Service provider attitudes regarding conversational rule violations in three public settings

References

• Alm, N., Morrison, A., & Arnott, L. (1995). A communication system based on scripts, plans, and goals for enabling nonspeaking people to conduct telephone conversations. Proceedings of IEEE Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 3, 2408–2412.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, A., Bock, S., Thompson, J. R., & Kosuwan, K. (2002). Influence of communicative competence and augmentative and alternative communication technique on children’s attitudes toward a peer who uses AAC. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 18(4), 217–227. doi:10.1080/07434610212331281301
   Google Scholar
• Beck, A., Thompson, J. R., Kosuwan, K., & Prochnow, J. M. (2010). The development and utilization of a scale to measure adolescents’ attitudes toward peers who use augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) devices. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 53(3), 572–587. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2009/07-0140)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bedrosian, J. L., Hoag, L. A., Johnson, D., & Calculator, S. (1998). Communicative competence as perceived by adults with severe speech impairments associated with cerebral palsy. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 41(3), 667–675. doi:10.1044/jslhr.4103.667
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bedrosian, J. L., Hoag, L. A., & McCoy, K. F. (2003). Relevance and speed of message delivery trade-offs in augmentative and alternative communication. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 46(4), 800–817. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2003/063)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, B. (2004). The order of service: The practical management of customer interaction. Sociological Research Online, 9(4), 28–22. doi:10.5153/sro.973
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burgoon, J. K., & Burgoon, M. (2001). Expectancy theories. In W. P. Robinson & H. Giles (Eds.), The new handbook of language and social psychology (pp. 79–102). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, H. H. (1996). Using language. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cody, M. J., & McLaughlin, M. L. (1985). The situation as a construct in interpersonal communication research. In M. Knapp & G. Miller (Eds.), Handbook of interpersonal communication (pp. 263–312). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Pub.
   Google Scholar
• Czepiel, J. A., Solomon, M. R., & Surprenant, C. F. (1985). The service encounter. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
   Google Scholar
• Douven, I. (2018). A Bayesian perspective on Likert scales and central tendency. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 25, 1203–1211. doi:10.3758/s13423-017-1344-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellis, D. G. (1999). From language to communication. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Fazio, R. H., & Zanna, M. P. (1981). Direct experience and attitude–behavior consistency. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 14, 161–202. doi:10.1016/S0065-2601(08)6
   Google Scholar
• Fazio, R. H., Zanna, M. P., & Cooper, J. (1978). Direct experience and attitude–behavior consistency: An information processing analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 4(1), 48–51. doi:10.1177/2F014616727800400109
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ford, W. S. Z. (2003). Communicating with customers: Service approaches, ethics, and impact. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Grant, S. (1995). Using TALK. Communication Matters, 9, 22–25.
   Google Scholar
• Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics, Volume 3; Speech acts (pp. 41–58). New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gutek, B. A. (1995). The dynamics of service: Reflections on the changing nature of customer/provider interactions. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Hoag, L., Bedrosian, J., & McCoy, K. (2007, November). Effects of maxim violation degree on a hierarchy in AAC. Poster presented at the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (ASHA) Convention, Boston, MA.
   Google Scholar
• Hoag, L. A., Bedrosian, J. L., McCoy, K. F., & Johnson, D. E. (2004). Trade-offs between informativeness and speed of message delivery in augmentative and alternative communication. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 47(6), 1270–1285. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2004/096)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoag, L. A., Bedrosian, J. L., McCoy, K. F., & Johnson, D. E. (2008). Hierarchy of conversational rule violations involving utterance-based augmentative and alternative communication systems. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 24(2), 149–161. doi:10.1080/07434610802038288
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holtgraves, T. M. (2002). Language as social action: Social psychology and language use. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Howell, D. C. (2002). Statistical methods for psychology (5th ed.). Belmont, CA: Duxbury Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hulley, S. B., & Cummings, S. R. (1988). Designing clinical research. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins.
   Google Scholar
• Hyter, Y. D., & Salas-Provance, M. B. (2019). Culturally responsive practices in speech, language, and hearing sciences. San Diego, CA: Plural Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, S., Jacobs, S., & Rossi, A. M. (1987). Conversational relevance: Three experiments on pragmatic connectedness in conversation. Annals of the International Communication Association, 10, 323–347. doi:10.1080/23808985.1987.11678650
   Google Scholar
• Jefferson, G., & Lee, J. R. E. (1981). The rejection of advice: Managing the problematic convergence of a ‘troubles-telling’ and a ‘service encounter. Journal of Pragmatics, 5(5), 399–422. doi:10.1016/0378-2166(81)90026-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kansas State University. (2001). Axio Survey System database. Manhattan, KS: Kansas State University.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, J. R., Kim, Y. T., Lee, H. J., & Park, E. H. (2015). Influence of message error type on Korean adults’ attitudes toward an individual who uses augmentative and alternative communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 31(2), 159–147. doi:10.3109/07434618.2015.1008569
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreuz, R. J., & Roberts, R. M. (1993). When collaboration fails: Consequences of pragmatic errors in conversation. Journal of Pragmatics, 19(3), 239–252. doi:10.1016/0378-2166(93)90030-S
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krosnick, J. A., & Schuman, H. (1988). Attitude intensity, importance, and certainty and susceptibility to response effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53(6), 940–952. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.940
   Google Scholar
• Kuehl, R. O. (1994). Statistical principles of research design and practice. Belmont, CA: Duxbury Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kulkarni, S. S., & Parmar, J. (2017). Culturally and linguistically diverse student and family perspectives of AAC. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 33(3), 170–180. doi:10.1080/07434618.2017.1346706
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Light, J. (1989). Toward a definition of communicative competence for individuals using augmentative and alternative communication systems. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 5(2), 137–144. doi:10.1080/07434618912331275126
   Google Scholar
• Lilienfeld, M., & Alant, E. (2002). Attitudes of children toward an unfamiliar peer using an AAC device with and without voice output. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 18(2), 91–101. doi:10.1080/07434610212331281191
   Google Scholar
• Llewellyn, N., & Hindmarsh, J. (2013). The order problem: Inference and interaction in interactive service work. Human Relations, 66(11), 1401–1426. doi:10.1177/2F0018726713479622
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyons, J. (1977). Semantics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Maio, G. R., Olson, J. M., & Cheung, I. (2012). Attitudes in social behavior. In I. B. Weiner, H. A. Tennen, & J. Suls (Eds.), Handbook of psychology, personality and social psychology (pp. 275–304). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• McCoy, K. F., Bedrosian, J. L., Hoag, L. A., & Johnson, D. E. (2007). Brevity and speed of message delivery trade-offs in augmentative and alternative communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 23(1), 76–88. doi:10.1080/07434610600924515
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merritt, M. (1976). On questions following questions in service encounters. Language in Society, 5(3), 315–357. doi:10.1017/S0047404500007168
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merritt, M. (1994). Repetition in situated discourse – Exploring its forms and functions. In B. Johnstone (Ed.), Repetition in discourse: Interdisciplinary perspectives (pp. 23–36). Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Milliken, G. A., & Johnson, D. E. (1993). Analysis of messy data, Vol 1: Designed experiments. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman Hall/CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mura, S. S. (1983). Licensing violations: Legitimate violations of Grice’s Conversational Principle. In R. T. Craig & K. Tracy (Eds.), Conversational coherence (pp. 101–115). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, K., & Myors, B. (1998). Statistical power analysis: A simple and general model for traditional and modern hypothesis tests. Mahway, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, T. M. (1969). The relationship between the affective, behavioral, and cognitive components of attitude. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 5(1), 12–30. doi:10.1016/0022-1031(69)90003-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paul, R., & Norbury, C. F. (2012). Language disorders from infancy through adolescence: Listening, speaking, reading, writing, and communicating. St. Louis, MO: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Poulton, E. C. (1989). Bias in quantifying judgments. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Pub.
   Google Scholar
• Raevaara, L. (2011). Accounts at convenience stores: Doing dispreference and small talk. Journal of Pragmatics, 43(2), 556–571. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2010.01.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlosser, R. W. (2002). On the importance of being earnest about treatment integrity. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 18(1), 36–44. doi:10.1080/aac.18.1.36.44
   Google Scholar
• Schlosser, R. W. (2003). The efficacy of augmentative and alternative communication: Toward evidence-based practice. New York: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Schlosser, R. W., & Raghavendra, P. (2004). Evidence-based practice in augmentative and alternative communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 20(1), 1–21. doi:10.1080/07434610310001621083
   Google Scholar
• Shimanoff, S. B. (1980). Communication rules: Theory and research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Sidak, Z. (1967). Rectangular confidence regions for the means of multivariate normal distributions. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 62, 626–633. doi:10.2307/2283989
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sorjonen, M.-L., & Raevaara, L. (2014). On the grammatical form of requests at the convenience store: Requesting as embodied action. In P. Drew & E. Couper Kuhlen (Eds.), Requesting in social interaction (pp. 243–269). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Stevens, S. S. (1971). Issues in psychophysical measurement. Psychological Review, 78(5), 426–450. doi:10.1037/h0031324
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stivers, T. (2010). An overview of the question-response system in American English conversation. Journal of Pragmatics, 42(10), 2772–2781. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2010.04.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svinhufvud, K. (2018). Waiting for the customer: Multimodal analysis of waiting in service encounters. Journal of Pragmatics, 129, 48–75. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2018.03.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tannen, D. (1989). Talking voices: Repetition, dialogue, and imagery in conversational discourse. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Todman, J., Alm, N., Higginbotham, J., & File, P. (2008). Whole utterance approaches in AAC. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 24(3), 235–254. doi:10.1080/08990220802388271
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanderheyden, P. B. (1995). An augmentative communication interface based on conversational schemata. Proceedings of the IFCAI’95 Workshop on Developing AI Applications for Disabled People (pp. 203–212). San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann.
   Google Scholar
• Vuchinich, S. (1977). Elements of cohesion between turns in ordinary conversations. Semiotica, 20(3–4), 229–257. doi:10.1515/semi.1977.20.3-4.229
   Google Scholar
• Wiemann, J. M. (1977). Explication and test of a model of communicative competence. Human Communication Research, 3(3), 195–213. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.1977.tb00518.x
   Google Scholar
• Williams, E. J. (1949). Experimental designs balanced for the estimation of residual effects of treatments. Australian Journal of Chemistry, 2, 149–168. doi:10.1071/CH9490149
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, D., & Carston, R. (2019). Pragmatics and the challenge of ‘non-propositional’ effects. Journal of Pragmatics, 145, 31–38. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2019.01.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, D., & Sperber, D. (2012). Meaning and relevance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zahn, C. J. (1984). A reexamination of conversational repair. Communication Monographs, 51(1), 56–66. doi:10.1080/03637758409390183
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar