The effect of non-verbal working memory on graphic symbol selection

References

• Baddeley, A. (2000). The episodic buffer: A new component of working memory? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4(11), 417–423. doi:10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01538-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baddeley, A. (2003). Working memory and language: An overview. Journal of Communication Disorders, 36(3), 189–208. doi:10.1016/S0021-9924(03)00019-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baddeley, A., & Hitch, G. (1974). Working memory. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (pp. 47–89). Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baddeley, A. D., & Logie, R. H. (1999). Working memory: The multiple component model. In A. Miyake, P. Shah (Eds.), Models of working memory: Mechanisms of active maintenance and executive control (pp. 28–61). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bedrosian, J. L. (1995). Limitations in the use of nondisabled subjects in AAC research. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 11(1), 6–10. doi:10.1080/07434619512331277089
   Google Scholar
• Bedrosian, J. L. (2003). On the subject of subject selection in AAC: Implications for planning and interpreting AAC efficacy research. In R. W. Schlosser (Ed.), The efficacy of augmentative and alternative communication interventions: Toward evidence-based practice (pp. 57–83). Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beukelman, D. R., Ball, L. J., & Fager, S. (2008). An AAC personnel framework: Adults with acquired complex communication needs. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 24(3), 255–267. doi:10.1080/07434610802388477
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beukelman, D., Fager, S., Ball, L., & Dietz, A. (2007). AAC for adults with acquired neurological conditions: A review. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 23(3), 230–242. doi:10.1080/07434610701553668
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brady, T. F., Konkle, T., & Alvarez, G. A. (2011). A review of visual memory capacity: Beyond individual items and toward structured representations. Journal of Vision, 11(5), 4–34. doi:10.1167/11.5.4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, H. J., Jeon, H. S., Shin, M. S., & Kim, H. J. (2014). Study on selection of basic vocabulary for elementary school students: Focused on basic vocabulary in the lower grades. Journal of Speech-Language & Hearing Disorders, 23, 157–170. doi:10.15724/jslhd.2014.23.1.008008
   Google Scholar
• Dell, G. S., & O’Seaghdha, P. G. (1992). Stages of lexical access in language production. Cognition, 42(1-3), 287–314. doi:10.1016/0010-0277(92)90046-K
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunning, D. L., Westgate, B., & Adlam, A.-L R. (2016). A meta-analysis of working memory impairments in survivors of moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury. Neuropsychology, 30(7), 811–819. doi:10.1037/neu0000285
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Psychology Software Tools, Inc. (2002). E-Prime 2.0 [computer program] Pittsburgh, PA.
   Google Scholar
• Erickson, K. A., & Geist, L. A. (2016). The profiles of students with significant cognitive disabilities and complex communication needs. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 32(3), 187–197. doi:10.1080/07434618.2016.1213312
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fager, S., Fried-Oken, M., Jakobs, T., & Beukelman, D. R. (2019). New and emerging access technologies for adults with complex communication needs and severe motor impairments: State of the science. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 35(1), 13–25. doi:10.1080/07434618.2018.1556730
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garrett, K. L., & Kimelman, M. D. Z. (2000). AAC and aphasia: Cognitive-linguistic considerations. In D. R. Beukelman, K. Yorkston, & J. Reichle (Eds.), Augmentative and alternative communication for adults with acquired neurologic disorders (pp. 339–374). Paul H. Brookes.
   Google Scholar
• Higginbotham, D. R. (1995). Use of nondisabled subjects in AAC research: Confessions of a research infidel. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 11(1), 2–5. doi:10.1080/07434619512331277079
   Google Scholar
• Higginbotham, D. R., & Bedrosian, J. L. (1995). Subject selection in AAC research: Decision points. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 11(1), 11–13. doi:10.1080/07434619512331277099
   Google Scholar
• Ho, K., Weiss, S., Garrett, K., & Lloyd, L. (2005). The effect of remnant and pictographic books on the communicative interaction of individuals with global aphasia. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 21(3), 218–232. doi:10.1080/07434610400016694
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hough, M., & Johnson, R. (2009). Use of AAC to enhance linguistic communication skills in an adult with chronic severe aphasia. Aphasiology, 23(7-8), 965–976. doi:10.1080/02687030802698145
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Indefrey, P., & Levelt, W. J. M. (2004). The spatial and temporal signatures of word production components. Cognition, 92(1-2), 101–144. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2002.06.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jescheniak, J. D., & Levelt, W. J. M. (1994). Word frequency effects in speech production: Retrieval of syntactic information and of phonological form. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20(4), 824–843. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.20.4.824
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kazdin, A. E. (2011). Single-case research designs: Methods for clinical and applied settings. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, Y. T., Hong, G. H., Kim, K. H., Jang, H. S., & Lee, J. Y. (2009). Receptive & Expressive Vocabulary Test (REVT). Seoul Community Rehabilitation Center.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, H. H., & Na, D. L. (2012). Paradise-Korean version of Western Aphasia Battery-Revised (PK-WAB-R). Paradise Welfare Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Koul, R., & Harding, R. (1998). Identification and production of graphic symbols by individuals with aphasia: Efficacy of a software application. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 14(1), 11–24. doi:10.1080/07434619812331278166
   Google Scholar
• Larsson, M., & Sandberg, A. D. (2008). Memory ability of children with complex communication needs. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 24(2), 139–148. doi:10.1080/07434610801897239
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levelt, W. J. M., Roelofs, A. P. A., & Meyer, A. S. (1999). A theory of lexical access in speech production. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22(1), 1–38. doi:10.1017/s0140525x99001776
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Light, J., & Drager, K. (2004). Re-thinking access to AAC technologies for young children: Simplifying the learning demands. Perspectives on Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 13(1), 5–12. doi:10.1044/aac13.1.5
   Google Scholar
• Light, J., & Lindsay, P. (1991). Cognitive science and augmentative and alternative communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 7(3), 186–203. doi:10.1080/07434619112331275893
   Google Scholar
• Logie, R. H. (1986). Visuo-spatial processing in working memory. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. A, Human Experimental Psychology, 38(2), 229–247. doi:10.1080/14640748608401596
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mayer, R. E. (2009). Multimedia learning. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Murray, J., & Goldbart, J. (2009). Cognitive and language acquisition in typical and aided language learning: A review of recent evidence from an aided communication perspective. Child Language Teaching and Therapy, 25(1), 31–58. doi:10.1177/0265659008098660
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oxley, J., & Norris, J. (2000). Children’s use of memory strategies: Relevance to voice output communication aid use. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 16(2), 79–94. doi:10.1080/07434610012331278924
   Google Scholar
• Park, E., Kim, Y. T., Hong, K., Yeon, S. J., Kim, K. Y., & Lim, J. (2016). Development of Korean Ewha-AAC symbols: Validity of vocabulary and graphic symbols. AAC Research & Practice, 4(2), 19–40. doi:10.14818/aac.2016.12.4.2.19
   Google Scholar
• Petroi, D., Koul, R. K., & Corwin, M. (2014). Effect of number of graphic symbols, levels, and listening conditions on symbol identification and latency in persons with aphasia. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 30(1), 40–54. doi:10.3109/07434618.2014.882984
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reichle, J., Dettling, E., Drager, K., & Leiter, A. (2000). Comparison of correct responses and response latency for fixed and dynamic displays: Performance of a learner with severe developmental disabilities. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 16(3), 154–163. doi:10.1080/07434610012331279014
   Google Scholar
• Ross, K., & Wertz, R. (2003). Quality of life with and without aphasia. Aphasiology, 17(4), 355–364. doi:10.1080/02687030244000716
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlosser, R. W. (2002). On the importance of being earnest about treatment integrity. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 18(1), 36–44. doi:10.1080/aac.18.1.36.44
   Google Scholar
• Shin, S., & Park, H. (2018). Effect of working memory and exposure to the symbols on sentence construction using AAC graphic symbols. Communication Sciences & Disorders, 23(2), 392–403. doi:10.12963/csd.18496
   Google Scholar
• Smyth, M. M., & Pendleton, L. R. (1990). Space and movement in working memory. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. A, Human Experimental Psychology, 42(2), 291–304. doi:10.1080/14640749008401223
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• SPSS statistical software (2019). Version 24. Amonk NY, IBM Co.
   Google Scholar
• Squire, L. R. (2004). Memory systems of the brain: A brief history and current perspective. Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, 82(3), 171–177. doi:10.1016/j.nlm.2004.06.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SuperLab 4.5 (2012). [computer program]. Cedrus Company.
   Google Scholar
• Thistle, J. J., & Wilkinson, K. M. (2013). Working memory demands of aided augmentative and alternative communication for individuals with developmental disabilities. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 29(3), 235–245. doi:10.3109/07434618.2013.815800
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner, B. T., & Jackson, H. M. (2006). Developmental memory capacity resources of typical children retrieving picture communication symbols using direct selection and visual linear scanning with fixed communication displays. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 49(1), 113–126. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2006/009)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallace, S. E. (2010). AAC use by people with TBI: Effects of cognitive impairments. Perspectives on Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 19(3), 79–86. doi:10.1044/aac19.3.79
   Google Scholar
• Wallace, S. E., Hux, K., & Beukelman, D. R. (2010). Navigation of a dynamic screen AAC interface by survivors of severe traumatic brain injury. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 26(4), 242–254. doi:10.3109/07434618.2010.521895
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weinrich, M., Shelton, J. R., McCall, D., & Cox, D. M. (1997). Generalization from single sentence to multisentence production in severely aphasic patients. Brain and Language, 58(2), 327–352. doi:10.1006/brln.1997.1759
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoo, J. (2018). Relative clause sentence processing and executive function in children with and without specific language impairment (SLI). (Publication No. TM 616.855 -18-30) [Master’s thesis]. Ewha Womans University.
   Google Scholar
• Yoo, J., & Yim, D. (2021). Relative clause sentence processing in Korean-speaking school-aged children with and without specific language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 64(2), 510–530. doi:10.1044/2020_JSLHR-19-00373
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar