651
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Early verbal categories and inflections in children who use speech-generating devices

&
Pages 194-205 | Received 06 Oct 2017, Accepted 11 Jun 2018, Published online: 12 Sep 2018

References

  • Binger, C., Kent-Walsh, J., King, M., Webb, E., & Buenviaje, E. (2017). Early sentence productions of 5-year-old children who use augmentative and alternative communication. Communication Disorders Quarterly, 38, 131–142. doi:10.1177/1525740116655804
  • Binger, C., & Light, J. (2008). The morphology and syntax of individuals who use AAC: Research review and implications for effective practice. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 24, 123–138. doi:10.1080/07434610701830587
  • Binger, C., Maguire-Marshall, M., & Kent-Walsh, J. (2011). Using aided AAC models, recasts, and contrastive targets to teach grammatical morphemes to children who use AAC. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 54, 160–176. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2010/09-0163)
  • Blockberger, S., & Johnston, J.R. (2003). Grammatical morphology acquisition by children with complex communication needs. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 19, 207–221. doi:10.1080/07434610310001598233
  • Bloom, L. (1993). Language development from two to three. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  • Bloom, L., Lifter, K., & Hafitz, J. (1980). Semantics of verbs and the development of verb inflection in child language. Language, 56, 386–412. doi:10.1353/lan.1980.0001
  • Boenisch, J., & Soto, G. (2015). The oral core vocabulary of typically developing English-speaking school-aged children: Implications for AAC practice. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 31, 77–84. doi:10.3109/07434618.2014.1001521
  • Brown, R. (1973). A first language: The early stages. Oxford, England: Harvard University Press.
  • Carrow-Woolfolk, E. (1999). Test for auditory comprehension of language (TACL-3). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
  • Clark, E.V. (1996). Early verbs, event-types, and inflections. In C. E. Johnson & J. H. V. Gilbert (Eds.), Children’s language (Vol.9, pp. 61–73). Mahway, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Clark, E.V. (2016). First language acquisition (3rd ed.). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  • Dowden, P. (1997). Augmentative and alternative communication decision making for children with severely unintelligible speech. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 13, 48–59. doi:10.1080/07434619712331277838
  • Dowty, D.R. (1979). Word meaning and Montague grammar: The semantics of verbs and times in generative semantics and in Montague's PTQ (Vol.7). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
  • Dunn, L.M., & Dunn, D. (2012). Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test (PPVT-4). Johannesburg, South Africa: Pearson Education.
  • Eliasson, A.C., Krumlinde-Sundholm, L., Rösblad, B., Beckung, E., Arner, M., Öhrvall, A.M., & Rosenbaum, P. (2006). The Manual Ability Classification System (MACS) for children with cerebral palsy: Scale development and evidence of validity and reliability. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 48, 549–554. doi:10.1017/S0012162206001162
  • Gentner, D. (1982). Why nouns are learned before verbs: Linguistic relativity versus natural partitioning. Center for the Study of Reading (Technical Report 257). Retrieved from https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/bitstream/handle/2142/17514/ctrstreadtechrepv01982i00257_opt.pdf
  • Golinkoff, R.M., Hirsh-Pasek, K., Mervis, C.B., Frawley, W.B., & Parillo, M. (1995). Lexical principles can be extended to the acquisition of verbs. In M. Tomasello & W. E. Merriman (Eds.), Beyond names for things: Young children’s acquisition of verbs (pp. 185–222). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
  • Kent-Walsh, J., Binger, C., & Buchanan, C. (2015). Teaching children who use augmentative and alternative communication to ask inverted yes/no questions using aided modeling. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 24, 222–236. doi:10.1044/2015_AJSLP-14-0066
  • Kovach, T.M. (2009). Augmentative and alternative communication profile: A continuum of learning. Retrieved from LinguiSystems, https://www.linguisystems.com/products/ product/display?itemid=10547
  • Lakoff, G. (1965). On the nature of syntactic irregularity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.
  • Levin, B., & Hovav, M.R. (2005). Argument realization. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  • Light, J. (1989). Toward a definition of communicative competence for individuals using augmentative and alternative communication systems. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 5, 137–144. doi:10.1080/07434618912331275126
  • Loncke, F. (2014). Augmentative and alternative communication: Models and applications for educators, speech-language pathologists, psychologists, caregivers, and users. San Diego, CA: Plural.
  • MacWhinney, B., & Snow, C. (1985). The child language data exchange system. Journal of Child Language, 12, 271–295. doi:10.1017/S0305000900006449
  • Miller, J.F., Andriacchi, K., Nockerts, A., Westerveld, M., & Gillon, G. (Eds.). (2012). NZAU assessing language production using SALT software. A clinician's guide to language sample analysis. Middleton, WI: SALT Software.
  • Newcomer, P.L., & Hammill, D.D. (2008). TOLD–P: 4 Test of Language Development Primary. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
  • Palisano, R., Rosenbaum, P., Walter, S., Russell, D., Wood, E., & Galuppi, B. (1997). Gross motor function classification system (GMFCS). Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 39, 214–223. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Jan_Willem_Gorter/publication/46664559_Gross_Motor_Function_Classification_System_GMFCS/links/549824210cf2eeefc30f767a.pdf
  • Rydeman, B. (2010). The growth of phrases. User-centred design for activity-based voice output communication aids. Gothenburg Papers in Theoretical Linguistics (42). Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/2077/22204
  • Savaldi-Harussi, G., & Soto, G. (2016). Using SALT: Considerations for the analysis of language transcripts of children who use SGDs. Perspectives of the ASHA Special Interest Groups, 1, 110–124. doi:10.1044/persp1.SIG12.110
  • Solomon-Rice, P., & Soto, G. (2011). Co-construction as a facilitative factor in supporting the personal narratives of children who use augmentative and alternative communication. Communication Disorders Quarterly, 32, 70–82. doi:10.1177/1525740109354776
  • Sonnenmeier, R. (1993). Co-construction of messages during facilitated communication. Facilitated Communication Digest, 1, 7–9.
  • Soto, G. (1997). Multi-unit utterances and syntax in graphic communication. In E. Bjorck-Åkesson & P. Lindsay (Eds.), Communication … naturally. Theoretical and methodological issues in research in augmentative and alternative communication: Proceedings of the Fourth ISAAC Research Symposium (pp. 26–32). Toronto, Canada: Malardalen University Press.
  • Soto, G. (1999). Understanding the impact of graphic sign use on the message structure. In F. T. Loncke, J. Clibbens, H. H. Arvidson, & L. Lloyd (Eds.), Augmentative and alternative communication: New direction in research and practice (pp. 40–48). London, England: Whurr.
  • Soto, G., & Clarke, M.T. (2017). Effects of a conversation-based intervention on the linguistic skills of children with motor speech disorders who use augmentative and alternative communication. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 60, 1980. doi:10.1044/2016_JSLHR-L-15-0246
  • Sutton, A., Soto, G., & Blockberger, S. (2002). Grammatical issues in graphic symbol communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 18, 192–204. doi:10.1080/07434610212331281271
  • Tomasello, M. (1992). First verbs: A case study of early grammatical development. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  • Waxman, S.R., & Lidz, J.L. (2006). Early word learning. In D. Kuhn & R. S. Siegler (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 299–335). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Vendler, Z. (1967). Linguistics in philosophy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. doi:10.2307/2217863
  • Waxman, S., Fu, X., Arunachalam, S., Leddon, E., Geraghty, K., & Song, H.J. (2013). Are nouns learned before verbs? Infants provide insight into a long-standing debate. Child Development Perspectives, 7, 155–159. doi:10.1111/cdep.12032

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.