblad, B., Beckung, E., Arner, M., Ohrvall, A.M., & Rosenbaum, P. (2006). The Manual Ability Classification System (MACS) for children with cerebral palsy: Scale development and evidence of validity and reliability. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 48, 549–554. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8749.2006.tb01313.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grice, H.P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In: P. Cole & J. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics 3: Speech acts (pp. 41–58). New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hidecker, M.J.C., Paneth, N., Rosenbaum, P.L., Kent, R.D., Lillie, J., Eulenberg, J.B., … Taylor, K. (2011). Developing and validating the Communication Function Classification System (CFCS) for individuals with cerebral palsy. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 53, 704–710. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8749.2011.03996.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, R. (1992). The Picture Communication Symbols (PCS) (Book II). Solana Beach: Mayer-Johnson.
   Google Scholar
• Kaufman, A.S., & Kaufman, N. (2004). Kaufman Brief Intelligence Test (2nd ed.). Bloomington, MN: Pearson. doi:10.1002/9781118660584.ese1325
   Google Scholar
• Kent-Walsh, J., Murza, K.A., Malani, M.D., & Binger, C. (2015). Effects of communication partner instruction on the communication of individuals using AAC: A meta-analysis. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 31, 271–284. doi:10.3109/07434618.2015.1052153
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurmanaviciute, R., & Stadskleiv, K., (2017). Assessment of verbal comprehension and non-verbal reasoning when standard response mode is challenging: A comparison of different response modes and an exploration of their clinical usefulness. Cogent Psychology, 4, 1275416. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311908.2016.1275416
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langdridge, D., & Hagger-Johnson, G. (2013). Introduction to research methods and data analysis in psychology (3rd ed.). Harlow, UK: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Light, J., & McNaughton, D. (2014). Communicative competence for individuals who require Augmentative and alternative communication: A new definition for a new era of communication? Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 30, 1–18. doi:10.3109/07434618.2014.885080
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lund, S.K., & Light, J. (2007). Long-term outcomes for individuals who use AAC: Part III − Factors contributing to outcomes. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 23, 323–335. doi:10.1080/02656730701189123
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maharaj, S. (1980). Pictogram Ideogram Communication (PIC). Regina: The George Reed Foundation for the Handicapped.
   Google Scholar
• Murray, J., Bell, H., & Goldbart, J. (2016). Operational demands and representational forms. In M.M. Smith & J. Murray (Eds.), The silent partner? Language, interaction and aided communication (pp. 35–64). Guildford, UK: J&R Press.
   Google Scholar
• Murray, J., & Goldbart, J. (2009). Cognitive and language acquisition in typical and aided language learning: A review of recent evidence from an aided communication perspective. Child Language Teaching and Therapy, 25, 31–58. doi:10.1177/0265659008098660
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray, J., & Goldbart, J. (2011). Emergence of working memory in children using aided communication. Journal of Assistive Technologies, 5, 213–232. doi:10.1108/17549451111190623
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, K. (2007). Young minds in social worlds: Experience meaning, and memory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, N.W. (1998). Childhood language disorders in context: Infancy through adolescence (2nd ed.). London: Allyn and Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Norbury, C.F. (2014). Practitioner review: Social (pragmatic) communication disorder conceptualization, evidence and clinical implications United. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 55, 204–216. doi:10.1111/jcpp.12154
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palisano, R., Rosenbaum, P., Bartlett, D., & Livingston, M. (2007). GMFCS: E & R, gross motor function classification system expanded and revised. Toronto, Ontario: CanChild Centre for Childhood Disability Research, McMaster University.
   Google Scholar
• Pennington, L., Virella, D., Mjøen, T., da Graça Andrada, M., Murray, J., Colver, A., … de la Cruz, J. (2013). Development of the Viking Speech Scale to classify the speech of children with cerebral palsy. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 34, 3202–3210. doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2013.06.035
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raven, J. (2008). Raven’s coloured progressive matrices. San Antonio, TX: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Raven, J., Raven, J.C., & Court, J.H. (2000). Standard progressive matrices. Including the parallel and plus versions. Oxford: Oxford Psychologists Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sevcik, R.A., Romski, M.A., & Wilkinson, K.M. (1991). Roles of graphic symbols in the language acquisition process for persons with severe cognitive disabilities. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 7, 161–170. doi:10.1080/07434619112331275873
   Google Scholar
• Smith, M.M. (2003). Environmental influences on aided language development: The role of partner adaptation. In S. von Tetzchner & N. Grove (Eds.), Augmentative and alternative communication: Developmental issues (pp. 155–175). London: Whurr/Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, M.M. (2006). Speech, language and aided communication: Connections and questions in a developmental context. Disability and Rehabilitation, 28, 151–157. doi:10.1080/09638280500077747
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, M.M. (2015). Language development of individuals who require aided communication: Reflections on state of the science and future research directions. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 31, 215–233. doi:10.3109/07434618.2015.1062553
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solomon-Rice, P.L., Soto, G., & Heidenreich, W. (2017). The impact of presupposition on the syntax and morphology of a child who uses AAC. Perspectives of the ASHA Special Interest Groups, 12, 13–22. doi:10.1044/persp2.SIG12.13
   Google Scholar
• Soto, G., & Hartmann, E. (2006). Analysis of narratives produced by four children who use augmentative and alternative communication. Journal of Communication Disorders, 39, 456–480. doi:10.1016/j.jcomdis.2006.04.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soto, G., & Starowicz, R. (2016). Narrative development and aided communication. In M.M. Smith, & J. Murray (Eds.), The silent partner? Language, interaction and aided communication (pp. 141–158). Guildford, Surrey, UK: J&R Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stadskleiv, K., von Tetzchner, S., Batorowicz, B., van Balkom, H., Dahlgren Sandberg, A., & Renner, G. (2014). Investigating executive functions in children with severe speech and movement disorders using structured tasks. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1–14. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00992
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stephenson, J. (2009). Iconicity in the development of picture skills: Typical development and implications for individuals with severe intellectual impairment. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 25, 187–201. doi:10.1080/07434610903031133
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutton, A. (2016). Symbolic representation and graphic symbol use: Insights from typical development. In M.M. Smith & J. Murray (Eds.), The silent partner? Language, interaction and aided communication (pp. 64–118). Guildford, UK: J&R Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thistle, J., & Wilkinson, K. (2013). Working memory demands of aided augmentative and alternative communication for individuals with developmental disabilities. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 29, 235–245. doi:10.3109/07434618.2013.815800
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, G., Nye, R., & Robinson, E. (1994). How children view pictures: Children’s responses to pictures as things in themselves and as representations of something else. Cognitive Development, 9, 141–164. doi:10.1016/0885-2014(94)90001-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trudeau, N., Sutton, A., & Morford, J.P. (2014). An investigation of developmental changes in interpretation and construction of graphic AAC symbol sequences through systematic combination of input and output modalities. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 30, 187–199. doi:10.3109/07434618.2014.940465
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Tetzchner, S. (2015). The semiotics of aided language development. Cognitive Development, 36, 180–190. doi:10.1016/j.cogdev.2015.09.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Tetzchner, S. (2018). Introduction to special issue aided language processes, development and use: An international perspective. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 34, 2–15. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/07434618.2017.1422020
   Google Scholar
• von Tetzchner, S., & Basil, C. (2011). Terminology and notation in written representations of conversations with augmentative and alternative communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 27, 141–149. doi:10.3109/07434618.2011.610356
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Tetzchner, S., & Stadskleiv, K. (2016). Constructing a language in alternative forms. In M. M. Smith & J. Murray (Eds.), The silent partner? Language, interaction and aided communication (pp.17–34). Guildford, UK: J&R Press.
   Google Scholar