Introduction to the special issue on aided language processes, development, and use: an international perspective

References

• Ambridge, B., & Lieven, E.V.M. (2011). Child language acquisition: Contrasting theoretical approaches. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ambridge, B., Pine, J.M., & Lieven, E.V. (2014). Child language acquisition: Why universal grammar doesn’t help. Language, 90, e53–e90. doi:10.1353/lan.2014.0051
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, D.I., Campos, J.J., Witherington, D.C., Dahl, A., Rivera, M., He, M., … Barbu-Roth, M. (2013). The role of locomotion in psychological development. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 440. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00440
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basil, C. (1992). Social interaction and learned helplessness in severely disabled children. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 8, 188–199. doi:10.1080/07434619212331276183
   Google Scholar
• Batorowicz, B., Stadskleiv, K., Renner, G., Dahlgren Sandberg, A., & von Tetzchner, S. (2018). Language and communication assessment: Achievements of children who use aided communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 34. doi:10.1080/07434618.2017.1420689
   Google Scholar
• Batorowicz, B., Stadskleiv, K., von Tetzchner, S., & Missiuna, C. (2016). Children who use communication aids instructing peer and adult partners during play-based activity. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 32, 105–119. doi:10.3109/07434618.2016.1160150
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beukelman, D., McGinnis, J., & Morrow, D. (1991). Vocabulary selection in augmentative and alternative communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 7, 171–185. doi:10.1080/07434619112331275883
   Google Scholar
• Beukelman, D.R., & Mirenda, P. (2013). Augmentative and alternative communication: Supporting children and adults with complex communication needs (4th ed.). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
   Google Scholar
• Binger, C., & Light, J. (2007). The effect of aided AAC modeling on the expression of multi-symbol messages by preschoolers who use AAC. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 23, 30–43. doi:10.1080/07434610600807470
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birch, T., Cross, A., Dumble, M., & Park, K. (2000). Switching on to stories: AAC use and storytelling with children with severe and profound learning disabilities. Commmunication Matters, 14, 3–4.
   Google Scholar
• Black, R., Waller, A., Turner, R., & Reiter, E. (2012). Supporting personal narrative for children with complex communication needs. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI), 19, 15. doi:10.1145/2240156.2240163
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bliss, C. (1965). Semantography (Blissymbolics). Sydney: Semantography Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Bohannon, J.N., MacWhinney, B., & Snow, C. (1990). No negative evidence revisited: Beyond learnability or who has to prove what to whom. Developmental Psychology, 26, 221–226. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.26.2.221
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bohannon, J.N., & Stanowicz, L.B. (1988). The issue of negative evidence: Adult responses to children’s language errors. Developmental Psychology, 24, 684–689. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.24.5.684
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bondy, A.S., & Frost, L.A. (2002). A picture’s worth: PECS and other visual communication strategies in autism. Bethesda, Maryland: Woodbine House.
   Google Scholar
• Brekke, K.M., & von Tetzchner, S. (2003). Co-construction in graphic language development. In S. von Tetzchner & N. Grove (Eds.), Augmentative and alternative communication: Developmental issues (pp. 176–210). London: Whurr/Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, R. (1958). Words and things. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bruner, J. (1983). Child’s talk. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bruner, J. (1975). The ontogenesis of speech acts. Journal of Child Language, 2, 1–19. doi:10.1017/S0305000900000866
   Google Scholar
• Bruner, J. (1990). Acts of meaning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bruno, J. (2006). Test of aided-communication symbol performance. Solana Beach, CA: Mayer-Johnson.
   Google Scholar
• Bruno, J., & Trembath, D. (2006). Use of aided language stimulation to improve syntactic performance during a weeklong intervention program. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 22, 300–313. doi:10.1080/07434610600768318
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burgoon, J.K. (1993). Interpersonal expectations, expectancy violations, and emotional communication. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 12, 30–48. doi:10.1177/0261927X93121003
   Google Scholar
• Campos, J., Anderson, D.I., Barbu-Roth, M.A., Hubbard, E.M., Hertenstein, M.J., & Witherington, D. (2000). Travel broadens the mind. Infancy, 1, 149–219. doi:10.1207/S15327078in0102_1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chomsky, N. (1959). A review of BF Skinner’s verbal behavior. Language, 35, 26–58. doi:10.2307/41133
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of a theory of syntax. Cambridge: MTT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chomsky, N. (1975). Reflections on language. New York: Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Chomsky, N. (1980). Rules and representations. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Chomsky, N. (1986). Knowledge of language: its nature, origin, and use. Westport, CT: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Chouinard, M.M., & Clark, E.V. (2003). Adult reformulations of child errors as negative evidence. Journal of Child Language, 30, 637–669. doi:10.1017/S0305000903005701
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Church, R.P., Best, A., Bruno, K., DuRette, J.G., Richardson, J., Veselich, B., & Young, M. (2000). Using technology to facilitate communication in students with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Journal, 10, 1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, M.T., Bloch, S., & Wilkinson, R. (2013). Speaker transfer in children’s peer conversation: Completing communication-aid-mediated contributions. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 29, 37–53. doi:10.3109/07434618.2013.767490
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke, M.T., Donlan, C., Lister, C., Wright, J., Newton, C., & Cherguit, J. (2007). The provision of communication aids to children in England: An analysis of applications to the Communication Aids Project. Child: Care, Health and Development, 33, 569–575. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2214.2006.00712.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke, M.T., & Kirton, A. (2003). Patterns of interaction between children with physical disabilities using augmentative and alternative communication and their peers. Child Language Teaching and Therapy, 19, 135–151. doi:10.1191/0265659003ct248oa
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, M.T., Soto, G., & Nelson, K. (2017). Language learning, recasts, and interaction involving AAC: Background and potential for intervention. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 33, 42–50. doi:10.1080/07434618.2016.1278130
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins, S., & Marková, I. (1999). Interaction between impaired and unimpaired speakers: Inter-subjectivity and the interplay of culturally shared and situation specific knowledge. British Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 339–368. doi:10.1348/014466699164211
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crain, S. (1991). Language acquisition in the absence of experience. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 14, 597–650. doi:10.1017/S0140525X00071491
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cress, C.J., & Marvin, C.A. (2003). Common questions about AAC services in early intervention. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 19, 254–272. doi:10.1080/07434610310001598242
   Google Scholar
• Crestani, C.A.M., Clendon, S.A., & Hemsley, B. (2010). Words needed for sharing a story: Implications for vocabulary selection in augmentative and alternative communication. Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disability, 35, 268–278. doi:10.3109/13668250.2010.513966
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deliberato, D., Jennische, M., Oxley, J., Nunes, L.R., Regina d’Oliveira de Paula Nunes, P., Walter, C.C.F., … von Tetzchner, S. (2018). Vocabulary comprehension and strategies in name construction among children using aided communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication. doi:10.1080/07434618.2017.1420691
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• de Saussure, F. (1974). Course in general linguistics. Glasgow, UK: Collins.
   Google Scholar
• Drager, K.D., Light, J.C., Carlson, R., D’Silva, K., Larsson, B., Pitkin, L., & Stopper, G. (2004). Learning of dynamic display AAC technologies by typically developing 3-year-olds: Effect of different layouts and menu approaches. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 47, 1133–1148. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2004/084)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunn, L.M., & Dunn, D.M. (2007). The Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test (4th ed.). San Antonio, TX: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Durand, V.M., & Merges, E. (2001). Functional communication training: A contemporary behavior analytic intervention for problem behaviors. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 16, 110–119. doi:10.1177/108835760101600207
   Google Scholar
• Escandell-Vidal, V. (2016). Expectations in interaction. In K. Allan, A. Capone, & I. Kecskes (Eds.), Pragmemes and theories of language use (pp. 493–503). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M. (2002). The way we think: Conceptual blending and the mind’s hidden complexities. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Fried-Oken, M., & More, L. (1992). An initial vocabulary for nonspeaking preschool children based on developmental and environmental language sources. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 8, 41–56. doi:10.1080/07434619212331276033
   Google Scholar
• Fulcher, G., & Svalberg, A. (2013). Limited aspects of reality: Frames of reference in language assessment. International Journal of English Studies, 13, 1–19. doi:10.6018/ijes.13.2.184061
   Google Scholar
• Gerber, S., & Kraat, A. (1992). Use of a developmental model of language acquisition: Applications to children using AAC systems. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 8, 19–32. doi:10.1080/07434619212331276013
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, R. (1994a). Criterion referenced tests: Part I. Origins. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 13, 9–11. doi:10.1111/j.1745-3992.1994.tb00562.x
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, R. (1994b). Criterion-referenced tests: Part 11. Unfinished business. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 13, 27–30. doi:10.1111/j.1745-3992.1994.tb00568.x
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goosens’, C.A. (1983). The relative iconicity and learnability of verb referents represented in Blissymbolics, Rebus symbols, and manual signs: An investigation with moderately retarded individuals (Doctoral dissertation). Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Grove, N. (1995). An analysis of the linguistic skills of signers with learning disabilities (Doctoral dissertation). University College London, London, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Grove, N., & Tucker, S. (2003). Narratives in manual sign by children with intellectual impairments. In S. von Tetzchner & N. Grove (Eds.), Augmentative and alternative communication: Developmental issues (pp. 229–254). London: Whurr/Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, D. (1982). Communicative interaction processes involving nonvocal physically handicapped children. Topics in Language Disorders, 2, 21–37.doi:10.1097/00011363-198203000-00005
   Google Scholar
• Herman, R., Grove, N., Holmes, S., Morgan, G., Sutherland, H., & Woll, B. (2004). Assessing BSL development: Production test (Narrative Skills). London, UK: City University Publication.
   Google Scholar
• Hjelmquist, E., & Dahlgren Sandberg, A. (1996). Sounds and silence: Interaction in aided language use. In S. von Tetzchner & M.H. Jensen (Eds.), Augmentative and Alternative Communication: European Perspectives (pp. 137–152). London: Whurr/Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Hoff-Ginsberg, E. (1990). Maternal speech and the child’s development of syntax: A further look. Journal of Child Language, 17, 85–99. doi:10.1017/S0305000900013118
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, C.H., & Chen, M.C. (2011). Effect of translucency on transparency and symbol learning for children with and without cerebral palsy. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 32, 1829–1836. doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2011.03.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hustad, K.C., Allison, K., McFadd, E., & Riehle, K. (2014). Speech and language development in 2-year-old children with cerebral palsy. Developmental Neurorehabilitation, 17, 167–175.doi:10.3109/17518423.2012.747009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inhelder, B., & Piaget, J. (1964). The early growth of logic in the child: Classification and seriation. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Jackendoff, R. (2002). Foundations of language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jennische, M. (2014). Characteristics of Blissymbolics. In L.L. Lloyd, L. Koehler, & S. von Tetzchner (Eds.), Augmentative and alternative communication research issues and needs: Proceedings of the 2012 ISAAC Research Symposium (pp. 67–76). Toronto, ON: International Society for Augmentative and Alternative Communication.
   Google Scholar
• Jennische, M., & Zetterlund, M. (2015). Interpretation and construction of meaning of Bliss-words in children. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 31, 97–107. doi:http://10.3109/07434618.2015.1036117http://10.3109/07434618.2015.1036117
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ko, M.L.B., McConachie, H., & Joleff, N. (1998). Outcome of recommendations for augmentative communication in children. Child: Care, Health and Development, 24, 195–205. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2214.1998.00065.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krstic, S., & Littorin, E. (2014) The iconicity and learnability of Blissymbols. A study of the interpretations of Blissymbols by Kenyan children with diverse language backgrounds (Master Thesis), University of Linköping, Sweden.
   Google Scholar
• Kurmanaviciute, R., & Stadskleiv, K. (2017). Assessment of verbal comprehension and non-verbal reasoning when standard response mode is challenging: A comparison of different response modes and an exploration of their clinical usefulness. Cogent Psychology, 4, 1275416. doi:10.1080/23311908.2016.1275416
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Labov, W. (1972). Language in the inner city. Philadelphia: University of Philadelphia Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lieven, E. (2014). First language development: A usage-based perspective on past and current research. Journal of Child Language, 41, 48–63. doi:10.1017/S0305000914000282
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lieven, E. (2016). Usage-based approaches to language development: Where do we go from here? Language and Cognition, 8, 346–368. doi:10.1017/langcog.2016.16
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Light, J. (1985). The communicative interaction patterns of young nonspeaking physically disabled children and their primary caregivers. Toronto: Blissymbolics Communication Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Light, J., Collier, B., & Parnes, P. (1985). Communicative interaction between young nonspeaking physically disabled children and their primary caregivers: Part l–Discourse Patterns. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 1, 74–83. doi:10.1080/07434618512331273561
   Google Scholar
• Light, J., & McNaughton, D. (2012). The changing face of augmentative and alternative communication: Past, present, and future challenges. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 28, 197–204. doi:10.3109/07434618.2012.737024
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lillo-Martin, D. (1991). Universal grammar and American Sign Language. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Linell, P. (2016). On agency in situated languaging: Participatory agency and competing approaches. New Ideas in Psychology, 42, 39–45. doi:10.1016/j.newideapsych.2015.07.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lloyd, L.L., & Fuller, D.R. (1990). The role of iconicity in augmentative and alternative communication symbol learning. In W. I. Fraser (Ed.), Key issues in mental retardation research (pp. 295–306). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lock, A. (1980). The guided reinvention of language. London: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Love, N. (2004). Cognition and the language myth. Language Sciences, 26, 525–544. doi:10.1016/j.langsci.2004.09.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Love, N. (2017). On languaging and languages. Language Sciences, 61, 113–147. doi:10.1016/j.langsci.2017.04.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lund, S.K., & Light, J. (2007). Long-term outcomes for individuals who use augmentative and alternative communication: Part II–Communicative interaction. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 23, 1–15. doi:10.1080/07434610600720442
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacWhinney, B. (2015). Introduction: Language emergence. In B. MacWhinney & W. O’Grady (Eds.), Handbook of language emergence (pp. 1–32). New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• McNaughton, D., Rackensperger, T., Benedek-Wood, E., Krezman, C., Williams, M.B., & Light, J. (2008). “A child needs to be given a chance to succeed”: Parents of individuals who use AAC describe the benefits and challenges of learning AAC technologies. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 24, 43–55. doi:10.1080/07434610701421007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mandak, K., O’Neill, T., Light, J., & Fosco, G.M. (2017). Bridging the gap from values to actions: A family systems framework for family-centered AAC services. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 33, 32–41. doi:10.1080/07434618.2016.1271453
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinsen, H., & von Tetzchner, S. (1996). Situating augmentative and alternative communication intervention. In S. von Tetzchner & M. H. Jensen (Eds.), Augmentative and alternative communication: European perspectives (pp. 37–48). London: Whurr/Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Mey, J.L. (2010). Reference and the pragmeme. Journal of Pragmatics, 42, 2882–2888. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2010.06.009
   Google Scholar
• Minsky, M. (1975). A framework for representing knowledge. In P. H. Winston (Ed.), The psychology of computer vision (pp. 211–277). New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Mirenda, P. (1997). Supporting individuals with challenging behavior through functional communication training and AAC: Research review. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 13, 207–225. doi:10.1080/07434619712331278048
   Google Scholar
• Murray, J., Dahlgren Sandberg, A., Smith, M.M., Deliberato, D., Stadskleiv, K., & von Tetzchner, S. (2018). Communicating the unknown: Descriptions of pictured scenes and events presented on video by children and adolescents using aided communication and their peers using natural speech. Augmentative and Alternative Communication. doi:10.1080/07434618.2017.1420690
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Murray, J., & Goldbart, J. (2009). Cognitive and language acquisition in typical and aided language learning: A review of recent evidence from an aided communication perspective. Child Language Teaching and Therapy, 25, 7–34. doi:10.1177/0265659008098660
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray, J., & Goldbart, J. (2011). Emergence of working memory in children using aided communication. Journal of Assistive Technologies, 5, 214–232. doi:10.1108/17549451111190623
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, K. (2007). Young minds in social worlds: Experience, meaning and memory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nunes, L.R., Delgado, S.M.M., & Walter, C.C.F. (2011). O que dizem as familias e os profissionais sobre a comunicação alternativa [What family and professionals say about alternative communication]. In L. R. Nunes, M. Pelosi, & C.C.F. Walter (Eds.), Compartilhando experiências: Ampliando a comunicação alternativa [Sharing experiences: Expanding augmentative and alternative communication] (vol.1, pp. 41–55). Marilia, Brazil: Editora da Associação Brasileira de Pesquisadores em Educação Especial [Publications of the Brazilian Association of Researchers in Special Education].
   Google Scholar
• Owen Van Horne, A.J., Hall, J., & Curran, M. (2014). Development of interventions for language impairment: Why universal grammar may be harmful (Commentary on Ambridge, Pine, and Lieven). Language, 90, e131–e143. doi:10.1353/lan.2014.0050
   Google Scholar
• Oxley, J.D., & Norris, J.A. (2000). Children’s use of memory strategies: Relevance to voice output communication aid use. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 16, 79–94. doi:10.1080/07434610012331278924
   Google Scholar
• Pampoulou, E., & Pampoulou, E. (2017). Graphic symbols terminology: A call for a consensus. Journal of Enabling Technologies, 11, 92–100. doi:10.1108/JET-02-2017-0008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinker, S. (1984) Language learnability and language development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pinker, S. (1994). The language instinct: The new science of language and mind. London: Penguin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Raghavendra, P., Olsson, C., Sampson, J., Mcinerney, R., & Connell, T. (2012). School participation and social networks of children with complex communication needs, physical disabilities, and typically developing peers. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 28, 33–43. doi:10.3109/07434618.2011.653604
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renner, G. (2014). Semiotic aspects of graphic signs in general and Blissymbolics specifically. In L.L. Lloyd, L. Koehler & S. von Tetzchner (Eds.), Augmentative and alternative communication research issues and needs: Proceedings of the 2012 ISAAC Research Symposium (pp. 77–90). Toronto: International Society for Augmentative and Alternative Communication.
   Google Scholar
• Robillard, M., Mayer-Crittenden, C., Roy-Charland, A., Minor-Corriveau, M., & Bélanger, R. (2013). Exploring the impact of cognition on young children’s ability to navigate a speech-generating device. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 29, 347–359. doi:10.3109/07434618.2013.849754
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rommetveit, R. (1974). On message structure: A framework for the study of language and communication. Oxford, UK: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Roth, F., & Cassatt-James, E.L. (1989). The language assessment process: Clinical implications for individuals with severe speech impairments. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 5, 165–172. doi:10.1080/07434618912331275166
   Google Scholar
• Sanford, A.J., & Garrod, S.C. (1998). The role of scenario mapping in text comprehension. Discourse Processes, 26, 159–190. doi:10.1080/01638539809545043
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schank, R.C., & Abelson, R. (1977). Scripts, goals, plans, and understanding. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Schank, R.C., & Abelson, R.P. (1975). Scripts, plans, and knowledge. In Advance Papers of the Fourth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (pp. 151–157). Tbilisi, Georgia: International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence.
   Google Scholar
• Senner, J.E. (2011). Parent perceptions of pragmatic skills in teens and young adults using AAC. Communication Disorders Quarterly, 32, 103–108. doi:10.1177/1525740109351570
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skinner, B.F. (1957). Verbal behavior. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, M.M. (1996). The medium or the message: A study of speaking children using communication boards. In S. von Tetzchner & M.H. Jensen (Eds.), Augmentative and alternative communication: European perspectives (pp. 119–136). London: Whurr/Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, M.M. (2003). Environmental influences on aided language development: The role of partner adaptation. In S. von Tetzchner, & N. Grove (Eds.), Augmentative and alternative communication: Developmental issues (pp. 155–175). London: Whurr/Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, M.M. (2006). Speech, language and aided communication: Connections and questions in a developmental context. Disability and Rehabilitation, 28, 151–157. doi:10.1080/09638280500077747
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, M.M. (2015). Language development of individuals who require aided communication: Reflections on state of the science and future research directions. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 31, 215–233. doi:10.3109/07434618.2015.1062553
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, M.M., Dahlgren Sandberg, A., Murray, J., Batorowicz, B., Neuvonen, K., Stadskleiv, K., & von Tetzchner, S. (2018). Constructing narratives to describe video events using aided communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication. doi:10.1080/07434618.2017.1422018
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Smith, M.M., & Grove, N. (1999). The bimodal situation of children learning language using manual and graphic signs. In F. Loncke, J. Clibbens, H. Arvidson, & L. Lloyd (Eds.), New directions in AAC: Research and practice (pp. 9–30). London: Whurr/Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, M. M., & Murray, J. (Eds.) (2016). The silent partner? Language, interaction and aided communication. Surrey, UK: J&R Press.
   Google Scholar
• Soto, G., & Clarke, M.T. (2017). Effects of a conversation-based intervention on the linguistic skills of children with motor speech disorders who use augmentative and alternative communication. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 60, 1980–1998. doi:10.1044/2016_JSLHR-L-15-0246
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soto, G., & Hartmann, E. (2006). Analysis of narratives produced by four children who use augmentative and alternative communication. Journal of Communication Disorders, 39, 456–480. doi:10.1016/j.jcomdis.2006.04.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soto, G., & Starowicz, R. (2016). Narrative development and aided communication. In M. M. Smith, & J. Murray (Eds.), The silent partner? Language, interaction and aided communication (pp. 141–158). Surrey, UK: J&R Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stadskleiv, K. (2017). The relationship between language, expressive abilities and executive functioning in children with speech and motor impairment (Doctoral dissertation) Department of Psychology, University of Oslo.
   Google Scholar
• Stadskleiv, K., Batorowicz, B., Massaro, M., van Balkom, H., & von Tetzchner, S. (2018). Visual-spatial cognition in children using aided communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication. doi:10.1080/07434618.2017.1422017
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stadskleiv, K., Jahnsen, R., Andersen, G.L., & von Tetzchner, S. (2017). Executive functioning in children aged 6–18 years with cerebral palsy. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 29, 663–681. doi:10.1007/s10882-017-9549-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stadskleiv, K., von Tetzchner, S., Batorowicz, B., van Balkom, H., Dahlgren Sandberg, A., & Renner, G. (2014). Investigating executive functions in children with severe speech and movement disorders using structured tasks. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1–14. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00992
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutton, A. (2016). Symbolic representation and graphic symbol use. In M.M. Smith, & J. Murray (Eds.), The silent partner? Language, interaction and aided communication (pp. 65–118). Surrey, UK: J&R Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sutton, A., Trudeau, N., Morford, J., Rios, M., & Poirier, M.A. (2010). Preschool-aged children have difficulty constructing and interpreting simple utterances composed of graphic symbols. Journal of Child Language, 37, 1–26. doi:10.1017/S0305000909009477
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thorne, S.L., & Tasker, T. (2011). Sociocultural and cultural-historical theories of language development. In J. Simpson (Ed.), Routledge handbook of applied linguistics (pp. 487–500). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Tomasello, M. (2003). Constructing a language: A usage based theory of language acquisition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Trembath, D., Balandin, S., & Togher, L. (2007). Vocabulary selection for Australian children who use augmentative and alternative communication. Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disability, 32, 291–301. doi:10.1080/13668250701689298
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trudeau, N., Sutton, A., Dagenais, E., de Broeck, S., & Morford, J. (2007). Construction of graphic symbol utterances by children, teenagers and adults: The effect of structure and task demands. Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research, 50, 1314–1327. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2007/092)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trudeau, N., Sutton, A., Morford, J.P., Côté-Giroux, P., Pauzé, A.M., & Vallée, V. (2010). Strategies in construction and interpretation of graphic-symbol sequences by individuals who use AAC systems. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 26, 299–312. doi:10.3109/07434618.2010.529619
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Udwin, O., & Yule, W. (1990). Augmentative communication systems taught to cerebral palsy children: A longitudinal study. 1. The acquisition of signs and symbols and syntactic aspects of their use over time. British Journal of Disorders of Communication, 25, 295–309. doi:10.3109/13682829009011979
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• van Balkom, H., & Donker-Gimbrère, M.W. (1996). A psycholinguistic approach to graphic language use. In S. von Tetzchner & M.H. Jensen (Eds.), Augmentative and alternative communication: European perspectives (pp. 153–170). London: Whurr/Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• van Tilborg, A.J., & Deckers, S.R. (2016). Vocabulary selection in AAC: Application of core vocabulary in atypical populations. Perspectives of the ASHA Special Interest Groups, 1, 125–138.doi:10.1044/persp1.SIG12.125
   Google Scholar
• Voils, C.I., Sandelowski, M., Barroso, J., & Hasselblad, V. (2008). Making sense of qualitative and quantitative findings in mixed research synthesis studies. Field Methods, 20, 3–25. doi:10.1177/1525822X07307463
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Tetzchner, S. (1997). The use of graphic language intervention among young children in Norway. European Journal of Disorders of Communication, 32, 217–234. doi:10.1080/13682829709177098
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• von Tetzchner, S. (2015). The semiotics of aided language development. Cognitive Development, 36, 180–190. doi:10.1016/j.cogdev.2015.09.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Tetzchner, S., & Basil, C. (2011). Terminology and notation in written representations of conversations with augmentative and alternative communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 27, 141–149. doi:10.3109/07434618.2011.610356
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Tetzchner, S., & Grove, N. (Eds.). (2003). Augmentative and alternative communications: Developmental issues. London: Whurr/Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• von Tetzchner, S., Grove, N., Loncke, F., Barnett, S., Woll, B., & Clibbens, J. (1996). Preliminaries to a comprehensive model of augmentative and alternative communication. In S. von Tetzchner & M. H. Jensen (Eds.), Augmentative and alternative communication: European perspectives (pp. 19–36). London: Whurr/Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• von Tetzchner, S., Hoiting, N., Küntay, A.C., & Slobin, D.I. (2008). Variation sets in child-directed language – implication for intervention with alternative means of communication. Presented at the 13th Biennial Conference of the International Society for Augmentative and Alternative Communication, Montreal, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• von Tetzchner, S., Launonen, K., Batorowicz, B., Nunes, L.R., Regina d’Oliveira Paula de Nunes, P., Walter, C.C.F., … Deliberato, D. (2018). Communication aid provision and use among children and adolescents developing aided communication: An international survey. Augmentative and Alternative Communication. doi:10.1080/07434618.2017.1422019
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• von Tetzchner, S., & Martinsen, H. (1996). Words and strategies: Communicating with young children who use aided language. In S. von Tetzchner & M. H. Jensen (Eds.), Augmentative and alternative communication: European perspectives (pp. 65–88). London: Whurr/Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• von Tetzchner, S., & Martinsen, H. (2000). Introduction to augmentative and alternative communication (2nd ed.). London: Whurr/Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. (1962). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Waller, A., & O’Mara, D. (2003). Aided communication and the development of personal storytelling. In S. von Tetzchner & N. Grove (Eds.), Augmentative and alternative communication: Developmental issues (pp. 256–271). London: Whurr/Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Wexler, K. (1999) Maturation and growth of grammar. In W.C. Ritchie, & T.K. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of child language acquisition (pp. 55–109). London: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wunderlich, D. (2004). Why assume UG? Studies in Language, 28, 615–641. doi:10.1075/sl.28.3.12wun
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar