References
- Achmadi, D., Kagohara, D. M., van der Meer, L., O’Reilly, M. F., Lancioni, G. E., Sutherland, D., … Sigafoos, J. (2012). Teaching advanced operation of an iPod-based speech-generating device to two students with autism spectrum disorders. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 6(4), 1258–1264. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2012.05.005
- Alzrayer, N., Banda, D. R., & Koul, R. K. (2014). Use of iPad/iPods with individuals with autism and other developmental disabilities: A meta-analysis of communication interventions. Review Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 1(3), 179–191. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s40489-014-0018-5
- Alzrayer, N. M., Banda, D. R., & Koul, R. K. (2019). The effects of systematic instruction in teaching multistep social-communication skills to children with autism spectrum disorder using an iPad. Developmental Neurorehabilitation, 22(6), 415–429. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/17518423.2019.1604578
- Barton-Hulsey, B.-H., Wegner, J., Brady, N., Bunce, B. B., & Sevcik, R. A. (2017). Comparing the effects of speech-generating device display organization on symbol comprehension and use by three children with developmental delays. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 26(2), 227–240. doi:https://doi.org/10.1044/2016_AJSLP-15-0166
- Binger, C., Kent-Walsh, J., & King, M. R. (2017). Dynamic assessment for 3- and 4-year-old children who use augmentative and alternative communication: Evaluating expressive syntax. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 60 (7), 1946–1958. doi:https://doi.org/10.1044/2017_JSLHR-L-15-0269
- Boesch, M. C., Wendt, O., Subramanian, A., & Hsu, N. (2013). Comparative efficacy of the Picture Exchange Communication System (PECS) versus a speech-generating device: Effects on requesting skills. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 7(3), 480–493. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2012.12.002
- Carnett, A., Bravo, A., & Waddington, H. (2019). Teaching mands for actions to children with autism spectrum disorder using systematic instruction, behavior chain interruption, and a speech-generating device. International Journal of Developmental Disabilities, 65(2), 98–107. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/20473869.2017.1412561
- Chen, M., Hyppa-Martin, J. K., Reichle, J. E., & Symons, F. J. (2016). Comparing single case design overlap-based effect size metrics from studies examining speech generating device interventions. American Journal on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 121(3), 169–193. doi:https://doi.org/10.1352/1944-7558-121.3.169
- Chiang, H.-M. (2008). Communicative spontaneity of children with autism: a preliminary analysis. The International Journal of Research and Practice, 12(1), 9–21.. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1362361307085264
- DiCarlo, C. F., & Banajee, M. (2000). Using voice output devices to increase initiations of young children with disabilities. Journal of Early Intervention, 23(3), 191–199. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/10538151000230030801
- Finke, E. H., Davis, J. M., Benedict, M., Goga, L., Kelly, J., Palumbo, L., … Waters, S. (2017). Effects of a least-to-most prompting procedure on multisymbol message production in children with autism spectrum disorder who use augmentative and alternative communication. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 26(1), 81–98. doi:https://doi.org/10.1044/2016_AJSLP-14-0187
- Friedman, M., Woods, J., & Salisbury, C. (2012). Caregiver coaching strategies for early intervention providers. Infants & Young Children, 25(1), 62–82. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/IYC.0b013e31823d8f12
- Frost, L., & Bondy, A. (2002). The picture exchange communication system training manual. Newark, DE: Pyramid Educational Products, Incorporated.
- Ganz, J. B., Earles-Vollrath, T. L., Heath, A. K., Parker, R. I., Rispoli, M. J., & Duran, J. B. (2012). A meta-analysis of single case research studies on aided augmentative and alternative communication systems with individuals with autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 42(1), 60–74. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-011-1212-2
- Geiger, K. B., Carr, J. E., LeBlanc, L. A., Hanney, N. M., Polick, A. S., & Heinicke, M. R. (2012). Teaching receptive discriminations to children with autism: A comparison of traditional and embedded discrete trial teaching. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 5(2), 49–59. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03391823
- Genc-Tosun, D., & Kurt, O. (2017). Teaching multi-step requesting to children with autism spectrum disorder using systematic instruction and a speech-generating device. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 33(4), 213–223. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/07434618.2017.1378717
- Gevarter, C., Groll, M., & Stone, E. (2020). Dynamic assessment of augmentative and alternative communication application grid formats and communicative targets for children with autism spectrum disorder. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 36(4), 226–237. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/07434618.2020.1845236
- Gevarter, C., O'Reilly, M. F., Sammarco, N., Ferguson, R., Watkins, L., Kuhn, M., & Sigafoos, J. (2018). Comparison of schematic and taxonomic speech generating devices for children with ASD. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 53(2), 222–238. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10400435.2016.1143411
- Gevarter, C., & Zamora, C. (2018). Naturalistic speech-generating device interventions for children with complex communication needs: A systematic review of single-subject studies. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 27(3), 1073–1090. doi:https://doi.org/10.1044/2018_ajslp-17-0128
- Horner, R. D., & Baer, D. M. (1978). Multiple-probe technique: A variation on the multiple baseline. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 11(1), 189–196. doi:https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1978.11-189
- Kagohara, D. M., van der Meer, L., Achmadi, D., Green, V. A., O’Reilly, M. F., Lancioni, G. E., … Sigafoos, J. (2012). Teaching picture naming to two adolescents with autism spectrum disorders using systematic instruction and speech-generating devices. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 6(3), 1224–1233. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2012.04.001
- King, M. R., Binger, C., & Kent-Walsh, J. (2015). Using dynamic assessment to evaluate the expressive syntax of children who use augmentative and alternative communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication (Baltimore, Md.: 1985), 31(1), 1–14. doi:https://doi.org/10.3109/07434618.2014.995779
- Kent-Walsh, J., Murza, K. A., Malani, M. D., & Binger, C. (2015). Effects of communication partner instruction on the communication of individuals using AAC: A meta-analysis. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 31(4), 271–284. doi:https://doi.org/10.3109/07434618.2015.1052153
- Kratochwill, T. R., Hitchcock, J. H., Horner, R. H., Levin, J. R., Odom, S. L., Rindskopf, D. M., & Shadish, W. R. (2013). Single-case intervention research design standards. Remedial and Special Education, 34(1), 26–38. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932512452794
- Laubscher, E., & Light, J. (2020). Core vocabulary lists for young children and considerations for early language development: A narrative review. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 36(1), 43–53. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/07434618.2020.1737964
- Lorah, E. R., Tincani, M., Dodge, J., Gilroy, S., Hickey, A., & Hantula, D. (2013). Evaluating picture exchange and the ipad as a speech generating device to teach communication to young children with autism. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 25(6), 637–649. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10882-013-9337-1
- McMillan, J. M., & Renzaglia, A. (2014). Supporting speech generating device use in the classroom. Part two: Student communication outcomes. Journal of Special Education Technology, 29(3), 49–61. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/016264341402900304
- Minick, N. (1987). Implications of Vygotsky's theories for dynamic assessment. In C. S. Lidz (Ed.), Dynamic assessment: An interactional approach to evaluating learning potential (p. 116–140). NY, NY: Guilford Press.
- Muharib, R., & Alzrayer, N. M. (2018). The use of high-tech speech-generating devices as an evidence-based practice for children with autism spectrum disorders: A meta-analysis. Review Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 5(1), 43–57. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s40489-017-0122-4
- Robillard, M., Roy-Charland, A., & Cazabon, S. (2018). The role of cognition on navigational skills of children and adolescents with autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research : JSLHR, 61(7), 1579–1590. doi:https://doi.org/10.1044/2018_JSLHR-S-17-0206
- Sarokoff, R. A., & Sturmey, P. (2004). The effects of behavioral skills training on staff implementation of discrete-trial teaching. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 37(4), 535–538. doi:https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.2004.37-535
- Schlosser, R. W. (2002). On the importance of being earnest about treatment integrity. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 18(1), 36–44. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/aac.18.1.36.44
- Schlosser, R., & Braun, U. (1994). Efficacy of AAC interventions: Methodologic issues in evaluating behavior change, generalization, and effects. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 10(4), 207–223. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/07434619412331276920
- Schlosser, R. W., & Koul, R. (2015). Speech output technologies in interventions for individuals with Autism Spectrum Disorders: A scoping review. Augmentative and Alternative Communication (Baltimore, Md. : 1985), 31(4), 285–309. doi:https://doi.org/10.3109/07434618.2015.1063689
- Schlosser, R. W., & Lee, D. (2000). Promoting generalization and maintenance in augmentative and alternative communication: A meta-analysis of 20 years of effectiveness research. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 16(4), 208–227. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/07434610012331279074
- Schlosser, R. W., Lee, D. L., & Wendt, O. (2008). Application of the Percentage of Non-overlapping Data in systematic reviews and meta-analyses: A systematic review of reporting characteristics. Evidence-Based Communication Assessment and Intervention, 2(3), 163–187. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/1748953080250412
- Schlosser, R., & Sigafoos, J. (2002). Selecting graphic symbols for an initial request lexicon: Integrative review. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 18(2), 102–123. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/07434610212331281201
- Schopler, E., Reichle, R. J., & Renner, B. R. (2010). Childhood Autism rating scale (2nd ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Western Psychological Services
- Scruggs, T. E., & Mastropieri, M. A. (1998). Summarizing single-subject research. Issues and applications. Behavior Modification, 22(3), 221–242. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/01454455980223001
- Sievers, S. B., Trembath, D., & Westerveld, M. (2018). A systematic review of predictors, moderators, and mediators of augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) outcomes for children with autism spectrum disorder. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 34(3), 219–229. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/07434618.2018.1462849
- Sigafoos, J., Lancioni, G. E., O’Reilly, M. F., Achmadi, D., Stevens, M., Roche, L., … Green, V. A. (2013). Teaching two boys with autism spectrum disorders to request the continuation of toy play using an iPad®-based speech-generating device. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 7(8), 923–930. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2013.04.002
- Sparrow, S. S., Cicchetti, D. V., & Saulnier, C. A. (2016). Vineland adaptive behavior scales. (3rd ed.). San Antonio, Texas: Pearson.
- Strasberger, S. K., & Ferreri, S. J. (2014). The effects of peer assisted communication application training on the communicative and social behaviors of children with autism. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 26(5), 513–526. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10882-013-9358-9
- Sundberg, M. (2008). Verbal behavior milestones assessment and placement program: The VB-MAPP. Concord, CA: Avb
- Thistle, J. J., Holmes, S. A., Horn, M. M., & Reum, A. M. (2018). Consistent symbol location affects motor learning in preschoolers without disabilities: Implications for designing augmentative and alternative communication displays. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 27(3), 1010–1017. doi:https://doi.org/10.1044/2018_AJSLP-17-0129
- van der Meer, L., Kagohara, D., Roche, L., Sutherland, D., Balandin, S., Green, V. A., … Sigafoos, J. (2013). Teaching multi-step requesting and social communication to two children with autism spectrum disorders with three AAC options. Augmentative and Alternative Communication (Baltimore, Md. : 1985), 29(3), 222–234. doi:https://doi.org/10.3109/07434618.2013.815801
- van der Meer, L., Sutherland, D., O’Reilly, M. F., Lancioni, G. E., & Sigafoos, J. (2012). A further comparison of manual signing, picture exchange, and speech-generating devices as communication modes for children with autism spectrum disorders. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 6(4), 1247–1257. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2012.04.005
- Waddington, H., Sigafoos, J., Lancioni, G. E., O'Reilly, M. F., van der Meer, L., Carnett, A., … Marschik, P. B. (2014). Three children with autism spectrum disorder learn to perform a three-step communication sequence using an iPad®-based speech-generating device. International Journal of Developmental Neuroscience : The Official Journal of the International Society for Developmental Neuroscience, 39, 59–67. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdevneu.2014.05.001
- Walton, K. M., & Ingersoll, B. R. (2013). Expressive and receptive fast-mapping in children with autism spectrum disorders and typical development: The influence of orienting cues. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 7(6), 687–698. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2013.02.012
- Wendt, O., Hsu, N., Simon, K., Dienhart, A., & Cain, L. (2019). Effects of an iPad-based speech-generating device infused into instruction with the picture exchange communication system for adolescents and young adults with severe autism spectrum disorder: behavior modification. Behaviour Modification, 43(6), 898–932. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0145445519870552
- Yucesoy‐Ozkan, S., Rakap, S., & Gulboy, E. (2020). Evaluation of treatment effect estimates in single‐case experimental research: Comparison of twelve overlap methods and visual analysis. British Journal of Special Education, 47(1), 67–87. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8578.12294