Engaging stakeholders to improve social validity: intervention priorities for students with complex communication needs

References

• Andzik, N. R., Chung, Y. C., Doneski-Nicol, J., & Dollarhide, C. T. (2019). AAC services in schools: A special educator’s perspective. International Journal of Developmental Disabilities, 65(2), 89–97. doi:10.1080/20473869.2017.1368909
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biggs, E. E., & Carter, E. W. (2017). Supporting the social lives of students with intellectual disability. In Wehmeyer, M. L., Shogren, K. A. (Eds.), Handbook of research-based practices for educating students with intellectual disability (pp. 235–254). Oxford, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Biggs, E. E., Carter, E. W., Bumble, J. L., Barnes, K., & Mazur, E. L. (2018). Enhancing peer network interventions for students with complex communication needs. Exceptional Children, 85(1), 66–85. doi:10.1177/0014402918792899
   Google Scholar
• Biggs, E. E., & Snodgrass, M. (2020). Children’s perspectives on their relationships with friends with and without complex communication needs. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 45(2), 81–97. doi:10.1177%2F1540796919901271
   Google Scholar
• Bornman, J., & Bryen, D. N. (2013). Social validation of vocabulary selection: ensuring stakeholder relevance. Augmentative and Alternative Communication (Baltimore, Md. : 1985), 29(2), 174–181. doi:10.3109/07434618.2013.784805
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brantlinger, E., Jimenez, R., Klingner, J., Pugach, M., & Richardson, V. (2005). Qualitative studies in special education. Exceptional Children, 71(2), 195–207. doi:10.1177/001440290507100205
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brock, M. E., Huber, H. B., Carter, E. W., Juarez, A. P., & Warren, Z. E. (2014). Statewide assessment of professional development needs related to educating students with autism spectrum disorder. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 29(2), 67–79. doi:10.1177/1088357614522290
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Browder, D. M., & Spooner, F. (2014). More language arts, math, and science for students with severe disabilities. Baltimore, Maryland: Brookes.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, F., McDonnell, J., & Snell, M. E. (2020). Instruction of students with severe disabilities (9th ed.). New York, New York: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Chung, Y. C., & Stoner, J. B. (2016). A meta-synthesis of team members' voices: what we need and what we do to support students who use AAC. Augmentative and Alternative Communication (Baltimore, Md. : 1985), 32(3), 175–186. doi:10.1080/07434618.2016.1213766
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook, B. G., & Odom, S. L. (2013). Evidence-based practices and implementation science in special education. Exceptional Children, 79(3), 135–144. doi:10.1177/001440291307900201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erickson, K. A., & Koppenhaver, D. A. (2020). Comprehensive literacy for all: Teaching students with significant disabilities to read and write. Baltimore, Maryland: Brookes Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Fawcett, S. B. (1991). Social validity: A note on methodology. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 24(2), 235–239. doi:10.1901/jaba.1991.24-235
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fixsen, D., Blasé, K., Metz, A., & Van Dyke, M. (2013). Statewide implementation of evidence-based programs. Exceptional Children, 79(3), 213–230. doi:10.1177/001440291307900206
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fixsen, D. L., Naoom, S. F., Blase, K. A., Friedman, R. M., & Wallace, F. (2005). Implementation Research: A Synthesis of the Literature. Tampa, FL: University of South Florida, Louis de la Parte Florida Mental Health Institute, The National Implementation Research Network (FMHI Publication #231).
   Google Scholar
• Ganz, J. B., & Ayres, K. M. (2018). Methodological standards in single-case experimental design: Raising the bar. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 79, 3–9. doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2018.03.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horner, R. H., Carr, E. G., Halle, J., McGee, G., Odom, S., & Wolery, M. (2005). The use of single-subject research to identify evidence-based practice in special education. Exceptional Children, 71(2), 165–179. doi:10.1177/001440290507100203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kazdin, A. E. (1977). Assessing the clinical or applied importance of behavior change through social validation. Behavior Modification, 1(4), 427–452. doi:10.1177/014544557714001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leko, M. M. (2014). The value of qualitative methods in social validity research. Remedial and Special Education, 35(5), 275–286. doi:10.1177/0741932514524002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Light, J., & McNaughton, D. (2012). The changing face of augmentative and alternative communication: Past, present, and future challenges. Augmentative and Alternative Communication (Baltimore, Md. : 1985), 28(4), 197–204. doi:10.3109/07434618.2012.737024
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Light, J., & McNaughton, D. (2015). Designing AAC research and intervention to improve outcomes for individuals with complex communication needs. Augmentative and Alternative Communication (Baltimore, Md. : 1985), 31(2), 85–96. doi:10.3109/07434618.2015.1036458
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Light, L., McNaughton, D., Beukelman, D., Koch Fager, D. Fried-Oken, M., Jakobs, T. & Erik Jakobs. E. (2019). Challenges and opportunities in augmentative and alternative communication: Research and technology development to enhance communication and participation for individuals with complex communication needs. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 35(1), 1–12. DOI: 10.1080/07434618.2018.1556732
   Google Scholar
• Light, J., McNaughton, D., & Caron, J. (2019). New and emerging AAC technology supports for children with complex communication needs and their communication partners: State of the science and future research directions. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 35(1), 26–41, DOI: 10.1080/07434618.2018.1557251
   Google Scholar
• Marchant, M., Heath, M. A., & Miramontes, N. Y. (2013). Merging empiricism and humanism: Role of social validity in the school-wide positive behavior support model. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 15(4), 221–230. doi:10.1177/1098300712459356
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nastasi, B. K., & Schensul, S. L. (2005). Contributions of qualitative research to the validity of intervention research. Journal of School Psychology, 43(3), 177–195. doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2005.04.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olswang, L. B., & Goldstein, H. (2017). Collaborating on the development and implementation of evidence-based practices: Advancing science and practice. Evidence-Based Communication Assessment and Intervention, 11(3-4), 61–71. doi:10.1080/17489539.2017.1386404
   Google Scholar
• Olswang, L. B., & Prelock, P. A. (2015). Bridging the gap between research and practice: Implementation science. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research : Jslhr, 58(6), S1818–S1826. doi:10.1044/2015_JSLHR-L-14-0305
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Saldaña, J. (2013). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. London, UK: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Schlosser, R. W. (1999). Social validation of interventions in augmentative and alternative communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 15(4), 234–247. doi:10.1080/074326199122331278775
   Google Scholar
• Schlosser, R. W., & Sigafoos, J. (2009). Navigating evidence-based information sources in augmentative and alternative communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication (Baltimore, Md. : 1985), 25(4), 225– 235. doi:10.3109/07434610903360649
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simeonsson, R. J., Björck-Åkessön, E., & Lollar, D. J. (2012). Communication, disability, and the ICF-CY. Augmentative and Alternative Communication (Baltimore, Md. : 1985), 28(1), 3–10. doi:10.3109/07434618.2011.653829
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singer, G. H. S., Agran, M., & Spooner, F. (2017). Evidence-based and values-based practices for people with severe disabilities. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 42(1), 62–72. doi:10.1177/1540796916684877
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snodgrass, M. R., Chung, M. Y., Kretzer, J., & Biggs, E. E. (in press). Rigorous assessment of social validity: A scoping review of a 40-year conversation. Remedial and Special Education,
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snodgrass, M. R., Chung, M. Y., Meadan, H., & Halle, J. W. (2018). Social validity in single-case research: A systematic literature review of prevalence and application. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 74, 160–173. doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2018.01.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• St John, B., Mihaila, I., Dorrance, K., DaWalt, L. S., & Ausderau, K. K. (2018). Reflections from co-researchers with intellectual Disability: Benefits to Inclusion in a Research Study Team. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 56(4), 251–262. doi:10.1352/1934-9556-56.5.251
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolf, M. M. (1978). Social validity: The case for subjective measurement or how applied behavior analysis is finding its heart. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 11(2), 203–214. doi:10.1901/jaba.1978.11-203
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization (2007). International classification of functioning, disability, and health: Children and youth version: ICF-CY. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization.
   Google Scholar