The emergence of clause construction in children who use speech generating devices

References

• Berman, R.A., & Slobin, D.I. (1994). Relating events in narrative: A crosslinguistic developmental study. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Beukelman, D., & Mirenda, P. (2013). Augmentative alternative communication supporting children and adults with complex communication needs (4th ed.). London, UK: Paul H. Brookes.
   Google Scholar
• Binger, C., Kent-Walsh, J., King, M., Webb, E., & Buenviaje, E. (2017). Early sentence productions of 5-year-old children who use augmentative and alternative communication. Communication Disorders Quarterly, 38, 131–142. doi:10.1177/1525740116655804
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Binger, C., & Light, J. (2008). The morphology and syntax of individuals who use AAC: Research review and implications for effective practice. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 24, 123–138. doi:10.1080/07434610701830587
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blockberger, S., & Johnston, J.R. (2003). Grammatical morphology acquisition by children with complex communication needs. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 19, 207–221. doi:10.1080/07434610310001598233
   Google Scholar
• Bloom, L., Lahey, M., Hood, L., Lifter, K., & Fiess, K. (1980). Complex sentences: Acquisition of syntactic connectives and the semantic relations they encode. Journal of Child Language, 7, 235–261. doi:10.1017/S0305000900002610
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brekke, K. M., & von Tetzchner, S. (2003). Co-construction in graphic language development. In S. von Tetzchner & N. Grove (Eds.), Augmentative and alternative communication developmental issues (pp. 176–211). London, UK: Whurr.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, R. (1973). A first language: The early stages. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carrow-Woolfolk, E. (1999). Test for auditory comprehension of language (TACL-3). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, E.V. (2016). First language acquisition (3rd ed.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Diessel, H. (2004). The acquisition of complex sentences (Vol. 105). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dixon, J. A., & Marchman, V.A. (2007). Grammar and the lexicon: Developmental ordering in language acquisition. Child Development, 78, 190–212. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.00992.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dowden, P. (1997). Augmentative and alternative communication decisions making for children with severely unintelligible speech. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 13, 48–58. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.00992.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunn, L.M., & Dunn, D. (2012). Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test (PPVT-4). Johannesburg, South Africa: Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Goodman, J. C., & Bates, E. (2013). On the emergence of grammar from the lexicon. In B. MacWhinney (Ed.), The emergence of language (pp. 47–98). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kent-Walsh, J., Binger, C., & Buchanan, C. (2015). Teaching children who use augmentative and alternative communication to ask inverted yes/no questions using aided modeling. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 24, 222–236. doi:10.1044/2015_AJSLP-14-0066
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klee, T., & Fitzgerald, M.D. (1985). The relation between grammatical development and mean length of utterance in morphemes. Journal of Child Language, 12, 251–269. doi:10.1017/S0305000900006437
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kovach, M.T. (2009). Augmentative and alternative communication profile: A continuum of learning. Austin, TX: LinguiSystems.
   Google Scholar
• Kovacs, T., & Hill, K. (2017). Language samples from children who use speech-generating devices: Making sense of small samples and utterance length. American Journal of Speech Language Pathology, 26, 939–950. doi:10.1044/2017_AJSLP-16-0114
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, L.L. (1974). Developmental sentence analysis. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, L.L., & Canter, S.M. (1971). Developmental sentence scoring: A clinical procedure for estimating syntactic development in children’s spontaneous speech. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 36, 315–340. doi:10.1044/jshd.3603.315
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lieven, E. (2010). Input and first language acquisition: Evaluating the role of frequency. Lingua, 120, 2546–2556. doi:10.1016/j.lingua.2010.06.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Light, J. (1989). Toward a definition of communicative competence for individuals using augmentative and alternative communication systems. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 5, 137–144. doi:10.1080/0743618912331275126
   Google Scholar
• Light, J., & McNaughton, D. (2014). Communicative competence for individuals who require augmentative and alternative communication: A new definition for a new era of communication? Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 30, 1–18. doi:10.3109/07434618.2014.885080
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loncke, F. (2014). Augmentative and alternative communication: Models and applications for educators, speech-language pathologists, psychologists, caregivers, and users. San Diego, CA: Plural.
   Google Scholar
• Mano-Lerman, L. (2017). Linguistic and communicative characteristics of experienced AAC users in different production tasks (Unpublished master thesis). Israel: University of Haifa.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, J. F., Andriacchi, K., Nockerts, A., Westerveld, M., & Gillon, G. (Eds.). (2012). NZAU assessing language production using SALT software. A clinician's guide to language sample analysis. Middelton, WI: SALT Software.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, J.F., & Chapman, R.S. (1981). The relation between age and mean length of utterance in morphemes. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 24, 154–161. doi:10.1044/jshr.2402.154
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, M.W. (1992). Performance is the prize: Language competence and performance among AAC users. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 8, 3–18. doi:10.1080/07434619212331276003
   Google Scholar
• Newcomer, P.L., & Hammill, D.D. (2008). TOLD–P: 4 Test of Language Development Primary. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
   Google Scholar
• Romberg, A., & Saffran, J. (2010). Statistical learning and language acquisition. Cognitive Science, 1, 906–914. doi:10.1002/wcs.78
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rydeman, B. (2010). The growth of phrases. User-centered design for activity-based voice output communication aids (Doctoral dissertation). Sweden: Gothenburg Papers in Theoretical Linguistics, Gothenburg University.
   Google Scholar
• Savaldi-Harussi, G., & Soto, G. (2018a). Early verbal categories and inflections in children who use speech-generating devices. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 34, 1–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savaldi-Harrusi, G., & Soto, G. (2018b). Changes in adult scaffolding in conversations with children who use aided AAC. Communication Matters Journal, 32, 4–6.
   Google Scholar
• Savaldi-Harussi, G., & Soto, G. (2016). Using SALT: Considerations for the analysis of language transcripts of children who use SGDs. Perspectives of the ASHA Special Interest Groups, 1, 110–124. doi:10.1044/persp1.SIG12.110
   Google Scholar
• Scarborough, H.S. (1990). Index of productive syntax. Applied Psycholinguistics, 11, 1–22. doi:10.1017/S0142716400008262
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scollon, R. (1976). Conversations with a one year old: A case study of the developmental foundation of syntax. Honolulu, Hawaii: University of Hawaii Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, M. (2006). Speech, language and aided communication: Connections and questions in a developmental context. Disability and Rehabilitation, 28, 151–157. doi:10.1080/09638280500077747
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, M. (2015). Language development of individuals who require aided communication: Reflections on state of the science and future research directions. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 31, 215–233. doi:10.3109/07434618.2015.1062553
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, M., & Grove, N. (2003). Asymmetry in input and output for individuals who use AAC. In J. Light, D. Beukelman, & J. Reichle (Eds.), Communicative competence for individuals who use augmentative and alternative communication: From research to effective practice (pp. 163–195). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
   Google Scholar
• Soto, G. (1999). Understanding the impact of graphic sign use on the message structure. In F. T. Loncke, J. Clibbens, H. H. Arvidson, & L. Lloyd (Eds.), Augmentative and alternative communication. New direction in research and practice (pp. 40–48). London, UK: Whurr.
   Google Scholar
• Soto, G., & Clarke, M.T. (2017). Effects of a conversation-based intervention on the linguistic skills of children with motor speech disorders who use augmentative and alternative communication. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 60, 1–19. doi:10.1044/2016_JSLHR-L-15-0246
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soto, G., Hartmann, E., & Wilkins, D.P. (2006). Exploring the elements of narrative that emerge in the interactions between an 8-year-old child who uses an AAC device and her teacher. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 22, 231–241. doi:10/1080/07434610500431777
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soto, G., & Seligman-Wine, J. (2003). Child-driven development of alternative communication: A case study. In S. von Tetzchner & N. Grove (Eds.), Augmentative and alternative communication developmental issues (pp. 211–229). London, UK: Whurr.
   Google Scholar
• Soto, G., Solomon-Rice, P., & Caputo, M. (2009). Enhancing the personal narrative skills of elementary school-aged students who use AAC: The effectiveness of personal narrative intervention. Journal of Communication Disorders, 42, 43–57. doi:10.1016/j.jcomdis.2008.08.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutton, A., Soto, G., & Blockberger, S. (2002). Grammatical issues in graphic symbol communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 18, 192–204. doi:10.1080/07434610212331281271
   Google Scholar
• Thothathiri, M., & Snedeker, J. (2011). The role of thematic roles in sentence processing: Evidence from structural priming in young children. Retrieved from Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard https://dash.harvard.edu/handle/1/5346646
   Google Scholar
• Todman, J., & Alm, N. (2003). Modelling conversational pragmatics in communication aids. Journal of Pragmatics, 35, 523–538. doi:10.1016/S0378-2166(02)00130-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomasello, M. (1992). First verbs: A case study of early grammatical development. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tomasello, M. (2003). Constructing a language: A usage-based theory of language acquisition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Trudeau, N., Sutton, A., Dagenais, E., de Broeck, S., & Morford, J. (2007). Construction of graphic symbol utterances by children, teenagers, and adults: The effect of structure and task demands. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 50, 1314–1329. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2007/092)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Tetzchner, S., & Martinsen, H. (1996). Words and strategies: Conversations with young children who use aided language. In S. von Tetzchner & M. H. Jensen (Eds.), Augmentative and alternative communication: European perspectives (pp. 65–89). London, UK: Whurr.
   Google Scholar
• Yurovsky, D., Yu, C., & Smith, L.B. (2012). Statistical speech segmentation and word learning in parallel: Scaffolding from child-directed speech. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 374. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00374
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar