A scoping review of AAC interventions for children and young adults with simultaneous visual and motor impairments: Clinical and research Implications

References

• *Asterix denotes studies that were included in the scoping review analysis.
   Google Scholar
• *Ali, E., MacFarland, S. Z., & Umbreit, J. (2011). Effectiveness of combining tangible symbols with the picture exchange communication system to teach requesting skills to children with multiple disabilities including visual impairment. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 46(3), 425–435. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23880596
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Assistive Technology Industrial Association and Human Service Institute (ATIA). (2020). 2019 ATIA survey: Training needs in augmentative and alternative communication. https://www.atia.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/ATIA-Survey-White-Paper-Final-2020820_508.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Batorowicz, B., Campbell, F., von Tetzchner, S., King, G., & Missiuna, C. (2014). Social participation of school-aged children who use communication aids: The views of children and parents. Augmentative and Alternative Communication (Baltimore, Md.: 1985), 30(3), 237–251. https://doi.org/10.3109/07434618.2014.940464
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker, L. A. (2000). Effect size calculators. University of Colorado, Colorado Springs, CO. https://lbecker.uccs.edu
   Google Scholar
• Beukelman, D., & Light, J. (2020). Augmentative & alternative communication: Supporting children & adults with complex communication needs (5th ed.). Paul H. Brookes.
   Google Scholar
• Blackhall, K., & Ker, K. (2007). Finding studies for inclusion in systematic reviews for interventions for injury prevention – importance of grey and unpublished literature. Injury Prevention: Journal of the International Society for Child and Adolescent Injury Prevention, 13(5), 359–359. https://doi.org/10.1136/ip.2007.017020
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blackstone, S. W., Williams, M. B., & Wilkins, D. P. (2007). Key principles underlying research and practice in AAC. Augmentative and Alternative Communication (Baltimore, Md. : 1985)), 23(3), 191–203. https://doi.org/10.1080/07434610701553684
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boster, J. B., McCarthy, J. W., Brown, K., Spitzley, A. M., & Blackstone, S. W. (2021). Creating a path for systematic investigation of children with cortical visual impairment who use augmentative and alternative communication. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 30(4), 1880–1893. https://doi.org/10.1044/2021_AJSLP-20-00203
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brady, N. C., Bruce, S., Goldman, A., Erickson, K., Mineo, B., Ogletree, B. T., Paul, D., Romski, M. A., Sevcik, R., Siegel, E., Schoonover, J., Snell, M., Sylvester, L., & Wilkinson, K. (2016). Communication services and supports for individuals with severe disabilities: Guidance for assessment and intervention. American Journal on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 121(2), 121–138. https://doi.org/10.1352/1944-7558-121.2.121
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). (2020, September 16). Common barriers to participation experienced by people with disabilities. https://www.cdc.gov/ncbddd/disabilityandhealth/disability-barriers.html#ref
   Google Scholar
• Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). (2022, May 2). Individuals with disabilities education act (IDEA) services. https://www.cdc.gov/ncbddd/cp/treatment.html
   Google Scholar
• Chadwick, D., Buell, S., & Goldbart, J. (2019). Approaches to communication assessment with children and adults with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities: Jarid, 32(2), 336–358. https://doi.org/10.1111/jar.12530
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, S. (2004). Social Relationships and Health. The American Psychologist, 59(8), 676–684. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.59.8.676
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colquhoun, H. L., Levac, D., O'Brien, K. K., Straus, S., Tricco, A. C., Perrier, L., Kastner, M., & Moher, D. (2014). Scoping reviews: Time for clarity in definition, methods, and reporting. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 67(12), 1291–1294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.03.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Cosbey, J. E., & Johnston, S. (2006). Using a single-switch voice output communication aid to increase social access for children with severe disabilities in inclusive classrooms. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 31(2), 144–156. https://doi.org/10.1177/154079690603100207
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crais, E., Douglas, D. D., & Campbell, C. C. (2004). The intersection of the development of gestures and intentionality. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research: Jslhr, 47(3), 678–694. https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2004/052)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crawford, J. R., Parker, D. E., & McKinlay, W. (2018). A handbook of neuropsychological assessment. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cress, C. J., & Marvin, C. A. (2003). Common questions about AAC services in early intervention. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 19(4), 254–272. https://doi.org/10.1080/07434610310001598242
   Google Scholar
• *Fleury, A., Wu, G., & Chau, T. (2019). A wearable fabric-based speech-generating device: System design and case demonstration. Disability and Rehabilitation. Assistive Technology, 14(5), 434–444. https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2018.1462860
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foreman, P., Arthur‐Kelly, M., & Pascoe, S. (2007). The impact of partner training on the communicative involvement of students with multiple and severe disability in special schools. Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability, 32(4), 233–247. https://doi.org/10.1080/13668250701654417
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foster, S. T., Brown, M. T., & Michels, C. M. (2023). The classroom profile for integrated communication supports: A framework to support augmentative and alternative communication coaching services in the school setting. Perspectives of the ASHA Special Interest Groups, 8(2), 358–371. https://doi.org/10.1044/2022_PERSP-22-00005
   Google Scholar
• Ganz, J. B., Pustejovsky, J. E., Reichle, J., Vannest, K. J., Foster, M., Pierson, L. M., Wattanawongwan, S., Fuller, M. C., Haas, A. N., Sallese, M. R., Smith, S. D., & Yllades, V. (2023). A case for increased rigor in AAC research: A methodological quality review. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 58(1), 3–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldman, A., Jackson, D., Kannan, K., Canter, C., Klein, C., Marshall, S., McNaughton, D., Paul, D., Rackensperger, T., Soto, G., & Zangari, C. (2021). Training needs in augmentative and alternative communication: A virtual roundtable discussion.  Assistive Technology Outcomes & Benefits,  15(1), 1–28.
   Google Scholar
• Granlund, M., Björck-Akesson, E., Wilder, J., & Ylvén, R. (2008). AAC interventions for children in a family environment: Implementing evidence in practice. Augmentative and Alternative Communication (Baltimore, Md.: 1985), 24(3), 207–219. https://doi.org/10.1080/08990220802387935
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grove, N., Bunning, K., Porter, J., & Olsson, C. (1999). See what I mean: Interpreting the meaning of communication by people with severe and profound intellectual disabilities. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 12(3), 190–203. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-3148.1999.tb00076.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harding, C., Lindsay, G., O’Brien, A., Dipper, L., & Wright, J. (2011). Implementing AAC with children with profound and multiple learning disabilities: A study in rationale underpinning intervention. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, 11(2), 120–129. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-3802.2010.01184.x
   Google Scholar
• Heiden, T., Saia, T. (2021). Engaging stakeholders for research impact. American Institutes for Research. https://ktdrr.org/products/KTDRR-Stakeholder-Engagement-Brief-508.pdf
   Google Scholar
• *Holyfield, C., Light, J., Drager, K., McNaughton, D., & Gormley, J. (2018). Effect of AAC partner training using video on peers’ interpretation of the behaviors of presymbolic middle-schoolers with multiple disabilities. Augmentative and Alternative Communication (Baltimore, Md. : 1985)), 34(4), 301–310. https://doi.org/10.1080/07434618.2018.1508306
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Holyfield, C., Caron, J. G., Drager, K., & Light, J. (2018). Effect of mobile technology featuring visual scene displays and just-in-time programming on communication turns by preadolescent and adolescent beginning communicators. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 21(2), 201–211. https://doi.org/10.1080/17549507.2018.1441440
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horn, E., & Kang, J. (2012). Supporting young children with multiple disabilities: What do we know and what do we still need to learn? Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 31(4), 241–248. https://doi.org/10.1177/0271121411426487
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hourcade, J., Everhart Pilotte, T., West, E., & Parette, P. (2004). A history of augmentative and alternative communication for individuals with severe and profound disabilities. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 19(4), 235–244. https://doi.org/10.1177/10883576040190040501
   Google Scholar
• Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). (2018). Sec. 300.8 (c) (7). Retrieved November 25, 2023, from https://sites.ed.gov/idea/regs/b/a/300.8/c/7/
   Google Scholar
• *Ivy, S., Hatton, D., & Hooper, J. D. (2014). Using the picture exchange communication system with students with visual impairment. Exceptional Children, 80(4), 474–488. https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402914527239
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Ivy, S., Robbins, A., & Kerr, M. G. (2020). Adapted picture exchange communication system using tangible symbols for young learners with significant multiple disabilities. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 36(3), 166–178. https://doi.org/10.1080/07434618.2020.1826051
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, T. W., Jones, J. K., & Ewing, K. M. (2006). Students with multiple disabilities. Deaf learners: Developments in curriculum and instruction, 127–143.
   Google Scholar
• Kangas, K., & Lloyd, L. (1988). Early cognitive skills as prerequisites to augmentative and alternative communication use: What are we waiting for? Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 4(4), 211–221. https://doi.org/10.1080/07434618812331274817
   Google Scholar
• Kent-Walsh, J., & Binger, C. (2018). Methodological advances, opportunities, and challenges in AAC research. Augmentative and Alternative Communication (Baltimore, Md. : 1985), 34(2), 93–103. https://doi.org/10.1080/07434618.2018.1456560
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kent-Walsh, J., Murza, K. A., Malani, M. D., & Binger, C. (2015). Effects of communication partner instruction on the communication of individuals using AAC: A meta-analysis. Augmentative and Alternative Communication (Baltimore, Md.: 1985), 31(4), 271–284. https://doi.org/10.3109/07434618.2015.1052153
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein, C. (2017). Communication and developing relationships for people who use augmentative and alternative communication. Assistive Technology Outcomes & Benefits, 11(1), 58–65.
   Google Scholar
• Kratochwill, T., Hitchcock, J., Horner, R., Levin, J., Odom, S., Rindskopf, D., & Shadish, W. (2013). Single-case intervention research design standards. Remedial and Special Education, 34(1), 26–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932512452794
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Lancioni, G. E., O'Reilly, M. F., Oliva, D., & Coppa, M. M. (2001). Using multiple microswitches to promote different responses in children with multiple disabilities. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 22(4), 309–318. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0891-4222(01)00074-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lancioni, G., Singh, N., O’Reilly, M., & Oliva, D. (2003). Extending microswitch-based programs for people with multiple disabilities: Use of words and choice opportunities. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 24(2), 139–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0891-4222(03)00015-5
   Google Scholar
• *Lancioni, G. E., Singh, N. N., O'Reilly, M. F., & Oliva, D. (2004). A microswitch program including words and choice opportunities for students with multiple disabilities. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 98(1), 214–222. https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.98.1.214-222
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lancioni, G. E., O'Reilly, M. F., Sigafoos, J., Singh, N. N., Oliva, D., & Basili, G. (2004). Enabling a person with multiple disabilities and minimal motor behaviour to control environmental stimulation with chin movements. Disability and Rehabilitation, 26(21-22), 1291–1294. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638280412331280316
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Lancioni, G. E., O'Reilly, M. F., Sigafoos, J., Singh, N. N., Oliva, D., & Baccani, S. (2006). Teaching ‘yes’ and ‘no’ responses to children with multiple disabilities through a program including microswitches linked to a vocal output device. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 102(1), 51–61. https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.102.1.51-61
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lancioni, G. E., O’Reilly, M. F., Singh, N. N., Oliva, D., Baccani, S., Severini, L., & Groeneweg, J. (2006). Micro-switch programmes for students with multiple disabilities and minimal motor behaviour: Assessing response acquisition and choice. Pediatric Rehabilitation, 9(2), 137–143. https://doi.org/10.1080/13638490500235466
   Google Scholar
• *Lancioni, G. E., Singh, N. N., O'Reilly, M. F., Sigafoos, J., Oliva, D., & Antonucci, M. (2006). A microswitch-based programme to enable a boy with multiple disabilities and minimal motor behaviour to choose among environmental stimuli. Disability and Rehabilitation. Assistive Technology, 1(3), 205–208. https://doi.org/10.1080/17483100612331392934
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• *Lancioni, G. E., Singh, N. N., O'Reilly, M. F., Sigafoos, J., Oliva, D., & Baccani, S. (2007). Enabling students with multiple disabilities to request and choose among environmental stimuli through microswitch and computer technology. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 28(1), 50–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2005.12.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Lancioni, G. E., O'Reilly, M. F., Singh, N. N., Sigafoos, J., Oliva, D., & Severini, L. (2008a). Enabling two persons with multiple disabilities to access environmental stimuli and ask for social contact through microswitches and a VOCA. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 29(1), 21–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2006.10.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Lancioni, G. E., O'Reilly, M. F., Singh, N. N., Sigafoos, J., Oliva, D., & Severini, L. (2008b). Three persons with multiple disabilities accessing environmental stimuli and asking for social contact through microswitch and VOCA technology. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research: Jidr, 52(Pt 4), 327–336. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2788.2007.01024.x
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• *Lancioni, G. E., O'Reilly, M. F., Singh, N. N., Sigafoos, J., Didden, R., Oliva, D., Campodonico, F., de Pace, C., Chiapparino, C., & Groeneweg, J. (2009). Persons with multiple disabilities accessing stimulation and requesting social contact via microswitch and VOCA devices: New research evaluation and social validation. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 30(5), 1084–1094. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2009.03.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Lancioni, G. E., Singh, N. N., O’Reilly, M. F., Sigafoos, J., Oliva, D., & Cingolani, E. (2009). Students with multiple disabilities using technology-based programs to choose and access stimulus events alone or with caregiver participation. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 30(4), 689–701. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2008.09.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Lancioni, G., O'Reilly, M., Singh, N., Sigafoos, J., Oliva, D., Smaldone, A., La Martire, M., Navarro, J., Spica, A., & Chirico, M. (2011). Technology-assisted programs for promoting leisure or communication engagement in two persons with pervasive motor or multiple disabilities. Disability and Rehabilitation. Assistive Technology, 6(2), 108–114. https://doi.org/10.3109/17483107.2010.496524
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• *Lancioni, G., O’Reilly, M., Sigafoos, J., Campodonico, F., Perilli, V., Alberti, G., Ricci, C., & Miglino, O. (2018). A modified smartphone-based program to support leisure and communication activities in people with multiple disabilities. Advances in Neurodevelopmental Disorders, 2(3), 293–299. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41252-017-0047-z
   Google Scholar
• Light, J. (1988). Interaction involving individuals using augmentative and alternative communication systems: State of the art and future directions. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 4(2), 66–82. https://doi.org/10.1080/07434618812331274657
   Google Scholar
• Light, J., & McNaughton, D. (2014). Communicative competence for individuals who require augmentative and alternative communication: A new definition for a new era of communication? Augmentative and Alternative Communication (Baltimore, Md. : 1985)), 30(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.3109/07434618.2014.885080
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mandak, K., O'Neill, T., Light, J., & Fosco, G. M. (2017). Bridging the gap from values to actions: A family systems framework for family-centered AAC services. Augmentative and Alternative Communication (Baltimore, Md.: 1985)), 33(1), 32–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/07434618.2016.1271453
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maes, B., Nijs, S., Vandesande, S., Van Keer, I., Arthur‐Kelly, M., Dind, J., Goldbart, J., Petitpierre, G., & Van Der Putten, A. (2021). Looking back, looking forward: Methodological challenges and future directions in research on persons with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities: JARID, 34(1), 250–262. https://doi.org/10.1111/jar.12803
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Mathy-Laikko, P., Iacono, T., Ratcliff, A., Villarruel, F., Yoder, D., & Vanderheiden, G. (1989). Teaching a child with multiple disabilities to use a tactile augmentative communication device. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 5(4), 249–256. https://doi.org/10.1080/07434618912331275306
   Google Scholar
• McAuley, L., Pham, B., Tugwell, P., & Moher, D. (2000). Does the inclusion of grey literature influence estimates of intervention effectiveness reported in meta-analyses? Lancet (London, England), 356(9237), 1228–1231. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(00)02786-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNaughton, D., & Light, J. (2015). What We Write about When We Write About AAC: The Past 30 Years of Research and Future Directions. Augmentative and Alternative Communication (Baltimore, Md.: 1985)), 31(4), 261–270. https://doi.org/10.3109/07434618.2015.1099736
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Midtlin, H., Næss, K., Taxt, T., & Karlsen, A. (2015). What communication strategies do AAC users want their communication partners to use? A preliminary study. Disability and Rehabilitation, 37(14), 1260–1267. https://doi.org/10.3109/09638288.2014.961659
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Millar, D., Light, J., & Schlosser, R. (2006). The impact of augmentative and alternative communication intervention on the speech production of individuals with developmental disabilities: A research review. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research: JSLHR, 49(2), 248–264. https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2006/021)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mirenda, P. (2015). Considerations in developing and acquiring communication aids. In J. Downing, A. Hanreddy, & K. Peckham-Hardin (Eds.). Teaching communication skills to students with severe disabilities (3rd ed.) (pp. 137–162). Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co.
   Google Scholar
• Munn, Z., Peters, M., Stern, C., Tufanaru, C., McArthur, A., & Aromataris, E. (2018). Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 18(1), 143. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0611-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Joint Committee for the Communication Needs of Persons with Severe Disabilities. (2003). Position statement on access to communication services and supports: Concerns regarding the application of restrictive “eligibility” policies [Position Statement]. Retrieved from www.asha.org/njc
   Google Scholar
• O'Neill, T., Light, J., & Pope, L. (2018). Effects of interventions that include aided augmentative and alternative communication input on the communication of individuals with complex communication needs: A meta-analysis. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research: JSLHR, 61(7), 1743–1765. https://doi.org/10.1044/2018_JSLHR-L-17-0132
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palisano, R., Rosenbaum, P., Bartlett, D., & Livingston, M. (2007). GMFCS-E&R. CanChild Centre for Childhood Disability Research, McMaster University, 200(7).
   Google Scholar
• Parker, R., Vannest, K., Davis, J., & Sauber, S. (2011). Combining Nonoverlap and Trend for Single-Case Research: Tau-U. Behavior Therapy, 42(2), 284–299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beth.2010.08.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pawliuk, C., Brown, H. L., Widger, K., Dewan, T., Hermansen, A.-M., Grégoire, M.-C., Steele, R., & Siden, H., (H.). (2021). Optimising the process for conducting scoping reviews. BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine, 26(6), 312–312. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjebm-2020-111452
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pham, M. T., Rajić, A., Greig, J. D., Sargeant, J. M., Papadopoulos, A., & McEwen, S. A. (2014). A scoping review of scoping reviews: Advancing the approach and enhancing the consistency. Research Synthesis Methods, 5(4), 371–385. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1123
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pope, L., Light, J., & Franklin, A. (2022). Black children with developmental disabilities receive less augmentative and alternative communication intervention than their white peers: Preliminary evidence of racial disparities from a secondary data analysis. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 31(5), 2159–2174. https://doi.org/10.1044/2022_AJSLP-22-00079
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prizant, B. M., Wetherby, A. M., Rubin, E., & Laurent, A. C. (2003). The SCERTS model: A transactional, family-centered approach to enhancing communication and socioemotional abilities of children with autism spectrum disorder. Infants & Young Children, 16(4), 296–316. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001163-200310000-00004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rackensperger, T., Krezman, C., Mcnaughton, D., Williams, M. B., & D'Silva, K. (2005). When I first got it, I wanted to throw it off a cliff”: The challenges and benefits of learning AAC technologies as described by adults who use AAC. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 21(3), 165–186. https://doi.org/10.1080/07434610500140360
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roche, L., Sigafoos, J., Lancioni, G. E., O'Reilly, M. F., & Green, V. A. (2015). Microswitch technology for enabling self-determined responding in children with profound and multiple disabilities: A systematic review. Augmentative and Alternative Communication (Baltimore, Md. : 1985)), 31(3), 246–258. https://doi.org/10.3109/07434618.2015.1024888
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romski, M. A., & Sevcik, R. (2005). Augmentative communication and early intervention: Myths and realities. Infants & Young Children, 18(3), 174–185. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001163-200507000-00002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romski, M. A., Sevcik, R., Adamson, L. B., Cheslock, M., Smith, A., Barker, R. M., & Bakeman, R. (2010). Randomized comparison of augmented and nonaugmented language interventions for toddlers with developmental delays and their parents. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research: Jslhr, 53(2), 350–364. https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2009/08-0156)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romski, M. A., & Sevcik, R. (2018). The complexities of AAC intervention research: Emerging trends to consider. Augmentative and Alternative Communication (Baltimore, Md.: 1985)), 34(4), 258–264. https://doi.org/10.1080/07434618.2018.1526319
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roush, J., Holcomb, M. A., Roush, P. A., & Escolar, M. L. (2004). When hearing loss occurs with multiple disabilities. Seminars in Hearing, 25(04), 333–345. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2004-836135
   Google Scholar
• Schlosser, R., & Koul, R. (2015). Speech output technologies in interventions for individuals with autism spectrum disorders: A scoping review. Augmentative and Alternative Communication (Baltimore, Md. : 1985), 31(4), 285–309. https://doi.org/10.3109/07434618.2015.1063689
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlosser, R., Wendt, O., Bhavnani, S., & Nail-Chiwetalu, B. (2006). Use of information-seeking strategies for developing systematic reviews and engaging in evidence-based practice: The application of traditional and comprehensive Pearl Growing. A review. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 41(5), 567–582. https://doi.org/10.1080/13682820600742190
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Schweigert, P. (1989). Use of microswitch technology to facilitate social contingency awareness as a basis for early communication skills. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 5(3), 192–198. https://doi.org/10.1080/07434618912331275196
   Google Scholar
• *Schweigert, P., & Rowland, C. (1992). Early communication and microtechnology: Instructional sequence and case studies of children with severe multiple disabilities. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 8(4), 273–286. https://doi.org/10.1080/07434619212331276313
   Google Scholar
• *Sigafoos, J., Roberts, D., Couzens, D., & Kerr, M. (1993). Providing opportunities for choice-making and turn-taking to adults with multiple disabilities. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 5(4), 297–310. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01046387
   Google Scholar
• Sigafoos, J., Roche, L., & Tait, K. (2021). Challenges in providing AAC intervention to people with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities. In B. T. Ogletree (Ed.), Augmentative and alternative communication: Challenges and solutions (pp. 229–252). Plural Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Simacek, J., Pennington, B., Reichle, J., & Parker-McGowan, Q. (2018). Aided AAC for people with severe to profound and multiple disabilities: A systematic review of interventions and treatment intensity. Advances in Neurodevelopmental Disorders, 2(1), 100–115. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41252-017-0050-4
   Google Scholar
• Simeonsson, R. J., & Bailey, D. B. (1991). Evaluating programme impact: Levels of certainty. In D. M. Mitchell & R. I. Brown (Eds.), Early Intervention Studies for Young Children with Special Needs. (pp. 280–296). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-3292-1_11
   Google Scholar
• Smith, M., Manduchi, B., Burke, É., Carroll, R., McCallion, P., & McCarron, M. (2020). Communication difficulties in adults with Intellectual Disability: Results from a national cross-sectional study. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 97, 103557. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2019.103557
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snell, M., Brady, N., McLean, L., Ogletree, B., Siegel, E., Sylvester, L., Mineo, B., Paul, D., Romski, M., & Sevcik, R. (2010). Twenty years of communication intervention research with individuals who have severe intellectual and developmental disabilities. American Journal on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 115(5), 364–380. https://doi.org/10.1352/1944-7558-115-5.364
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• *Snodgrass, M. R., Stoner, J. B., & Angell, M. E. (2013). Teaching conceptually referenced core vocabulary for initial augmentative and alternative communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication (Baltimore, Md.: 1985), 29(4), 322–333. https://doi.org/10.3109/07434618.2013.848932
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stasolla, F., & Perilli, V. (2015). Microswitch-based programs (MBP) to promote communication, occupation, and leisure skills for children with multiple disabilities: A literature overview. In Silton, N.R. Recent advances in assistive technologies to support children with developmental disorders. IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-8395-2.ch009
   Google Scholar
• Trabacca, A., Vespino, T., Di Liddo, A., & Russo, L. (2016). Multidisciplinary rehabilitation for patients with cerebral palsy: Improving long-term care. Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare, 9, 455–462. https://doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S88782
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tricco, A. C., Lillie, E., Zarin, W., O'Brien, K. K., Colquhoun, H., Levac, D., Moher, D., Peters, M. D. J., Horsley, T., Weeks, L., Hempel, S., Akl, E. A., Chang, C., McGowan, J., Stewart, L., Hartling, L., Aldcroft, A., Wilson, M. G., Garritty, C., … Straus, S. E. (2018). PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMAScR): Checklist and explanation. Annals of Internal Medicine, 169(7), 467–473. https://doi.org/10.7326/M18-0850
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vannest, K. J., & Ninci, J. (2015). Evaluating intervention effects in single-case research designs. Journal of Counseling & Development, 93 (4), 403–411. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcad.12038
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vannest, K. J., Parker, R. I., Gonen, O., Adiguzel, T. (2016). Single case research: Web based calculators for SCR analysis. (Version 2.0) [Web-based application]. College Station, TX: Texas A&M University. www.singlecaseresearch.org
   Google Scholar
• *Walker, C., & Wegner, J. (2021). Eyegaze access and cortical visual impairment: A case study. Assistive Technology Outcomes and Benefits, 15, 24.
   Google Scholar