Conversation-based intervention for adolescents using augmentative and alternative communication

References

• Baker, N.D., & Nelson, K.E. (1984). Recasting and related conversational techniques for triggering syntactic advances by young children. First Language, 5, 3–21. doi:10.1177/014272378400501301
   Google Scholar
• Biggs, E.E., Carter, E.W., & Gustafson, J. (2017). Efficacy of peer support arrangements to increase peer interaction and AAC use. American Journal on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 122, 25–48. doi:10.1352/1944-7558-122.1.25
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Binger, C., & Light, J. (2008). The morphology and syntax of individuals who use AAC: Research review and implications for effective practice. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 24, 123–138. doi:10.1080/07434610701830587
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Binger, C., Kent-Walsh, J., & King, M. (2017). Dynamic assessment for 3-and 4-year-old children who use augmentative and alternative communication: Evaluating expressive syntax. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 60, 1946–1958. doi:10.1044/2017_JSLHR-L-15-0269
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Binger, C., Kent-Walsh, J., King, M., & Mansfield, L. (2017). Early sentence productions of 3-and 4-year-old children who use augmentative and alternative communication. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 60, 1930–1945. doi:10.1044/2017_JSLHR-L-15-0408
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Binger, C., Kent-Walsh, J., King, M., Webb, E., & Buenviaje, E. (2017). Early sentence productions of 5-year-old children who use augmentative and alternative communication. Communication Disorders Quarterly, 38, 131–142. doi:10.1177/1525740116655804
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Binger, C., Maguire-Marshall, M., & Kent-Walsh, J. (2011). Using aided AAC models, recasts, and contrastive targets to teach grammatical morphemes to children who use AAC. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 54, 160–176. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2010/09-0163)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boenisch, J., & Soto, G. (2015). The oral core vocabulary of typically developing English-speaking school-aged children: Implications for AAC practice. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 31, 77–84. doi:10.3109/07434618.2014.1001521
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Camarata, S., & Nelson, K.E. (2006). Conversational recast intervention with preschool and older children. In R. McCauley & M. Fey (Eds) Treatment of language disorders in children, (pp. 237–264). Baltimore, MD: Maryland.
   Google Scholar
• Camarata, S.M., Nelson, K.E., & Camarata, M.N. (1994). Comparison of conversational-recasting and imitative procedures for training grammatical structures in children with specific language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 37, 1414–1423. doi:10.1044/jshr.3706.1414
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chung, Y.C., Carter, E.W., & Sisco, L.G. (2012). Social interactions of students with disabilities who use augmentative and alternative communication in inclusive classrooms. American Journal on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 117, 349–367. doi:10.1352/1944-7558-117.5.349
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Clarke, M.T., Soto, G., & Nelson, K. (2017). Language learning, recasts, and interaction involving AAC: Background and potential for intervention. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 33, 42–50. doi:10.1080/07434618.2016.1278130
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cowley, D., M. (2013). “Being grown”: How adolescent girls with disabilities narrate self-determination and transitions (Doctoral dissertation, Syracuse University).
   Google Scholar
• Dowden, P. (1997). Augmentative and alternative communication decision making for children with severely unintelligible speech. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 13, 48–59. doi:10.1080/07434619712331277838
   Google Scholar
• Dunn, L.M., & Dunn, D.M. (2007). PPVT-4: Peabody picture vocabulary test. Minneapolis, MN: Pearson Tests.
   Google Scholar
• Eisenberg, S. (2014). What works in therapy: Further thoughts on improving clinical practice for children with language disorders. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 45, 117–126. doi:10.1044/2014_LSHSS-14-0021
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisenberg, S.L. (2013). Grammar intervention: Content and procedures for facilitating children’s language development. Topics in Language Disorders, 33, 165–178. doi:10.1097/TLD.0b013e31828ef28e
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fleiss, J.L. (1981). Balanced incomplete block designs for inter-rater reliability studies. Applied Psychological Measurement, 5, 105–112. doi:10.1177/014662168100500115
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gast, D. L. (Ed.). (2010). Single subject research methodology in behavioral sciences. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gast, D.L., & Ledford, J. (2010). Multiple baseline and multiple probe designs. In D. L. Gast (Ed.), Single subject research methodology in behavioral sciences (pp. 129–165). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gillam, S.L., Hartzheim, D., Studenka, B., Simonsmeier, V., & Gillam, R. (2015). Narrative intervention for children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 58, 920–933. doi:10.1044/2015_JSLHR-L-14-0295
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammill, D.D., & Newcomer, P.L. (2008). TOLD-I:4. Test of Language Development-Intermediate: 4th ed. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
   Google Scholar
• Holyfield, C., Drager, K.D.R., Kremkow, J.M.D., & Light, J. (2017). Systematic review of AAC intervention research for adolescents and adults with autism spectrum disorder. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 33, 201–212. doi:10.1080/07434618.2017.1370495
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennedy, C. H. (2005). Single-case designs for educational research. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Kent-Walsh, J., Murza, K.A., Malani, M.D., & Binger, C. (2015). Effects of communication partner instruction on the communication of individuals using AAC: A meta-analysis. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 31, 271–284. doi:10.3109/07434618.2015.1052153
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kovach, T., M. (2009). Augmentative & alternative communication profile: A continuum of learning. East Moline, IL: Linguisystems.
   Google Scholar
• Kovacs, T., & Hill, K. (2015). A tutorial on reliability testing in AAC language sample transcription and analysis. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 31, 148–158. doi:10.3109/07434618.2015.1036118
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lilienfeld, M., & Alant, E. (2005). The social interaction of an adolescent who uses AAC: The evaluation of a peer-training program. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 21, 278–294. doi:10.1080/07434610500103467
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manhardt, J., & Rescorla, L. (2002). Oral narrative skills of late talkers at ages 8 and 9. Applied Psycholinguistics, 23, 21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, N.A., & Brownell, R. (2010). Receptive One-Word Picture Vocabulary Test Fourth Edition (ROWPVT-4), Novato, CA: Academic Therapy Publications.
   Google Scholar
• McGregor, K.K. (2000). The development and enhancement of narrative skills in a preschool classroom: Towards a solution to clinician-client mismatch. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 9, 55–71. doi:10.1044/1058-0360.0901.55
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNaughton, D., & Bryen, D.N. (2007). AAC technologies to enhance participation and access to meaningful societal roles for adolescents and adults with developmental disabilities who require AAC. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 23, 217–229. doi:10.1080/07434610701573856
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, J., & Iglesias, A. (2012). Systematic analysis of language transcripts (SALT TM), Research version 2012 [Computer Software]. Middleton, WI: SALT Software, LLC.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, K.E., Camarata, S.M., Welsh, J., Butkovsky, L., & Camarata, M. (1996). Effects of imitative and conversational recasting treatment on the acquisition of grammar in children with specific language impairment and younger language-normal children. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 39, 850–859. doi:10.1044/jshr.3904.850
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nippold, M.A. (2016). Language disorders in adolescents: Current needs and future directions. Seminars in Speech and Language, 37, 274–279.
   Google Scholar
• Nippold, M.A. (2007). Later language development: School-age children, adolescents, and young adults. Austin, TX: Pro-ed.
   Google Scholar
• Nippold, M.A., Frantz-Kaspar, M.W., Cramond, P.M., Kirk, C., Hayward-Mayhew, C., & MacKinnon, M. (2014). Conversational and narrative speaking in adolescents: Examining the use of complex syntax. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 57, 876–886.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker, R., Vannest, K., & Davis, L. (2011). Effect size in single-case research: A review of nine nonoverlap techniques. Behaviour Modification, 35, 303–322. doi:10.1177/0145445511399147
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker, R.I., Vannest, K.J., & Brown, L. (2009). The improvement rate difference for single-case research. Exceptional Children, 75, 135–150. doi:10.1177/001440290907500201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker, R.I., Vannest, K.J., Davis, J.L., & Sauber, S.B. (2011). Combining nonoverlap and trend for single-case research: Tau-U. Behavior Therapy, 42, 284–299. doi:10.1016/j.beth.2010.08.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paul, R., & Norbury, C. (2012). Language disorders from infancy through adolescence: Listening, speaking, reading, writing, and communicating. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier Health Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Raffaelli, M., Duckett, E. (1989). “We were just talking”: Conversations in early adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 18, 567–582. doi:10.1007/BF02139074
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raghavendra, P., Olsson, C., Sampson, J., McInerney, R., & Connell, T. (2012). School participation and social networks of children with complex communication needs, physical disabilities, and typically developing peers. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 28, 33–43. doi:10.3109/07434618.2011.653604
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rakap, S. (2015). Effect sizes as result interpretation aids in single‐subject experimental research: description and application of four nonoverlap methods. British Journal of Special Education, 42, 11–33. doi:10.1111/1467-8578.12091
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rakap, S., Snyder, P., & Pasia, C. (2014). Comparison of nonoverlap methods for identifying treatment effect in single-subject experimental research. Behavioral Disorders, 39, 128–145. doi:10.1177/019874291303900303
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romski, M., Sevcik, R., Adamson, L., Cheslock, M., Smith, A., Barker, R., & Bakeman, R. (2010). Randomized comparison of augmented and nonaugmented language interventions for toddlers with developmental delays and their parents. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 53, 350–364. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2009/08-0156)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruston, H.P., & Schwanenflugel, P.J. (2010). Effects of a conversation intervention on the expressive vocabulary development of prekindergarten children. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 41, 303–313. doi:10.1044/0161-1461(2009/08-0100)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savaldi-Harussi, G., & Soto, G. (2016). Using SALT: Considerations for the analysis of language transcripts of children who use SGDs. Perspectives of the ASHA Special Interest Groups, 1, 110–124. doi:10.1044/persp1.SIG12.110
   Google Scholar
• Scherer, N.J., & Olswang, L.B. (1989). Using structured discourse as a language intervention technique with autistic children. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 54, 383–394. doi:10.1044/jshd.5403.383
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schlosser, R., & Lee, D. (2000). Promoting generalization and maintenance in augmentative and alternative communication: A meta-analysis of 20 years of effectiveness research. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 16, 208–226. doi:10.1080/07434610012331279074
   Google Scholar
• Scott, C.M., & Stokes, S.L. (1995). Measures of syntax in school-age children and adolescents. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 26, 309–319. doi:10.1044/0161-1461.2604.309
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, M. (2005). The dual challenges of aided communication and adolescence. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 21, 67–69. doi:10.1080/10428190400006625
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soto, G., & Clarke, M. (2017). Effects of a conversation-based intervention on the linguistic skills of children with motor speech disorders who use augmentative and alternative communication. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 60, 1980–1998. doi:10.1044/2016_JSLHR-L-15-0246
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soto, G., & Hartmann, E. (2006). Analysis of narratives produced by four children who use augmentative and alternative communication. Journal of Communication Disorders, 39, 456–480. doi:10.1016/j.jcomdis.2006.04.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stiegler, L.N., & Hoffman, P.R. (2001). Discourse-based intervention for word finding in children. Journal of Communication Disorders, 34, 277–303. doi:10.1016/S0021-9924(01)00051-X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutton, A., Soto, G., & Blockberger, S. (2002). Grammatical issues in graphic symbol communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 18, 192–204. doi:10.1080/07434610212331281271
   Google Scholar
• Therrien, M.C., Light, J., & Pope, L. (2016). Systematic review of the effects of interventions to promote peer interactions for children who use aided AAC. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 32, 81–93. doi:10.3109/07434618.2016.1146331
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thordardottir, T., Chapman, R.S., & Wagner, L. (2002). Complex sentence production by adolescents with Down syndrome. Applied Psycholinguistics, 23, 163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turkstra, L., Ciccia, A., & Seaton, C. (2003). Interactive behaviors in adolescent conversation dyads. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 34, 117–127. doi:10.1044/0161-1461(2003/010)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vannest, K.J., & Ninci, J. (2015). Evaluating intervention effects in single‐case research designs. Journal of Counseling & Development, 93, 403–411. doi:10.1002/jcad.12038
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wickenden, M. (2011a). Talking to teenagers: Using anthropological methods to explore identity and the life-worlds of young people who use AAC. Communication Disorders Quarterly, 32, 151–163. doi:10.1177/1525740109348792
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wickenden, M. (2011b). Whose voice is that?: Issues of identity, voice and representation arising in an ethnographic study of the lives of disabled teenagers who use augmentative and alternative communication (AAC). Disability Studies Quarterly, 31, 1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Wickenden, M. (2011c). Talk to me as a teenager: Experiences of friendship for disabled teenagers who have little or no speech. Childhoods Today, 5, 1–35.
   Google Scholar
• Wong, C., Odom, S.L., Hume, K.A., Cox, A.W., Fettig, A., Kucharczyk, S., … Schultz, T.R. (2015). Evidence-based practices for children, youth, and young adults with autism spectrum disorder: A comprehensive review. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 45, 1951–1966. doi:10.1007/s10803-014-2351-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar