The structure of participants’ turn-transition practices in aided conversations that use speech-output technologies

References

• Batorowicz, B., Campbell, F., von Tetzchner, S., King, G., & Missiuna, C. (2014). Social participation of school-aged children who use communication aids: The views of children and parents. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 30(3), 237–251. doi:10.3109/07434618.2014.940464
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Binger, C., & Light, J. (2008). The morphology and syntax of individuals who use AAC: Research review and implications for effective practice. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 24(2), 123–138. doi:10.1080/07434610701830587
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blackstone, S. W., Williams, M. B., & Wilkins, D. P. (2007). Key principles underlying research and practice in AAC. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 23(3), 191–203. doi:10.1080/07434610701553684
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke, M. T. (2005). Conversational interaction between children using communication aids and their peers (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from http://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/1445394
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, M. (2016). Co-construction, asymmetry and multimodality in children’s conversations. In M. M. Smith & J. Murray (Eds.), The silent partner? Language, interaction and aided communication (pp. 177–198). Guildford: J & R Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, M., Bloch, S., & Wilkinson, R. (2013). Speaker transfer in children's peer conversation: Completing communication-aid-mediated contributions. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 29(1), 37–53. doi:10.3109/07434618.2013.767490
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke, M., & Wilkinson, R. (2008). Interaction between children with cerebral palsy and their peers 2: Understanding initiated VOCA-mediated turns. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 24(1), 3–348. doi:10.1080/07434610701390400
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke, M., & Wilkinson, R. (2010). Communication aid use in children’s conversation: Time, timing and speaker transfer. In H. Gardner & F. Michael (Eds.), Analysing interaction in childhood: Insights from conversation analysis (pp. 249–266). Singapore: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Enfield, N. J. (2013). Relationship thinking: Agency, enchrony, and human sociality. Oxford: University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Enfield, N. J. (2017). How we talk: The inner workings of conversation. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Engelke, C., & Higginbotham, D. (2013). Looking to speak: On the temporality of misalignment in interaction involving an augmented communicator using eye-gaze technology. Journal of Interactional Research in Communication Disorders, 4(1), 95–122. doi:10.1558/jircd.v4i1.95
   Google Scholar
• Hakulinen, A., Vilkuna, M., Korhonen, R., Koivisto, V., Heinonen, T. R., & Alho, I. (2005). Verkossa iso suomen kielioppi (VISK) [Online version of the Great Finnish Grammar]. Helsinki: Research Center for the Languages of Finland in cooperation with the Finnish Literature Society and the University of Helsinki Department of Finnish Language and Literature. Retrieved from http://scripta.kotus.fi/visk
   Google Scholar
• Hayashi, M. (2013). Turn allocation and turn sharing. In J. Sidnell & T. Stivers (Eds.), The handbook of conversation analysis (pp. 167–190). Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Hidecker, M. J. C., Paneth, N., Rosenbaum, P. L., Kent, R. D., Lillie, J., Eulenberg, J. B., … Taylor, K. (2011). Developing and validating the communication function classification system (CFCS) for individuals with cerebral palsy. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology, 53(8), 704–710. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8749.2011.03996.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higginbotham, D. J., & Engelke, C. R. (2013). A primer for doing talk-in-interaction research in augmentative and alternative communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 29(1), 3–19. doi:10.3109/07434618.2013.767556
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higginbotham, J., Fulcher, K., & Seale, J. (2016). Time and timing in interactions involving individuals with ALS, their unimpaired partners and their speech generating devices. In M. Smith & J. Murray (Eds.), The silent partner? Language, interaction and aided communication (pp.199–228). Guildford: J&R Press.
   Google Scholar
• Higginbotham, D. J., & Wilkins, D. P. (1999). Slipping through the timestream: Social issues of time and timing in augmented interactions. In D. Kovarsky, M. Maxwell, & J. Duchan (Eds.), Constructing (in) competence: Disabling evaluations in clinical and social interaction (pp. 49–82). London: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hoey, E. M. (2015). Lapses: How people arrive at, and deal with, discontinuities in talk. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 48(4), 430–453. doi:10.1080/08351813.2015.1090116
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jefferson, G. (2004). Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. In G. H. Lerner (Ed.), Conversation analysis: Studies from the first generation (pp. 13–31). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Levinson, S. C. (2013). Action formation and ascription. In J. Sidnell & T. Stivers (Eds.), The handbook of conversation analysis (pp. 103–130). Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Mondada, L. (2014). The temporal orders of multiactivity. In P. Haddington, T. Keisanen, L. Mondada, & M. Nevile (Eds.), Multiactivity in social interaction: Beyond multitasking (pp. 33–75). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Noren, N., Samuelsson, C., & Plejert, C. (2013). Dialogical perspectives on aided communication. In N. Noren, C. Samuelsson, & C. Plejert (Eds.), Aided communication in everyday interaction (pp. 1–22). Guildford: J & R Press Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Noren, N., Svensson, E., & Telford, J. (2013). Participants’ dynamic orientation to folder navigation when using a VOCA with a touch screen in talk-in-interaction. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 29, 20–36. doi:10.3109/07434618.2013.767555
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peräkylä, A. (1997). Validity and reliability in research based tapes and transcripts. In D. Silverman (Ed.), Qualitative analysis: Issues of theory and method (pp. 201–220). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Pullin, G., Treviranus, J., Patel, R., & Higginbotham, J. (2017). Designing interaction, voice, and inclusion in AAC research. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 33(3), 139–148. doi:10.1080/07434618.2017.1342690
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50(4), 696–735. doi:10.1353/lan.1974.0010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savolainen, I. (2010, August). TAIKE. A large set of dynamic displays and a new communication system. Paper presented at the International Society for Augmentative and Alternative Communication (ISAAC) Conference, Barcelona, Spain.
   Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A. (1996). Turn organization: One intersection of grammar and interaction. In E. Ochs, E. A. Schegloff, & S. A. Thompson (Eds.), Interaction and grammar (pp. 52–113). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A. (2007). Sequence organization in interaction. Cambridge: University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sigurd Pilesjö, M. (2013). On the use of bodily action and vocalizations as recourses and methods when claiming and completing turns in aided interaction. In N. Noren, C. Samuelsson, & C. Plejert (Eds.), Aided communication in everyday interaction (pp. 59–94). Guildford: J & R Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stevanovic, M., & Weiste, E. (2017). Conversation-analytic data session as a pedagogical institution. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 15, 1–17. doi:10.1016/j.lcsi.2017.06.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sundqvist, A., Plejert, C., & Ronnberg, J. (2010). The role of active participation in interaction for children who use augmentative and alternative communication. Communication & Medicine, 7(2), 165–175. doi:10.1558/cam.v7i2.165
   Google Scholar
• Ten Have, P. (2007). Doing conversation analysis. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• von Tetzchner, S., & Basil, C. (2011). Terminology and notation in written representations of conversations with augmentative and alternative communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 27(3), 141–149. doi:10.3109/07434618.2011.610356
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar