1,300
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

Typical preschoolers’ perceptions of augmentative and alternative communication modes of a preschooler with autism spectrum disorder

, ORCID Icon &
Pages 52-63 | Received 31 Jan 2020, Accepted 08 Dec 2020, Published online: 13 Feb 2021

References

  • Achmadi, D. (2015). Comparing acquisition, preference, maintenance, and social validity of manual sign, picture exchange, and speech-generating devices as AAC options for children with developmental disabilities (Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation). Victoria University of Wellington, Te Herenga Waka.
  • Alzrayer, N. M. (2020). Transitioning from a low- to high-tech Augmentative and Alternative Communication (AAC) system: effects on augmented and vocal requesting, Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 36(3), 155–165, doi:10.1080/07434618.2020.1813196
  • American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Publishing.
  • Bazeley, P. (2013). Qualitative data analysis: Practical strategies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Bazeley, P., & Jackson, K. (2014). Designing an NVivo database. In P. Bazeley & K. Jackson (Eds), Qualitative data analysis with NVIVO (2nd ed, pp. 24–45). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Bedrosian, J. (1997). Language acquisition in young AAC system users: Issues and directions for future research. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 13(3), 179–185. doi:10.1080/07434619712331277998
  • Brinkmann, S., & Kvale, S. (2015). InterViews: Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing (3rd ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
  • Coolahan, K., Fantuzzo, J., Mendez, J., & McDermott, P. (2000). Preschool peer interactions and readiness to learn: Relationships between classroom peer play and learning behaviors and conduct. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(3), 458–465. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.92.3.458
  • Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Danby, S., Ewing, L., & Thorpe, K. (2011). The novice researcher: Interviewing young children. Qualitative Inquiry, 17(1), 74–84. doi:10.1177/1077800410389754
  • Drager, K. D. (2009). Aided modeling interventions for children with autism spectrum disorders who require AAC. Perspectives on Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 18(4), 114–120. doi:10.1044/aac18.4.114
  • Ganz, J. B. (2015). AAC interventions for individuals with autism spectrum disorders: State of the science and future research directions. Augmentative and Alternative Communication (Baltimore, MD: 1985), 31(3), 203–214. doi:10.3109/07434618.2015.1047532
  • Gevarter, C., Groll, M., & Stone, E. (2020). Dynamic assessment of augmentative and alternative communication application grid formats and communicative targets for children with autism spectrum disorder. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 36(4), 226–237, doi:10.1080/07434618.2020.1845236
  • Holyfield, C., Light, J., Drager, K., McNaughton, D., & Gormley, J. (2018). Effect of AAC partner training using video on peers' interpretation of the behaviors of presymbolic middle-schoolers with multiple disabilities . Augmentative and Alternative Communication (Baltimore, MD.: 1985), 34(4), 301–310. doi:10.1080/07434618.2018.1508306
  • Hyppa-Martin, J., Collins, D., Chen, M., Amundson, C., Timinski, K., & Mizuko, M. (2016). Comparing first graders' attitudes and preferences toward a peer using an iPad(®)-based speech-generating device and a non-electronic AAC system. Augmentative and Alternative Communication (Baltimore, MD.: 1985), 32(2), 94–104. doi:10.3109/07434618.2016.1146332
  • Kent-Walsh, J., Murza, K. A., Malani, M. D., & Binger, C. (2015). Effects of communication partner instruction on the communication of individuals using AAC: A meta-analysis. Augmentative and Alternative Communication (Baltimore, MD.: 1985), 31(4), 271–284. doi:10.3109/07434618.2015.1052153
  • Light, J. (1988). Interaction involving individuals using augmentative and alternative communication systems: State of the art and future directions. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 4(2), 66–82. doi:10.1080/07434618812331274657
  • Light, J. C., Roberts, B., Dimarco, R., & Greiner, N. (1998). Augmentative and alternative communication to support receptive and expressive communication for people with autism. Journal of Communication Disorders, 31(2), 153–180. doi:10.1016/S0021-9924(97)00087-7
  • Lorah, E. R. (2016). Comparing teacher and student use and preference of two methods of augmentative and alternative communication: Picture exchange and a speech-generating device. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 28(5), 751–767. doi:10.1007/s10882-016-9507-z
  • Lorah, E. R., Parnell, A., Whitby, P. S., & Hantula, D. (2015). A systematic review of tablet computers and portable media players as speech generating devices for individuals with autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 45(12), 3792–3804. doi:10.1007/s10803-014-2314-4
  • Maenner, M. J., Shaw, K. A., Baio, J., Washington, A., Patrick, M., DiRienzo, M., … Esler, A. (2020). Prevalence of autism spectrum disorder among children aged 8 years – Autism and developmental disabilities monitoring network, 11 sites, United States, 2016. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. Surveillance Summaries (Washington, D.C.: 2002), 69(4), 1–12. doi:10.15585/mmwr.ss6904a1
  • McCarthy, J., & Light, J. (2005). Attitudes toward individuals who use augmentative and alternative communication: Research review. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 21(1), 41–55. doi:10.1080/07434610410001699753
  • McLay, L., Schäfer, M. C. M., van der Meer, L., Couper, L., McKenzie, E., O’Reilly, M. F., … Sutherland, D. (2017). Acquisition, preference and follow-up comparison across three AAC modalities taught to two children with autism spectrum disorder. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 64(2), 117–130. doi:10.1080/1034912X.2016.1188892
  • Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Drawing and verifying conclusions. In M. B. Miles, A. M. Huberman, & J. Saldaña. Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed., pp. 275–322). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Pink Fong. (2011). Baby shark [Video]. Retrieved from www.youtube.com/watch?v=XqZsoesa55w
  • Rafferty, Y., Piscitelli, V., & Boettcher, C. (2003). The impact of inclusion on language development and social competence among preschoolers with disabilities. Exceptional Children, 69(4), 467–479. doi:10.1177/001440290306900405
  • Schlosser, R. W. (1999). Social validation of interventions in augmentative and alternative communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 15(4), 234–247. doi:10.1080/07434619912331278775
  • Schlosser, R. W. (2002). On the importance of being earnest about treatment integrity. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 18(1), 36–44. doi:10.1080/aac.18.1.36.44
  • Schlosser, R. W., & Blischak, D. M. (2001). Is there a role for speech output in interventions for persons with autism? A review. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 16(3), 170–178. doi:10.1177/108835760101600305
  • Shane, H. C., Laubscher, E., Schlosser, R. W., Flynn, S., Sorce, J. F., & Abramson, J. (2012). Applying technology to visually support language and communication in individuals with autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 42(6), 1228–1235. doi:10.1007/s10803-011-1304-z
  • Sigafoos, J., O'Reilly, M., Ganz, J. B., Lancioni, G. E., & Schlosser, R. W. (2005). Supporting self-determination in AAC interventions by assessing preference for communication devices. Technology and Disability, 17(3), 143–153. doi:10.3233/TAD-2005-17302
  • Wilson, A. D., Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Manning, L. P. (2016). Using paired depth interviews to collect qualitative data. The Qualitative Report, 21, 1549–1573. Retrieved from https://nsuworks.nova.edu/tqr/vol21/iss9/
  • Wodka, E. L., Mathy, P., & Kalb, L. (2013). Predictors of phrase and fluent speech in children with autism and severe language delay. Pediatrics, 131(4), e1128–1134. doi:10.1542/peds.2012-2221
  • Zimmerman, D. W., & Zumbo, B. D. (1993). Relative power of the Wilcoxon test, the Friedman test, and repeated-measures ANOVA on ranks. The Journal of Experimental Education, 62(1), 75–86. doi:10.1080/00220973.1993.9943832

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.