Augmentative and alternative communication: an evolving field*

REFERENCES

• Beukelman, D. R. (1991). Magic and cost of communicative competence. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 7, 2-10.Beukelman, D. R., & Garrett, K. L. (1988). Augmentative and alternative communication for adults with acquired severe communication disorders. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 4, 104–121.
   Google Scholar
• Beukelman, D. R., McGinnis, J., & Morrow, D. (1991). Vocabulary selection in augmentative and alternative communication. Aug-mentative and Alternative Communication, 7, 171–185.
   Google Scholar
• Bohannon, J. N., & Warren-Leubecker, A. (1989). Theoretical ap-proaches to language acquisition. In J. B. Gleason (Ed.), The development of language (pp. 167–224). Columbus: Merill Pub-lishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Bowler, D. M. (1991). Need for theory in studies of augmentative and alternative communication. Augmentative and Alternative Commu-nication, 7, 127–132.
   Google Scholar
• Bruner, J. (1968). On cognitive growth. In J. Bruner, R. R. Olver, & P. M. Greenfield (Eds.), Studies in cognitive growth (pp. 1–29). New York: John Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Calculator, S. N. (1988). Promoting the acquisition and generalization of conversational skills by individuals with severe disabilities. Aug-mentative and Alternative Communication, 4, 94–103.
   Google Scholar
• Calculator, S. N., &Jorgensen, C. M. (1991). Integrating AAC instruc-tion into regular education settings: Expounding on best practices. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 7, 204–214.
   Google Scholar
• Carlson, F. (1981). A format for selecting vocabulary for the non-speaking child. Language Speech and Hearing Services in Schools, 12, 240–245.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, E. (1990, August). Summary notes: Methodological challenges in applying single case designs to problems in AAC. ISAAC Re-search Symposium, Stockholm, Sweden.
   Google Scholar
• Erickson, F. (1986). Qualitative methods in research on teaching. In M. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (Vol. 3, pp. 119–161). New York: MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Fristoe, M., & Lloyd, L. L. (1979). Nonspeech communication. In N. R. Ellis (Ed.), Handbook of mental deficiency: Psychological theory and research (2nd ed., pp. 401–430). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Fristoe, M., & Lloyd, L. L. (1980). Planning an initial expressive sign lexicon for persons with severe communication impairment. Jour-nal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 45, 170–180.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fuller, D. R., Lloyd, L. L., & Schlosser, R. W. (under review). The further development of an augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) symbol taxonomy. Augmentative and Alternative Communication.
   Google Scholar
• Garrett, K., Beukelman, D., & Morrow, D. (1989). A comprehensive augmentative communication system for an adult with Broca's aphasia. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 5, 55–61.
   Google Scholar
• Goetz, J. P., & LeCompte, M. D. (1984). Ethnography and qualitative design in educational research. San Diego: Academic Press, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, S. M., & Talkington, L. W. (1972). The redwood project. Training School Bulletin, 69, 10–12.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kangas, K. A., & Lloyd, L. L. (1988). Early cognitive skills as prereq-uisites to augmentative and alternative communication use: What are we waiting for? Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 4, 211–221.
   Google Scholar
• Karlan, G. K., & Lloyd, L. L. (1983). Considerations in the planning of communication intervention. I. Selecting the lexion. Journal of the Association for the Severely Handicapped, 8, 13–25.
   Google Scholar
• Kopchick, G. A., & Lloyd, L. L. (1976). Total communication for the severely language impaired: A 24-hour approach. In L. L. Lloyd (Ed.), Communication assessment and intervention strategies (pp. 501–522). Baltimore: University Park Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kozulin, A. (1986). Vygotsky in context. In: L. S. Vygotsky, Thought and Language. Translation of: Myshlenie i rech' (pp. xi-lxi). Cam-bridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Light, J., & Lindsay, P. (1991). Cognitive science and augmentative and alternative communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 7, 186–203.
   Google Scholar
• Light, J. (1988). Interaction involving individuals using augmentative and alternative communication systems: State of the art and future directions. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 4, 66–82.
   Google Scholar
• Lloyd, L. L. (1976). Communication assessment and intervention strategies. Baltimore: University Park Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lloyd, L. L. (1980). Non-speech communication: Discussant's com-ments. In B. Urban (Ed.), Proceedings of the 18th Congress of the International Association of Logopedics and Phoniatrics (Vol. II, pp. 43–48). Washington, DC: American Speech-Language-Hearing Association.
   Google Scholar
• Lloyd, L. L. (1986). Editorial. Augmentative and Alternative Commu-nication, 2, 67–68.
   Google Scholar
• Lloyd, L. L., & Fuller, D. R. (1986). Toward an augmentative and alternative communication symbol taxonomy: A proposed super-ordinate classification. Augmentative and Alternative Communica-tion, 2, 165–171.
   Google Scholar
• Lloyd, L. L., & Fuller, D. R. (1990). The role of iconicity in augmentative and alternative communication symbol learning. In W. I. Fraser (Ed.), Key issues in mental retardation research (pp. 295–306). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lloyd, L. L., & Karlan, G. R. (1984). Nonspeech communication symbols: Where have we been and where are we going? Journal of Mental Deficiency Research, 28, 3–20.
   Google Scholar
• Lloyd, L. L., Quist, R., & Windsor, J. (1990). A proposed augmentative and alternative communication model. Augmentative and Altema-five Communication, 6, 172–183.
   Google Scholar
• McNaughton, S. (1990a). Gaining the most from AAC's growing years. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 6, 2–14.
   Google Scholar
• McNaughton, S. (1990b, August). Session summary: Methodological challenges in applying single case designs to problems in AAC. ISAAC Research Symposium, Stockholm, Sweden.
   Google Scholar
• Mirenda, P. (1991). Terminology about people: Comments on Lloyd and Kangas (1990). Augmentative and Alternative Communica-tion, 7, 59–60.
   Google Scholar
• Morrow, D. R. (1989). Vocabulary selection for augmentative commu-nication systems: A comparison of three techniques. Unpublished master's thesis, University of Nebraska, Lincoln.
   Google Scholar
• Reichardt, C. S., & Cook, T. D. (1979). Beyond qualitative versus quantitative methods. In T. D Cook & C. S. Reichardt (Eds.), Qualitative and quantitative methods in evaluation research (pp. 7–48). Beverly Hills: Sage publications, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Reichle, J., & Karlan, G. R. (1988). Decision rules for the adoption of augmentative techniques. In R. L. Schiefelbusch & L. L. Lloyd (Eds.), Language Perspectives II (pp. 321–339). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
   Google Scholar
• Romski, M. A., & Sevcik, R. (1988). Augmentative and alternative communication systems: Considerations for individuals with se-vere intellectual disabilities. Augmentative and Alternative Com-munication, 4, 83–93.
   Google Scholar
• Sevcik, R. A., Romski, M. A., & Wilkinson, K. M. (1991). The roles of graphic symbols in the augmented language acquisition process for persons with severe cognitive disabilities. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 7, 161–170.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1986). Thought and language. Translation of: My-shlenie i rech'. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Werner, H., & Kaplan, B. (1984). Symbol formation. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Yorkston, K., Beukelman, D. R., Smith, K., & Tice, R. (1990). Extended communication samples of augmented communicators II: Analysis of multi-word sequences. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disor-ders, 55, 225–230.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yorkston, K., Smith, K., & Beukelman, D. R. (1989). Extended com-munication samples of augmented communicators I: A comparison of individualized versus standard single word vocabularies. Journal of Speech and Heating Disorders, 55, 217–224.
   Google Scholar
• Zangari, C., Kangas, K. A., & Lloyd, L. L;. (1988). Augmentative and alternative communication: A field in transition. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 4, 60–65.
   Google Scholar
• Zangari, C., Lloyd, L. L., & Vicker, B. (under review). Augmentative and alternative communication: An historic perspective. Augmen-tative and Alternative Communication.
   Google Scholar