A qualitative metasynthesis of the meaning of speech-generating devices for people with complex communication needs

References

• Alper, M. (2017). Giving voice: Mobile communication, disability, and inequality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bailey, R.L., Parette, H.P., Stoner, J.B., Angell, M.E., & Carroll, K. (2006). Family members’ perceptions of augmentative and alternative communication device use. Language, Speech and Hearing Services in Schools, 37, 50–60. doi:10.1044/0161-1461(2006/006)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barker, D.J., Reid, D., & Cott, C. (2006). The experience of senior stroke survivors: Factors in community participation among wheelchair users. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 73, 18–25. doi:10.2182/cjot.05.0002
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Barnett-Page, E., & Thomas, J. (2009). Methods for the synthesis of qualitative research: A critical review. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 9, 1–11. doi:10.1186/1471-2288-9-59
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batorowicz, B., Campbell, F., von Tetzchner, S., King, G., & Missiuna, C. (2014). Social participation of school-aged children who use communication aids: The views of children and parents. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 30, 237–251. doi:10.3109/07434618.2014.940464
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baxter, S., Enderby, P., Evans, P., & Judge, S. (2012). Barriers and facilitators to the use of high-technology augmentative and alternative communication devices: A systematic review and qualitative synthesis. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 47, 115–129. doi:10.1111/j.1460-6984.2011.00090.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blackstone, S., & Hunt Berg, M. (2012). Social networks: A communication inventory for individuals with complex communication needs and their communication partners. Revised version. Verona USA: Attainment Company.
   Google Scholar
• Borg, S., Agius, M., & Agius, L. (2015). A user and their family's perspective of the use of a low-tech vs a high-tech AAC system. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, 217, 811–818. doi:10.3233/978-1-61499-566-1-811
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chung, Y.-C., & Stoner, J.B. (2016). A meta-synthesis of team members’ voices: What we need and what we do to support students who use AAC. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 32, 175–186. doi:10.1080/07434618.2016.1213766
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke, H., McConachie, K., Price, P., & Wood, M. (2001). Views of young people using augmentative and alternative communication systems. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 36, 107–115. doi:10.1080/13682820150217590
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, L., Balandin, S., & Trembath, D. (2009). The loneliness experiences of young adults with cerebral palsy who use alternative and augmentative communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 25, 154–164. doi:10.1080/07434610903036785
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crisp, C., Draucker, C.B., & Ellett, M.L.C. (2014). Barriers and facilitators to children’s use of speech-generating devices: A descriptive qualitative study of mothers’ perspectives. Journal for Specialists in Pediatric Nursing, 19, 229–237. doi:10.1111/jspn.12074
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahler, A.M., Rasmussen, D.M., & Andersen, P.T. (2016). Meanings and experiences of assistive technologies in everyday lives of older citizens: A meta-interpretive review. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 11, 619–629. doi:10.3109/17483107.2016.1151950
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dattilo, J., Estrella, G., Estrella, L.J., Light, J., McNaughton, D., & Seabury, M. (2008). I have chosen to live life abundantly: Perceptions of leisure by adults who use augmentative and alternative communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 24, 16–28. doi:10.1080/07434610701390558
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dickerson, S.S., Stone, V.I., Panchura, C., & Usiak, D.J. (2002). The meaning of communication: Experiences with augmentative communication devices. Rehabilitation Nursing, 27, 215–220. doi:10.1002/j.2048-7940.2002.tb02016.x
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fomiatti, R., Moir, L., Richmond, J., & Millsteed, J. (2014). The experience of being a motorised mobility scooter user. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 9, 183–187. doi:10.7748/phc.24.8.19.s24
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Goldbart, J., & Marshall, J. (2004). Pushes and pulls on the parents of children who use AAC. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 20, 194–208. doi:10.1080/07434610400010960
   Google Scholar
• Gramstad, A., Storli, S.L., & Hamran, T. (2014). Exploring the meaning of a new assistive technology device for older individuals. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 9, 493–498. doi:10.3109/17483107.2014.921249
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hocking, C. (1999). Function or feelings: Factors in abandonment of assistive devices. Technology and Disability, 11, 3–11.
   Google Scholar
• Iacono, T., Lyon, K., Johnson, H., & West, D. (2013). Experiences of adults with complex communication needs receiving and using low tech AAC: An Australian context. Disability and Rehabilitation; Assistive Technology, 8, 392–401. doi:10.3109/17483107.2013.769122
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lund, S.K., & Light, J. (2007). Long-term outcomes for individuals who use augmentative and alternative communication, Part 3: Contributing factors. AAC: Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 23, 323–335. doi:10.1080/02656730701189123
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, A., & Newell, C. (2013). Living through a computer voice: A personal account. Logopedics Phoniatrics Vocology, 38, 96–104. doi:10.3109/14015439.2013.809145
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCord, S., & Soto, G. (2004). Perceptions of AAC: An ethnographic investigation of Mexican-American families. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 20, 209–227. doi:10.1080/07434610400005648
   Google Scholar
• McNaughton, D., & Light, J. (2013). The iPad and mobile technology revolution: Benefits and challenges for individuals who require augmentative and alternative communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 29, 107–116. doi:10.3109/07434618.2013.784930
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNaughton, D., Light, J., & Arnold, K. (2002). Getting your wheel in the door: Successful full-time employment experiences of individuals with cerebral palsy who use augmentative and alternative communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 18, 59–76. doi:10.1080/07434610212331281171
   Google Scholar
• McNaughton, D., Rackensperger, T., Benedek-Wood, E., Krezman, C., Williams, M.B., & Light, J. (2008). A child needs to be given a chance to succeed: Parents of individuals who use AAC describe the benefits and challenges of learning AAC technologies. AAC: Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 24, 43–55. doi:10.1080/07434610701421007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNaughton, D., Symons, G., Light, J., & Parsons, A. (2006). My dream was to pay taxes: The self-employment experiences of individuals who use augmentative and alternative communication. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 25, 181–196.
   Google Scholar
• Meder, A.M., & Wegner, J.R. (2015). iPads, mobile technologies, and communication applications: A survey of family wants, needs, and preferences. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 31, 27–36. doi:10.3109/07434618.2014.995223
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, J. (2004). I prefer contact this close: Perceptions of AAC by peoples with motor neurone disease and their communication partners. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 20, 259–271. doi:10.1080/07434610400005663
   Google Scholar
• Murray, C.D., & Forshaw, M.J. (2013). The experience of amputation and prosthesis use for adults: A metasynthesis. Disability and Rehabilitation, 35, 1133–1142. doi:10.3109/09638288.2012.723790
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nathanson, E. (2017). Native voice, self-concept and the moral case for personalized voice technology. Disability and Rehabilitation, 39, 73–81. doi:10.3109/09638288.2016.1139193
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paterson, H., & Carpenter, C. (2015). Using different methods to communicate: How adults with severe acquired communication difficulties make decisions about the communication methods they use and how they experience them. Disability and Rehabilitation, 37, 1522–1530. doi:10.3109/09638288.2015.1052575
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pettersson, C., Iwarsson, S., Brandt, Å., Norin, L., & Månsson Lexell, E. (2014). Men’s and women’s perspectives on using a powered mobility device: Benefits and societal challenges. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 21, 438–446. doi:10.3109/11038128.2014.905634
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rackensperger, T., Krezman, C., McNaughton, D., Williams, M.B., & D'Silva, K. (2005). When I first got it, I wanted to throw it off a cliff: The challenges and benefits of learning AAC technologies as described by adults who use AAC. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 21, 165–186. doi.org/ doi:10.1080/07434610500140360
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ripat, J., Verdonck, M., & Carter, R. (2018). The meaning ascribed to wheeled mobility devices by individuals who use wheelchairs and scooters: A metasynthesis. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 13, 253–262. doi:10.1080/17483107.2017.1306594
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ripat, J., & Woodgate, R. (2011). The intersection of culture, disability and assistive technology. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 6, 87–96. doi:10.3109/17483107.2010.507859
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ritchie, L., Wright-St Clair, V.A., Keogh, J., & Gray, M. (2014). Community integration after traumatic brain injury: A systematic review of the clinical implications of measurement and service provision for older adults. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 95, 163–174. doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2013.08.237
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandelowski, M. (2012). Metasynthesis of qualitative research. In H. Cooper (Ed.), APA handbook of research methods in psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 19–36). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Scherer, M., Jutai, J., Fuhrer, M., Demers, L., & Deruyter, F. (2007). A framework for modelling the selection of assistive technology devices (ATDs). Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 2, 1–8. doi:10.1080/17483100600845414
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sigurdson, C., & Woodgate, R. (2015). Designing a metasynthesis study in pediatric oncology nursing research. Journal of Pediatric Oncology Nursing, 32, 360–368. doi:10.1177/1043454214563544
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, M.M., & Connolly, I. (2008). Roles of aided communication: Perspectives of adults who use AAC. Disability and Rehabilitation, 3, 260–273. doi:10.1080/17483100802338499
   Google Scholar
• Speech-Language & Audiology Canada. (2015). SAC Position Paper: The role of speech-language pathologists with respect to augmentative and alternative communication (AAC). Retrieved from www.sac-oac.ca/sites/default/files/resources/aac_position-paper_en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, D.R. (2006). A general inductive approach for analyzing qualitative evaluation data. American Journal of Evaluation, 27, 237–246. doi:10.1177/1098214005283748
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, J., & Harden, A. (2008). Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 8, 1–10. doi:10.1186/1471-2288-8-45
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trembath, D., Balandin, S., Stancliffe, R.J., & Togher, L. (2010). C1-10ommunication is everything: The experiences of volunteers who use AAC. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 26, 75–86. doi:10.3109/07434618.2010.481561
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wickenden, M. (2011). Whose voice is that?: Issues of identity, voice and representation arising in an ethnographic study of the lives of disabled teenagers who use augmentative and alternative communication. Disability Studies Quarterly, 31, doi:10.18061/dsq.v31i4.1724
   Google Scholar
• Wickenden, M. (2013). Widening the SLP lens: How can we improve the wellbeing of people with communication disabilities globally. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 15, 14–20. doi:10.3109/17549507.2012.726276
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar